Noke Bluetooth bike lock
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Noke Bluetooth bike lock
I bought a bluetooth bike lock a few days ago and really like it. You can leave your phone in the pocket and unlock it with a click. When you have not used it for a while you have to open the app on your phone to open it which is a bit annoying. I contacted their support let’s see if they have a solution. I am aware that it is not a very secure lock and I use it only for short stops in low theft areas.
#2
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Is there a failsafe for when your phone dies or bluetooth doesn't connect?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,242
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18416 Post(s)
Liked 15,556 Times
in
7,331 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
While I can understand the initial thought that you're already taking your phone with you so why not use it to unlock your bike, it seems like it would be a major pain to deal with a lock that you have to remember to recharge. Maybe if the battery lasted a year or something, but even then it's just less hassle and more reliable overall to bring a lock with a key or a combination.
Someone "picking" your lock doesn't seem to be much of a concern to me as it seems like thieves find it faster and easier to cut the whole lock anyways.
Someone "picking" your lock doesn't seem to be much of a concern to me as it seems like thieves find it faster and easier to cut the whole lock anyways.
#7
SuperGimp
Well, the obvious advantage would be that you are far less likely to misplace your phone than you are the key. I have at least a couple bike locks out in the garage waiting to be reunited with a key that works.
I have bluetooth locks on my deadbolts (but you can still use the key) and frankly, I love them there.
But yeah, picking the lock seems to be the least likely way you'd lose them.
I have bluetooth locks on my deadbolts (but you can still use the key) and frankly, I love them there.
But yeah, picking the lock seems to be the least likely way you'd lose them.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
you have to press the lock to unlock it or open the app to unlock it.
Last edited by Semipedersen; 07-13-18 at 02:07 PM. Reason: typo
#10
Every day a winding road
Because it connects to your pone it has to be good.
This is a solution looking for a problem. Exactly what is wrong with an old fashioned combo lock or better a key lock??
This is a solution looking for a problem. Exactly what is wrong with an old fashioned combo lock or better a key lock??
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 126
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i am not here to defend a product that is not essential but I bought it and like it. My car is also keyless and I would not buy a new car without the keyless feature.
#12
Every day a winding road
And I will reject keyless technology for as long as possible. Is it really that much hassle to place a key in the door then one in the ignition to start it? Really?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
If someone tends to lose keys or forget his combination it does solve a problem. There's also something to be said for convenience. I think it's pretty cool even if I don't want one.
#14
Senior Member
I'm a dinosaur... i have my bike lock key on the ring with my housekey.
I don't like to break my bike off a pole because the lock or the phone battery is low or because of some bluetooth issue.
I don't like to break my bike off a pole because the lock or the phone battery is low or because of some bluetooth issue.
#15
Every day a winding road
Hang the key around your neck and keep a backup in your shoe or your wallet. Or use a less secure (probably more secure than a bluetooth device that can be hacked) combination lock.
Sorry it does not solve any problems. If anything it introduces them.
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes, it is. I also have cruise control, surround cameras, sensors for lane departure, someone stopping ahead, speed limit violations, someone darting behind me when I back up, tire pressure, satnav, power liftgate, and airbags everywhere. Why on earth would I want less?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Analogously, we use Google Authenticator (which provides an authentication PIN on our phones) as part of 2-factor authentication to remotely access the corporate VPN. What if the battery on the phone dies - it doesn't invalidate the solution. The bike lock isn't as secure as that process, but it doesn't need to be. Both solve a particular problem - access to a resource - and your objection about a possible point of failure does not reasonably lead to the conclusion that it's no solution, or that there was no problem in the first place. Nor does it introduce additional problems, as long as a backup method exists.
My phone battery is reasonably likely to be discharged during a ride, based on past experience, so this particular solution is not for me. But there is a path forward for this tech which would eliminate that and make it more generally applicable, which I might buy into if it's ever developed.
Hang the key around your neck and keep a backup in your shoe or your wallet. Or use a less secure (probably more secure than a bluetooth device that can be hacked) combination lock.
Sorry it does not solve any problems. If anything it introduces them.
Sorry it does not solve any problems. If anything it introduces them.
#19
SuperGimp
Do you still unlock your garage door and raise it by hand too?
