Velo: Thus far, thus bonkers
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Velo: Thus far, thus bonkers
https://www.mrinitialman.com/StandAlo...e_design.xhtml
So, this page shows the general shape I'm going for, the general length and width (not height yet), and some of the front suspension.
I hope this would be useful as a sort of blueprint and/or plan.
So, this page shows the general shape I'm going for, the general length and width (not height yet), and some of the front suspension.
I hope this would be useful as a sort of blueprint and/or plan.
Likes For MrInitialMan:
#2
Senior Member
I don't know what you plan on making it from but it looks heavy, if it were me I'd consider a couple of cheap electric motor hubs for two of the wheels to assist on the up hills.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Steel tubing with 1/8" wall if I have to, aluminum if I can afford it. Since it will be a four-wheeler, motors are a no-go (Alberta regulations)
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,693
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4034 Post(s)
Liked 3,458 Times
in
2,097 Posts
I suspect a lot of us here wonder about the strength of the rider being enough...
I forget why you feel the need for suspension. A performance go cart frame can see one wheel lifted an inch+ off the ground and still have the other three wheels stay on the ground. How much weight will you be placing in this thing? Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#7
Senior Member
I admire your DIYness but this is way over built, is will weigh too much to pedal. Check images online to see what is needed in the way of a frame. Have you thought about making a pan type frame/bottom from fiberglass kind of like the VW beetle but fiberglass. Google quadricycle
Forum member cs641 in this thread Insurance for frame builders. says he builds 4 wheel bikes similar to these
https://rhoadescar.com/
Maybe he would advise you.
Good luck
Forum member cs641 in this thread Insurance for frame builders. says he builds 4 wheel bikes similar to these
https://rhoadescar.com/
Maybe he would advise you.
Good luck
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
- Iffy level railroad crossings.
- Poorly maintained roads.
- Winter driving conditions.
There's a video of a guy riding a velo in winter.
The timestamp shows how bumpy the roads can be.
I admire your DIYness but this is way over built, is will weigh too much to pedal. Check images online to see what is needed in the way of a frame. Have you thought about making a pan type frame/bottom from fiberglass kind of like the VW beetle but fiberglass. Google quadricycle
Forum member cs641 in this thread Insurance for frame builders. says he builds 4 wheel bikes similar to these
https://rhoadescar.com/
Maybe he would advise you.
Good luck
Forum member cs641 in this thread Insurance for frame builders. says he builds 4 wheel bikes similar to these
https://rhoadescar.com/
Maybe he would advise you.
Good luck
I've checked out some images, including the Rhoades cars--which don't give much protection from anything beyond a light drizzle or a very sunny day. Sadly, I have NO ability to work with fiberglass. I was planning on using plywood for the actual bodywork.
So, let's leave the overall size and shape as it is, and add in the fact that I'd like SOME sort of suspension. Where would I save weight?
UPDATE: Just did some calculations, and the weight of the floor frame alone (using 16-guage tubing) alone is about 84 lbs. *Sighs*
UPDATE #2 The weight is around 55 lbs if I use 6061 Aluminum at 1/8" wall. *Still sighs*
Last edited by MrInitialMan; 06-19-20 at 01:33 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 916
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
204 Posts
Yes easily. To give you the ball-park, CroMo tubes are about 560MPa ultimate tensile strength and mild steel is about 400MPa-- so more than half. 0.8mm wall (which is about 1/32") CrMo is commonly used on bikes. So if you made a regular bike frame out of 1/16" mild it would be about as strong as a CrMo bike (on paper a bit stronger but we can deduct a bit for the fact that the mild steel tubes are just rolled). Also your chassis is probably going to have more tubes in it, so will be even stronger.
