Settle an argument?
#26
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
What about the heavier guy with the 20 lb bike and the lighter wheels?
Last edited by Kapusta; 03-29-19 at 11:40 PM.
#27
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Heavier rider on the lighter bike, all other things being more-or-less equal.
I did this exact ‘experiment’ over the winter. I gained some weight, partly because of a job change, but I also shifted my exercise away from running and cycling more towards weights and strength training.
I also upgraded my road bike with modern aero wheels, better tires, 9-speed 105 from RSX, and a better fitting cockpit. The bike probably lost 3-4 lb, I gained 10.
First ride of the spring I picked up ~1.5 mph on average ‘cruising’ speed and 3 mph in ‘sprint’ mode.
Hoping for more improvement as I get more mileage in this year.
I did this exact ‘experiment’ over the winter. I gained some weight, partly because of a job change, but I also shifted my exercise away from running and cycling more towards weights and strength training.
I also upgraded my road bike with modern aero wheels, better tires, 9-speed 105 from RSX, and a better fitting cockpit. The bike probably lost 3-4 lb, I gained 10.
First ride of the spring I picked up ~1.5 mph on average ‘cruising’ speed and 3 mph in ‘sprint’ mode.
Hoping for more improvement as I get more mileage in this year.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
OP's request is to settle the argument.
I don't think that's going to happen.
I don't think that's going to happen.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#29
Banned
#30
Lopsided biped
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 737
Bikes: 2017 Day 6 Cyclone (the Buick); 2015 Simcoe Deluxe (the Xebec); Street Strider 3i (the not-a-bike); GreenSpeed Anura (the Black Swan)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 316 Post(s)
Liked 160 Times
in
97 Posts
Wow. Nice to whittle the huge pile of variables down to just two.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,235
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18411 Post(s)
Liked 15,531 Times
in
7,327 Posts
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
Please supply this crucial information.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,488
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
What color is the bike? Oops .... @ indyfabz beat me to it.
#33
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,832 Times
in
2,229 Posts
The motor accounts for the vast majority of bike performance. Followed by overcoming air resistance (at speed). Everything else is a much smaller factor to adding speed.
So given equal motor output (and equivalent drivetrains) the person+bike with the best aero profile is favored in a race for speed.
So given equal motor output (and equivalent drivetrains) the person+bike with the best aero profile is favored in a race for speed.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 03-30-19 at 02:01 PM.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18373 Post(s)
Liked 4,508 Times
in
3,351 Posts
Obviously this also depends on the course.
Are we talking hills, or pounding on the level?
That 5 lbs will likely get lost in the noise...
But, go up a bit... 10 lbs difference? And the stronger rider will win.
Are we talking hills, or pounding on the level?
That 5 lbs will likely get lost in the noise...
But, go up a bit... 10 lbs difference? And the stronger rider will win.
#35
Senior Member
Can there be anything as silly as posting on an internet forum to "settle an argument"?
#36
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
#37
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Percentage body fat could be equal, but the extra five pounds of muscle could be upper body, which really gives you no power advantage on a bike. Unless the five pounds are leg or gluteal muscle, it's just five more pounds of gross vehicle weight, and eliminating it would just have the same effect as reducing the weight of the bike.
And on what planet can we just assume that the extra five pounds isn't fat? Five pounds heavier on the same frame is just as likely to indicate the heavier person is less fit.
And on what planet can we just assume that the extra five pounds isn't fat? Five pounds heavier on the same frame is just as likely to indicate the heavier person is less fit.
#39
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times
in
806 Posts
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Mid Atlantic / USA
Posts: 2,115
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Crosstrail / 2013 Trek Crossrip Elite
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1002 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
155 Posts
The friction to the ground will be the same.
The air resistance will be the same.
And the total amount of energy required to put that amount of mass forward will be the same.
That is if all other variables are equal such as the size and shape of the rider.
The scientific way to test this would be to have a 20 lb weight that the rider wears on his back, do time trials. Then take the same 20 lbs and attach it to the bike and do time trials. Same bike. Same bearings. Same wheels. Same tires. Same rider. Same strength. Same air resistance. Same total weight in both groups....only variable is the placement of the weight.
In a real world scenario though the lighter rider goes faster because the heavier rider needs to take more breaks to eat donuts and smoke.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 274
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
With respect to power output required to go the same pace uphill, the two will be the same. On the flats, aero profile comes more into play, so it is impossible to say which rider might need to put out more watts to go the same speed.