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,290 Times
in
743 Posts
Here is another way they do it. They intercept the signal from the fob, then retransmit it. https://www.wired.com/2017/04/just-p...can-steal-car/
https://gizmodo.com/watch-thieves-ha...-in-1820767189
It is also a "feature," that when it fails, is difficult to fix by the side of the road.
Last edited by phughes; 07-14-18 at 11:33 AM.
#21
Every day a winding road
Manual unlock sequence, no worse than what you (presumably) do right now. Anything can fail, and it does not invalidate the solution.
Analogously, we use Google Authenticator (which provides an authentication PIN on our phones) as part of 2-factor authentication to remotely access the corporate VPN. What if the battery on the phone dies - it doesn't invalidate the solution. The bike lock isn't as secure as that process, but it doesn't need to be. Both solve a particular problem - access to a resource - and your objection about a possible point of failure does not reasonably lead to the conclusion that it's no solution, or that there was no problem in the first place. Nor does it introduce additional problems, as long as a backup method exists.
My phone battery is reasonably likely to be discharged during a ride, based on past experience, so this particular solution is not for me. But there is a path forward for this tech which would eliminate that and make it more generally applicable, which I might buy into if it's ever developed.
Analogously, we use Google Authenticator (which provides an authentication PIN on our phones) as part of 2-factor authentication to remotely access the corporate VPN. What if the battery on the phone dies - it doesn't invalidate the solution. The bike lock isn't as secure as that process, but it doesn't need to be. Both solve a particular problem - access to a resource - and your objection about a possible point of failure does not reasonably lead to the conclusion that it's no solution, or that there was no problem in the first place. Nor does it introduce additional problems, as long as a backup method exists.
My phone battery is reasonably likely to be discharged during a ride, based on past experience, so this particular solution is not for me. But there is a path forward for this tech which would eliminate that and make it more generally applicable, which I might buy into if it's ever developed.
Sometimes the low tech solution is the best solution. I good key lock is not going to fail if it is not abused. With a bluetooth solution, all bets are off. Almost anything can got wrong.
Oh and as far as losing the key; What says you can't lose your phone?? Happens all of the time. I can carry a spare key. How many people carry a spare cell phone.??
#22
Every day a winding road
Now a device that is not a lock but alarms and sends a text to your phone when removed? That makes a lot of sense. It can still fail but so what? If it fails you are no worse off than if you didn't use it at all.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Ontario
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think they're pretty cool. I want the kind that mounts to the frame & locks the back wheel.
Like so...
Living in a City with high bike theft I think it would be great while relaxing in a park.
I've already had 3 people approach me while sitting down attempting to steal my bike.
Like so...
Living in a City with high bike theft I think it would be great while relaxing in a park.
I've already had 3 people approach me while sitting down attempting to steal my bike.
#24
Senior Member
The difference to a car is I don't need to manually mangle the chain around my car frame and some obstacle.
This lock doesn't really save much time since getting my phone out takes the same time as using a key. What takes long is to route the chain through frame and something to lock onto.
the real problem with bike locks is not the inconvenience of locking. The problem is to be practical the chain needs to be long to find good spots to lock onto. the other problem to be secure it needs to be heavy material. Long and heavy material = heavy. what the world needs is a long cable that is light but reasonably secure (i.e. equals a heavy chain). No lock is perfect, but inventing a cable lock at least as secure as a chain would be helpful.
U-locks can get heavy, and require a well placed thin pole. chains are more practical and can be long to give me more easy locking options, but get heavy.
This lock doesn't really save much time since getting my phone out takes the same time as using a key. What takes long is to route the chain through frame and something to lock onto.
the real problem with bike locks is not the inconvenience of locking. The problem is to be practical the chain needs to be long to find good spots to lock onto. the other problem to be secure it needs to be heavy material. Long and heavy material = heavy. what the world needs is a long cable that is light but reasonably secure (i.e. equals a heavy chain). No lock is perfect, but inventing a cable lock at least as secure as a chain would be helpful.
U-locks can get heavy, and require a well placed thin pole. chains are more practical and can be long to give me more easy locking options, but get heavy.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I don't see how you come to that, but I'm sure that the people who use and like the product (like OP) will disagree with you, which is the only way that it matters either way. That's the great thing about technology. No matter what there will be naysayers who cannot see the point, but in the end their opinions don't matter. If it has utility for enough people who do like it, that's what matters.