Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-14-08, 06:26 PM   #1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Okanagan Valley, BC CANADA
Bikes: Trek 7300FX, Lemond Sarthe
Posts: 1,049
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
TIG or Fillet Brazing for my new frame?

I am planning to have a new frame built and have yet to decide if I should have it TIG welded or go for fillet brazing.

As far as I can tell from talking to people and hours spent on the internet, that fillet brazing (along with lug construction) was the best way to go years ago.

But now days, TIG is lighter than fillet brazing, and TIG doesn't have the strength problems with air hardening tubing that welding used to have. I have been planning to go with Reynolds 731 or True temper OX which may be more appropriate for use with TIG.

On the plus side for fillet brazing it makes for a smoother looking join, and maybe is stronger(?).

Are there any other arguments in favor of fillet brazing that I should consider, seeing that it can cost $300 - $500 more than TIG.

Last edited by bccycleguy; 07-14-08 at 07:13 PM.
bccycleguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-08, 10:03 AM   #2
Senior Member
Nessism's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Posts: 2,333
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Unless fillet brazed is an aesthetic you prefer, I'd go with TIG. There is less overall heat involved with TIG, which can reduce the amount of heat deformation and subsequent cold setting required. Overall, TIG is just a cleaner way to go in my view.
Becareful buying/selling bike parts on-line. I learned the hard way. :(
Nessism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-08, 09:15 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I build fillet braze bikes, so I am biased. I think TIG looks unfinished and boring. Fillet brazing is my favorite because you aren't limited by angles and tube diameters but you still get a very neat finished look.

as far as deformation and coldsetting all depends on the builder. A good builder will know a process that will stop the frame from deforming or twisting with either joining process. I will usually check my frame after tacking to see if I need to pull a joint in a certain direction or keep it in place during brazing.

either way, you will get an awesome bike. both ways are plenty strong if done correctly. ask you builder their opinion.
G0balistik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-08, 01:19 PM   #4
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think that if this came down to deciding between several builders the key thing would be to try to make the decision outside of the issue of how the tubes are joined. Aesthetics aside, the real ordering of joinery methods should probably be TIG, Fillet brazing, lug. Somehow it's all backwards. But so is deciding a bike on how the joints are made. Fit, getting the precise kind of bike you need, and your builder's experience should count for more.

On aesthetics i think TIG is also superior, but you won't find too many who agree. The reason is that real art and craft values fingertips. Meaning the human trace left by the master. Like brushstrokes. Not to be confused with someone who can't cover his tracks due to poor workmanship. TIG leaves behind a certain fingertip impression of the builder, it can be perfectly smooth like Don from Anvil, or it can be various kinds of "dimes" (a good deal of it can also be the electronics of the machine). Even where it is perfectly smooth the fillets left behind seem to appeal to some as being too small, people like the beefy look. However these are the only real smooth fillets out there, right from the chraftsman's touch.

While obviously brazing works great, it is hard to see the amount of heat required to build up the brass is an advantage, it's costly, increases your carbon footprint, heats the tubing a lot. But the aesthetic issue is they don't go raw. They file and sand the heck out of the stuff so that the end result is like bondo, no fingerprints. If bondo is what you want, why not bondo tig? I have some welds like that that have been out of doors summer and winter for 5 years and still are great, no lifting of the bondo, nice fat look.

Another option with TIG is the tigged over layer of brass. Very light amps are used to melt brass over the weld to fair it in. Never see this on bikes, and I prefer the fingerprints, but for those who want the melted techique, that is a good part of what the brass is in the welding store is for... I don't expect people to agree, and do accept the beauty of the good conventional bike builder. But I have also been around the craft world a long time, and know what gets respect more broadly and what doesn't.
NoReg is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 PM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.