Am I too fat for an aluminum Bike ?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Boonville Indiana
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Am I too fat for an aluminum Bike ?
Hi, I am 53 and 6'-1 at 320 lbs, I wanna start riding again and want a Trek bike. i have a budget of 750 bucks but bike descriptions on Treks site say nothing about Maximum weights....just curious, the guy at the bike shop said he been there 3 years and never heard anything about weight limits. just worried about crushing an aluminum frame. Thanks

#2
Non omnino gravis
#3
Senior Member
Trek does show the maximum weight limits on their website. You have to scroll down the page right below the components list.
#4
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Central Valley of California
Posts: 28
Bikes: Two Independent Fabications, a Niner, and a TRek
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Part of the reason people trash wheels is how they ride. I rarely damage wheels at 6-6 and 260 (a former life as a defensive end in college). I have been in pacelines where lighter riders don't lift off the saddle over ruts and have bent rims where heavier riders who unweight their bike and spread the weight over both wheels or avoid the rut completely have little or no damage to the same wheels.
#5
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 23,570
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, an orange one and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3887 Post(s)
Liked 1,319 Times
in
817 Posts
On the other hand, they don't list weight limits on hybrids
__________________
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Richmond VA area
Posts: 2,713
Bikes: '00 Koga Miyata Full Pro Oval Road bike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Part of the reason people trash wheels is how they ride. I rarely damage wheels at 6-6 and 260 (a former life as a defensive end in college). I have been in pacelines where lighter riders don't lift off the saddle over ruts and have bent rims where heavier riders who unweight their bike and spread the weight over both wheels or avoid the rut completely have little or no damage to the same wheels.
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15
Bikes: Trek Shift 3
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I suppose it depends on the bike, but honestly I think you'll be fine. When I started I was 6 ft 330lbs. I had (and still have) a Trek Shift 3 and I've never had one issue. I've had it since May of last year and done about 1500 miles total on that one and yet to have one mechanical failure, no flats, no damaged spokes or an untrue wheel. You'll be fine. I think a lot of the "limits" are well below the actual just from legal teams that want to play it safe, which is fair, but don't let it stop you. You won't damage the frame and if your bike has the right wheel stock, you won't need anything custom either.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,022
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1498 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times
in
267 Posts
Trek shows the maximum weight limits on some of their bikes. What I find curious about the limits, however, is that they are the same for the lower end aluminum bikes as they are for their higher end carbon bikes. The Émonda S5 carbon bike has exactly the same limit as the Émonda ALR aluminum bike. It's also the same limit as the far more expensive and much lighter Madone 9.9 bike. Something doesn't add up here.
On the other hand, they don't list weight limits on hybrids
On the other hand, they don't list weight limits on hybrids
Do they design the bike and then test it afterward to determine the maximum weight capacity. Or do they decide on a weight capacity and then design the bike to meet it.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#9
Semper Fi
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Barrineau Park, Florida
Posts: 12,773
Bikes: 1980 Medici Pro Strada, 1984 Tommasini Prestige, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10 Ultegra
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
143 Posts
Trek shows the maximum weight limits on some of their bikes. What I find curious about the limits, however, is that they are the same for the lower end aluminum bikes as they are for their higher end carbon bikes. The Émonda S5 carbon bike has exactly the same limit as the Émonda ALR aluminum bike. It's also the same limit as the far more expensive and much lighter Madone 9.9 bike. Something doesn't add up here.
On the other hand, they don't list weight limits on hybrids
On the other hand, they don't list weight limits on hybrids
__________________
Are their wheels sets the same ones between the two? The wheels can be the limiting factor for rider weight. I have no idea about what wheels are on Treks, Bontrager I would guess. If Trek lists weight limits for bare frames, then you have a good comparison point. the OP could just upgrade to some 36H hubs and rims to meet his needs.
Frame weight is a factor of several different variables, fiber strength, lay up and resin all can make a CF frame much more sturdy and able to handle loads, yet remain light. Aluminum varies in its alloys used and in its internal formation (hydroforming for butting purposes,) also. The trend towads lower spoke counts for wheels is a big part of the manufacturers setting weight limits on bicycles.
Bill
__________________
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
Last edited by qcpmsame; 11-28-17 at 07:06 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 7,825
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2046 Post(s)
Liked 1,757 Times
in
952 Posts
Yes, I think there is a good chance that mfgs figure wheels as the weakest part when they set weight limits. I can't recall seeing reports of overweight folks actually breaking frames, usually it's wheels. The Clyde section is a good and friendly resource for all things "biking while XL"
#11
Standard Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 2,812
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 718 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
Yes. You need to bring your weight to 250lbs to ride aluminum. Do this and award yourself with a nice, light bicycle.
#12
Semper Fi
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Barrineau Park, Florida
Posts: 12,773
Bikes: 1980 Medici Pro Strada, 1984 Tommasini Prestige, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10 Ultegra
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
143 Posts
Yes, I think there is a good chance that mfgs figure wheels as the weakest part when they set weight limits. I can't recall seeing reports of overweight folks actually breaking frames, usually it's wheels. The Clyde section is a good and friendly resource for all things "biking while XL"
When I purchased my CAAD10 4, in 2012, the Fulcrum Racing7 wheel set had the limiting factor for rider weight. By rights, I should have skipped buying it since at that time I was 290 lbs. It never gave me a worry, and now its a moot point since shedding over 100lbs.
#13
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 23,570
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, an orange one and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3887 Post(s)
Liked 1,319 Times
in
817 Posts
I suspect that it's the latter.
__________________
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
#14
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 23,570
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, an orange one and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3887 Post(s)
Liked 1,319 Times
in
817 Posts
@DrIsotope siad it in the first reply, "The frame won't be an issue, but the wheels might be. You're going to want 32-36 spokes."
__________________
Are their wheels sets the same ones between the two? The wheels can be the limiting factor for rider weight. I have no idea about what wheels are on Treks, Bontrager I would guess. If Trek lists weight limits for bare frames, then you have a good comparison point. the OP could just upgrade to some 36H hubs and rims to meet his needs.
Frame weight is a factor of several different variables, fiber strength, lay up and resin all can make a CF frame much more sturdy and able to handle loads, yet remain light. Aluminum varies in its alloys used and in its internal formation (hydroforming for butting purposes,) also. The trend towads lower spoke counts for wheels is a big part of the manufacturers setting weight limits on bicycles.
Bill
__________________
Are their wheels sets the same ones between the two? The wheels can be the limiting factor for rider weight. I have no idea about what wheels are on Treks, Bontrager I would guess. If Trek lists weight limits for bare frames, then you have a good comparison point. the OP could just upgrade to some 36H hubs and rims to meet his needs.
Frame weight is a factor of several different variables, fiber strength, lay up and resin all can make a CF frame much more sturdy and able to handle loads, yet remain light. Aluminum varies in its alloys used and in its internal formation (hydroforming for butting purposes,) also. The trend towads lower spoke counts for wheels is a big part of the manufacturers setting weight limits on bicycles.
Bill
On the other hand, GoProTrek's budget doesn't say carbon or even aluminum road bike. His budget says hybrid and there is no weight limit listed for those. I'm not saying that there isn't a weight limit for hybrids, only that Trek doesn't list one.
GoProTrek's weight is probably going to push the machine built wheels to the limit and he will likely experience some spoke failures but that bridge can be crossed when he comes to it.
__________________
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
#15
Super Moderator
Hi, I am 53 and 6'-1 at 320 lbs, I wanna start riding again and want a Trek bike. i have a budget of 750 bucks but bike descriptions on Treks site say nothing about Maximum weights....just curious, the guy at the bike shop said he been there 3 years and never heard anything about weight limits. just worried about crushing an aluminum frame. Thanks


