Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Settle an argument?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Settle an argument?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-19, 11:32 PM
  #26  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times in 1,433 Posts
What about the heavier guy with the 20 lb bike and the lighter wheels?

Last edited by Kapusta; 03-29-19 at 11:40 PM.
Kapusta is online now  
Old 03-29-19, 11:59 PM
  #27  
Dirty Heathen
 
Ironfish653's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182

Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times in 534 Posts
Heavier rider on the lighter bike, all other things being more-or-less equal.

I did this exact ‘experiment’ over the winter. I gained some weight, partly because of a job change, but I also shifted my exercise away from running and cycling more towards weights and strength training.
I also upgraded my road bike with modern aero wheels, better tires, 9-speed 105 from RSX, and a better fitting cockpit. The bike probably lost 3-4 lb, I gained 10.
First ride of the spring I picked up ~1.5 mph on average ‘cruising’ speed and 3 mph in ‘sprint’ mode.
Hoping for more improvement as I get more mileage in this year.
Ironfish653 is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 12:18 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
OP's request is to settle the argument.

I don't think that's going to happen.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 01:24 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Settle it like Gentlemen

Burr V Hamilton
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 01:29 PM
  #30  
Lopsided biped
 
rollagain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 737

Bikes: 2017 Day 6 Cyclone (the Buick); 2015 Simcoe Deluxe (the Xebec); Street Strider 3i (the not-a-bike); GreenSpeed Anura (the Black Swan)

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 316 Post(s)
Liked 160 Times in 97 Posts
Wow. Nice to whittle the huge pile of variables down to just two.
rollagain is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 01:36 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,235
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18411 Post(s)
Liked 15,531 Times in 7,327 Posts
Originally Posted by AWillZ
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
This discussion is pointless without knowing whether or not both bikes are red.

Please supply this crucial information.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 01:40 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times in 1,834 Posts
What color is the bike? Oops .... @ indyfabz beat me to it.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 01:57 PM
  #33  
Veteran, Pacifist
 
Wildwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328

Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?

Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,832 Times in 2,229 Posts
The motor accounts for the vast majority of bike performance. Followed by overcoming air resistance (at speed). Everything else is a much smaller factor to adding speed.

So given equal motor output (and equivalent drivetrains) the person+bike with the best aero profile is favored in a race for speed.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.

Last edited by Wildwood; 03-30-19 at 02:01 PM.
Wildwood is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 02:33 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18373 Post(s)
Liked 4,508 Times in 3,351 Posts
Obviously this also depends on the course.

Are we talking hills, or pounding on the level?

That 5 lbs will likely get lost in the noise...

But, go up a bit... 10 lbs difference? And the stronger rider will win.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 02:54 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 315

Bikes: 2016 Cervelo R3 2018 Rodriguez Tandem

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Can there be anything as silly as posting on an internet forum to "settle an argument"?
124Spider is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 08:35 PM
  #36  
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by pstolz
I agree with this. If the five pounds goes to muscle, it makes a huge difference.

​​​​​​And if the five pounds is removed from the bike by taking off the tires and the handlebars, that would also make a huge difference.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 08:46 PM
  #37  
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Percentage body fat could be equal, but the extra five pounds of muscle could be upper body, which really gives you no power advantage on a bike. Unless the five pounds are leg or gluteal muscle, it's just five more pounds of gross vehicle weight, and eliminating it would just have the same effect as reducing the weight of the bike.

​​​​​​And on what planet can we just assume that the extra five pounds isn't fat? Five pounds heavier on the same frame is just as likely to indicate the heavier person is less fit.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 03-30-19, 09:09 PM
  #38  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Matter for what? Speed? All things being equal friction would be the same.
kyleand is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 06:31 AM
  #39  
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
Originally Posted by AWillZ
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
Drop them both from a 15-story building and see which one goes "splat" first?
Phil_gretz is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 06:43 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Skipjacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Mid Atlantic / USA
Posts: 2,115

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Crosstrail / 2013 Trek Crossrip Elite

Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1002 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times in 155 Posts
Originally Posted by kyleand
Matter for what? Speed? All things being equal friction would be the same.
This is the correct answer.

The friction to the ground will be the same.

The air resistance will be the same.

And the total amount of energy required to put that amount of mass forward will be the same.

That is if all other variables are equal such as the size and shape of the rider.

