Hearts of Swimmers vs Runners vs... Cyclists
#101
Senior Member
Thread Starter
true, true... you need a regular exercise that's enough to afford the calories for a pint of beer...
#102
Senior Member
All of these comparisons are pointless. I ran cross country in high school and college, raced bikes for almost 20 years and I swam competitively from age 8 through college. I know something about all of these sports. Just saying one sport is "harder" than another is silly. You have to account for how hard you're going.
Putting on a pair of trunks and splashing around for 20 lengths is easy, swimming 1,000 yards under 10 minutes is friggen hard.
Jogging at a 9:30 pace for a few miles is easy, running a 5k under 17 minutes is friggen hard.
Getting out the flat bar bike and tooling around at 13 mph is easy, half an hour at 350+ watts on a bike is friggen hard.
Too many people say "cycling is easy" because they're unfamiliar with what riding truly fast feels like. Hop in a cat 1/2 crit some time that's spiking at over 34 mph, get back to me on how "easy" cycling is.
Putting on a pair of trunks and splashing around for 20 lengths is easy, swimming 1,000 yards under 10 minutes is friggen hard.
Jogging at a 9:30 pace for a few miles is easy, running a 5k under 17 minutes is friggen hard.
Getting out the flat bar bike and tooling around at 13 mph is easy, half an hour at 350+ watts on a bike is friggen hard.
Too many people say "cycling is easy" because they're unfamiliar with what riding truly fast feels like. Hop in a cat 1/2 crit some time that's spiking at over 34 mph, get back to me on how "easy" cycling is.
#103
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: SW Michigan/SW Alabama
Posts: 35
Bikes: Trek FX2, Nishiki Tri-A, Univega Sportech
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
All of these comparisons are pointless. I ran cross country in high school and college, raced bikes for almost 20 years and I swam competitively from age 8 through college. I know something about all of these sports. Just saying one sport is "harder" than another is silly. You have to account for how hard you're going.
Putting on a pair of trunks and splashing around for 20 lengths is easy, swimming 1,000 yards under 10 minutes is friggen hard.
Jogging at a 9:30 pace for a few miles is easy, running a 5k under 17 minutes is friggen hard.
Getting out the flat bar bike and tooling around at 13 mph is easy, half an hour at 350+ watts on a bike is friggen hard.
Too many people say "cycling is easy" because they're unfamiliar with what riding truly fast feels like. Hop in a cat 1/2 crit some time that's spiking at over 34 mph, get back to me on how "easy" cycling is.
Putting on a pair of trunks and splashing around for 20 lengths is easy, swimming 1,000 yards under 10 minutes is friggen hard.
Jogging at a 9:30 pace for a few miles is easy, running a 5k under 17 minutes is friggen hard.
Getting out the flat bar bike and tooling around at 13 mph is easy, half an hour at 350+ watts on a bike is friggen hard.
Too many people say "cycling is easy" because they're unfamiliar with what riding truly fast feels like. Hop in a cat 1/2 crit some time that's spiking at over 34 mph, get back to me on how "easy" cycling is.
#104
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,466
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8105 Post(s)
Liked 8,950 Times
in
4,978 Posts
All of these comparisons are pointless. I ran cross country in high school and college, raced bikes for almost 20 years and I swam competitively from age 8 through college. I know something about all of these sports. Just saying one sport is "harder" than another is silly. You have to account for how hard you're going.
Putting on a pair of trunks and splashing around for 20 lengths is easy, swimming 1,000 yards under 10 minutes is friggen hard.
Jogging at a 9:30 pace for a few miles is easy, running a 5k under 17 minutes is friggen hard.
Getting out the flat bar bike and tooling around at 13 mph is easy, half an hour at 350+ watts on a bike is friggen hard.
Too many people say "cycling is easy" because they're unfamiliar with what riding truly fast feels like. Hop in a cat 1/2 crit some time that's spiking at over 34 mph, get back to me on how "easy" cycling is.
Putting on a pair of trunks and splashing around for 20 lengths is easy, swimming 1,000 yards under 10 minutes is friggen hard.
Jogging at a 9:30 pace for a few miles is easy, running a 5k under 17 minutes is friggen hard.
Getting out the flat bar bike and tooling around at 13 mph is easy, half an hour at 350+ watts on a bike is friggen hard.
Too many people say "cycling is easy" because they're unfamiliar with what riding truly fast feels like. Hop in a cat 1/2 crit some time that's spiking at over 34 mph, get back to me on how "easy" cycling is.
#105
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1018 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times
in
199 Posts
All of these comparisons are pointless. I ran cross country in high school and college, raced bikes for almost 20 years and I swam competitively from age 8 through college. I know something about all of these sports. Just saying one sport is "harder" than another is silly. You have to account for how hard you're going.
Putting on a pair of trunks and splashing around for 20 lengths is easy, swimming 1,000 yards under 10 minutes is friggen hard.
Jogging at a 9:30 pace for a few miles is easy, running a 5k under 17 minutes is friggen hard.
Getting out the flat bar bike and tooling around at 13 mph is easy, half an hour at 350+ watts on a bike is friggen hard.
Too many people say "cycling is easy" because they're unfamiliar with what riding truly fast feels like. Hop in a cat 1/2 crit some time that's spiking at over 34 mph, get back to me on how "easy" cycling is.
Putting on a pair of trunks and splashing around for 20 lengths is easy, swimming 1,000 yards under 10 minutes is friggen hard.
Jogging at a 9:30 pace for a few miles is easy, running a 5k under 17 minutes is friggen hard.
