Thread URL format change in the past?
06-06-23, 03:41 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,656
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1344 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
659 Posts
Thread URL format change in the past?
I'm working my way through some URLs in a Google Docs spreadsheet (Medici serial numbers). Google complained repeatedly that there might be problems with one or more links. I finally tracked one down today and decided to check all the other URLs. A couple are BF URLs which don't work. Here's one:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...4#post13341327
That doesn't look like current practice. For example:
AVA "death stem" fact or fiction
Is there a way to map the first URL into a form acceptable by the forum software, or is it just a busted (or deleted) thread reference?
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...4#post13341327
That doesn't look like current practice. For example:
AVA "death stem" fact or fiction
Is there a way to map the first URL into a form acceptable by the forum software, or is it just a busted (or deleted) thread reference?
Last edited by smontanaro; 06-10-23 at 06:43 PM.
Likes For Siu Blue Wind:
06-12-23, 09:52 AM
#3
Administrator
I'm working my way through some URLs in a Google Docs spreadsheet (Medici serial numbers). Google complained repeatedly that there might be problems with one or more links. I finally tracked one down today and decided to check all the other URLs. A couple are BF URLs which don't work. Here's one:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...4#post13341327
That doesn't look like current practice. For example:
AVA "death stem" fact or fiction
Is there a way to map the first URL into a form acceptable by the forum software, or is it just a busted (or deleted) thread reference?
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...4#post13341327
That doesn't look like current practice. For example:
AVA "death stem" fact or fiction
Is there a way to map the first URL into a form acceptable by the forum software, or is it just a busted (or deleted) thread reference?
So with what understanding I have, that first URL you linked, may be because it got deleted, merged with another thread, or moved.
