Why am I so much faster on stationary bike vs outside riding?
#27
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
This can’t possibly be a serious question.
#28
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I feel the opposite , on the cheapo life fitness bikes its ruffer but easier to gain miles , on a keiser spin bike its smooth like butter but easier than a stationary trainer that resists you with a smaller fly wheel. For me i feel on a non windy day im faster on road i think momentum is the biggest difference other that aero drag .
#29
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Wind resistance has less to do with it than people here imagine.
You are not accelerating your body mass on a trainer, nor is energy required to keep that mass in motion.
It takes less energy for 150 or 200 lb to remain stationary than it does for the same mass to stay in motion.
-Tim-
You are not accelerating your body mass on a trainer, nor is energy required to keep that mass in motion.
It takes less energy for 150 or 200 lb to remain stationary than it does for the same mass to stay in motion.
-Tim-
#30
Senior Member
Wind resistance has less to do with it than people here imagine.
You are not accelerating your body mass on a trainer, nor is energy required to keep that mass in motion.
It takes less energy for 150 or 200 lb to remain stationary than it does for the same mass to stay in motion.
-Tim-
You are not accelerating your body mass on a trainer, nor is energy required to keep that mass in motion.
It takes less energy for 150 or 200 lb to remain stationary than it does for the same mass to stay in motion.
-Tim-
On a flat road, the biggest energy sink is drag, followed by rolling resistance, then drivetrain friction.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 515 Times
in
344 Posts
I think that could actually be part of the reason. I might put more effort in the stationary bike just because it is so boring and I want to get the hour over with indoors vs outdoors much more enjoyable, relaxing, can easily ride 2 hours outside and enjoy the ride. Can't wait till it gets warm enough to ride outside again.
#32
Newbie
This question also gets asked for runners who cannot understand why they cannot run outdoors like they can on the treadmill. Air resistance! When I trained for marathons I would start out with the treadmill at 1-2 degrees and then increase as I ran. Same thing training indoors on bike rollers, always use a higher gear then you normally would so when you ride outdoors your pace won't suffer as much from the air resistance.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 515 Times
in
344 Posts
I did buy a used mag trainer for this winter, but I didn't like the feeling of riding a bicycle in a vacuum. It's currently for sale.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times
in
31 Posts
This question also gets asked for runners who cannot understand why they cannot run outdoors like they can on the treadmill. Air resistance! When I trained for marathons I would start out with the treadmill at 1-2 degrees and then increase as I ran. Same thing training indoors on bike rollers, always use a higher gear then you normally would so when you ride outdoors your pace won't suffer as much from the air resistance.
I'm not sure where everyone is finding these "easy" stationary bikes....my spin bike at home is absolute torture...The resistance that beast has for nearly all of its "resistance" settings is ridiculous. I'd have thought it would simulate my typical ride, fairly flat but always in the neighborhood of a 24mph headwind, but it still seems worse some how. Maybe it's because I curse as I pedal into the wind, lol, and know that unless the wind is really fickle, that it will eventually be a tail wind.
#35
Senior Member
I been on stationary bike since it has been snowing/ raining outside. I can ride about 19-20 miles in an hour on a stationary bike at health club, but outside I am lucky to go at a pace of 15 mph in perfect weather conditions on flat bike trails on my trek hybrid. Why such the difference, why is the stationary bike so much easier? Is this pretty much same for everyone that they can go faster on stationary bike or is it just me? I go at a cadence of about 90 rpm outside and on stationary bike it is about 95-100 rpm.
#36
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
Try the newer smart trainers connected to apps like Zwift. If you have the correct weight entered with properly calibrated power meters they will place you very much into the same ball park. Some will quibble over things like wind or you don't ride full power around curves but essentially if an accurate outside to inside speed is desired one can set the settings to achieve this.
#37
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
Calibrate them to match!
You could re-calibrate your 'outside' bike computer to match the speed reading of the indoor exercycle by noting the % speed difference for the same perceived effort, and then adjusting the effective wheel circumference number that you input into the bike computer for your wheel size. That way, both bikes will show the same speed, and you'll feel better about it.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: ATL ,GA. NE corridor
Posts: 192
Bikes: 17 Cannondale Synapse C; 17 DB Podium; 15 Trek Marlin 5
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
because no stopping for red lights, stop signs, cars, pedestrians
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
littleArnold, Howdy;
So, basically you are asking what's the difference between fantasy and reality.
hank
So, basically you are asking what's the difference between fantasy and reality.
hank
Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,484
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7650 Post(s)
Liked 3,472 Times
in
1,833 Posts
I don't know how you manage it ... I have spent countless hours on a stationary bike and never travels so much as an millimeter. In miles per hour or any time/distance reckoning .... zero. every time. Then when I rode my bike home from the gym, even if I was exhausted, I'd average 14-16 mph. I can't figure out your technique.
#41
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Lots of people in this thread with expertise in how to treat others like pieces of ****.
-Tim-
-Tim-
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,282
Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked 846 Times
in
410 Posts
watts is watts. you maintain 130 or 160 or 200 watts, that's your "engine"
imagine if bike #1 is carbon on new asphalt.
then bike #2 is fatbike on the beach
then bike #3 is whatever you're riding on a trainer.
same human engine, different speeds.
imagine if bike #1 is carbon on new asphalt.
then bike #2 is fatbike on the beach
then bike #3 is whatever you're riding on a trainer.
same human engine, different speeds.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Richmond VA area
Posts: 2,618
Bikes: '00 Koga Miyata Full Pro Oval Road bike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
This thread reminds me of one I was gonna start titled 'why do I get so many more flats when I ride outside vs when I ride my stationary bike?'..
