Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Why am I so much faster on stationary bike vs outside riding?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Why am I so much faster on stationary bike vs outside riding?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-18, 11:11 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
LittleArnold, try riding on rollers.
De Sisti is offline  
Old 02-25-18, 12:23 PM
  #27  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
This can’t possibly be a serious question.
Kapusta is offline  
Old 02-25-18, 04:29 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I feel the opposite , on the cheapo life fitness bikes its ruffer but easier to gain miles , on a keiser spin bike its smooth like butter but easier than a stationary trainer that resists you with a smaller fly wheel. For me i feel on a non windy day im faster on road i think momentum is the biggest difference other that aero drag .
providencebikes is offline  
Old 02-25-18, 06:42 PM
  #29  
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 469 Posts
Wind resistance has less to do with it than people here imagine.

You are not accelerating your body mass on a trainer, nor is energy required to keep that mass in motion.

It takes less energy for 150 or 200 lb to remain stationary than it does for the same mass to stay in motion.



-Tim-
TimothyH is offline  
Old 02-25-18, 08:32 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 780

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey Cooper CX; 2007 Cannondale F4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 368 Post(s)
Liked 155 Times in 64 Posts
Originally Posted by TimothyH
Wind resistance has less to do with it than people here imagine.

You are not accelerating your body mass on a trainer, nor is energy required to keep that mass in motion.

It takes less energy for 150 or 200 lb to remain stationary than it does for the same mass to stay in motion.



-Tim-
Uhhh... inertia is a property of all matter. An object in motion stays in motion unless there is an opposing force to slow it down. In our case, that opposing force is mostly gravity (on climbs), atmospheric drag (wind), rolling resistance, and mechanical friction of the bicycle's drivetrain.

On a flat road, the biggest energy sink is drag, followed by rolling resistance, then drivetrain friction.
General Geoff is offline  
Old 02-25-18, 08:55 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
FBOATSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 515 Times in 344 Posts
Originally Posted by littleArnold
I think that could actually be part of the reason. I might put more effort in the stationary bike just because it is so boring and I want to get the hour over with indoors vs outdoors much more enjoyable, relaxing, can easily ride 2 hours outside and enjoy the ride. Can't wait till it gets warm enough to ride outside again.
The only mistake you made in your OP was using "miles" and "MPH" instead of just hours, resistance level, cadence, etc., provoking the ire of the "serious cyclists". Just keep riding no matter how boring. You will be better off come Spring. I hang my bikes up in the fall and ride an elliptical cross-trainer until warm weather. I spent the majority of my career working outdoors year around and don't feel the urge to ride outdoors in much less than ideal weather.
FBOATSB is offline  
Old 02-25-18, 09:20 PM
  #32  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Boston suburb
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 11 Posts
This question also gets asked for runners who cannot understand why they cannot run outdoors like they can on the treadmill. Air resistance! When I trained for marathons I would start out with the treadmill at 1-2 degrees and then increase as I ran. Same thing training indoors on bike rollers, always use a higher gear then you normally would so when you ride outdoors your pace won't suffer as much from the air resistance.
tobey is offline  
Old 02-25-18, 09:26 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
FBOATSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 515 Times in 344 Posts
I did buy a used mag trainer for this winter, but I didn't like the feeling of riding a bicycle in a vacuum. It's currently for sale.
FBOATSB is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 08:42 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Craptacular8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 31 Posts
Originally Posted by tobey
This question also gets asked for runners who cannot understand why they cannot run outdoors like they can on the treadmill. Air resistance! When I trained for marathons I would start out with the treadmill at 1-2 degrees and then increase as I ran. Same thing training indoors on bike rollers, always use a higher gear then you normally would so when you ride outdoors your pace won't suffer as much from the air resistance.
+1

I'm not sure where everyone is finding these "easy" stationary bikes....my spin bike at home is absolute torture...The resistance that beast has for nearly all of its "resistance" settings is ridiculous. I'd have thought it would simulate my typical ride, fairly flat but always in the neighborhood of a 24mph headwind, but it still seems worse some how. Maybe it's because I curse as I pedal into the wind, lol, and know that unless the wind is really fickle, that it will eventually be a tail wind.
Craptacular8 is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 09:37 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,721

