![]() |
Originally Posted by kingston
(Post 21078285)
Can you explain why that's relevant? If it works what difference does it make if it's a lubricant or not?
Them nits ain't gonna pick themselves, y'know! |
Originally Posted by livedarklions
(Post 21078237)
Just from the other perspective because there's no right or wrong here, only preference and riding habits. I gave up on wax the first time I rode the bike with the waxed chain in a rainstorm. I just don't want to use something that might crap out on me 75 miles into a 150 mile ride.
|
Originally Posted by ksryder
(Post 21078306)
Yeah I don't want to have to re-wax a chain every 300 miles than I'm going to replace 3-4 times a year anyway.
|
Originally Posted by livedarklions
(Post 21078299)
All I can say is it crapped out big time for me that time, and I really don't want to have to prepare special for sudden unforeseeable downpours. We get ones that aren't in the forecast a fair amount in New England, and I already have to pack enough stuff to be self-supported.
I'm used to grease and don't mind it, so I think I'll just stay being the old dog. More power to you kids with your stuff that works, too. |
Originally Posted by kingston
(Post 21078332)
Pretty sure this is why the vast majority of people don't mess around with wax. From what I've seen, most of the people who run wax do it because they like having a clean bike, not because it's "better" in any other way. I still use oil on my commuter bike because it's filthy all the time anyway.
I'm lazy and conventional chain lube works well enough. |
Originally Posted by kingston
(Post 21078336)
I have noticed that chains don't hold the wax as well until they have been run and re-waxed a few times, which could explain our different experiences. Obviously nothing wrong with using oil if that's what works for you.
Took a quick peek at your posting history out of curiosity, and I think it's safe to say that your cat knows more about bike mechanical stuff than I do, assuming you have a cat. I would defer to you on all such questions. |
Originally Posted by kingston
(Post 21078285)
Can you explain why that's relevant? If it works what difference does it make if it's a lubricant or not?
Look at the two "non-lubricants" of this group, MSW and Smoove, just being their absolute best non-lubricant selves. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f9668c5aea.jpg |
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
(Post 21078608)
Shhhhhh! He does this in every single chain wax thread, always. He's trying to be a pedant, but not doing very well. Lubricant is Latin-- we just took the word straight from Latin-- and literally means "making slippery."
Look at the two "non-lubricants" of this group, MSW and Smoove, just being their absolute best non-lubricant selves. Anyway, I followed the instructions which are basically "clean the everliving dog snot out of your chain before applying" and ... yeah. It turned into a sloppy mess almost instantly. Even more of a black, greasy, gets on everything mess than conventional lube. And I didn't notice any particular difference in my shifting, and it was a pain in the butt, so I just went back to conventional lube. I still have 3.9 bottles of Smoove somewhere in my basement. |
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
(Post 21078608)
Look at the two "non-lubricants" of this group, MSW and Smoove, just being their absolute best non-lubricant selves.
|
Well, I started with straight paraffin, then on to the Friction Facts recipe, then started tinkering with my own blend, then when crockpot 2 showed up I bought a bag of MSW. It's great, it absolutely does what it advertises.
But I'm ever so cheap. Not counting the bag of MSW, I have ~$50 invested into the whole waxing shebang-- 3 crockpots, 10lbs of paraffin, lamp oil, Slick50, etc. I dunno if I should include the Zogs, as I was buying 10-packs when I was bodyboarding a lot more, and still have a big box of 'em-- and each puck is good for about a year. Based on my best guesstimate, waxing the chains of 4 bikes (combined monthly mileage ~1,0000 miles,) every time I dip a chain it costs 4 cents. I should run out of wax and/or additives in 2025 or 2026. I'll probably change the formula several times before I get there, though. |
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
(Post 21078635)
Well, I started with straight paraffin, then on to the Friction Facts recipe, then started tinkering with my own blend, then when crockpot 2 showed up I bought a bag of MSW. It's great, it absolutely does what it advertises.
But I'm ever so cheap. Not counting the bag of MSW, I have ~$50 invested into the whole waxing shebang-- 3 crockpots, 10lbs of paraffin, lamp oil, Slick50, etc. I dunno if I should include the Zogs, as I was buying 10-packs when I was bodyboarding a lot more, and still have a big box of 'em-- and each puck is good for about a year. Based on my best guesstimate, waxing the chains of 4 bikes (combined monthly mileage ~1,0000 miles,) every time I dip a chain it costs 4 cents. I should run out of wax and/or additives in 2025 or 2026. I'll probably change the formula several times before I get there, though. This is why I have a bottle of dry lube and a bottle of wet lube. The effort behind this just doesn't make sense, for me. Keep innovating, good Dr.:) |
Slightly OT but every time I see a chainwax thread I think of a certain Key and Peele sketch that centered around a NSFW phrase that included the word chainwax and I giggle.
Google at your own peril. |
Originally Posted by kingston
(Post 21078623)
Hence the recommendation to just get a bag of MSW and be done with it.
|
Originally Posted by ksryder
(Post 21078337)
I'm lazy and conventional chain lube works well enough.
In 14,000 miles I've cleaned my drivetrain twice using the Ultrafast wax formula. I'm still on the original 2 chains, and they'll probably make 10,000 miles each before they will come close to needing to be replace. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.