![]() |
Originally Posted by JNV
(Post 19514283)
Hi Everyone, new here.
I have some novice bike questions. My husband and I want to do some light bike riding together, lots of paved trails where we live and maybe a dirt path occasionally. We don't know what kind of bike to get, I read that hybrids would be good for this kind of riding but when we went to a shop they suggested for us Giant Roam and Rove. My understanding is these have front suspension as opposed to none that you would lock it out on pavement and unlock for mild terrain. Some of the threads I read were talking about the extra weight and people suggested the suspension was mediocre/unecessary for light dirt paths, grass, etc. and that upkeep was more. Can I get some thoughts on this? Should we consider a regular hybrid without the suspension? Our price range is at the entry level, we are comfortable in the $400 range (each) Thanks Edit: maybe I am confused, the Rove 3 it says LIV? Is that the same as Giant? The suspension debate is a hotly contested one and thankfully therealjoeblow has shown up to offer some good insights into suspension forks. However in chosing between suspension and non-suspension forked bikes, it isn't always so easy to do an Apples to Apples comparison. If you want to compare a Trek FX to a Giant Roam, you need to be mindful of a few things. Yes the Trek FX is 5 or so pounds lighter, but it also comes with narrower tyres and does not have disc brakes. The Roam has a stronger frame than the Trek FX, not because the Trek FX is weak, but because the Roam is strong and may even be overbuilt for your needs. I'm not sure how old you and your husband are, but you might appreciate the wider tyres and suspension of the Roam whilst you get back into cycling, as the vibrations and bumps take a few weeks to start getting use to. If your husband is going to be doing trails, I would go with the Roam for him, for sure. |
Originally Posted by one4smoke
(Post 19515011)
Even though we're both fighting the good fight here, I'll have to disagree with you there. In my experience, being locked out (suspension frozen) when climbing is essential. I can tell a big difference in efficiency when it's not. As many hills as I encounter here in Tennessee, I would constantly be switching it back and forth. So, it's better for me to leave it off until absolutely necessary to have it on.
Cheers TRJB |
Originally Posted by ColonelSanders
(Post 19515105)
Firstly, "Liv" is Giant's female oriented line of bikes and they are built to the same quality as the men's range, which just go by the name of Giant.
The suspension debate is a hotly contested one and thankfully therealjoeblow has shown up to offer some good insights into suspension forks. However in chosing between suspension and non-suspension forked bikes, it isn't always so easy to do an Apples to Apples comparison. If you want to compare a Trek FX to a Giant Roam, you need to be mindful of a few things. Yes the Trek FX is 5 or so pounds lighter, but it also comes with narrower tyres and does not have disc brakes. The Roam has a stronger frame than the Trek FX, not because the Trek FX is weak, but because the Roam is strong and may even be overbuilt for your needs. I'm not sure how old you and your husband are, but you might appreciate the wider tyres and suspension of the Roam whilst you get back into cycling, as the vibrations and bumps take a few weeks to start getting use to. If your husband is going to be doing trails, I would go with the Roam for him, for sure. Cheers TRJB |
I would say weigh the pros of cons of each And what you want to get out of this bike. Crappy suspension is still suspension and will make for much less jarring ride over bumps especially for beginer rider that hasn't learned to handle bumps. With shocks youll beable to run higher psi on pavement over bumps to acually go faster. My first serious bike was trek fx (shockless hybrid) and it was not great on the bumpy recreation paths I was riding it on should have had a dual sport type bike. Then I starting riding it in the road and it was amazing the end. You prob want to consider type of terrain if it's pretty bad get wider tires or suspension. Narrow tires are best for pavement
|
After all our answers they probably decided to get a canoe instead :lol:
|
Canoe forums probably as bad. Wood vs fiberglass fights daily
|
Originally Posted by Crawdaddy
(Post 19515555)
Canoe forums probably as bad. Wood vs fiberglass fights daily
|
What about wood and canvas? What about dugouts?
|
Originally Posted by bikingtotown
(Post 19515407)
After all our answers they probably decided to get a canoe instead :lol:
Best comment ever... :p What an awesome forum. |
So wow, that's great Info. You guys are so helpful, as I expected.
