Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

The Ongoing Destruction of the Sheldon Brown Repository

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

The Ongoing Destruction of the Sheldon Brown Repository

Reply

Old 07-22-16, 04:33 PM
  #1  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,662
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1055 Post(s)
The Ongoing Destruction of the Sheldon Brown Repository

Is it me or has the ongoing annotation, expansion and occasionally re-purpose, of the Sheldon Brown bicycle encyclopedia reaching a critical mass? Does anyone else think that John Allen and John Schubert should just start their own bicycle encyclopedias and leave Mr. Brown's intellectual property unchallenged out of respect to Mr. Brown's unmatched breadth of knowledge and website administration. Wikipedia would quickly become unusable if every new editor used their own byline in an attempt to one up the original author. Allen and Schubert afix their own bylines to every edit and new entry they make and appear to be on a quest to completely re-make the site into their own creation. I ask because, and I've searched, I don't see any reaction to this ... desecration... it's not too strong a word, in my opinion.
Leisesturm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-16, 05:21 PM
  #2  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 10,636

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4942 Post(s)
Desecration? Now you have canonized Sheldon Brown and made him a saint, and made his writings Holy Writ?

I think Sheldon Brown's original idea was to have a repository of information--a single site--where fellow enthusiasts could learn as much as he could share.

it seems very much Not in keeping with his idea, to have several different sites ... particularly because the cycling industry advances and so quickly, in ten years most of Sheldon Brown's material will only be helpful to C&V enthusiasts.

I don't see any indication that Sheldon brown wanted to be deified ... want to be the "One True Source." He posted material from and shared credit with other writers while he was alive---why would he or any object if that continued to be the case?

As for "an attempt to one up the original author" that tells us something about you. How is posting more recent and more accurate information a challenge to Sheldon Brown? Do you think Sheldon Brown wouldn't have posted the same info had he not died?

What you are doing by attempting to deify Sheldon Brown will render him irrelevant ... in ten years know one will know he ever existed because no one will bother reading the outdated info on his site---which means cyclists also won't read all the very relevant info on his site, because they will go to the sites with the latest information.

Your attempt to save Sheldon Brown as a Holy Cycling Resource will kill his site.
Maelochs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-16, 06:19 PM
  #3  
jfowler85
Senior Member
 
jfowler85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Zinj
Posts: 1,839

Bikes: '93 911 Turbo 3.6

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Last I checked Sheldon is not a venerated saint.
jfowler85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-16, 06:23 PM
  #4  
OldTryGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 4,170

Bikes: 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 592 Post(s)
Seriously????
OldTryGuy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-16, 06:48 PM
  #5  
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 10,699

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 807 Post(s)
Sheldon Brown's knowledge of bicycling was encyclopedic, but he wasn't prescient. He didn't write about any developments that came along after his death.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-16, 06:49 PM
  #6  
martianone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern VT
Posts: 2,107

Bikes: recumbent & upright

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Having met and talked with Sheldon a few times, he certainly had a huge knowledge base that he was happy to share. He also listened to and credited other sources. His site is a testament to his efforts. Like any other information resource, it needs to continue to evolve and grow. While I personally might not prefer the course and direction of his old site, IMHO - it's survival is predicated on that evolution.
martianone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-16, 06:54 PM
  #7  
FBOATSB 
Senior Member
 
FBOATSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,440

Bikes: Old Schwinns for now

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 521 Post(s)
They're just words on the web, ethereal at best. While Sheldon Brown has benefited me greatly as the beginner I am, I'm still thirsty.
FBOATSB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-16, 09:16 PM
  #8  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 9,336

Bikes: '15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, '76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, '17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, '12 Breezer Venturi, '09 Dahon Mariner, '05 Novara Big Buzz, '12 Mercier Nano, '95 DeKerf Team

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1026 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Maelochs View Post
Desecration? Now you have canonized Sheldon Brown and made him a saint, and made his writings Holy Writ?

I think Sheldon Brown's original idea was to have a repository of information--a single site--where fellow enthusiasts could learn as much as he could share.

it seems very much Not in keeping with his idea, to have several different sites ... particularly because the cycling industry advances and so quickly, in ten years most of Sheldon Brown's material will only be helpful to C&V enthusiasts.

I don't see any indication that Sheldon brown wanted to be deified ... want to be the "One True Source." He posted material from and shared credit with other writers while he was alive---why would he or any object if that continued to be the case?

