Mopeds on sidewalks
#26
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 12,417
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3912 Post(s)
Liked 3,379 Times
in
2,269 Posts
Shoot out his tires. Those nail devices that move a nail from a magazine to a barrel and from the barrel move quickly out towards whatever you are intending to nail because saying the dirty G word is verbotten would be an excellent choice. You could just say you are a roofer and it went off.
Though videos are the popular thing these days with the youtubin' and the instanttelegrams the kids are all about.
Though videos are the popular thing these days with the youtubin' and the instanttelegrams the kids are all about.
#27
Rhapsodic Laviathan
It's the IC engine version of an e-bike, it should be allowed wherever bikes go right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moped
Sorry, I've always used the word "moped" for any bike with pedals and a gas motor. I see a "moped" is actually a scooter. The ones I see, including this morning, are all bikes equipped with gas motors that make them much faster and heavier than your average sidewalk biker. Not really a "moped," but still not something that should be on the sidewalk.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 14,976
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7353 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,590 Posts
Almost perfect. @TimothyH (I assume) figured that step 4--"Spray the loser with bear spray"---was a given and didn't need to be listed.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,676
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 768 Times
in
400 Posts
My town has conflicting laws on what does and doesn't need registration. A "moped" is 50cc or under, goes 25mph or less, and requires registration and insurance. A "motorized bike" is 48cc or under, goes 20mph or less, and doesn't require anything. Nobody registers or plates anything regardless. Yes, motoring on the sidewalk is illegal. No, the police won't go out of their way to catch people doing it.
I think "let it go" like Ivy first said is the best advice, which I'm happy to do. But, this particular person seems like one of those man-children who never grew out of the "you can't tell me what to do" phase. I've seen him before, and I'm sure I'll see him again. I'm worried he might go out of his way to invade my space on the sidewalk now.
I did file a police report in case things escalate, but the officer said "there's nothing we can do," as I expected.
@jefnvk , it's a narrow sidewalk next to a busy road with good bike lanes. He rides for miles all on the sidewalk, not just coasting up to park somewhere.
@livedarklions , I'm more worried about the dogs than I am about myself, if he decides he wants to run one of us over.
I think "let it go" like Ivy first said is the best advice, which I'm happy to do. But, this particular person seems like one of those man-children who never grew out of the "you can't tell me what to do" phase. I've seen him before, and I'm sure I'll see him again. I'm worried he might go out of his way to invade my space on the sidewalk now.
I did file a police report in case things escalate, but the officer said "there's nothing we can do," as I expected.
@jefnvk , it's a narrow sidewalk next to a busy road with good bike lanes. He rides for miles all on the sidewalk, not just coasting up to park somewhere.
@livedarklions , I'm more worried about the dogs than I am about myself, if he decides he wants to run one of us over.
You blocked the sidewalk.
You then escalated it further by telling him to get off the sidewalk.
You wanted a battle so you started a battle and now out of nowhere you have determined that he might want to run over your dogs?
You clearly have issues

#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 6,830
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,617 Times
in
1,712 Posts
being a vigilante is not needed when other indirect means can usually yield a better solution with less of a negative outcome for the offended party.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#31
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,782
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6841 Post(s)
Liked 731 Times
in
465 Posts
Almost perfect. @TimothyH (I assume) figured that step 4--"Spray the loser with bear spray"---was a given and didn't need to be listed.
-Tim-
Last edited by TimothyH; 09-04-18 at 07:53 AM.
#32
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8182 Post(s)
Liked 9,077 Times
in
5,047 Posts
You are the one that caused the confrontation by ‘standing your ground’
You blocked the sidewalk.
You then escalated it further by telling him to get off the sidewalk.
You wanted a battle so you started a battle and now out of nowhere you have determined that he might want to run over your dogs?
You clearly have issues