The YouTube videos are great, I love that. So many things I didn't think of.... Now you all have me thinking about what kind of seat the bike has, but I guess that's easy to change right? I do want something comfy. I'm deffinatetly not affraid to "ride" the bike, I wont be whining if I hit a bump. Even so, watching the video even just with the guy going over speed bumps and what not the suspension looked nice. And then am I understanding correctly you have to adjust it? That guy called it "Sag"? Another concern is the maintenance, how often do you have to oil it or whatever it needs? I'm going to look at some of those other suggestions too (a fixed fork, is that how you call it?) Just a little extra so you understand our needs, we are mid 30's, live in Las Vegas. We have a ton of paved paths, again if we did dirt it would be probably be pretty smooth or desert like. I like the idea of different size tires or adjusting the air, I never would have though of that. Our riding will be part exercise/activity and recreational, I could see us taking a trip to Sedona or places like that with them. Possibly a little trailer for some kiddo's down the road. I think we may be leaning towards no suspension based on the variety of suggestions, is it normal to test ride some bikes? I guess it's only logical it's just a little intimidating all those brand spanking new ones I didn't even think to ask. They did not have the Giants they recommend in stock anyway so we would have to go back and test something similar..... |
Originally Posted by ColonelSanders
(Post 19515105)
Firstly, "Liv" is Giant's female oriented line of bikes and they are built to the same quality as the men's range, which just go by the name of Giant.
The suspension debate is a hotly contested one and thankfully therealjoeblow has shown up to offer some good insights into suspension forks. However in chosing between suspension and non-suspension forked bikes, it isn't always so easy to do an Apples to Apples comparison. If you want to compare a Trek FX to a Giant Roam, you need to be mindful of a few things. Yes the Trek FX is 5 or so pounds lighter, but it also comes with narrower tyres and does not have disc brakes. The Roam has a stronger frame than the Trek FX, not because the Trek FX is weak, but because the Roam is strong and may even be overbuilt for your needs. I'm not sure how old you and your husband are, but you might appreciate the wider tyres and suspension of the Roam whilst you get back into cycling, as the vibrations and bumps take a few weeks to start getting use to. If your husband is going to be doing trails, I would go with the Roam for him, for sure. When you consider the price point is a lower quality suspension, what are the main problems you would notice compaired to a higher end? |
Originally Posted by Crawdaddy
(Post 19515555)
Canoe forums probably as bad. Wood vs fiberglass fights daily
I'm sure it's so true. I understand how many times you guys have probably taken on these same questions. I'm a moderator on a Parrot forum so I'm used to hearing the same things over and over too. Thanks for putting up with yet another noob. :D |
Originally Posted by linberl
(Post 19514813)
+1 on the general advice about not needing shocks for your use. Be aware that shops will sell you what they have. So try some other bike shops.
You can go with wide lower pressure tires and probably get the same effect as a cheap shock with little of the added weight or maintenance. Also, padded bike gloves and a sprung seat or brooks work well if you ride bumpy paths. The advantage in using tires/gloves/seat to address any vibration or bumps in your case, is that it is easily replaced or removed after you have some experience with that bike. Things like tires and seats are already stock right or do you have options? I guess what I'm getting at is would changing that stuff require add on? I know we're already going to want to customize little things anyway like lights or what not. |
Originally Posted by bikingtotown
(Post 19514321)
It's kind of a matter of preference. Do you want to use tires/upper body strength for suspension and have a faster more agile bike.. or be more comfortable over bumps in arm/ shoulders ? Still gonna feel bumps in tail of bike anyways. I personally avoid suspension on my bikes because I do t ride crazy trails and I like a fast lively ride
|
Ok I just told a peak at the Sedona. Not gonna lie, that bike looks cushy comfy. :o
A few things though, it dosent appear to have a lock out, and seems a little less specific with the brakes and gear shifting than the Rove. I've never seen a bike without the top bar it looks funny (the Sedona) Mostly i think though it's the seat i like. My but hurts a little just looking at the seat on the Rove 3. How hard is that to change? Still thinking of no-shock options just haven't gotten that far yet. |
Originally Posted by JNV
(Post 19516370)
Ok I just told a peak at the Sedona. Not gonna lie, that bike looks cushy comfy. :o
A few things though, it dosent appear to have a lock out, and seems a little less specific with the brakes and gear shifting than the Rove. I've never seen a bike without the top bar it looks funny (the Sedona) Mostly i think though it's the seat i like. My but hurts a little just looking at the seat on the Rove 3. How hard is that to change? Still thinking of no-shock options just haven't gotten that far yet. Swapping saddles is one of the easiest jobs on a bike. A breeze. |
Originally Posted by JNV
(Post 19516370)
Ok I just told a peak at the Sedona. Not gonna lie, that bike looks cushy comfy. :o
A few things though, it dosent appear to have a lock out, and seems a little less specific with the brakes and gear shifting than the Rove. I've never seen a bike without the top bar it looks funny (the Sedona) Mostly i think though it's the seat i like. My but hurts a little just looking at the seat on the Rove 3. How hard is that to change? Still thinking of no-shock options just haven't gotten that far yet. In my opinion, you get the most bang for your buck with Giant bikes. I wouldn't be concerned with the saddle right now. Get you some padded cycling shorts instead and start riding. "Comfy" padded saddles aren't what they appear to be, and can be worse for you. |
Changing out the saddle isn't difficult at all, and you may even be able to get the LBS to swap out your saddle for take-offs of past bikes they've sold. Definitely go do test rides. Your local shops will let you try any of the bikes they sell which will give you a feel for what you want. Even if they don't have the exact bike you're looking for, you can get a feel for the difference between rigid fork and suspension, cruiser v. road bike v. hybrid, etc.
