does cycling hills count as hiit?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Tulsa/B.A. OK
Posts: 170
Bikes: Crosstrail Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
does cycling hills count as hiit?
does cycling up a bunch of rolling hills count as hiit?
The hills take a minute or less to get up and if I give it the juice trying to maintain speed or even go faster I'm pretty out of breath at the top.
I don't know the grade or elevation gain for a typical hill but I usually see around 700-1000' elevation gain over a typical 10 mileish lunchtime or after-work ride.
Earlier this year I used to cycle a lot at a big 20+ mile system of trails alongside a river (riverparks tulsa if you're from around here) so they are way flat, I noticed weight started dropping* much quicker about exactly the time I started riding another set of trails alongside a turnpike, trails follow the countour of the earth and also go up or down every mile for exiting at major streets. (creek turnpike trail and st. francis area bikeway if you're from around here)
*wife and I got too in to drinking for a few years, that plus eating bad plus a wreck that put me off the bike for 2 weeks and those 2 weeks down made me lazy and turned in to 2 years down, I put on a lot, up to 244, down to 205 now since feb 1, just riding, drinking under control and using myfitnesspal to eat between 2000-2400 cals/day.
The hills take a minute or less to get up and if I give it the juice trying to maintain speed or even go faster I'm pretty out of breath at the top.
I don't know the grade or elevation gain for a typical hill but I usually see around 700-1000' elevation gain over a typical 10 mileish lunchtime or after-work ride.
Earlier this year I used to cycle a lot at a big 20+ mile system of trails alongside a river (riverparks tulsa if you're from around here) so they are way flat, I noticed weight started dropping* much quicker about exactly the time I started riding another set of trails alongside a turnpike, trails follow the countour of the earth and also go up or down every mile for exiting at major streets. (creek turnpike trail and st. francis area bikeway if you're from around here)
*wife and I got too in to drinking for a few years, that plus eating bad plus a wreck that put me off the bike for 2 weeks and those 2 weeks down made me lazy and turned in to 2 years down, I put on a lot, up to 244, down to 205 now since feb 1, just riding, drinking under control and using myfitnesspal to eat between 2000-2400 cals/day.
Last edited by John Redcorn; 04-21-16 at 08:05 PM.
#2
Super Moderator
Hiit ?
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,671
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2864 Post(s)
Liked 2,842 Times
in
1,309 Posts
High intensity interval training.
Yes, hill repeats are classic interval training.
Yes, hill repeats are classic interval training.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: West Linn, Oregon
Posts: 99
Bikes: Cannondale R1000, Redline Disc R, 1982 Colnage Superissimo, Specialized M2 Stumpjumper, Trek Elance, 1984 Trek 610
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't understand the question. Hiit?
#5
Some Guy on the Road
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: 614
Posts: 423
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot, Trek Domane
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
High Intensity Interval Training
And yes, OP, if you're exerting yourself rolling hills are like nature's intervals. If you're shifting down real low and just spinning your way up (keeping your heart rate fairly low) then they're just scenery, but you can make them whatever you want
And yes, OP, if you're exerting yourself rolling hills are like nature's intervals. If you're shifting down real low and just spinning your way up (keeping your heart rate fairly low) then they're just scenery, but you can make them whatever you want
#6
rebmeM roineS
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,137
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 633 Post(s)
Liked 307 Times
in
198 Posts
High intensity interval training. Had to google it.
Cycling up a bunch of rolling hills can be good training, generally. And fun.
Cycling up a bunch of rolling hills can be good training, generally. And fun.
__________________
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
#7
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 21,745
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3491 Post(s)
Liked 1,800 Times
in
1,162 Posts
It really depends on what you're doing. The essence of HIIT is that you are doing very brief blasts of truly maximum effort with brief rest periods in between. You should get close to puking, if you don't actually puke. Just riding up hills ain't necessarily HIIT.
#8
Senior Member
It really depends on what you're doing. The essence of HIIT is that you are doing very brief blasts of truly maximum effort with brief rest periods in between. You should get close to puking, if you don't actually puke. Just riding up hills ain't necessarily HIIT.