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 66 Posts
Originally Posted by littleArnold
I been on stationary bike since it has been snowing/ raining outside. I can ride about 19-20 miles in an hour on a stationary bike at health club, but outside I am lucky to go at a pace of 15 mph in perfect weather conditions on flat bike trails on my trek hybrid. Why such the difference, why is the stationary bike so much easier? Is this pretty much same for everyone that they can go faster on stationary bike or is it just me? I go at a cadence of about 90 rpm outside and on stationary bike it is about 95-100 rpm.
You're not going " anywhere" on a bike that that doesn't move. Just spinning in circles. Try head wind, actual gearing and gravity. Hybrid would not be a "fast" bike. Got some rolling resistance? I don't do trainers, VR, sit n spin or the such. Snow and rain? Got a rain jacket, studded tires and a big cup of HTFU?
Leebo is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 09:52 AM
  #36  
Full Member
 
La Tortue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Try the newer smart trainers connected to apps like Zwift. If you have the correct weight entered with properly calibrated power meters they will place you very much into the same ball park. Some will quibble over things like wind or you don't ride full power around curves but essentially if an accurate outside to inside speed is desired one can set the settings to achieve this.
La Tortue is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 10:21 AM
  #37  
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
Calibrate them to match!

You could re-calibrate your 'outside' bike computer to match the speed reading of the indoor exercycle by noting the % speed difference for the same perceived effort, and then adjusting the effective wheel circumference number that you input into the bike computer for your wheel size. That way, both bikes will show the same speed, and you'll feel better about it.
Phil_gretz is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 12:58 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
xodondum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: ATL ,GA. NE corridor
Posts: 192

Bikes: 17 Cannondale Synapse C; 17 DB Podium; 15 Trek Marlin 5

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
because no stopping for red lights, stop signs, cars, pedestrians
xodondum is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 01:01 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times in 936 Posts
Originally Posted by hankaye
littleArnold, Howdy;

So, basically you are asking what's the difference between fantasy and reality.

hank
Is this real life? Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 03:13 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,484

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7650 Post(s)
Liked 3,472 Times in 1,833 Posts
I don't know how you manage it ... I have spent countless hours on a stationary bike and never travels so much as an millimeter. In miles per hour or any time/distance reckoning .... zero. every time. Then when I rode my bike home from the gym, even if I was exhausted, I'd average 14-16 mph. I can't figure out your technique.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 03:17 PM
  #41  
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 469 Posts
Lots of people in this thread with expertise in how to treat others like pieces of ****.


-Tim-
TimothyH is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 03:41 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
blacknbluebikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,282

Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked 846 Times in 410 Posts
watts is watts. you maintain 130 or 160 or 200 watts, that's your "engine"
imagine if bike #1 is carbon on new asphalt.
then bike #2 is fatbike on the beach
then bike #3 is whatever you're riding on a trainer.
same human engine, different speeds.
blacknbluebikes is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 04:00 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
exmechanic89's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Richmond VA area
Posts: 2,618

Bikes: '00 Koga Miyata Full Pro Oval Road bike.

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
This thread reminds me of one I was gonna start titled 'why do I get so many more flats when I ride outside vs when I ride my stationary bike?'..
exmechanic89 is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 05:50 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,003
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 332 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by blacknbluebikes
watts is watts. you maintain 130 or 160 or 200 watts, that's your "engine"
imagine if bike #1 is carbon on new asphalt.
then bike #2 is fatbike on the beach
then bike #3 is whatever you're riding on a trainer.
same human engine, different speeds.
This! This!

My last ride on Zwift I had a weighted avg power of 184W and an average speed of 34.6kmh. My ride this morning in the real world had a weighted avg power of 180W and an average speed of 20.4kmh. Turns out a lot of hills, wind, water, potholes, rough roads and stop start riding is not conducive to high average speeds.

The OP may not be able to afford a power meter but if he is interested in comparing his efforts between gym bike and outdoor rides he should be using a heart rate monitor and comparing his heart rate between rides and just ignore the average speed which is junk data on the gym bike.
smarkinson is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 08:12 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 113

Bikes: Trek, Schwinn, Huffy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
It depends on the stationary bike. Some will feel easier at an equivalent speed and some will be harder. Kurt Kinetics, for example, designs their trainer to approximate a 165lb rider going up a 1% hill.
I am starting to think your right. I been riding an upright stationary bike at the gym at a speed of 19-20 mph, but today I tried a recumbent stationary bike at the gym and only was able to go at a speed of 15 mph on it in an hour. Found it much harder, maybe because never ride a recumbent bike. It was closer to the bike speed I ride on my hybrid outside. The other stationary bike is built like a road bike; I hunch over the handles and put a lot more power into my peddling using more of my bodyweight, hips and legs which is maybe why I have an easier time with that type of stationary bike.

