Are you limited by frame size forever?
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are you limited by frame size forever?
I was told by a bike shop employee who I tested out some bikes in the store with told me since because I had a bit of a longer torso at 5'7" that I'd need a 46cm after we tried the 52cm, and it was too large. 50cm was pushing on my sack as well, and dude said the geometry of my body didn't seem right on it. There wasn't a 48cm there to test. 46cm was next, and he said it looked good as far as my positioning on the bike, plus I had some room in between my legs when I was standing over the bike.
I don't really like the idea of paying 150 coin to get a fitting done, so my question is - if I go with the 46cm that looked good to the naked eye of the employee, can adjustments of the saddle, handlebars and stem be made later to dial it in perfectly? Or am I doing myself a disservice by not just forking over the money to get a pro fit, and 46cm may not be the sweet spot?
Basically what I'm asking is, is the actual frame size the most important factor? Or is just getting a frame size that I can stand over comfortably work and what's most important are the finer adjustments of the saddle and stem? I just don't want to waste money and be hurting/injured later.
Thanks
I don't really like the idea of paying 150 coin to get a fitting done, so my question is - if I go with the 46cm that looked good to the naked eye of the employee, can adjustments of the saddle, handlebars and stem be made later to dial it in perfectly? Or am I doing myself a disservice by not just forking over the money to get a pro fit, and 46cm may not be the sweet spot?
Basically what I'm asking is, is the actual frame size the most important factor? Or is just getting a frame size that I can stand over comfortably work and what's most important are the finer adjustments of the saddle and stem? I just don't want to waste money and be hurting/injured later.
Thanks
Last edited by likewater; 10-28-16 at 12:38 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,235
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18411 Post(s)
Liked 15,531 Times
in
7,327 Posts
What was the size of the bike you bought and returned?
And a 46cm at 5'7"? My GF is 5' even and rides a 42cm touring bike.
I smell something.
And a 46cm at 5'7"? My GF is 5' even and rides a 42cm touring bike.
I smell something.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,706
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5779 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
There's plenty of room to adjust saddles on modern bikes. In fact there's MUCH more room than in the days of horizontal top tubes and 250mm posts. This allows you to consider a shorter frame without worry about limited handlebar height. So, the 2cm difference saddle height is meaningless.
What may matter more is the height at the front, which determines the range of handlebar heights, and the overall length. Generally (but not always) taller frames are slightly longer saddle to stem. Frame length and handlebar height are also adjustable by changing the stem, but having them properly fitted helps ensure that your position is properly centered with stems in the normal range.
In your shoes, if a 50cm was snug, I'd probably skip the 48 and go with the 46 because there's no reason to work so close to something you know is wrong. OTOH id the 50 was kind of OK, though a bit high, then the 48 might make sense.
I'm not a proponent of paid for fittings for mot people, but if the hop offers the option, you might ask for an abbreviated version for free as part of the buy the bike deal. However, as I said, there's plenty of room to adjust, and fitting isn't a complex rocket science.
What may matter more is the height at the front, which determines the range of handlebar heights, and the overall length. Generally (but not always) taller frames are slightly longer saddle to stem. Frame length and handlebar height are also adjustable by changing the stem, but having them properly fitted helps ensure that your position is properly centered with stems in the normal range.
In your shoes, if a 50cm was snug, I'd probably skip the 48 and go with the 46 because there's no reason to work so close to something you know is wrong. OTOH id the 50 was kind of OK, though a bit high, then the 48 might make sense.
I'm not a proponent of paid for fittings for mot people, but if the hop offers the option, you might ask for an abbreviated version for free as part of the buy the bike deal. However, as I said, there's plenty of room to adjust, and fitting isn't a complex rocket science.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Standover height means literally nothing.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,901
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,928 Times
in
1,210 Posts
Is there another bike shop that'll do a bit more work to fit you to a bike near you?
Or is there another model or style you might look into?
