Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Surly 4130 or Tange #1

Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Surly 4130 or Tange #1

Old 06-25-10, 10:30 PM
  #1  
Abacus
Decrepit Member
Thread Starter
 
Abacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 309

Bikes: 2003 Trek 520, 1996 Trek 370, 1996 Bianchi Osprey, too many others.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Surly 4130 or Tange #1

OK, I have a dilemma.

I have a brand new Surly Pacer frame hanging on my wall, ready to be built up. I bought it as a boxed complete bike a few months ago, but decided I didn't like the color So it's just been hanging there while I decide whether to have it re-powder coated or not. I haven't even got around to fitting the star nut.

Just recently a mid 80's lugged steel frame has come up, and being the retro grouch that I am, it has attracted my attention. The original manufacturer's make and model decals are gone, but it is Tange No 1 tubing. I'm guessing it's a Japanese something-or-other. I don't believe its a 70's or early 80's frame because it's built for 700C wheels, not 27" It has a bit of surface rust, and if I buy it I will have it stripped and powder coated. I would sell the Pacer frame.

So, all things being equal, with size, geometry, etc, what would be the better ride - a bike built with Surly's 4130 or a bike built with Tange No 1? We are not talking Tange Prestige here, were talking about the best of Tange's second rung range.
Abacus is offline  
Old 06-26-10, 05:35 AM
  #2  
lord_athlon
Senior Member
 
lord_athlon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I really like my #1 Centurion
lord_athlon is offline  
Old 06-26-10, 11:39 AM
  #3  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 21,553

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2178 Post(s)
Liked 545 Times in 374 Posts
Tange "Champion" tubing *IS* 4130 Chome-moly, just like the Surly. The #1 designation means it is the lightest Champion tube set. Tange "Prestige" tubing was heat-treated Champion #1 tubing, so the frame you're considering would likely be just as light as a similar frame built from Prestige tubing, just slightly lower strength because it wasn't heat-treated.

Here's an old (pre-Prestige) Tange catalog, if you're interested:
https://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/catalogs/tange-catalog.pdf

The Surly frame could be any gauge 4130 tubing. Probably a decent frame, but I'd personally prefer the lugged frame if only for aesthetic reasons.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 06-26-10, 05:26 PM
  #4  
joseph senger
Senior Member
 
joseph senger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: middle canada
Posts: 173

Bikes: trek 8000, GF sugar 1, 1975 schwinn fairlady, 1942 ccm, 1965 ccm retro mod, khe lagger flatland bike...ect..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sell the surly. I love the prestige but i have had it crimp. Champion is notably flexier, but honestly if it's for ripping around town, good on it for being flexy.

JohnD
Thanks for the link.
joseph senger is offline  
Old 06-27-10, 08:01 AM
  #5  
Abacus
Decrepit Member
Thread Starter
 
Abacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 309

Bikes: 2003 Trek 520, 1996 Trek 370, 1996 Bianchi Osprey, too many others.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the info. It ties up with my own thoughts, being that there wouldbn't be much in it. And yes, my main interest in the old frame is the aesthetics.

I expect the Tange to be a bit lighter, but also to flex a bit more. I'm not racing, and I like comfort, so that doesn't bother me.

Looks like I'm selling an unused Pacer frame.
Abacus is offline  
Old 06-27-10, 12:51 PM
  #6  
wrk101
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 22,597

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 901 Post(s)
Liked 300 Times in 226 Posts
Depending on the sticker, it could be early 1980s. My Tange Champion 1 Lotus Classique is 1983/1984 timeframe.

+1 Go for the lugged steel.
wrk101 is offline  
Old 07-01-10, 10:09 PM
  #7  
Six jours
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Looks like you've already made your decision, so I'll back you up on it. I had a Surly. It was a fine bike, but it was really stiff, and I found it unpleasant. That's heavy gauge tubing, regardless of the particular steel used. The Tange #1 bike, OTOH, is light gauge steel and will give a much more pleasant ride, on average. The caveat is that if you are 6'4" and 300 pounds, the Surly is going to be a much better bike for you.
Six jours is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MARJA
Classic & Vintage
4
07-09-12 01:42 AM
uncle uncle
Classic & Vintage
4
06-12-12 09:45 PM
gerv
Classic & Vintage
12
01-20-10 08:37 AM
cykel
Classic & Vintage
14
01-18-10 06:40 PM
cykel
General Cycling Discussion
5
01-17-10 07:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.