|
Originally Posted by JNV
(Post 19516355)
What would be the limit for terrain that the Roam can handle?
When you consider the price point is a lower quality suspension, what are the main problems you would notice compaired to a higher end? The functional criticism of the sort of suspension forks on the Roam are that if you were to get airborne to say a height of 30cm or more, that the Roam fork would bottom out upon impact and thus transmit a lot of vibration back your way, but plenty of people never ride like that in the first place. The below is a video that impressed me when I was looking at the Giant Toughroad SLR 2 that I ended up buying, and the Roam would arguably be able to handle this kind of riding even better than the Toughroad. |
Originally Posted by JNV
(Post 19516370)
Ok I just told a peak at the Sedona. Not gonna lie, that bike looks cushy comfy. :o
A few things though, it dosent appear to have a lock out, and seems a little less specific with the brakes and gear shifting than the Rove. I've never seen a bike without the top bar it looks funny (the Sedona) Mostly i think though it's the seat i like. My but hurts a little just looking at the seat on the Rove 3. How hard is that to change? Still thinking of no-shock options just haven't gotten that far yet. |
Originally Posted by JNV
(Post 19516359)
I actually wish they had them, but they weren't in store. I think everything in the shop was out of our price range.
Things like tires and seats are already stock right or do you have options? I guess what I'm getting at is would changing that stuff require add on? I know we're already going to want to customize little things anyway like lights or what not. |
Originally Posted by therealjoeblow
(Post 19515196)
I agree with [MENTION=364284]ColonelSanders[/MENTION], the Trek FX series is not a fair comparison to the Roam. It's a light-duty mostly road intended bike, much closer to the Giant Escape series. You would be better to compare the Giant Roam to the Giant Toughroad if you want to more comparable frame and component levels for suspension vs non. Both of those are heavier duty frames than the Trek FX or Giant Escape series. I don't know exactly what the Toughroad weighs compared to the Roam, but my guess is stock, it would be closer to the 2lb difference I noted.
Cheers TRJB I don't go airborne on my hybrids or gravel bike if I can help it, but I do ride non-technical single and double-track trails without issue. I'd probably put the fattest tires I could fit (I think my hybrids will accept 42's) if I were doing a lot of those types of trails, mostly for the float when I encounter sandy areas...those can be tricky when encountered at speed on skinny tires. |
Originally Posted by therealjoeblow
(Post 19514861)
Those are two totally different bikes, you can't attribute the whole 5lb difference to the shock... Please use some realistic logic here at least!
Cheers TRJB I'm not a weight weenie, but my fiancee has an aforementioned lower end name brand hybrid, and the amount of times her forks are unlocked are minimal. I wouldn't personally bother with suspension for such trails. That said, if I got a good deal on a suspension model, I wouldn't let it keep me from buying the bike either, it is just not something I am seeking out and would slightly prefer to not have. |
Originally Posted by Craptacular8
(Post 19517090)
I'd probably put the fattest tires I could fit (I think my hybrids will accept 42's) if I were doing a lot of those types of trails, mostly for the float when I encounter sandy areas...those can be tricky when encountered at speed on skinny tires.
|
My kayak will blow the paddles off your canoe
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.