#44
Senior Member
My last ride on Zwift I had a weighted avg power of 184W and an average speed of 34.6kmh. My ride this morning in the real world had a weighted avg power of 180W and an average speed of 20.4kmh. Turns out a lot of hills, wind, water, potholes, rough roads and stop start riding is not conducive to high average speeds.
The OP may not be able to afford a power meter but if he is interested in comparing his efforts between gym bike and outdoor rides he should be using a heart rate monitor and comparing his heart rate between rides and just ignore the average speed which is junk data on the gym bike.
#45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 113
Bikes: Trek, Schwinn, Huffy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I am starting to think your right. I been riding an upright stationary bike at the gym at a speed of 19-20 mph, but today I tried a recumbent stationary bike at the gym and only was able to go at a speed of 15 mph on it in an hour. Found it much harder, maybe because never ride a recumbent bike. It was closer to the bike speed I ride on my hybrid outside. The other stationary bike is built like a road bike; I hunch over the handles and put a lot more power into my peddling using more of my bodyweight, hips and legs which is maybe why I have an easier time with that type of stationary bike.
Last edited by littleArnold; 02-26-18 at 08:17 PM.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
248 Posts
Oh, it is. There are people who will quite seriously talk about trainer "miles" and include them in their annual distance totals. You can argue 'til you're blue in the face, and they still don't get the concept that "miles", "speed" etc. measured on a trainer are meaningless, and that all that matters is time and effort (or power).
There are even people who will spend unreasonable amounts of time trying to come up with formulas to translate power on the trainer to "real world" speed and distance. And then they'll actually take those numbers seriously.
-------------
There are even people who will spend unreasonable amounts of time trying to come up with formulas to translate power on the trainer to "real world" speed and distance. And then they'll actually take those numbers seriously.
-------------
#47
Senior Member
Personally as a dad who has to watch young kids that can’t keep up with me on a ride to where I get a work out, trainer miles is a necessary evil. My option is to only ride real miles and then not ride a good number of days at all or ride on the trainer. In the past I just didn’t ride the trainer, but now I just ride if I have too on the trainer. I can tell you my fitness level, power output, average speed are all better when I ride the trainer too. So is that time spent on the trainer worthless? Obviously not or I would not have made the gains I have. What does that mean to you worried about how how many miles other people ride? Who cares.
Back to the OPs question, I can say 16mph on the cycleops fluid 2 trainer is a solid work out for me but 16 mph on the road is an easy recovery day. An hour long ftp test on the road at 20mph would be a 5 min interval on the trainers at best at the same speed. I see about a 3 mph difference with the trainer being slower at the same power output. And the older and more worn out the trainer bearings get, the larger the spread. So wind resistance does not make a noticeable difference, it’s the resistance of the breaking method of the trainer that far outweighs wind resistance.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,232
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,525 Times
in
7,325 Posts
Ride the stationary bike outside in the rain/snow and see if it's harder. Just don't ride a stationery bike in the rain.
Last edited by indyfabz; 02-27-18 at 12:30 PM.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Why do you even care what other people consider mileage? I can tell you I don’t care how many miles you ride no matter how you do it.
Personally as a dad who has to watch young kids that can’t keep up with me on a ride to where I get a work out, trainer miles is a necessary evil. My option is to only ride real miles and then not ride a good number of days at all or ride on the trainer. In the past I just didn’t ride the trainer, but now I just ride if I have too on the trainer. I can tell you my fitness level, power output, average speed are all better when I ride the trainer too. So is that time spent on the trainer worthless? Obviously not or I would not have made the gains I have. What does that mean to you worried about how how many miles other people ride? Who cares.
Back to the OPs question, I can say 16mph on the cycleops fluid 2 trainer is a solid work out for me but 16 mph on the road is an easy recovery day. An hour long ftp test on the road at 20mph would be a 5 min interval on the trainers at best at the same speed. I see about a 3 mph difference with the trainer being slower at the same power output. And the older and more worn out the trainer bearings get, the larger the spread. So wind resistance does not make a noticeable difference, it’s the resistance of the breaking method of the trainer that far outweighs wind resistance.
Personally as a dad who has to watch young kids that can’t keep up with me on a ride to where I get a work out, trainer miles is a necessary evil. My option is to only ride real miles and then not ride a good number of days at all or ride on the trainer. In the past I just didn’t ride the trainer, but now I just ride if I have too on the trainer. I can tell you my fitness level, power output, average speed are all better when I ride the trainer too. So is that time spent on the trainer worthless? Obviously not or I would not have made the gains I have. What does that mean to you worried about how how many miles other people ride? Who cares.
Back to the OPs question, I can say 16mph on the cycleops fluid 2 trainer is a solid work out for me but 16 mph on the road is an easy recovery day. An hour long ftp test on the road at 20mph would be a 5 min interval on the trainers at best at the same speed. I see about a 3 mph difference with the trainer being slower at the same power output. And the older and more worn out the trainer bearings get, the larger the spread. So wind resistance does not make a noticeable difference, it’s the resistance of the breaking method of the trainer that far outweighs wind resistance.