1/8" wall (about 1.5" diameter) mild steel DOM is about what they use for roll cages in racing cars. That's strong enough to crash at over 100mph. But your project has no engine and will be going more like 10mph. You want to keep it as light as you can. 1/16" is already overbuilding.
1/8" wall (about 1.5" diameter) mild steel DOM is about what they use for roll cages in racing cars. That's strong enough to crash at over 100mph. But your project has no engine and will be going more like 10mph. You want to keep it as light as you can. 1/16" is already overbuilding.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 916
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
204 Posts
I think it's a lot of fun to make a suspension system. It all adds weight and drag and yes it does really need an engine, ideally something loud and screamy out of a motorbike, but if you build something like that you may end up attracting attention from the police, your neighbours, local regulators etc. I think an e-bike as has been suggested is a very good idea.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
There is no such thing as a four-wheeled e-bike in Canada; power-assisted bicycles are described under Canada's Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (C.R.C., c. 1038) as (amongst other things) " is designed to travel on not more than three wheels in contact with the ground."
A four-wheeled vehicle with a motor of any kind is a passenger car and subject to all regulations thereof. This is what I got from the Alberta DOT, and that's a can of worms I do NOT want to open.
By the way, do you guys think that in the floor frame I could get away with 1x1" and 1x2" 18-gauge tubing? That drops the weight of the floor frame down to 44 lbs. Even 16-guage brings it down to 58.
Or maybe even 1/8th" wall aluminum tubing of the same size?
A four-wheeled vehicle with a motor of any kind is a passenger car and subject to all regulations thereof. This is what I got from the Alberta DOT, and that's a can of worms I do NOT want to open.
By the way, do you guys think that in the floor frame I could get away with 1x1" and 1x2" 18-gauge tubing? That drops the weight of the floor frame down to 44 lbs. Even 16-guage brings it down to 58.
Or maybe even 1/8th" wall aluminum tubing of the same size?
Last edited by MrInitialMan; 06-19-20 at 03:32 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 916
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
204 Posts
There is no such thing as a four-wheeled e-bike in Canada; power-assisted bicycles are described under Canada's Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (C.R.C., c. 1038) as (amongst other things) " is designed to travel on not more than three wheels in contact with the ground."
A four-wheeled vehicle with a motor of any kind is a passenger car and subject to all regulations thereof. This is what I got from the Alberta DOT, and that's a can of worms I do NOT want to open.
By the way, do you guys think that in the floor frame I could get away with 1x1" and 1x2" 18-gauge tubing? That drops the weight of the floor frame down to 44 lbs. Even 16-guage brings it down to 58.
Or maybe even 1/8th" wall aluminum tubing of the same size?
A four-wheeled vehicle with a motor of any kind is a passenger car and subject to all regulations thereof. This is what I got from the Alberta DOT, and that's a can of worms I do NOT want to open.
By the way, do you guys think that in the floor frame I could get away with 1x1" and 1x2" 18-gauge tubing? That drops the weight of the floor frame down to 44 lbs. Even 16-guage brings it down to 58.
Or maybe even 1/8th" wall aluminum tubing of the same size?
#13
Senior Member
There is no such thing as a four-wheeled e-bike in Canada; power-assisted bicycles are described under Canada's Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations (C.R.C., c. 1038) as (amongst other things) " is designed to travel on not more than three wheels in contact with the ground."
A four-wheeled vehicle with a motor of any kind is a passenger car and subject to all regulations thereof. This is what I got from the Alberta DOT, and that's a can of worms I do NOT want to open.
A four-wheeled vehicle with a motor of any kind is a passenger car and subject to all regulations thereof. This is what I got from the Alberta DOT, and that's a can of worms I do NOT want to open.