https://www.bikeforums.net/clydesdal...-200-lb-91-kg/
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,582
Bikes: 2017 Colnago C-RS, 2012 Colnago Ace, 2010 Giant Cypress hybrid
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 404 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
82 Posts
Trek and other hybrids usually come with sturdy wheels that have a high spoke count. I don't think the OP will have a problem with buying the bike he wants.
__________________
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily
2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
HCFR Cycling Team
Ride Safe ... Ride Hard ... Ride Daily
2017 Colnago C-RS
2012 Colnago Ace
2010 Giant Cypress
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 3,224
Bikes: Breezer Radar
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1716 Post(s)
Liked 987 Times
in
466 Posts
I bet they take all their stress test data and plug into a formula to come up with a conservative weight limit value. If marketing tells engineering that value is too low then the engineers would know how to tweak the design to get numbers marketing wants.
#18
Senior Member
It's just my opinion, but I do think the OP would be ill advised to get a road bike at this stage. A really heavy rider puts massive stresses on a bike, and not just the wheels, though that's the part that usually breaks first. I think he'd be well advised to go with something like a hardtail 29er mountain bike with some 35mm slick road/commuter tires on it. At the very least a decent hybrid would probably be a reasonable choice.
I don't think that the margin of safety he ought to be concerned about is whether or not he'll probably break the bike today or not. These bikes are engineered with a certain margin of safety that assumes a much, much lighter rider, which means at 320lbs he's probably already well into the designer's margin of safety, if not already beyond it. Will it break today? Probably not. Is "probably not" really good enough? It's always made me nervous as hell.
Btw, I rode a mountain bike all the way from 350lbs down to 275 or so and only then bought a road bike (the one I'd had when I was young was long gone by then), and I always still felt kind of nervous on it, and actually did break the original rear wheel that it came with. I didn't just break a spoke - I literally tore the spoke through the aluminum flange of the hub. And that was just riding over a railroad track without unweighting as I hit it. Fortunately I never had anything else fail on me like that, but bombing down descents at 40-50mph as a superclyde and realizing your bike was probably designed to be ridden by someone over 100lbs lighter can make for some serious reflection. "What if?"
Anyhow, everyone has an opinion, and that's mine, as someone who has ridden thousands of miles on several different bikes at weights both over and under the OP's.
I don't think that the margin of safety he ought to be concerned about is whether or not he'll probably break the bike today or not. These bikes are engineered with a certain margin of safety that assumes a much, much lighter rider, which means at 320lbs he's probably already well into the designer's margin of safety, if not already beyond it. Will it break today? Probably not. Is "probably not" really good enough? It's always made me nervous as hell.
Btw, I rode a mountain bike all the way from 350lbs down to 275 or so and only then bought a road bike (the one I'd had when I was young was long gone by then), and I always still felt kind of nervous on it, and actually did break the original rear wheel that it came with. I didn't just break a spoke - I literally tore the spoke through the aluminum flange of the hub. And that was just riding over a railroad track without unweighting as I hit it. Fortunately I never had anything else fail on me like that, but bombing down descents at 40-50mph as a superclyde and realizing your bike was probably designed to be ridden by someone over 100lbs lighter can make for some serious reflection. "What if?"
Anyhow, everyone has an opinion, and that's mine, as someone who has ridden thousands of miles on several different bikes at weights both over and under the OP's.
#19
Interocitor Command
I had an aluminum road frame crack on me just prior to hitting 1,800 miles and I weigh 240. It was a 2004 Specialized Sequoia Elite. You'd think with a name like Sequoia it could stand up to years of abuse. However, I never abused it.
#20
Senior Member
At the time this was fun, but afterwards I was terrified by the "what if" possibilities: I did a 40something mile round trip ride up Mt. Lemmon near Tucson. So that's like 20 miles up, with something like 5500 feet of elevation. That was a pretty hard slog for me at my 275 lbs or so. Then, of course, I got to speed like 45 minutes just bombing down that mountain. Nothing serious happened, but afterwards I was thinking about it: were those brakes really up to it? What abuse does a 275-lb guy put on 2003-era Ultegra 6500 hardware that already has thousands of miles on it by 2013? All it would have taken was for the front brakes to fail somehow while I was bombing down that winding road at 40+mph and I might not be here typing this right now.
Now, nothing happened. And I have no idea how close that equipment came to actually failing, and there's no way I'll ever know. But I can say, with confidence, that at 275 lbs I was much closer to that line than a 175 lb rider would have been. At 320 lbs it would just be that much worse. Anyhow, I posted my $.02 earlier, and just gave you another $.02. Now you've got $.04.
Now, nothing happened. And I have no idea how close that equipment came to actually failing, and there's no way I'll ever know. But I can say, with confidence, that at 275 lbs I was much closer to that line than a 175 lb rider would have been. At 320 lbs it would just be that much worse. Anyhow, I posted my $.02 earlier, and just gave you another $.02. Now you've got $.04.
#21
Senior Member
Seems straightforward to me.
Design all your road frames according to similar sets of durability requirements, the higher-end bikes end up lighter, and pick a single boilerplate max weight figure that's simple for sales and leaves you with decent liability clearance.
Design all your road frames according to similar sets of durability requirements, the higher-end bikes end up lighter, and pick a single boilerplate max weight figure that's simple for sales and leaves you with decent liability clearance.
#22
Banned
Hi, I am 53 and 6'-1 at 320 lbs, I wanna start riding again and want a Trek bike. i have a budget of 750 bucks but bike descriptions on Treks site say nothing about Maximum weights....just curious, the guy at the bike shop said he been there 3 years and never heard anything about weight limits. just worried about crushing an aluminum frame. Thanks