Having to gear down from 3rd ring to 1st ring and from the 14t cog to 28t or 34t cog and you can hear your heart pounding in your ears, the road surface is soaked with your sweat because you're doing 3 or 4 mph, and it's 10-15 minutes before you even see the top of the hill, that is climbing a hill.
Of course, on this forum, no one does that. Everyone here climbs 20+% hills in the big chain ring spinning in the middle of the cassette at 16 mph.
As for weight loss, I'm no expert, but I personally think riding continuous for longer periods of time on a flat trail with sustained moderately elevated heart rate will burn fat and result in weight loss much better than hill climbing. The hill climbing or interval training is probably the best for fitness (heart strength and respiratory) but I lose weight easier when riding the flat river trails than riding on the road with western PA hills.
#9
Ride On!
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 971
Bikes: Allez DSW SL Sprint | Fuji Cross
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 227 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I've been doing intervals for a long time -- and yes, hill climbing is interval training.
Technically you don't have to push yourself to ALL-OUT levels of intensity for it to be considered HIIT. Just an intensity level during your high intensity intervals that is higher than you could sustain for a longer duration. Typically you do want to push yourself to the max you can do in that 30 seconds or however long your intervals shape out to be. But just because it's not an all-out effort doesn't mean that it's not high intensity.
In the end, you know if your intervals are pushing your intensity to a level that you can't sustain for longer than 1-2 minutes, so if you're not going as hard as you can, you should probably push it a bit more, but it's not absolutely necessary that you're nearly dying at the end of each high intensity interval. You can technically do 1:30 of low intensity, then :30 of 80-90% MHR, repeat...that's still a high intensity interval and just bringing your heart rate up to that unsustainable heart rate during your high intensity interval portion, then letting it come back down during rest is enough to get the benefits associated with training in that higher HR zone.
Now tabata will put you into MHR or above ( Trainer Q&A: What's the Difference Between HIIT and Tabata? )...and is probably only recommended for very highly-conditioned athletes who are currently performing at or very near their peak.
Technically you don't have to push yourself to ALL-OUT levels of intensity for it to be considered HIIT. Just an intensity level during your high intensity intervals that is higher than you could sustain for a longer duration. Typically you do want to push yourself to the max you can do in that 30 seconds or however long your intervals shape out to be. But just because it's not an all-out effort doesn't mean that it's not high intensity.
In the end, you know if your intervals are pushing your intensity to a level that you can't sustain for longer than 1-2 minutes, so if you're not going as hard as you can, you should probably push it a bit more, but it's not absolutely necessary that you're nearly dying at the end of each high intensity interval. You can technically do 1:30 of low intensity, then :30 of 80-90% MHR, repeat...that's still a high intensity interval and just bringing your heart rate up to that unsustainable heart rate during your high intensity interval portion, then letting it come back down during rest is enough to get the benefits associated with training in that higher HR zone.
Now tabata will put you into MHR or above ( Trainer Q&A: What's the Difference Between HIIT and Tabata? )...and is probably only recommended for very highly-conditioned athletes who are currently performing at or very near their peak.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,276
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 652 Post(s)
Liked 538 Times
in
293 Posts
Hills are good training and intense ONLY until you stop short of going all-out....which is what usually happens. Tell ya what, train on hills until you are feeling like you are in decent shape. Then, hit an all-out, everything you got, grizzly-on-my-azz half mile SPRINT. When you finish....coast to catch your breath and wonder what just happened.
I commend you for hill training. Hills are your friends, dont avoid them. But you really can add to that with gut-busting intervals.
I commend you for hill training. Hills are your friends, dont avoid them. But you really can add to that with gut-busting intervals.
Last edited by OldsCOOL; 04-22-16 at 08:51 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2933 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
224 Posts
Since I seldom do any real all-out HIIT, you bet I count the rolling hills! But HIIT are targeted exercises for specific goals, and hill "intervals" don't really have the structure to provide that.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,671
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2864 Post(s)
Liked 2,842 Times
in
1,309 Posts
I've been doing intervals for a long time -- and yes, hill climbing is interval training.
Technically you don't have to push yourself to ALL-OUT levels of intensity for it to be considered HIIT. Just an intensity level during your high intensity intervals that is higher than you could sustain for a longer duration. Typically you do want to push yourself to the max you can do in that 30 seconds or however long your intervals shape out to be. But just because it's not an all-out effort doesn't mean that it's not high intensity.
