Interesting geometry question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 255
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting geometry question
OK. So for all of you with vast knowledge of frame building, engineering, and the requisite mathematics I have a question to ask.
Say that one had a funnybike, an older version with the 24" front wheel and 700c rear. What kind of geometry changes would occur if you replaced the front fork and wheel with a 650? This is assuming that the 24" is the more common small wheel which measures 520mm and that the 650 is the more common 650c which measures 571mm, for an overall difference of 5.1cm which would raise the front end by 2.55cm. Would the resulting change in geometry severely alter the handling of the bicycle?
Say that one had a funnybike, an older version with the 24" front wheel and 700c rear. What kind of geometry changes would occur if you replaced the front fork and wheel with a 650? This is assuming that the 24" is the more common small wheel which measures 520mm and that the 650 is the more common 650c which measures 571mm, for an overall difference of 5.1cm which would raise the front end by 2.55cm. Would the resulting change in geometry severely alter the handling of the bicycle?
#2
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
Say that one had a funnybike, an older version with the 24" front wheel and 700c rear. What kind of geometry changes would occur if you replaced the front fork and wheel with a 650? This is assuming that the 24" is the more common small wheel which measures 520mm and that the 650 is the more common 650c which measures 571mm, for an overall difference of 5.1cm which would raise the front end by 2.55cm. Would the resulting change in geometry severely alter the handling of the bicycle?
Raising the front end will slacken the head tube angle quite a bit. You can get back some of the quickness if you go with a highly raked fork though. The bottom bracket height will also increase a goodly bit which may feel kind of weird. Whether or not these changes are "too much" kind of depends on how the bike was set up to begin with.
Good luck.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Raising the front end will slacken the head tube angle quite a bit. You can get back some of the quickness if you go with a highly raked fork though. The bottom bracket height will also increase a goodly bit which may feel kind of weird. Whether or not these changes are "too much" kind of depends on how the bike was set up to begin with.
Good luck.
Good luck.
#4
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
I think it's going to result in less trail, which might really not be a problem. More trail makes it easier to keep the bike in a straight line, and makes the bike want more to "self-recover" if there's been a disturbance, such as sidewind, sharp bump, or rider fidgeting. However, trail is by no means all there is to say about bike handling.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
The added trail should slow the steering but improve stability.
The hard part is to decide what the geometry needs to be without extensive trial and error.
Road Fan