There's a lot of variation between models as far as effective top tube length for a given "size" (=seat tube length). And if you're just getting into cycling, it's worth looking for a (free) second opinion before you plunk down the credit card.
Or is there another model or style you might look into?
There's a lot of variation between models as far as effective top tube length for a given "size" (=seat tube length). And if you're just getting into cycling, it's worth looking for a (free) second opinion before you plunk down the credit card.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
You're in the negotiating process of buying a new bike. Broadening the negotiating process is always a good tactic.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#7
Banned
What kind of cycling you do and what type of bike you want to ride doing it,
Seems a secret you dont want to share, so IDK what to say.
'/,
Seems a secret you dont want to share, so IDK what to say.
'/,
#8
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Any shop that wants to sell you a bike should be able to make a few measurements in 5 or 10 minutes that will at least get you in a general direction of a good fit (or eliminate bad fitting options). I also have the problem of having short legs for my height, which makes finding a good fit hard. Before I got a custom frame, I would have to choose between too short a top tube and too high a seat tube. (Standover height does mean something if you haven't yet had children.)
#9
glorified 5954
Yeah. 5 foot 7 inch on a 47? What is your inseam? Also stand straight and measure from your foot bottom to middle hip bone. What is that measurement? What bike have you been fitted on?
I am 5 foot 9 inch and I ride a 54, but I also ride a 56 and a 60... I modified the stem lengths or saddle positions and they are all very comfortable. FYI, i have a longer torso than legs so I like a longer top tube.
But yeah, I would hit up another bike shop. Try a totally different bike and get another opinion.
I am 5 foot 9 inch and I ride a 54, but I also ride a 56 and a 60... I modified the stem lengths or saddle positions and they are all very comfortable. FYI, i have a longer torso than legs so I like a longer top tube.
But yeah, I would hit up another bike shop. Try a totally different bike and get another opinion.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Tucson Az
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: 2015 Ridley Fenix, 1983 Team Fuji, 2019 Marin Nail Trail 6
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
137 Posts
I'm the same height and body style, and I don't pay much attention to standover height. Yeah, I want to be able to stand flat footed in my shoes without suffering damage to the boys, but I'm much more concerned with how the bike fits while I'm riding.
I've been on enough bikes with the "proper" standover height to know when I'm riding, I'm going to feel like I'm riding a clown bike.
I've been on enough bikes with the "proper" standover height to know when I'm riding, I'm going to feel like I'm riding a clown bike.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
51 Posts
Yeah. 5 foot 7 inch on a 47? What is your inseam? Also stand straight and measure from your foot bottom to middle hip bone. What is that measurement? What bike have you been fitted on?
I am 5 foot 9 inch and I ride a 54, but I also ride a 56 and a 60... I modified the stem lengths or saddle positions and they are all very comfortable. FYI, i have a longer torso than legs so I like a longer top tube.
I am 5 foot 9 inch and I ride a 54, but I also ride a 56 and a 60... I modified the stem lengths or saddle positions and they are all very comfortable. FYI, i have a longer torso than legs so I like a longer top tube.
You spend hours hunched over the TT, seconds standing over it, which measurement is really more important to you?
#14
NYC
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times
in
62 Posts
A longer stem and set back seat post is a lot easier than the reverse.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,706
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5779 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
Most frames use the same angle seat tube for all frame sizes, except sometimes for the smallest. Since the seat post is simply an extension of the seat tube, the saddle position will be identical whether achieved with a long post on a short frame or with a short post on a tall frame.
Other than top tube height and stepover clearance (where it's a factor) the more significant effect of frame size is head tube height at the stem, and overall length if length is proportioned, which isn't always the case.
Folks get overly wrought about small differences in frame size, but for most people, just being in the right ballpark is all that matters, then they may decide based on the secondary considerations of head height and effective (horizontal) top tube length.