In the end, you know if your intervals are pushing your intensity to a level that you can't sustain for longer than 1-2 minutes, so if you're not going as hard as you can, you should probably push it a bit more, but it's not absolutely necessary that you're nearly dying at the end of each high intensity interval. You can technically do 1:30 of low intensity, then :30 of 80-90% MHR, repeat...that's still a high intensity interval and just bringing your heart rate up to that unsustainable heart rate during your high intensity interval portion, then letting it come back down during rest is enough to get the benefits associated with training in that higher HR zone.
Now tabata will put you into MHR or above ( Trainer Q&A: What's the Difference Between HIIT and Tabata? )...and is probably only recommended for very highly-conditioned athletes who are currently performing at or very near their peak.
Technically you don't have to push yourself to ALL-OUT levels of intensity for it to be considered HIIT. Just an intensity level during your high intensity intervals that is higher than you could sustain for a longer duration. Typically you do want to push yourself to the max you can do in that 30 seconds or however long your intervals shape out to be. But just because it's not an all-out effort doesn't mean that it's not high intensity.
In the end, you know if your intervals are pushing your intensity to a level that you can't sustain for longer than 1-2 minutes, so if you're not going as hard as you can, you should probably push it a bit more, but it's not absolutely necessary that you're nearly dying at the end of each high intensity interval. You can technically do 1:30 of low intensity, then :30 of 80-90% MHR, repeat...that's still a high intensity interval and just bringing your heart rate up to that unsustainable heart rate during your high intensity interval portion, then letting it come back down during rest is enough to get the benefits associated with training in that higher HR zone.
Now tabata will put you into MHR or above ( Trainer Q&A: What's the Difference Between HIIT and Tabata? )...and is probably only recommended for very highly-conditioned athletes who are currently performing at or very near their peak.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,075
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
Ride On!
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 971
Bikes: Allez DSW SL Sprint | Fuji Cross
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 227 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
How else would one estimate their MHR?
There's one way to receive an actual value and that involves a cardiologist.
EDIT: Seems like an easy and a practical method to base your .65-.85 MHR, or .60-.70, .70-.80, .80-.90, and .90-100 off of to me. If there's some other way to calculate those and at least arrive somewhere in the ballpark, I'm all for learning it.
There's one way to receive an actual value and that involves a cardiologist.
EDIT: Seems like an easy and a practical method to base your .65-.85 MHR, or .60-.70, .70-.80, .80-.90, and .90-100 off of to me. If there's some other way to calculate those and at least arrive somewhere in the ballpark, I'm all for learning it.
Last edited by deapee; 04-22-16 at 01:19 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,671
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2864 Post(s)
Liked 2,842 Times
in
1,309 Posts
How else would one estimate their MHR?
There's one way to receive an actual value and that involves a cardiologist.
EDIT: Seems like an easy and a practical method to base your .65-.85 MHR, or .60-.70, .70-.80, .80-.90, and .90-100 off of to me. If there's some other way to calculate those and at least arrive somewhere in the ballpark, I'm all for learning it.
There's one way to receive an actual value and that involves a cardiologist.
EDIT: Seems like an easy and a practical method to base your .65-.85 MHR, or .60-.70, .70-.80, .80-.90, and .90-100 off of to me. If there's some other way to calculate those and at least arrive somewhere in the ballpark, I'm all for learning it.
#17
Ride On!
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 971
Bikes: Allez DSW SL Sprint | Fuji Cross
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 227 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't estimate it. I use my observed maximum. In my case it's 15bpm higher than the number derived by 220-age formula. If I went by 220-age, I'd barely be above lactate threshhold. Although it may be accurate for large samples of untrained subjects, it's pretty useless for individual athletes. I'm always amazed that magazines and trainers are still spouting it.
Since you state your parents are in their 70's, I calculated the zones for a 50 year old (and since you stated your MHR is 15 BPM higher, I simply added 15 to the calculation)...