Last edited by littleArnold; 02-26-18 at 08:17 PM.
littleArnold is offline  
Old 02-27-18, 11:43 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times in 248 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
This can’t possibly be a serious question.
Oh, it is. There are people who will quite seriously talk about trainer "miles" and include them in their annual distance totals. You can argue 'til you're blue in the face, and they still don't get the concept that "miles", "speed" etc. measured on a trainer are meaningless, and that all that matters is time and effort (or power).

There are even people who will spend unreasonable amounts of time trying to come up with formulas to translate power on the trainer to "real world" speed and distance. And then they'll actually take those numbers seriously.



-------------
noimagination is offline  
Old 02-27-18, 12:18 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
jitteringjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,962

Bikes: 2018 Canyon Aeroad CF SLX 9.0 2016 Bombtrack Arise Campy build cross bike 2005 Fuji Outland Pro

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by noimagination
Oh, it is. There are people who will quite seriously talk about trainer "miles" and include them in their annual distance totals.
Why do you even care what other people consider mileage? I can tell you I don’t care how many miles you ride no matter how you do it.

Personally as a dad who has to watch young kids that can’t keep up with me on a ride to where I get a work out, trainer miles is a necessary evil. My option is to only ride real miles and then not ride a good number of days at all or ride on the trainer. In the past I just didn’t ride the trainer, but now I just ride if I have too on the trainer. I can tell you my fitness level, power output, average speed are all better when I ride the trainer too. So is that time spent on the trainer worthless? Obviously not or I would not have made the gains I have. What does that mean to you worried about how how many miles other people ride? Who cares.

Back to the OPs question, I can say 16mph on the cycleops fluid 2 trainer is a solid work out for me but 16 mph on the road is an easy recovery day. An hour long ftp test on the road at 20mph would be a 5 min interval on the trainers at best at the same speed. I see about a 3 mph difference with the trainer being slower at the same power output. And the older and more worn out the trainer bearings get, the larger the spread. So wind resistance does not make a noticeable difference, it’s the resistance of the breaking method of the trainer that far outweighs wind resistance.
jitteringjr is offline  
Old 02-27-18, 12:23 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,232
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,525 Times in 7,325 Posts
Ride the stationary bike outside in the rain/snow and see if it's harder. Just don't ride a stationery bike in the rain.

Last edited by indyfabz; 02-27-18 at 12:30 PM.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 02-27-18, 12:48 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
WNCGoater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 931

Bikes: Diamondback Century 3. Marin Four Corners

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 416 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
19 - 20 MPH on a stationary bike.
WNCGoater is offline  
Old 02-27-18, 01:27 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by jitteringjr
Why do you even care what other people consider mileage? I can tell you I don’t care how many miles you ride no matter how you do it.

Personally as a dad who has to watch young kids that can’t keep up with me on a ride to where I get a work out, trainer miles is a necessary evil. My option is to only ride real miles and then not ride a good number of days at all or ride on the trainer. In the past I just didn’t ride the trainer, but now I just ride if I have too on the trainer. I can tell you my fitness level, power output, average speed are all better when I ride the trainer too. So is that time spent on the trainer worthless? Obviously not or I would not have made the gains I have. What does that mean to you worried about how how many miles other people ride? Who cares.

Back to the OPs question, I can say 16mph on the cycleops fluid 2 trainer is a solid work out for me but 16 mph on the road is an easy recovery day. An hour long ftp test on the road at 20mph would be a 5 min interval on the trainers at best at the same speed. I see about a 3 mph difference with the trainer being slower at the same power output. And the older and more worn out the trainer bearings get, the larger the spread. So wind resistance does not make a noticeable difference, it’s the resistance of the breaking method of the trainer that far outweighs wind resistance.
No. Time and effort matter. That is the point, actually.
caloso is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.