Using that theory, short leg/long torso people may do better with a frame size at the high end of the acceptable range, and long leg/ short torso folks the opposite.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#17
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The middle of nowhere, the center of everywhere!
Posts: 48
Bikes: 1998 GT Avalanche, Zunow Z-1, 1985/86 Gitane Professional, 1980 Raleigh Team, 1980 Apollo Gran Tour, 1937 Durkopp road racer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5' 7" on a 46cm bike? I hope you're wearing lipstick for the salesman, cause you're getting f*#%@d.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
#20
Standard Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,268
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times
in
490 Posts
I can't see a 50cm frame being a problem for you if you are 5'7". Either a 50 or a 52.
I ride a frame that gives me no standover, but is perfect when I ride. Like Jefn, I am 5'9.5" and my seat tube is a 58 and top tube 57. It's awesome. Try something bigger than 46cm. Did you ride the one that was 46?
I ride a frame that gives me no standover, but is perfect when I ride. Like Jefn, I am 5'9.5" and my seat tube is a 58 and top tube 57. It's awesome. Try something bigger than 46cm. Did you ride the one that was 46?
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
Every frame is different, every manufacturer measures its frames a little differently, and every body is different, even if every measurement seems identical. I don't say "I ride a 56" or "I ride a 58" because I can fit on a number of different frame sizes ... but it really does change bike to bike.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
So you are saying that if you stand over the 50cm bike that you cannot lift both wheels from the ground without it being hard against your pubic bone?
Usually these weird new fangled "compact" frames with the odd sloped top tubes can accommodate people with odd body proportions a little more easily that traditional level top tube bikes.
The top tube is the more important measurement.
J
Usually these weird new fangled "compact" frames with the odd sloped top tubes can accommodate people with odd body proportions a little more easily that traditional level top tube bikes.
The top tube is the more important measurement.
J
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
The opposite would be true if I were more flexible, aggressive, and concerned with speed rather than just enjoying the ride. - I'd probably opt for the shorter/smaller bike if the two were in the ball park.
But I have no idea what advice to give the OP since he's just using frame size, which may or may not (I haven't read the whole thread) indicate anything other than the manufacturer's way of labeling frames. It doesn't tell us the ETT, HT, or even the seat tube lenght (it could be a compact type frame or a horizontal TT frame - and a "50" would be night and day difference in size, depending).
If we knew his cycling inseam and the two bikes' ETT and HT length, and least important, standover, we might be able to advise. A competent bike salesman should be communicating to him in those terms.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree, but just to clarify a detail.
Most frames use the same angle seat tube for all frame sizes, except sometimes for the smallest. Since the seat post is simply an extension of the seat tube, the saddle position will be identical whether achieved with a long post on a short frame or with a short post on a tall frame.
Other than top tube height and stepover clearance (where it's a factor) the more significant effect of frame size is head tube height at the stem, and overall length if length is proportioned, which isn't always the case.
Folks get overly wrought about small differences in frame size, but for most people, just being in the right ballpark is all that matters, then they may decide based on the secondary considerations of head height and effective (horizontal) top tube length.
Using that theory, short leg/long torso people may do better with a frame size at the high end of the acceptable range, and long leg/ short torso folks the opposite.
Most frames use the same angle seat tube for all frame sizes, except sometimes for the smallest. Since the seat post is simply an extension of the seat tube, the saddle position will be identical whether achieved with a long post on a short frame or with a short post on a tall frame.
Other than top tube height and stepover clearance (where it's a factor) the more significant effect of frame size is head tube height at the stem, and overall length if length is proportioned, which isn't always the case.
Folks get overly wrought about small differences in frame size, but for most people, just being in the right ballpark is all that matters, then they may decide based on the secondary considerations of head height and effective (horizontal) top tube length.
Using that theory, short leg/long torso people may do better with a frame size at the high end of the acceptable range, and long leg/ short torso folks the opposite.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Likewater, your post had a few responses. Now let's hear your response to the response. Sounds like a voter's guide?