Settle an argument?
03-29-19, 02:44 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 37
Bikes: Ridley Damocles, Dura Ace 7800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Settle an argument?
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
03-29-19, 02:51 PM
#2
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8185 Post(s)
Liked 9,087 Times
in
5,052 Posts
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
Why would rider weight matter less than bike weight? Makes no sense.
Wheels spin, maybe.
03-29-19, 02:55 PM
#3
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 21,141
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Hybrid
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2991 Post(s)
Liked 5,908 Times
in
3,456 Posts
How about a 100 pound rider on a 100 pound bike?
03-29-19, 02:56 PM
#4
Senior Member
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
03-29-19, 02:57 PM
#5
Junior Member
Well, technically your friend is correct, from a purely International Bureau of Weights and Measures perspective.
If you are saying a 20lb bike is harder to move than a 15lb - I would agree.
....and what about the riders? is the 185lb chap an Olympic class athlete and the 180 lb a 5ft 1in couch potato or vice versa?
If you are saying a 20lb bike is harder to move than a 15lb - I would agree.
....and what about the riders? is the 185lb chap an Olympic class athlete and the 180 lb a 5ft 1in couch potato or vice versa?
03-29-19, 03:12 PM
#6
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8185 Post(s)
Liked 9,087 Times
in
5,052 Posts
Well, technically your friend is correct, from a purely International Bureau of Weights and Measures perspective.
If you are saying a 20lb bike is harder to move than a 15lb - I would agree.
....and what about the riders? is the 185lb chap an Olympic class athlete and the 180 lb a 5ft 1in couch potato or vice versa?
If you are saying a 20lb bike is harder to move than a 15lb - I would agree.
....and what about the riders? is the 185lb chap an Olympic class athlete and the 180 lb a 5ft 1in couch potato or vice versa?
03-29-19, 03:21 PM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Easton, MA
Posts: 632
Bikes: Specialized Ruby Sport
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 318 Post(s)
Liked 314 Times
in
165 Posts
I would have agreed with your friend. I wasn't going to worry about dropping grams off my bike until I got down to my own ideal weight. But I've been riding an old, heavy bike for a few years now. Since I started riding, I have dropped 40 pounds off myself with no appreciable improvement in performance (at least based on average speed). I do have more endurance now than when I started and I can attribute that to better conditioning and weight loss.
I just got a new bike. It's MUCH lighter than the old one. On the first day out, my average speed improved by 4 mph over what I was doing at the end of last season. And that is on the first ride of the year. I know it's not entirely the lighter bike. I went from a heavy, upright, flat-bar hybrid to a carbon-fiber road bike with very nice components. I'm sure the more aggressive riding position is helping me put more power through the pedals and my more aero position is helping me not lose all that power through wind resistance. But the new bike INSTANTLY made me a much better rider.
I just got a new bike. It's MUCH lighter than the old one. On the first day out, my average speed improved by 4 mph over what I was doing at the end of last season. And that is on the first ride of the year. I know it's not entirely the lighter bike. I went from a heavy, upright, flat-bar hybrid to a carbon-fiber road bike with very nice components. I'm sure the more aggressive riding position is helping me put more power through the pedals and my more aero position is helping me not lose all that power through wind resistance. But the new bike INSTANTLY made me a much better rider.
03-29-19, 03:23 PM
#8
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,000
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 808 Post(s)
Liked 1,292 Times
in
745 Posts
Gravity, friction, rolling resistance, what ever factor is in the equation, does not care where the weight is. Unless you are an elite racer 5 lbs is not going to make much difference. The mind set, talent, fitness and skills of the riders involved is the difference in average cyclists.
03-29-19, 03:27 PM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,009 Times
in
972 Posts
If the 2 riders are the same fitness level, same body fat percentage, etc., I'd guess the heavier rider has an advantage because he's propelling a smaller percentage of additional weight.
03-29-19, 03:30 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,588
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18044 Post(s)
Liked 4,354 Times
in
3,254 Posts
I wrestled in High School.
I was at 148 lbs. It was a big difference wrestling with guys say a couple of weight classes lower (130 pounds?), or a couple of weight classes higher (165 lbs?). And, the heavyweights were interesting.
So...
The big question is whether the 185 lb rider is actually stronger than the 180 lb rider.
Even if it is the same person, did the person lose muscle mass going from 185 to 180, or gain muscle going from 180 to 185?
Keep in mind, simply walking, that 185 pound person is getting more of a workout than the 180 lb person.
As far as rotating weight. It will depend a bit on whether it is at the hub or rim. There was discussions about rotating weight decades ago. I don't know what the current status is. Perhaps it is less important for steady state riding, and more important for accelerating.