BS.
The moped rider was on the sidewalk illegally, and essentially demanded implicitly that pedestrians who are there legally get off of the sidewalk so that the illegal moped operation could continue uninterrupted.
There's a world of difference between being justifiably angry and "having issues" The moped rider was grossly violating safety laws and norms, what he is doing is actually quite dangerous. Telling him to stop and refusing to move seems pretty damn reasonable. Physically attacking him or the like would not.
If you think running a motorized vehicle illegally on a sidewalk isn't confronting the pedestrians on that sidewalk, you clearly have issues of your own.
As for fear for the dogs being reasonable, you and I weren't there to see how the moped rider was acting, so our opinions are absurdly uninformed.
Likes For livedarklions:
#33
peddles & breaks
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 216
Bikes: 1986 Schwinn Prelude, 1988 Basso Arrenacia, 2001 Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times
in
53 Posts
You are the one that caused the confrontation by ‘standing your ground’
You blocked the sidewalk.
You then escalated it further by telling him to get off the sidewalk.
You wanted a battle so you started a battle and now out of nowhere you have determined that he might want to run over your dogs?
You clearly have issues



To everyone else who made helpful, non-violent suggestions, thanks. I haven't seen the guy again, so maybe it doesn't matter.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,676
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 768 Times
in
400 Posts
BS.
The moped rider was on the sidewalk illegally, and essentially demanded implicitly that pedestrians who are there legally get off of the sidewalk so that the illegal moped operation could continue uninterrupted.
There's a world of difference between being justifiably angry and "having issues" The moped rider was grossly violating safety laws and norms, what he is doing is actually quite dangerous. Telling him to stop and refusing to move seems pretty damn reasonable. Physically attacking him or the like would not.
If you think running a motorized vehicle illegally on a sidewalk isn't confronting the pedestrians on that sidewalk, you clearly have issues of your own.
As for fear for the dogs being reasonable, you and I weren't there to see how the moped rider was acting, so our opinions are absurdly uninformed.
The moped rider was on the sidewalk illegally, and essentially demanded implicitly that pedestrians who are there legally get off of the sidewalk so that the illegal moped operation could continue uninterrupted.
There's a world of difference between being justifiably angry and "having issues" The moped rider was grossly violating safety laws and norms, what he is doing is actually quite dangerous. Telling him to stop and refusing to move seems pretty damn reasonable. Physically attacking him or the like would not.
If you think running a motorized vehicle illegally on a sidewalk isn't confronting the pedestrians on that sidewalk, you clearly have issues of your own.
As for fear for the dogs being reasonable, you and I weren't there to see how the moped rider was acting, so our opinions are absurdly uninformed.
You lost me after that ridiculous string of words.
Read my post. It is factual based upon the OP’s statement.
Your post on the other hand is pure conjecture.
Good job

#35
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8182 Post(s)
Liked 9,077 Times
in
5,047 Posts
You clearly want an internet fight.
I was on a narrow sidewalk and did not jump out of the way for someone illegally driving down it. Yes, I confronted him, because I'd rather not have to deal with that crap when I'm out walking the dogs. No, it wasn't the smartest thing to do. People aren't smart when they're mad.
That's my takeaway from this experience. A thoughtful, helpful point. Ironic, coming from someone with your username.
To everyone else who made helpful, non-violent suggestions, thanks. I haven't seen the guy again, so maybe it doesn't matter.

That's my takeaway from this experience. A thoughtful, helpful point. Ironic, coming from someone with your username.

To everyone else who made helpful, non-violent suggestions, thanks. I haven't seen the guy again, so maybe it doesn't matter.
Just my 2 cents--I think the way you handled it was fine, and miles away from vigilantism. It's possible that enough people acting this way has made sidewalk riding so inconvenient that he actually has stopped doing it.
#36
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8182 Post(s)
Liked 9,077 Times
in
5,047 Posts
As usual, you pick fights with no knowledge or sense.
#37
peddles & breaks
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 216
Bikes: 1986 Schwinn Prelude, 1988 Basso Arrenacia, 2001 Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times
in
53 Posts
And I appreciate the support, but don't feed the troll.