I'd talk to your Trek dealer , if I were in your situation.

#23
Semper Fi
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Barrineau Park, Florida
Posts: 12,773
Bikes: 1980 Medici Pro Strada, 1984 Tommasini Prestige, 2012 Cannondale CAAD 10 Ultegra
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
143 Posts
While the wheels might be the limiting factor on how much the bikes can carry, that's not the point of my post. The weight limit for all of Trek's road bikes is the same from top of the range to the bottom. That covers a very wide range of wheels and frame materials. Each bike should have a separate weight carrying ability based on its construction and materials but they just use a blanket number which says to me that it's just a CYA policy and has little to no basis in fact.
On the other hand, GoProTrek's budget doesn't say carbon or even aluminum road bike. His budget says hybrid and there is no weight limit listed for those. I'm not saying that there isn't a weight limit for hybrids, only that Trek doesn't list one.
GoProTrek's weight is probably going to push the machine built wheels to the limit and he will likely experience some spoke failures but that bridge can be crossed when he comes to it.
On the other hand, GoProTrek's budget doesn't say carbon or even aluminum road bike. His budget says hybrid and there is no weight limit listed for those. I'm not saying that there isn't a weight limit for hybrids, only that Trek doesn't list one.
GoProTrek's weight is probably going to push the machine built wheels to the limit and he will likely experience some spoke failures but that bridge can be crossed when he comes to it.
My CAAD 10 had a weight limit established by the Fulcrum wheel set as all CAAD 10 frames for 2012 were identical in their construction. No idea about Treks since I don’t own one.
Bill
__________________
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977
I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13
#24
Senior Member
This is what you buy when you reach your goal weight:

#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: buffalo
Posts: 74
Bikes: 86 Trek 330 fixie, 2011 Trek 1.1, POS mb
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I would ride any material of bike at your weight providing your bike is in good condition, which of course it would be if it was new from a shop.