Likes For wsteve464:
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Based on this and the overall weight you have to pedal I'd seriously think about about a 3 wheeler so I could hook up a motor. Use a cheaper suspension fork in the front and a trailing arm suspension in the rear with an electric motor in the front wheel or adapt one of the mid drive motors to the rear wheels and you could probably hit 30+ mph on the flats. Or easier to make as far drive train (and guaranteed fun) reverse the 3 wheeler and put the two wheels in front use a mid drive motor for the single rear wheel. 

... where's the "digging in heels" smiley?
#15
Senior Member
Well if it gets done at least you will be in great shape .
Ok last idea


I wish you the best of luck.
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
What I actually had an idea of was to replace some of the crossbraces with flatiron, and much of the side tubes and the diagonal tubes with angle iron. Most of my weight will be on the center, anyways.
And the plywood sheet would be even worse for weight.
And the plywood sheet would be even worse for weight.
Last edited by MrInitialMan; 06-19-20 at 06:30 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,693
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4034 Post(s)
Liked 3,458 Times
in
2,097 Posts
I will defend your right to try projects that might seem like poor choices
Have you thought about the wheels and tires much? Tensioned spoke wheels have a very high strength to weight ratio IF the forces are kept in plane with the wheel's structure. The cars of yester year got away with thie design by having a very wide rim and more then two "sets" of spoke bracing between the hub and rim. Bicycle wheels lack these elements. Your 4 wheel design will not readily allow for the wheels to lean into the turn like a bike's do. Likewise the tires ability to not deform under turning forces will be challenged.
Designing the front suspension and steering geometry well will mitigate this to some degree (pun intended) and canting the rear wheels like some wheel chairs do will help that end of your machine.
As to the frame members I know thin wall Cro Moly tubing well so would likely use that. I braze, not weld, so would use that joining method. I likely would use various diameters and wall thicknesses depending on my thoughts about the stress levels each might see. I would hope that .035" and .049" walls would be enough for most parts. But I'm no engineer so... Andy

Have you thought about the wheels and tires much? Tensioned spoke wheels have a very high strength to weight ratio IF the forces are kept in plane with the wheel's structure. The cars of yester year got away with thie design by having a very wide rim and more then two "sets" of spoke bracing between the hub and rim. Bicycle wheels lack these elements. Your 4 wheel design will not readily allow for the wheels to lean into the turn like a bike's do. Likewise the tires ability to not deform under turning forces will be challenged.
Designing the front suspension and steering geometry well will mitigate this to some degree (pun intended) and canting the rear wheels like some wheel chairs do will help that end of your machine.
As to the frame members I know thin wall Cro Moly tubing well so would likely use that. I braze, not weld, so would use that joining method. I likely would use various diameters and wall thicknesses depending on my thoughts about the stress levels each might see. I would hope that .035" and .049" walls would be enough for most parts. But I'm no engineer so... Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
I will defend your right to try projects that might seem like poor choices
Have you thought about the wheels and tires much? Tensioned spoke wheels have a very high strength to weight ratio IF the forces are kept in plane with the wheel's structure. The cars of yester year got away with thie design by having a very wide rim and more then two "sets" of spoke bracing between the hub and rim. Bicycle wheels lack these elements. Your 4 wheel design will not readily allow for the wheels to lean into the turn like a bike's do. Likewise the tires ability to not deform under turning forces will be challenged.
Designing the front suspension and steering geometry well will mitigate this to some degree (pun intended) and canting the rear wheels like some wheel chairs do will help that end of your machine.
As to the frame members I know thin wall Cro Moly tubing well so would likely use that. I braze, not weld, so would use that joining method. I likely would use various diameters and wall thicknesses depending on my thoughts about the stress levels each might see. I would hope that .035" and .049" walls would be enough for most parts. But I'm no engineer so... Andy

Have you thought about the wheels and tires much? Tensioned spoke wheels have a very high strength to weight ratio IF the forces are kept in plane with the wheel's structure. The cars of yester year got away with thie design by having a very wide rim and more then two "sets" of spoke bracing between the hub and rim. Bicycle wheels lack these elements. Your 4 wheel design will not readily allow for the wheels to lean into the turn like a bike's do. Likewise the tires ability to not deform under turning forces will be challenged.
Designing the front suspension and steering geometry well will mitigate this to some degree (pun intended) and canting the rear wheels like some wheel chairs do will help that end of your machine.
As to the frame members I know thin wall Cro Moly tubing well so would likely use that. I braze, not weld, so would use that joining method. I likely would use various diameters and wall thicknesses depending on my thoughts about the stress levels each might see. I would hope that .035" and .049" walls would be enough for most parts. But I'm no engineer so... Andy
As for geometry, I know the steering setup is over-complicated. That's so that the steering can be adjusted.
How much more expensive is Chromoly compared to steel or aluminum?
Last edited by MrInitialMan; 06-19-20 at 11:20 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 916
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
204 Posts
Cromoly is about 3x the price of mild steel here but it might be different where you are. Bear in mind though that very thin-wall tubeis much harder to weld. Also, although it's stronger than mild steel it isn't any stiffer, so you will want large diameters and might need a bit more triangulation spaceframe type stuff going on.
Aluminium might be an idea but you need to be sure your design will be OK for fatigue and things-- steel is much more forgiving.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Tubing is usually better for a lightweight structure than flat bar or angle iron because it's so much better in torsion. The thinnest flat bar or angle you (normally) get here in the UK is 3mm ("hot-rolled"). A piece of 3mm angle iron is going to weigh about the same as 1/16" wall square tube of the same length, but the tube will be stiffer in bending and much better in torsion. The best bang for your buck is usually to use quite thin-wall but large diameter tubes (1.25" and above). The large diameter gives you a lot more stiffness. Steel is much stronger than you think so you're normally designing for stiffness not strength. Square or rectangular tube is very easy to cut and weld because it doesn't need to be mitred and you're welding in straight lines, but round is a more optimal shape.