As for "an attempt to one up the original author" that tells us something about you. How is posting more recent and more accurate information a challenge to Sheldon Brown? Do you think Sheldon Brown wouldn't have posted the same info had he not died?

What you are doing by attempting to deify Sheldon Brown will render him irrelevant ... in ten years know one will know he ever existed because no one will bother reading the outdated info on his site---which means cyclists also won't read all the very relevant info on his site, because they will go to the sites with the latest information.

Your attempt to save Sheldon Brown as a Holy Cycling Resource will kill his site.
Well said!
chaadster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-16, 09:31 PM
  #9  
jefnvk
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,084

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3492 Post(s)
Meh, it's nice to have insight that has arisen after his death all in the same location as his brilliance.
jefnvk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-16, 06:04 AM
  #10  
qcpmsame
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,243
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Those that have said Sheldon was a source of immense bicycle knowledge, but he was human are spot on correct. I think he would be fine with the men that have assumed the upkeep, and their updating of the site is just what he had wanted done with his work.

The fact they have their names at, or following anything they add, or change, gives credence to their work in that it gives an identification to who was publishing it, and not presenting it as Sheldon's work. this way, it can stand, or fail, as their product and not from Sheldon. That would seem to be good practice, to me.

Nothing is really lost about what the site is, and was to cycling, by their work at the new, or corrected material. Sheldon was well versed in academic or professional publications from his wife's, and his children's own work in their respective fields. I think he would approve of their methods. You may agree, or disagree as you see fit.

Bill
qcpmsame is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-16, 06:25 AM
  #11  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 19,902

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 91 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1495 Post(s)
Sheldon collaborated with many people, including me, to produce the content on his site. I don't see that Allen and Schubert are doing anything Sheldon would disapprove of, or different from what Sheldon himself might have done to keep the pages up to date and relevant. It's not a shrine, after all; it's a knowledge base and needs to change with time.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-16, 06:31 AM
  #12  
Moe Zhoost
Half way there
 
Moe Zhoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,096

Bikes: 72 Raleigh Super Course (daily commuter), 1973 Raleigh Sports, 1974 Raleigh Competition, 1976 Nishiki Professional, 1977 Nishiki International, 1983 Colnago Super, 90s Bianchi Eros (conversion to 650B in progress), 2010 ICE Trike

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
To build upon the foundation he so nicely laid is the best way to respect Mr. Brown's contribution to our collective knowledge.
Moe Zhoost is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-16, 06:36 AM
  #13  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 27,375

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
Allen and Schubert afix their own bylines to every edit and new entry they make and appear to be on a quest to completely re-make the site into their own creation. I ask because, and I've searched, I don't see any reaction to this ... desecration... it's not too strong a word, in my opinion.
I am not aware of their quest to re-make Sheldon Brown's website. Are they inserting edits, opinions and articles that reflect their long time close association with John Forester and his/their Vehicular Cycling Agenda? Or is it something else?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-16, 06:53 AM
  #14  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 11,847

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
I am not aware of their quest to re-make Sheldon Brown's website. Are they inserting edits, opinions and articles that reflect their long time close association with John Forester and his/their Vehicular Cycling Agenda? Or is it something else?
I haven't searched the whole site looking for vehicular cycling stuff, but I also haven't come across any whenever I've visited. I think this is an example of the 'destruction' the OP is concerned about: Derailer Adjustment

And perhaps this is leaning too far away from Sheldon's style (I think it's relevant information but that's me): Cycle Sense: Why Reflectors Don't Work
joejack951 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-16, 07:26 PM
  #15  
velonomad
Older I get, Better I was
 
velonomad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Greenfield Lake, Wilmington NC
Posts: 1,764

Bikes: '14 BD Lurch Fatbike, '10 homemade road,'03 homemade tourer, '94 Yokota Tandem, '88 homemade MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Originally Posted by joejack951 View Post
If there is a hell, Mine will be spending eternity locked in a room with Shubert, Allen and Forester droning on about bicycle safety
velonomad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 08:39 AM
  #16  
pdlamb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 4,854

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Leisesturm View Post
Is it me or has the ongoing annotation, expansion and occasionally re-purpose, of the Sheldon Brown bicycle encyclopedia reaching a critical mass?

Notwithstanding the points others have made that web sites aren't holy writ, I hit this point a few years ago. I was re-checking some point or other, and what was on "Sheldon's" site wasn't at all what I remembered. After scratching my head for a few minutes (Was I remembering things that wrong??), I noticed the re-write attribution. At that point I hit the wayback machine -- the re-write had violently changed the meaning of Sheldon's writing.


