Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Interesting geometry question

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Interesting geometry question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-07, 12:28 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 255
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting geometry question

OK. So for all of you with vast knowledge of frame building, engineering, and the requisite mathematics I have a question to ask.

Say that one had a funnybike, an older version with the 24" front wheel and 700c rear. What kind of geometry changes would occur if you replaced the front fork and wheel with a 650? This is assuming that the 24" is the more common small wheel which measures 520mm and that the 650 is the more common 650c which measures 571mm, for an overall difference of 5.1cm which would raise the front end by 2.55cm. Would the resulting change in geometry severely alter the handling of the bicycle?
daneil is offline  
Old 08-20-07, 01:23 PM
  #2  
Banned.
 
Nessism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061

Bikes: Homebuilt steel

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times in 337 Posts
Originally Posted by daneil
Say that one had a funnybike, an older version with the 24" front wheel and 700c rear. What kind of geometry changes would occur if you replaced the front fork and wheel with a 650? This is assuming that the 24" is the more common small wheel which measures 520mm and that the 650 is the more common 650c which measures 571mm, for an overall difference of 5.1cm which would raise the front end by 2.55cm. Would the resulting change in geometry severely alter the handling of the bicycle?

Raising the front end will slacken the head tube angle quite a bit. You can get back some of the quickness if you go with a highly raked fork though. The bottom bracket height will also increase a goodly bit which may feel kind of weird. Whether or not these changes are "too much" kind of depends on how the bike was set up to begin with.

Good luck.
Nessism is offline  
Old 08-21-07, 08:19 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by Nessism
Raising the front end will slacken the head tube angle quite a bit. You can get back some of the quickness if you go with a highly raked fork though. The bottom bracket height will also increase a goodly bit which may feel kind of weird. Whether or not these changes are "too much" kind of depends on how the bike was set up to begin with.

Good luck.
I think it's going to result in less trail, which might really not be a problem. More trail makes it easier to keep the bike in a straight line, and makes the bike want more to "self-recover" if there's been a disturbance, such as sidewind, sharp bump, or rider fidgeting. However, trail is by no means all there is to say about bike handling.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 08-23-07, 10:23 PM
  #4  
Banned.
 
Nessism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061

Bikes: Homebuilt steel

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times in 337 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
I think it's going to result in less trail, which might really not be a problem. More trail makes it easier to keep the bike in a straight line, and makes the bike want more to "self-recover" if there's been a disturbance, such as sidewind, sharp bump, or rider fidgeting. However, trail is by no means all there is to say about bike handling.
Why would there be less trail if the head tube angle is relaxed, that should increase trail.
Nessism is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 02:57 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by Nessism
Why would there be less trail if the head tube angle is relaxed, that should increase trail.
Sorry, Nessism, you're right! He'll get a trail increase by decreasing the head angle, and an addtional one by making the wheel bigger (both terms are in the equation). He can reduce trail by increasing fork rake.

The added trail should slow the steering but improve stability.

The hard part is to decide what the geometry needs to be without extensive trial and error.

Road Fan
Road Fan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.