[TABLE="width: 288"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]formula max: 170[/TD]
[TD]actual max: 185[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD].6-.7[/TD]
[TD]102-119[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]111-129[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD].7-.8[/TD]
[TD]119-136[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]129-148[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD].8-.9[/TD]
[TD]136-153[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]148-166[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
For a newer person to a sport, I'd be willing to bet that the zones for formula based on a MHR of 170 are more accurate than for a conditioned athlete such as yourself. Clearly the MHR formula is just an estimate and not applicable to those who are well-trained. Either way, the zones based off of the formula are roughly equivalent and would probably result in satisfactory training even for a conditioned athlete.
That being said, we do know that the heart rate supposedly declines by 7 BPM every 10 years (I think) which would actually put a 50 year old right at 185 as opposed to 170...maybe that is a more accurate metric. However, maybe the metric is designed for beginners anyway.
In either event, even using the standard 220-age formula, working at the top of a zone puts the 50 year old in the zone anyway (the greater your age the greater the probability of discrepancy here anyway). So while not super accurate, I'd call the formula a pretty good method of determining your zones for conditioning well into any person's path to fitness.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
176 Posts
For a newer person to a sport, I'd be willing to bet that the zones for formula based on a MHR of 170 are more accurate than for a conditioned athlete such as yourself. Clearly the MHR formula is just an estimate and not applicable to those who are well-trained. Either way, the zones based off of the formula are roughly equivalent and would probably result in satisfactory training even for a conditioned athlete.
#19
Senior Member
Riding hills doesn't necessarily mean it's HIIT...HIIT is basically 10-30 seconds of an all out max effort
(eg: sprinting) followed by 20-60 seconds of rest and then repeat that for a few sets...You can ride hills all day and not even come close to anaerobic threshold...The intensity of real HIT is so high that it's impossible to continue for longer then 30 seconds...If your efforts are closer to 1 minute or longer then you're just doing aerobic work and not HIT.
(eg: sprinting) followed by 20-60 seconds of rest and then repeat that for a few sets...You can ride hills all day and not even come close to anaerobic threshold...The intensity of real HIT is so high that it's impossible to continue for longer then 30 seconds...If your efforts are closer to 1 minute or longer then you're just doing aerobic work and not HIT.
#20
Ride On!
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 971
Bikes: Allez DSW SL Sprint | Fuji Cross
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 227 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Sorry for hijacking the thread. I'm a fan of perceived rate of exertion anyway, personally...I just track heart rate and review my own graphs after activity for fun I guess.
#21
Senior Member
Riding hills doesn't necessarily mean it's HIIT...HIIT is basically 10-30 seconds of an all out max effort
(eg: sprinting) followed by 20-60 seconds of rest and then repeat that for a few sets...You can ride hills all day and not even come close to anaerobic threshold...The intensity of real HIT is so high that it's impossible to continue for longer then 30 seconds...If your efforts are closer to 1 minute or longer then you're just doing aerobic work and not HIT.
(eg: sprinting) followed by 20-60 seconds of rest and then repeat that for a few sets...You can ride hills all day and not even come close to anaerobic threshold...The intensity of real HIT is so high that it's impossible to continue for longer then 30 seconds...If your efforts are closer to 1 minute or longer then you're just doing aerobic work and not HIT.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2933 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
224 Posts
How else would one estimate their MHR?
There's one way to receive an actual value and that involves a cardiologist.
EDIT: Seems like an easy and a practical method to base your .65-.85 MHR, or .60-.70, .70-.80, .80-.90, and .90-100 off of to me. If there's some other way to calculate those and at least arrive somewhere in the ballpark, I'm all for learning it.
There's one way to receive an actual value and that involves a cardiologist.
EDIT: Seems like an easy and a practical method to base your .65-.85 MHR, or .60-.70, .70-.80, .80-.90, and .90-100 off of to me. If there's some other way to calculate those and at least arrive somewhere in the ballpark, I'm all for learning it.
#23
Senior Member
I can only go by feeling. I can go as hard as I can on flat for 30-60 seconds. My legs give out first. I can get going so fast and try to keep up 30 or so MPH on flat for so long before I can't utilize my legs to keep it up any more. I don't know what my heart rate is doing. I can only judge what it feels like by comparing it to riding a hill.