#38
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8182 Post(s)
Liked 9,077 Times
in
5,047 Posts
No problem--both as a pedestrian and a cyclist, I definitely believe that not taking stuff meekly is important. As a cyclist, I believe that courtesy to pedestrians should be observed at all times, and sidewalks are for walking and kids. The only motorized vehicles that should be there are devices for disabled people.
#39
Senior Member
This whole affair is an offense to wisdom and reason.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 14,976
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7353 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,590 Posts
#41
Senior Member
This is also the case for some versions of e-bike. Did you not look at the wikipedia link and see where mopeds started? I really don't see "e-bikes" as any different from a moped, especially since MOtor PEDaler doesn't specify what sort of motor is being used. As batteries improve, I see no reason why e-bikes wouldn't follow the same development path as IC mopeds have.
Likes For Caliper:
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,676
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 768 Times
in
400 Posts

You also stated that you are worried about you and/or your dogs getting run over by a moped.
Good stuff.
#43
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8182 Post(s)
Liked 9,077 Times
in
5,047 Posts
This is also the case for some versions of e-bike. Did you not look at the wikipedia link and see where mopeds started? I really don't see "e-bikes" as any different from a moped, especially since MOtor PEDaler doesn't specify what sort of motor is being used. As batteries improve, I see no reason why e-bikes wouldn't follow the same development path as IC mopeds have.
Call them what you want, neither of them should be ridden on sidewalks. It's going to be questions of size, speed and weight that are going to be important in determining whether the vehicle should be allowed on a bike path or bike lane, not the nature of the fuel.
I'm starting to see some very heavy pedal assisted delivery vehicles on bike paths that would definitely be too heavy to pedal unassisted. Getting bumped by something that heavy in the realative close confines of a path is a pretty scary prospect.
#44
Senior Member
It's going to be questions of size, speed and weight that are going to be important in determining whether the vehicle should be allowed on a bike path or bike lane, not the nature of the fuel.
I'm starting to see some very heavy pedal assisted delivery vehicles on bike paths that would definitely be too heavy to pedal unassisted. Getting bumped by something that heavy in the relative close confines of a path is a pretty scary prospect.
I'm starting to see some very heavy pedal assisted delivery vehicles on bike paths that would definitely be too heavy to pedal unassisted. Getting bumped by something that heavy in the relative close confines of a path is a pretty scary prospect.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,088
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 757 Post(s)
Liked 546 Times
in
314 Posts
this reminds me of a silly bumper sticker I saw once that said "IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE WAY I'M DRIVING THEN GET OFF THE SIDEWALK!"
#46
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8182 Post(s)
Liked 9,077 Times
in
5,047 Posts
Wow, good question. Interesting that didn't even occur to me, they definitely don't make me nervous and now I need to think about why.
Part of it is speed, I've never seen anyone riding tandems fast on a path, but I also think it's the shape of the vehicle. Some of these motor assist delivery vehicles are getting really wide, and most paths are pretty narrow, with a lot of bits sticking out wider than the rider. I'm nervous about getting side-swiped by something like that, whereas I think that's a somewhat unlikely scenario for a tandem. I also think tandems are hard enough to ride that there isn't likely to be a drastic increase in their numbers, where I just think we're seeing the leading edge of a trend towards motorized electric bikes. As the motors get better and better, we can also expect the weight of the vehicles to continue to go up, while tandems will generally stay the same as they are now.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 6,830
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,617 Times
in
1,712 Posts
#48
Senior Member
#50
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,008
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1141 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times
in
236 Posts
Also, send a note to the local prosecutor and several local attorneys saying "You may be dealing with this guy in a tort suit or criminal case if he hurts someone by illegally riding on the sidewalk - let me know if you need a witness to the fact that he's demonstrated contempt for the safety of others".
May be illegal to publish the video. As I understand it, you are perfectly within your rights to record the video, but there are restrictions on publishing without the subject's permission. Forum members who are lawyers can comment. I'm not. See https://www.quora.com/Is-it-illegal-...t-them-knowing
May be illegal to publish the video. As I understand it, you are perfectly within your rights to record the video, but there are restrictions on publishing without the subject's permission. Forum members who are lawyers can comment. I'm not. See https://www.quora.com/Is-it-illegal-...t-them-knowing