Another hazard for cyclists-noise levels
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Another hazard for cyclists-noise levels
This may or may not apply to other cities, but in Toronto a study has found that noise levels on the street and on subway platforms are so high they may pose a risk to hearing.
There is a special caution to cyclists.
"Cycling in particular was singled out as the most potentially damaging to hearing, exposing people to larger amounts of dangerous noise than any other way of getting around, with 14 per cent of measurements exceeding recommended levels."
https://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/toronto/toronto-commute-noise-damage-1.4414767
There is a special caution to cyclists.
"Cycling in particular was singled out as the most potentially damaging to hearing, exposing people to larger amounts of dangerous noise than any other way of getting around, with 14 per cent of measurements exceeding recommended levels."
https://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/toronto/toronto-commute-noise-damage-1.4414767
#2
Non omnino gravis
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#5
MUP World Champ
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Jamis Quest Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Wind noise is enough to be a problem. https://www.noisyplanet.nidcd.nih.go...ss-in-cyclists
So move and go slow.
So move and go slow.
#8
On Holiday
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,014
Bikes: A bunch of old steel bikes
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
12 Posts
Haven't read the actual study yet (can't find the full text), but I have to say that interpreting measurements of noise from either sound level meters or recording dosimeters to determine risk to hearing is a very complex endeavour. All noise measurements are integrated over time so how you measure affects the number you get. Integrating a source measurement over 8 milliseconds will give you a much higher noise reading than integrating over 25 milliseconds. Dosimetry is especially complicated because results are affected by the set up parameters. Throwing out high numbers and waving the "risky" flag is what news folks do and this results in skewed or misinformed perceptions. It's also what researchers do to seed the grant money clouds.
If anyone has a link to the actual publication, please post.
If anyone has a link to the actual publication, please post.
#9
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,147
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3201 Post(s)
Liked 586 Times
in
321 Posts
Yeah ... the birds and sheep can get a bit noisy at times where I live.

__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 765
Bikes: Fitz randonneuse, Trek Superfly/AL, Tsunami SS, Bacchetta, HPV Speed Machine, Rans Screamer
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I wish noise pollution was checked along with smog emissions. There are definite outliers, like Harleys (always modified and technically illegal), street racers, garbage trucks. But only the Hogs are actually painful. But I rarely have that sensation, what do you call it, where hearing is temporarily diminished.
#11
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
Wind noise is enough to be a problem. https://www.noisyplanet.nidcd.nih.go...ss-in-cyclists
So move and go slow.
So move and go slow.