#42
Senior Member
The scientific way to test this would be to have a 20 lb weight that the rider wears on his back, do time trials. Then take the same 20 lbs and attach it to the bike and do time trials. Same bike. Same bearings. Same wheels. Same tires. Same rider. Same strength. Same air resistance.
#43
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
People have very distorted views of what a "heavy" bike is. The local club run B rider probably thinks an alum cyclocross bike is heavy compared to some kind of climbing bike.
Yeah, but we're not talking 1990's era steel city cruiser versus a climbing bike.
My alum Crockett with high spoke count wheels and knobbies isn't THAT much heavier than my carbon road bike.
It almost always boils down to justifying a purchase. Buy what you want.
I still always contend that if the average A/B/C non-racer rider knew how it felt to ride a bike at an ideal and easy to maintain body weight......they'd be shocked. It makes a big difference.
That's not to pressure or judge anyone, do as you wish. Enjoy your purchase. Just don't think that shedding 3 lbs off your bike is going to be the difference between being a 185 lb club rider and a 155 lb club rider. Not even close home slice.
Yeah, but we're not talking 1990's era steel city cruiser versus a climbing bike.
My alum Crockett with high spoke count wheels and knobbies isn't THAT much heavier than my carbon road bike.
It almost always boils down to justifying a purchase. Buy what you want.
I still always contend that if the average A/B/C non-racer rider knew how it felt to ride a bike at an ideal and easy to maintain body weight......they'd be shocked. It makes a big difference.
That's not to pressure or judge anyone, do as you wish. Enjoy your purchase. Just don't think that shedding 3 lbs off your bike is going to be the difference between being a 185 lb club rider and a 155 lb club rider. Not even close home slice.
#44
Junior Member
All other things being equal (which is entirely impossible) I'm fairly certain the effects of added weight will be least if it is on the bike somewhere other than the wheels. Rotating weight on the wheels would be a hindrance and would be a third variable. Weight on the bike is lower to the ground and not being a pendulum on the top of the seat or being on the body where it is not only higher up causing a higher center of gravity but also being more weight to support on your hands, hold up with your core muscles, or even worse rotating weight that you have to move if on your legs.
So really the only way to answer the question is to have the same 180# rider on the same 15# bike with a 5# weight what you can move from the rider to the bike. Even then its going to matter where you were to put the weight but I'd venture to guess the rider will do much better with the weight situated in his seat tube bottle cage as opposed to strapped to his back (i.e. Camelbak vs water bottles). The result would be (as stated above) less weight for the riders body to hold (less energy expense in doing so) and less pendulum effect thereby loosing less energy to keeping the bike upright and less energy loss in side-to-side motion from the upper body as he pedals.
So really the only way to answer the question is to have the same 180# rider on the same 15# bike with a 5# weight what you can move from the rider to the bike. Even then its going to matter where you were to put the weight but I'd venture to guess the rider will do much better with the weight situated in his seat tube bottle cage as opposed to strapped to his back (i.e. Camelbak vs water bottles). The result would be (as stated above) less weight for the riders body to hold (less energy expense in doing so) and less pendulum effect thereby loosing less energy to keeping the bike upright and less energy loss in side-to-side motion from the upper body as he pedals.
#45
Junior Member
#47
Junior Member
#49
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,832 Times
in
2,229 Posts
Does Trek make good bikes?
Is a custom bike better?
Grant Petersen is a cycling deity. Right?
Is a custom bike better?
Grant Petersen is a cycling deity. Right?
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#50
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
On to a more important question to settle--what's the ideal air pressure for a 700c 23mm tire operating on the moon?
Assuming that the ideal pressure is 100 pounds on earth, my friend says that because the gravity is 1/6 G, the proper pressure is 16.67 pounds, But I contend because the atmospheric pressure is 0, the proper pressure is no more than 4 pounds or the tire will explode, I, of course, calculated that by using the torocaca formula (proofs available if you send me $50 and a SASE).
Assuming that the ideal pressure is 100 pounds on earth, my friend says that because the gravity is 1/6 G, the proper pressure is 16.67 pounds, But I contend because the atmospheric pressure is 0, the proper pressure is no more than 4 pounds or the tire will explode, I, of course, calculated that by using the torocaca formula (proofs available if you send me $50 and a SASE).