Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Cycle computer settings, 207,210?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!
View Poll Results: How do you set the "calc" number?
Set the number on the money
10
76.92%
Set the number "low" for the tire size
2
15.38%
Set then number "high" for the tire size
1
7.69%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Cycle computer settings, 207,210?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-02, 06:46 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Richard Cranium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Posts: 3,013

Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 44 Times in 35 Posts
Cycle computer settings, 207,210?

When I setup my cycle computers I always end up resetting the "circumference number" a little lower than the recommended tire size. if I set it normally, by the instructions table, it seem to give to "high" of a distance/speed reading....

Any comments?

Last edited by Richard Cranium; 07-12-02 at 06:24 AM.
Richard Cranium is offline  
Old 07-11-02, 06:59 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
lotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: n.w. superdrome
Posts: 17,687

Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
I do the measuring and then set the wheel circumference
that way. Seems to be a bit more accurate that way.

Marty
__________________
Sono pił lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.


Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
lotek is offline  
Old 07-11-02, 07:05 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,452
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I measured my tires and set the size on the dot.
Cadd is offline  
Old 07-11-02, 07:07 AM
  #4  
bac
Senior Member
 
bac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,481

Bikes: Too many to list!

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally posted by Richard Cranium
When I setup my cycle computers I always end up resetting the "circumference number" a little lower than the recommended tire size. if I set it normally, by the instructions table, it seem to give to "high" of a distance/speed reading....

Any comments?
Yup, I'd stick with your measurement. Also, you should put weight on the bike when doing this measurement as the rider's weight will compress the tires a bit. Then, as a check, take the cage (auto) out and measure an exact 5-mile distance and check it with the bike. Then ... adjust accordingly.
bac is offline  
Old 07-11-02, 09:11 AM
  #5  
A Heart Needs a Home
 
Rich Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you're referring to the numbers in the manual, the correct answer isn't in your poll.

The correct answer is: do several rollouts to get the true circumference of your tire at normal pressure with you on the bike. Use the average and input that number.

The numbers in the manuals are by necessity only crude approximations. They can't know what brand of tire you use, how much pressure is in it, or how much you weigh.

RichC
Rich Clark is offline  
Old 07-11-02, 10:13 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6,521

Bikes: Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I measured once with my weigth on the bike - this time it matched the manual. I wouldnt mind if it was off a bit, because I am only interested in how my speed or distance compared with my other rides. I am not trying to get my performance into the Guiness Book of Records, so the exact numbers dont matter.
AndrewP is offline  
Old 07-11-02, 11:11 AM
  #7  
have bike will tour
 
catfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wisconsin / New Mexico
Posts: 387

Bikes: Trek 5200, Trek 520, Trek 2120

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
yep I measure the wheel roll i get pretty accurate readings comparing it to an automobile spedomitor ? i have seen more than a few auto speedomitors to be off too right from the factory. I think it is a scam to make you use up the warentee miles quicker
CF
catfish is offline  
Old 07-12-02, 06:31 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Richard Cranium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Posts: 3,013

Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 44 Times in 35 Posts
Well that was a true "Richard Cranium" poll, the poll was supposed to ask weather you used the "table" supplied with computer.

However the other answers still apply. Is the number you use higher or lower, or on the money (the table value).?

Most computers use the fornt wheel, I can't beleive there's enough "tire flattening" to create much error....never mind..

I know that Cat-eye Mighty 3's are "mighty" generous with their speed values........distance values....
Richard Cranium is offline  
Old 07-15-02, 08:26 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
fofa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Using 3 roll out average (with rider on bike).
2 different computers and bikes, both 20 inch wheels.
Bike 1 daughters (9 years old) Childs Mtn Bike with knobby tires, about 1/8 inch less than the 20 inch setting in the manual.
Bike 2 my LWB 'Bent with street tires, 3 1/4 inches LESS then the 20 inch setting in the manual.
Both manuals had the same 20 inch setting.
fofa is offline  
Old 07-15-02, 10:51 AM
  #10  
To infinity and beyond
 
Anders K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 425

Bikes: Cannondale M600, Crescent 92318, Bianchi Lo Spillone (tandem)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I measure to get as close as possible. That“s me

Anders K
Anders K is offline  
Old 07-15-02, 12:01 PM
  #11  
Member
 
greatnexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Get it close enough and just ride....that's my theory
greatnexus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.