frame terminology and general design info source
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
frame terminology and general design info source
I' have recently done a basic refurb on my 1977 Nishiki Olympic, after decades of not riding, and in the process, decided I would do some dimensional documentation and perhaps create a CAD model of the bike for future reference. Whether that project has any real merit is another question entirely, but in getting the bike road- and ride-worthy, I did some basic measuring of various locating points, and became curious about a couple of things:
1. Whether there is easily accessible general frame design information, such as "normal" range of angular dimension relationships of frame tubes, and
2. Where I might find a good layout drawing and/or associated information defining/naming the various parts of a typical road bike frame.
I was not in any way curious about this sort of stuff when I bought the bike originally, but was simply interested in getting transport for work commuting in Boston and getting around without car, so I'm playing a little catch-up here.
My curiosity was sharpened after I had created a hand sketch and started the CAD model, using an eyeballed 75-degree value for the seat tube-to-crank bearing housing, then saw some discussion on this forum that contained several references to 76 degrees for what I recall as a few different frames. That made me wonder about "standard" design dims.
If anyone has pointers for basic info, that would be appreciated. Thanks --
1. Whether there is easily accessible general frame design information, such as "normal" range of angular dimension relationships of frame tubes, and
2. Where I might find a good layout drawing and/or associated information defining/naming the various parts of a typical road bike frame.
I was not in any way curious about this sort of stuff when I bought the bike originally, but was simply interested in getting transport for work commuting in Boston and getting around without car, so I'm playing a little catch-up here.
My curiosity was sharpened after I had created a hand sketch and started the CAD model, using an eyeballed 75-degree value for the seat tube-to-crank bearing housing, then saw some discussion on this forum that contained several references to 76 degrees for what I recall as a few different frames. That made me wonder about "standard" design dims.
If anyone has pointers for basic info, that would be appreciated. Thanks --
#2
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,093
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,414 Times
in
2,340 Posts
Standard seat tube and head tube angles are both 73 degrees (because that's what I like). 72 degrees is also common. I would expect most road bikes to be somewhere between 68 and 75 degrees. One source of this information is manufacturer websites.
I don't know if you can get a free version of rattlecad at this time. There are demo versions of bikecad https://bikecad.ca/bikecadpro (at the bottom). Not sure what the limitations are, it might work for you.
I don't know if you can get a free version of rattlecad at this time. There are demo versions of bikecad https://bikecad.ca/bikecadpro (at the bottom). Not sure what the limitations are, it might work for you.
Likes For unterhausen:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,706
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4040 Post(s)
Liked 3,475 Times
in
2,105 Posts
Pre interweb we viewed the CONI book and Sutherland's Manual as the defining texts on this. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#4
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,736
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3484 Post(s)
Liked 3,152 Times
in
1,807 Posts
Martin Manning wrote an Excel spreadsheet for frame geometry (also works in LibreOffice and gnumeric). It hasn't been updated for a while, but is still relevant.
XLS file: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...f=true&sd=true
Documentation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...f=true&sd=true
XLS file: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...f=true&sd=true
Documentation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...f=true&sd=true
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
Thanks for the pointers. The Sutherland's Handbook looks especially useful. I'm sure I'll have some more questions at some point. Any additional recommendations accepted with gratitude.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,445
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4490 Post(s)
Liked 3,582 Times
in
2,321 Posts
I'd be interested in seeing the angles on the Olympic. I raced a '76 Fuji Pro. 74 seat, 75 head. 59 cm seat tube. Roughly the same top tube. Chainstays as short as you can do and still get an inflated training tubular in. (With a little muscle; race Criterium Setas went in just fine. You could only insert your fingers between seat stay and tire once. NOT recommended!)
Likes For 79pmooney:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 920
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 254 Times
in
206 Posts
https://geometrygeeks.bike/ is a good resource.
Likes For guy153: