Carbon 38mm deep VS Alloy 18mm deep rims, Double butted VS bladed spokes
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 762
Bikes: A few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Carbon 38mm deep VS Alloy 18mm deep rims, Double butted VS bladed spokes
I am looking into building up a new wheel set, using DT Swiss 240 disk centre locking hubs 32 hole, DT aerolite (buddle butted and slightly bladed), Brass nipples
Consider a cruising speed of 25km/h (15.62mph), and another cruising speed of 30km/h (18.75mph). at each of these speeds how much difference in watts or km/h (mph) would the 38mm rims make over the 18mm rims
Carbon, 38mm deep, 430g
VS
Alloy, 18mm deep, 417g
Consider a cruising speed of 25km/h (15.62mph), and another cruising speed of 30km/h (18.75mph). at each of these speeds how much difference in watts or km/h (mph) would the 38mm rims make over the 18mm rims
Carbon, 38mm deep, 430g
VS
Alloy, 18mm deep, 417g
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,318
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Liked 294 Times
in
208 Posts
I am looking into building up a new wheel set, using DT Swiss 240 disk centre locking hubs 32 hole, DT aerolite (buddle butted and slightly bladed), Brass nipples
Consider a cruising speed of 25km/h (15.62mph), and another cruising speed of 30km/h (18.75mph). at each of these speeds how much difference in watts or km/h (mph) would the 38mm rims make over the 18mm rims
Carbon, 38mm deep, 430g
VS
Alloy, 18mm deep, 417g
Consider a cruising speed of 25km/h (15.62mph), and another cruising speed of 30km/h (18.75mph). at each of these speeds how much difference in watts or km/h (mph) would the 38mm rims make over the 18mm rims
Carbon, 38mm deep, 430g
VS
Alloy, 18mm deep, 417g
Rims vary. Vaguely aerodynamic shapes only give up about 2W to a 38mm carbon wheel at that speed. Box section rims like Open Pros are somewhat worse.
Half that at 15 MPH.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 762
Bikes: A few
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
14/17 gauge aero spokes like Aerolites save 1-2W at 30 MPH compared to round ones like Revolutions so that's 0.25 - 0.5W at 18 MPH.
Rims vary. Vaguely aerodynamic shapes only give up about 2W to a 38mm carbon wheel at that speed. Box section rims like Open Pros are somewhat worse.
Half that at 15 MPH.
Rims vary. Vaguely aerodynamic shapes only give up about 2W to a 38mm carbon wheel at that speed. Box section rims like Open Pros are somewhat worse.
Half that at 15 MPH.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,318
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Liked 294 Times
in
208 Posts
1. Tires. Gatorskins and GP4 Seasons are about 20 and 15W less efficient at 20MPH compared to GP4000SII tires. With power overcoming rolling resistance linear with speed you still save 15 and 13W at 15 MPH. I never noticed a difference in flat rate between the three, although the GP4 Seasons lasted half as long as the others. OTOH, the GP4000SII tires lack sidewall protection and would not do well on gravel. There's a regular Grand Prix with better side-wall protection that's supposed to share the GP4000 tread, although I've never seen measurements. Power lost due to rolling r
2. An aero jersey (or skin suit). The meat bag on top of the bike is responsible for about 75% of total drag.
#8
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,368
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 823 Post(s)
Liked 563 Times
in
423 Posts
Drew consistently has good input and his tire comment again is right on the mark. Tires has a huge impact.
Even though the carbon aero only saves a couple watts at your cruising speed, don't forget sprints, hard efforts, and downhill. You may not see 10 watts difference, but it will be more than two.
Even though the carbon aero only saves a couple watts at your cruising speed, don't forget sprints, hard efforts, and downhill. You may not see 10 watts difference, but it will be more than two.
#9
blah blah blah
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Basically the difference is also enough that nobody participating in this forum should care. LOL
In a recent interview, the road bike manager for Felt bikes said the cyclist accounts for about 85% of the drag in the system. Then of the remaining 15% due to the bicycle, a huge amount is from the handlebars. Pretty amazing considering Felt was one of the earliest companies to push the road aero bike.
In a recent interview, the road bike manager for Felt bikes said the cyclist accounts for about 85% of the drag in the system. Then of the remaining 15% due to the bicycle, a huge amount is from the handlebars. Pretty amazing considering Felt was one of the earliest companies to push the road aero bike.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,318
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Liked 294 Times
in
208 Posts
Sharpie dots on each spoke or a tape flag on representative samples (after the valve hole, plus the next spoke in rear wheels) let you undo that completely with no negative effects.
Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 02-15-16 at 08:09 PM.
#12
Senior Member
If watt savings per cost is what is important to you, wheels are one of the last places to look. As already mentioned tires and aero clothing are important. Aero helmet is another decent option, as are aero shoe covers (I assume, can't recall any solid data on this but I am sure it is out there.)
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,538
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 516 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 215 Times
in
122 Posts
If watt savings per cost is what is important to you, wheels are one of the last places to look. As already mentioned tires and aero clothing are important. Aero helmet is another decent option, as are aero shoe covers (I assume, can't recall any solid data on this but I am sure it is out there.)

#14
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,368
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 823 Post(s)
Liked 563 Times
in
423 Posts
Except the OP is probably just a road rider looking to go a little quicker. While skin suits, aero helmets and shoe covers help with tt's, they aren't for daily road riding. The same likely applies with aero bars
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wgscott
General Cycling Discussion
48
06-07-19 05:02 AM
Lew.
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
25
09-12-13 11:32 AM