Is this frame done for?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 707
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 255 Post(s)
Liked 337 Times
in
198 Posts
Is this frame done for?
This bike is special to me and I would like to keep it in rideable condition. I bought it used a couple of days ago and only noticed this split today. It is not like this on the other side of the frame. Is it possible to grind the paint off and do a TIG weld all the way along the split.





#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,341
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 3,117 Times
in
1,904 Posts
I'll be the bad guy here and say that the cost to repair (if that is what is called for, I do wonder about the joint actually having a problem as opposed to just very low cost fabrication that shows in these features) is more than the bike is worth. Then there's the comment about the bike meaning a lot to you, yet is only a few days old. Is this a model you have been seeking for some time and only just now found? Is it the bike that some person you love had?
My suggestion is that lacking some great intangible reason to value this bike for far more than its market value is you should either ride it till it completely fails or find a bike in better condition. Andy (hoping this thread isn't a trolling)
My suggestion is that lacking some great intangible reason to value this bike for far more than its market value is you should either ride it till it completely fails or find a bike in better condition. Andy (hoping this thread isn't a trolling)
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#3
Junior Member
There is no corrosion in that spilt and it is painted. It has been there since fabrication and will be there in the same condition for the remainder of its life. If it makes you feel better, you can watch it, but it is not a defect.
#4
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,496
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 2,994 Times
in
2,060 Posts
Can't agree with the statement that it's not a defect, but I agree that it was always there since they made the bike. It's a manufacturing defect. Failure really depends on how much and how hard the OP proposes to use the bike. I am pretty sure these were made by squashing the stays and then the stay and dropout were held together by a couple of spot welds. As long as the spot welds hold, these cracks aren't going to matter. I have had the misfortune to work on a large number of bikes made this way and I don't recall seeing one that failed at that location. But it's possible the owners would just immediately give up on them and not take them to a bike shop.
#5
Half way there
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,915
Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 970 Post(s)
Liked 850 Times
in
510 Posts
Seat stays are not highly stressed and then they under compression which will tend to keep this joint together. If this defect does actually progress to a failure, it will happen gradually and likely not result in a crash. I'd do nothing more than monitor this area. Take a quick look before any ride.
Likes For Moe Zhoost:
#6
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,496
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 2,994 Times
in
2,060 Posts
The thing that makes this situation different is that the OP only recently bought the bike. I wouldn't have purchased this bike knowing that defect was there.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 870
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 300 Post(s)
Liked 229 Times
in
188 Posts
Agree with people who say it looks like it was made like that-- the stays were pressed around the dropout and then presumably spot-welded. But you say it's not like that on the other side. But either way yes you can easily run a TIG bead down there which will strengthen it anyway.
Likes For guy153:
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 707
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 255 Post(s)
Liked 337 Times
in
198 Posts
Agree with people who say it looks like it was made like that-- the stays were pressed around the dropout and then presumably spot-welded. But you say it's not like that on the other side. But either way yes you can easily run a TIG bead down there which will strengthen it anyway.
#11
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8,881
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 127 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 1,058 Times
in
733 Posts
I suspect that the tube was flattened without regard for the location of the seam along the tube.
I really don't think that this split matters, as it's not really stressed in a way that would force the split to propagate upward along the tube.
This is the beauty of such thick-walled tubing, the stresses are lower and the metallurgy is less "notch-sensitive" to defects like this because typically there is still some ductility there.
Welding on the other hand is going to fry the paint, and unless your welder makes the right guess as to the grade of steel and knows what he is doing, the frame might end up weaker (more prone to cracking) after the molten steel shrinks and puts the metal along that edge in tension.
I'm pretty sure that the factory engineers didn't worry about the seam ending up oriented along the creased edge and splitting, because it wouldn't matter either way.
These Huffies have tremendous potential of the right frame size for the rider is found.
I recommend "sizing up" considerably on frames of this type (Schwinn EF frames included) because of the very short reach caused by the slack seattube angle.
A longer stem is a possibility to extend reach, but I strongly recommend that the handlebar width be increased with every centimeter added to the stem length, particularly going beyond 9cm. A wider aluminum bar is also going to have a larger, more comfortable gripping diameter, but is going to need to stay with 25.4mn (1") clamping diameter for any stem that you can find to fit the 21.1mm (.833") quill diameter.
I really don't think that this split matters, as it's not really stressed in a way that would force the split to propagate upward along the tube.
This is the beauty of such thick-walled tubing, the stresses are lower and the metallurgy is less "notch-sensitive" to defects like this because typically there is still some ductility there.
Welding on the other hand is going to fry the paint, and unless your welder makes the right guess as to the grade of steel and knows what he is doing, the frame might end up weaker (more prone to cracking) after the molten steel shrinks and puts the metal along that edge in tension.
I'm pretty sure that the factory engineers didn't worry about the seam ending up oriented along the creased edge and splitting, because it wouldn't matter either way.
These Huffies have tremendous potential of the right frame size for the rider is found.
I recommend "sizing up" considerably on frames of this type (Schwinn EF frames included) because of the very short reach caused by the slack seattube angle.
A longer stem is a possibility to extend reach, but I strongly recommend that the handlebar width be increased with every centimeter added to the stem length, particularly going beyond 9cm. A wider aluminum bar is also going to have a larger, more comfortable gripping diameter, but is going to need to stay with 25.4mn (1") clamping diameter for any stem that you can find to fit the 21.1mm (.833") quill diameter.
Last edited by dddd; 03-16-23 at 05:21 PM.