Riding hills, so far there isn't a hill I can't climb, but I haven't tried any of the extreme grades in Pittsburgh yet (a coworker rode one of the dirty dozen hills last weekend and came back in shock over the steepness.) I am overweight and don't climb them fast, but on 16-18% I can tell you, my legs will grind up it slow but steady until I get to the top but my heart rate is screaming in my ears and I am dang near at my limit for breathing. I can tell, riding up a steep hill, it is definitely far more taxing on my heart rate and respiratory system than 30-60 seconds of all out sprinting on flat and the duration lasts far longer than doing HIIT sprints as it may take me 10 minutes or more to climb up a hill. Last big hill I climbed had 17.9% max, half a mile in length, and took me 15 minutes to climb up. That's the hardest I felt my heart and respiratory working since the very beginning when I started riding on the road with hills.
Riding hills, so far there isn't a hill I can't climb, but I haven't tried any of the extreme grades in Pittsburgh yet (a coworker rode one of the dirty dozen hills last weekend and came back in shock over the steepness.) I am overweight and don't climb them fast, but on 16-18% I can tell you, my legs will grind up it slow but steady until I get to the top but my heart rate is screaming in my ears and I am dang near at my limit for breathing. I can tell, riding up a steep hill, it is definitely far more taxing on my heart rate and respiratory system than 30-60 seconds of all out sprinting on flat and the duration lasts far longer than doing HIIT sprints as it may take me 10 minutes or more to climb up a hill. Last big hill I climbed had 17.9% max, half a mile in length, and took me 15 minutes to climb up. That's the hardest I felt my heart and respiratory working since the very beginning when I started riding on the road with hills.
#24
Non omnino gravis
I don't delve too deep into it, but I consider any portion of my rides done above LTHR to be high intensity, and going up hills is pretty much the only way for me to get above LTHR for any period of time. I have a hill segment I repeat now and again, a roughly 2-mile square which ascends 150 feet in 0.4 miles, then descends over the remaining 1.5 miles back to the start, where I do it again. The climb comes in under 2 minutes when pushing it, and I go as hard as I can. The descent is usually long enough to recover for the next climb.
The thing about MHR dropping definitely seems to be happening to me. A few months back, I hit 184bpm twice in one ride. Lately, getting above even 170bpm is quite rare. Most days will have a peak of 166-168bpm, even when perceived effort is wide open and I feel like breakfast/lunch might be coming back for a second visit.
The thing about MHR dropping definitely seems to be happening to me. A few months back, I hit 184bpm twice in one ride. Lately, getting above even 170bpm is quite rare. Most days will have a peak of 166-168bpm, even when perceived effort is wide open and I feel like breakfast/lunch might be coming back for a second visit.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 26,874
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15645 Post(s)
Liked 3,111 Times
in
2,317 Posts
I think it all depends on the hills, and how you approach them.
I hit a couple of hill climb rides last weekend (about 30 out of 50 miles each day).
https://ridewithgps.com/ambassador_r...est-portlandia
https://ridewithgps.com/ambassador_r...ost-portlandia
They may not look like much, but there are a lot of 10% hills mixed in. And those jagged edges on elevations shouldn't be ignored.
And, for those that rode the 20% slopes, they were nothing but HIGH INTENSITY, especially if you hit them at moderately high gearing. I think I hit them at 39/23 which threw me over the top.
One thing, if you use Strava, with or without a power meter, it should give you some idea of the watts.
At least for an amateur rider, hit the slopes at 300W, and it is a pretty decent workout. Hit them at 400-500W, and it is a really good workout.
I hit a couple of hill climb rides last weekend (about 30 out of 50 miles each day).
https://ridewithgps.com/ambassador_r...est-portlandia
https://ridewithgps.com/ambassador_r...ost-portlandia
They may not look like much, but there are a lot of 10% hills mixed in. And those jagged edges on elevations shouldn't be ignored.
And, for those that rode the 20% slopes, they were nothing but HIGH INTENSITY, especially if you hit them at moderately high gearing. I think I hit them at 39/23 which threw me over the top.
One thing, if you use Strava, with or without a power meter, it should give you some idea of the watts.
At least for an amateur rider, hit the slopes at 300W, and it is a pretty decent workout. Hit them at 400-500W, and it is a really good workout.