Getting out the flat bar bike and tooling around at 13 mph is easy, half an hour at 350+ watts on a bike is friggen hard.
Too many people say "cycling is easy" because they're unfamiliar with what riding truly fast feels like. Hop in a cat 1/2 crit some time that's spiking at over 34 mph, get back to me on how "easy" cycling is.
Wait... I said essentially the exact same thing a week or so ago. Does my post not count?

#106
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1018 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times
in
199 Posts
The other reason these comparisons are silly is because we're probably talking about small marginal differences in effects on the heart and other factors are and should be more important in selecting activities for yourself. I'm not going to run because it would cripple me, and I don't want to swim very much because I find it inconvenient and tedious, especially since I'm essentially blind when I take my glasses off.
#107
Senior Member
This is a very interesting thread. I've learned (I think) quite a bit. Your "runners high" comment caught my eye...
I know every time I go out on my bike, the first 8 to 12 miles almost always feels like work. Very rarely does it not. The heart rate goes up, I'm breathing hard and I'm very aware of the legs working hard. But after that initial period of "work" the adrenaline kicks in, the heart rate goes down, the heavy breathing subsides and I can literally go all day long (well, up to about 100 miles or so). I get into a rhythm and forget all about my legs even moving. Almost feels like I’m riding a motorcycle. Well, maybe an E-Bike would be a better analogy. Most cyclists I talk to can relate to it, but very few casual riders know what I'm talking about.
I've often referred to it as "a runner's high" but does the term mean something else?
Btw... if I had to run to get my physical exercise, I'd be SOL. Tried it ...and it ain't for me. Not fun.
Last edited by one4smoke; 07-02-19 at 08:31 AM.
#108
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: SW Michigan/SW Alabama
Posts: 35
Bikes: Trek FX2, Nishiki Tri-A, Univega Sportech
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Maybe because I was not following the thread carefully enough and didn’t digest your post adequately. Apologies sent.....
#109
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
All of these comparisons are pointless. I ran cross country in high school and college, raced bikes for almost 20 years and I swam competitively from age 8 through college. I know something about all of these sports. Just saying one sport is "harder" than another is silly. You have to account for how hard you're going.
There are differences in physiological adaptations, between running and cycling. That isn't really debatable, and are the only "comparisons" that are really relevant to this thread. How those differences relate to the development of the athlete's heart may be debatable.
#110
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: SW Michigan/SW Alabama
Posts: 35
Bikes: Trek FX2, Nishiki Tri-A, Univega Sportech
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
There are differences in physiological adaptations, between running and cycling. That isn't really debatable, and are the only "comparisons" that are really relevant to this thread. How those differences relate to the development of the athlete's heart may be debatable.
#111
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,774
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1018 Post(s)
Liked 318 Times
in
199 Posts
This, at least, is something everyone should agree on.
Likes For OBoile:
#112
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Regardless, you'd be wrong about that.
Exactly. You keep talking about is or isn't "harder than the other" when no one else is concerned about it.
No, we said that going all out in one is no harder than the other... kind of based on the definition of "all out".
#114
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Going back to the original observation noted in the article, running is difficult from the onset because you are horizontal vs, swimming, for example - the heart has more to overcome compared to where the body is horizontal and the body weight is displaced by water. But then, you have more energy to apply to, for example, the breaststroke. It's only my assumption that cycling would fall somewhere in between running and swimming as far as... what you might think of is a sort of basic load on the heart before you do anything. But, as was mentioned - if you're going 'all out'... what more can you do. So,you must be doing the max, irrespective of whatever the sport may be. Still, apparently... there is some difference because heart health is different as far as overall health benefits being measured by longevity.
Last edited by McBTC; 07-03-19 at 07:10 PM.
#115
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 1,053 Times
in
628 Posts
I seem to recall, when I first got a heart rate monitor and wanted to find my maximum heart rate, I compared running uphill to the point of almost collapsing, with sprinting up a hill on a bike, also to the point of almost collapsing. I was able to get several beats per minute higher on the bike. However, I've been riding a bike almost all of my life, and only run occasionally, so that probably should not be surprising.
I would be curious of other people's experiences in this regard, whether they can achieve a higher heart rate while running, vs. biking, swimming, cross country skiing, or whatever.
I would be curious of other people's experiences in this regard, whether they can achieve a higher heart rate while running, vs. biking, swimming, cross country skiing, or whatever.
#116
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
I seem to recall, when I first got a heart rate monitor and wanted to find my maximum heart rate, I compared running uphill to the point of almost collapsing, with sprinting up a hill on a bike, also to the point of almost collapsing. I was able to get several beats per minute higher on the bike. However, I've been riding a bike almost all of my life, and only run occasionally, so that probably should not be surprising.
I would be curious of other people's experiences in this regard, whether they can achieve a higher heart rate while running, vs. biking, swimming, cross country skiing, or whatever.
I would be curious of other people's experiences in this regard, whether they can achieve a higher heart rate while running, vs. biking, swimming, cross country skiing, or whatever.
#117
Senior Member
Thread Starter
...
, I've been riding a bike almost all of my life, and only run occasionally, so that probably should not be surprising.
I would be curious of other people's experiences in this regard, whether they can achieve a higher heart rate while running, vs. biking, swimming, cross country skiing, or whatever.
, I've been riding a bike almost all of my life, and only run occasionally, so that probably should not be surprising.
I would be curious of other people's experiences in this regard, whether they can achieve a higher heart rate while running, vs. biking, swimming, cross country skiing, or whatever.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
20_700c
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
6
08-15-13 07:15 AM