I haven't been back. Except for the gearing calculator.


If someone wants to make a real change in keeping up with technology, I'd certainly appreciate an update to Spocalc. The new models of hubs and rims have to be looked up individually, often over multiple sites, which really impacts the utility of the Spocalc calculator, IMHO.
pdlamb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 08:50 AM
  #17  
Spoonrobot 
Senior Member
 
Spoonrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,959
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 861 Post(s)
Originally Posted by pdlamb View Post
Notwithstanding the points others have made that web sites aren't holy writ, I hit this point a few years ago. I was re-checking some point or other, and what was on "Sheldon's" site wasn't at all what I remembered. After scratching my head for a few minutes (Was I remembering things that wrong??), I noticed the re-write attribution. At that point I hit the wayback machine -- the re-write had violently changed the meaning of Sheldon's writing.
Hit us with a link man, hard to judge what you can't see.
Spoonrobot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 08:57 AM
  #18  
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 29,063

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals View Post
Sheldon Brown's knowledge of bicycling was encyclopedic, but he wasn't prescient. He didn't write about any developments that came along after his death.
Even while he was still alive. I once posted that something on his site wasn't correct. He posted back that I was right and that his site was so large that he couldn't keep it updated.

I've posted a couple of times that, even though it's a simple machine, the world of bicycling technology is expanding faster than I can keep up with. For example, this year Mrs. Grouch and I have both acquired recumbent tricycles with our first 10-speed cassettes. Now 11-speed cassettes are available but (I think) a different rear derailleur is necessary. Mountain bike suspension technology is another whole universe that i know almost nothing about.

I've reached the point at which the more confident a bike mechanic is that he knows everything, the more I question his ability.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 10:20 AM
  #19  
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 38,890

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5997 Post(s)
IDK about any where else, Mr Allen has updated, added, to the gears calculator list
products released after St Sheldon's death.
fietsbob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 10:39 AM
  #20  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,662
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1055 Post(s)
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson View Post
Sheldon collaborated with many people, including me, to produce the content on his site. I don't see that Allen and Schubert are doing anything Sheldon would disapprove of, or different from what Sheldon himself might have done to keep the pages up to date and relevant. It's not a shrine, after all; it's a knowledge base and needs to change with time.
Then just do it. The way information is updated, corrected, and expanded on every other kind of encyclopedia platform... without ego gratification. I am not deifying Sheldon, but he was, one has to admit, one of a kind. Attempting to copy his style, humor or approach just looks churlish to me. To do it on the very site he created... well I've had my say about what I think of that.
Leisesturm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 10:40 AM
  #21  
San Rensho 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,653
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Sheldon is not a saint? Didnt he perform a miracle when he turned 3 speeds into 6 by adding another chainring to a SA 3speed hub?

He should at least be Beatified for his efforts.
San Rensho is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 12:03 PM
  #22  
AlexCyclistRoch
The Infractionator
 
AlexCyclistRoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,208

Bikes: Classic road bikes: 1986 Cannondale, 1978 Trek

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
Even while he was still alive. I once posted that something on his site wasn't correct. He posted back that I was right and that his site was so large that he couldn't keep it updated.

........
Many years ago, Sheldon and I had a disagreement on usenet. He said that my idea of doing half-step chainrings "would_not_work" because the gap between the tooth areas would be wide enough for my 6-speed chain to get jammed in between them. I proved in my answer by measuring different chain brands that the Shimano 6-sped chain of the period was just wide enough that this would not be a problem. In fact, I rode this bike for many years without issue, as has the guy who bought it from me.

Sheldon did a lot, but he was not infallible, nor was he eligible for beatification. If you want to keep a holy shrine to his memory, post one online, and copy his old pages for posterity.
AlexCyclistRoch is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 12:15 PM
  #23  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 20,625
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7464 Post(s)
Originally Posted by San Rensho View Post
Sheldon is not a saint? Didnt he perform a miracle when he turned 3 speeds into 6 by adding another chainring to a SA 3speed hub?

And when he turned water into chain lube.
indyfabz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-16, 12:18 PM
  #24  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 11,847

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Originally Posted by indyfabz View Post
And when he turned water into chain lube.
And when he filled 1000s of MS Ride cyclists' tires from a single CO2 canister.
joejack951 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service