Sorry I didn't answer this earlier. I think it's about the same (16 gauge being 0.065").
Last edited by MrInitialMan; 06-20-20 at 05:11 AM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 916
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
204 Posts
Yes suspension is good. But it will increase the budget quite a bit because the springs and shocks and things are all a bit pricey. I would go with 1/16" wall mild steel tubing which will be strong enough with or without suspension and cheap enough to make a few mistakes with and make the design up as you go along. If it all works well can consider rebuilding with more exotic chromoly later.
#22
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Yes suspension is good. But it will increase the budget quite a bit because the springs and shocks and things are all a bit pricey. I would go with 1/16" wall mild steel tubing which will be strong enough with or without suspension and cheap enough to make a few mistakes with and make the design up as you go along. If it all works well can consider rebuilding with more exotic chromoly later.
I was also thinking using 1X2" rectangular tubing for much of the floor frame, with the tubing "on edge" so to speak.
Also, a bit off the topic of weight (sort of), would you all agree that I should have brakes on all four wheels?
Last edited by MrInitialMan; 06-20-20 at 10:00 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 916
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 309 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times
in
204 Posts
Well, I know the suspension will be a bit pricy, but a wise person once said "If you do not engineer a point of flexibility into something, it will engineer one for you."
I was also thinking using 1X2" rectangular tubing for much of the floor frame, with the tubing "on edge" so to speak.
Also, a bit off the topic of weight (sort of), would you all agree that I should have brakes on all four wheels?
I was also thinking using 1X2" rectangular tubing for much of the floor frame, with the tubing "on edge" so to speak.
Also, a bit off the topic of weight (sort of), would you all agree that I should have brakes on all four wheels?
The only alternative to bicycle brakes I can think off is to use one car or motorbike disk brake on the rear axle like a go-kart. This would give you all the heat dissipation you could ever need on long descents. Bicycle front brakes could assist with emergency stops and day to day braking.
#24
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 44 Times
in
23 Posts
I am going to enjoy this build, please keep us updated?
Since it is just for one person + load could you make the chassis much narrower to save weight and resist torsion.
This would give you more room for suspension which could then be something as simple as transverse leaf springs.
I am no expert by the way :-)
Since it is just for one person + load could you make the chassis much narrower to save weight and resist torsion.
This would give you more room for suspension which could then be something as simple as transverse leaf springs.
I am no expert by the way :-)
Likes For mikeread:
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 194
Bikes: Best described as "What is that?!"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Okay, taking some of the advice--particularly that I'm underestimating the strength of steel, do you think I could get away with a floor frame like this:
CarCycle Design #3
I haven't put in the measurements for the floor frame, but I have for the overall body. For the floor frame, I managed to save around 24 lbs, so it's about 60 lbs instead of 84.
I don't think I could narrow the chassis much--I need elbow room.
As for transverse leaf springs--I looked those up online, and they look like an interesting option. It was mentioned that they aren't great for cornering at high speed--but this isn't going to be a high speed vehicle anyways. I might use transverse springs on both ends--I can get away with that due to low speeds, can't I?
CarCycle Design #3
I haven't put in the measurements for the floor frame, but I have for the overall body. For the floor frame, I managed to save around 24 lbs, so it's about 60 lbs instead of 84.
I am going to enjoy this build, please keep us updated?
Since it is just for one person + load could you make the chassis much narrower to save weight and resist torsion.
This would give you more room for suspension which could then be something as simple as transverse leaf springs.
I am no expert by the way :-)
Since it is just for one person + load could you make the chassis much narrower to save weight and resist torsion.
This would give you more room for suspension which could then be something as simple as transverse leaf springs.
I am no expert by the way :-)

Last edited by MrInitialMan; 06-27-20 at 09:46 PM.