For a high quality bike, there is also a trade-off between low profile light wheels and heavier high profile aero wheels. With the difference being in part dependent on the terrain.
I was at 148 lbs. It was a big difference wrestling with guys say a couple of weight classes lower (130 pounds?), or a couple of weight classes higher (165 lbs?). And, the heavyweights were interesting.
So...
The big question is whether the 185 lb rider is actually stronger than the 180 lb rider.
Even if it is the same person, did the person lose muscle mass going from 185 to 180, or gain muscle going from 180 to 185?
Keep in mind, simply walking, that 185 pound person is getting more of a workout than the 180 lb person.
As far as rotating weight. It will depend a bit on whether it is at the hub or rim. There was discussions about rotating weight decades ago. I don't know what the current status is. Perhaps it is less important for steady state riding, and more important for accelerating.
For a high quality bike, there is also a trade-off between low profile light wheels and heavier high profile aero wheels. With the difference being in part dependent on the terrain.
03-29-19, 06:14 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 657
Bikes: Norco search xr
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times
in
90 Posts
I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
03-29-19, 06:28 PM
#14
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
Both fall over at exactly the same rate.
03-29-19, 06:41 PM
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I wrestled in High School.
I was at 148 lbs. It was a big difference wrestling with guys say a couple of weight classes lower (130 pounds?), or a couple of weight classes higher (165 lbs?). And, the heavyweights were interesting.
So...
The big question is whether the 185 lb rider is actually stronger than the 180 lb rider.
Even if it is the same person, did the person lose muscle mass going from 185 to 180, or gain muscle going from 180 to 185?
I was at 148 lbs. It was a big difference wrestling with guys say a couple of weight classes lower (130 pounds?), or a couple of weight classes higher (165 lbs?). And, the heavyweights were interesting.
So...
The big question is whether the 185 lb rider is actually stronger than the 180 lb rider.
Even if it is the same person, did the person lose muscle mass going from 185 to 180, or gain muscle going from 180 to 185?
03-29-19, 06:45 PM
#16
Senior Member
03-29-19, 06:48 PM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,403
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5180 Post(s)
Liked 3,485 Times
in
2,288 Posts
03-29-19, 06:49 PM
#19
Senior Member
"Vs. a 105 lb rider on a 105 lb bike (who is running Shimano 105, the other guy is running Ultegra)."
That is called the 105 formula. 105+105+105=X
There is no known answer to this day and mathematicians the world over have been working the problem since the 90's. On the same level as the Beal problem, except there is no prize money if solved.
That is called the 105 formula. 105+105+105=X
There is no known answer to this day and mathematicians the world over have been working the problem since the 90's. On the same level as the Beal problem, except there is no prize money if solved.
03-29-19, 06:55 PM
#20
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,780
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 908 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
269 Posts
My friend contends that a 180 lb rider on a 20 lb bike is the same as a 185 lb rider on a 15 lb bike and I say not even close, 5 lbs of rider weight is far less significant than 5 lbs of bike weight. I also contend that a 16.5 lb bike with 1500 gram wheelset is going to be an advantage over a 15.5 lb bike with 1750 gram wheelset.
That's 200 grams net difference. Just one full water bottle, 22 ounces, is 650 grams. You can tell the difference when your bottle is full or empty?
Lightweight wheels feel faster, and usually have a little quicker steering response. They probably spin up faster, but that means they also lose speed faster when coasting.
03-29-19, 07:00 PM
#21
Senior Member
Peanut butter is more likely to land face-down than butter. Regardless of how light the wheels are. Oh, and the answer is 42.
03-29-19, 07:54 PM
#22
Senior Member
ROTATING weight is more important than the total bike weight. Other than that, my 200-ish pounds could stand to lose 40 pounds, and have more effect than my bike losing 20% of it's non-rotating weight.
03-29-19, 07:58 PM
#23
Senior Member
Yes, but how much more? 10%, 1%, or as is more likely 0.1%? Does it matter that 1lb on a wheel equals 1.001lb on the bike?
Also, I don’t think anyone thinks losing ~5lbs from the bike is better than losing 40lbs from the rider.
Also, I don’t think anyone thinks losing ~5lbs from the bike is better than losing 40lbs from the rider.
Last edited by asgelle; 03-29-19 at 08:01 PM.
03-29-19, 10:31 PM
#24
Senior Member
Fitness levels being equal (that is, watt output per lb of mass), the 185 lb rider will be slightly more powerful than the 180 lb rider. If the bikes being ridden equalize total weight, then the heavier rider will have the advantage.