The scientific way to test this would be to have a 20 lb weight that the rider wears on his back, do time trials. Then take the same 20 lbs and attach it to the bike and do time trials. Same bike. Same bearings. Same wheels. Same tires. Same rider. Same strength. Same air resistance. Same total weight in both groups....only variable is the placement of the weight.

In a real world scenario though the lighter rider goes faster because the heavier rider needs to take more breaks to eat donuts and smoke.
Skipjacks is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 06:45 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 274
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
With respect to power output required to go the same pace uphill, the two will be the same. On the flats, aero profile comes more into play, so it is impossible to say which rider might need to put out more watts to go the same speed.
chicagogal is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 07:40 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipjacks
The scientific way to test this would be to have a 20 lb weight that the rider wears on his back, do time trials. Then take the same 20 lbs and attach it to the bike and do time trials. Same bike. Same bearings. Same wheels. Same tires. Same rider. Same strength. Same air resistance.
Why do you think changing the location of the weight wouldn't change air resistance? It's possible it might not, but not at all certain.
asgelle is online now  
Old 04-01-19, 08:09 AM
  #43  
Newbie racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406

Bikes: Propel, red is faster

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times in 974 Posts
People have very distorted views of what a "heavy" bike is. The local club run B rider probably thinks an alum cyclocross bike is heavy compared to some kind of climbing bike.

Yeah, but we're not talking 1990's era steel city cruiser versus a climbing bike.

My alum Crockett with high spoke count wheels and knobbies isn't THAT much heavier than my carbon road bike.

It almost always boils down to justifying a purchase. Buy what you want.

I still always contend that if the average A/B/C non-racer rider knew how it felt to ride a bike at an ideal and easy to maintain body weight......they'd be shocked. It makes a big difference.

That's not to pressure or judge anyone, do as you wish. Enjoy your purchase. Just don't think that shedding 3 lbs off your bike is going to be the difference between being a 185 lb club rider and a 155 lb club rider. Not even close home slice.
burnthesheep is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 10:19 AM
  #44  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
All other things being equal (which is entirely impossible) I'm fairly certain the effects of added weight will be least if it is on the bike somewhere other than the wheels. Rotating weight on the wheels would be a hindrance and would be a third variable. Weight on the bike is lower to the ground and not being a pendulum on the top of the seat or being on the body where it is not only higher up causing a higher center of gravity but also being more weight to support on your hands, hold up with your core muscles, or even worse rotating weight that you have to move if on your legs.

So really the only way to answer the question is to have the same 180# rider on the same 15# bike with a 5# weight what you can move from the rider to the bike. Even then its going to matter where you were to put the weight but I'd venture to guess the rider will do much better with the weight situated in his seat tube bottle cage as opposed to strapped to his back (i.e. Camelbak vs water bottles). The result would be (as stated above) less weight for the riders body to hold (less energy expense in doing so) and less pendulum effect thereby loosing less energy to keeping the bike upright and less energy loss in side-to-side motion from the upper body as he pedals.
Mitkraft is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 10:21 AM
  #45  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by 124Spider
Can there be anything as silly as posting on an internet forum to "settle an argument"?
Maybe asking for marital, medical, or legal advice?
Mitkraft is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 10:22 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,791
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 293 Posts
You come here to settle an argument? Good luck, the folks on BF can’t agree on anything.
eja_ bottecchia is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 10:25 AM
  #47  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by eja_ bottecchia
You come here to settle an argument? Good luck, the folks on BF can’t agree on anything.
Yes they can!
Mitkraft is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 10:34 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,791
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 293 Posts
Originally Posted by Mitkraft
Yes they can!
Sure.
eja_ bottecchia is offline  
Old 04-01-19, 11:22 AM
  #49  
Veteran, Pacifist
 
Wildwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328

Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?

Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,832 Times in 2,229 Posts
Does Trek make good bikes?
Is a custom bike better?
Grant Petersen is a cycling deity. Right?
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Wildwood is offline  
Old 04-02-19, 08:27 AM
  #50  
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
On to a more important question to settle--what's the ideal air pressure for a 700c 23mm tire operating on the moon?

Assuming that the ideal pressure is 100 pounds on earth, my friend says that because the gravity is 1/6 G, the proper pressure is 16.67 pounds, But I contend because the atmospheric pressure is 0, the proper pressure is no more than 4 pounds or the tire will explode, I, of course, calculated that by using the torocaca formula (proofs available if you send me $50 and a SASE).
livedarklions is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.