Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Change crank length for $50 per millimeter?

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Change crank length for $50 per millimeter?

Old 01-14-20, 02:42 PM
  #1  
Moishe
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Moishe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 44 Posts
Change crank length for $50 per millimeter?

I never paid any attention to crank length until last week, when I bought a newly affordable Stages Ultegra left crank power meter for $350, and I noticed that my one-year-old Trek Domain has 175mm cranks, while my nine-year-old Roubaix, now my Zwift bike, has 172.5mm cranks. A few hardly noticeable knee twinges over the 4,000 miles ridden in the past year on the 175mm cranks. I’m 71 inches tall with a longer-than-average inseam of 34.5 inches; cranky mavens say that by height I should have shorter cranks, by leg length longer ones. The shorter cranks kinda sorta feel a little better, but I couldn’t swear to it in open court.

So here is my question: should I just install my new 175mm crank-meter and relax with a couple of Dogfish Head triple IPAs, or should I exchange it for a 172.5mm (or even 170mm) crank-meter, buy a matching right-side Ultegra crank for around $125, and THEN have the beers?
Moishe is offline  
Old 01-14-20, 05:52 PM
  #2  
shelbyfv
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 10,340
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3112 Post(s)
Liked 4,184 Times in 2,112 Posts
There are certainly folks who are concerned about a couple of mm difference in crank length. There are also folks who are concerned that they don't have a 15t or 17t or whatever on 11 speed cassettes. However, most people are somewhat adaptable. I have 172.5 on one of the two bikes I ride most often, 175 on the other. I couldn't tell you which was which w/o looking. Look at 2mm on a ruler.... Save the time and drama and continue to enjoy what you have.
shelbyfv is offline  
Likes For shelbyfv:
Old 01-14-20, 06:00 PM
  #3  
Pratt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 873
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 328 Post(s)
Liked 351 Times in 216 Posts
My wife's father had asymmetrical leg lengths subsequent to a fractured pelvis. He was an avid rider and competed in the Mt Equinox hill climb. I'm inclined to agree with Shelby
Pratt is offline  
Old 01-14-20, 07:53 PM
  #4  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 6,693
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6071 Post(s)
Liked 9,192 Times in 3,974 Posts
I was going to answer your question, but suddenly I am craving a beer. Good luck!
Koyote is offline  
Likes For Koyote:
Old 01-15-20, 03:46 AM
  #5  
Kabuki12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,700
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 1,491 Times in 869 Posts
I have 170mm cranks on all but one bike . That bike came with 175mm cranks and it seems to be not much different . I am a tad over 6 ‘ and an inseam of 35”. I wouldn’t be able to tell even pushing up hill to be honest. Joe
Kabuki12 is offline  
Old 01-15-20, 04:03 AM
  #6  
canklecat
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,381

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 196 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4483 Post(s)
Liked 2,633 Times in 1,705 Posts
My cranks range from 170 to 175. The only difference I notice is I tend to mash more with longer cranks, and spin more with shorter cranks. I'd probably prefer 172.5 for all of my bikes, but not enough to spend money to replace cranks that already work with only a minor adjustment. If I haven't ridden the bike with 175 cranks for awhile it takes a few minutes to adapt. Same with the 170 cranks.

I seem to finish long rides or harder workout rides with a bit less leg fatigue with the road bike with 170 cranks. I suspect that's because it's using less range of motion and in my sweet spot. I prefer nearly full leg extension -- not quite toe-down, a la Anquetil, but as close as I can comfortably get. To get that extension with 175 cranks my thighs are more nearly parallel with the ground at the top of the stroke. I find that a bit more tiring on longer rides or harder workouts. But at age 62 with bird legs, I'm a bit more picky than I used to be.
canklecat is offline  
Likes For canklecat:
Old 01-15-20, 09:26 AM
  #7  
Wilfred Laurier
Seńor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,063
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 286 Times in 210 Posts
I am 195 cm (about 77") tall with a ~36" inseam and I am perfectly comfortable riding my bikes with cranks 170, 175, and 180 mm long. I, too, have read about how crank length should be proportional to height or leg length or thigh length, but in the real world you quickly get used to whatever you are riding when faced with tiny differences like that.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 01-15-20, 09:39 AM
  #8  
HerrKaLeun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,923

Bikes: Giant Toughroad SLR1 and Motobecane Sturgis NX

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 900 Post(s)
Liked 229 Times in 166 Posts
2 different bikes have different geometry that puts your body in different angles. That is the difference you think you notice. 2.5 mm crank length difference, not noticeable.
HerrKaLeun is offline  
Likes For HerrKaLeun:
Old 01-15-20, 10:22 AM
  #9  
tgenec86
Rouleur
 
tgenec86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Central NY
Posts: 148

Bikes: Felt FC (SRAM Red), Nashbar Carbon (SRAM Red), Felt BR2 (SRAM Red), Salsa El Mariachi 29'er - solid steel, Peugeot PX-10 1972

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 161 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Moishe View Post
Should I just install my new 175mm crank-meter and relax with a couple of Dogfish Head triple IPAs?
Answer. Yes... This is the perfect solution. While spending money on bikes is a one-time investment and can last many long, enjoyable years, SAVING money on unnecessary bike stuff leaves more money for Dogfish Head Triple IPA's.
tgenec86 is offline  
Likes For tgenec86:
Old 01-15-20, 10:50 AM
  #10  
JDandy
Newbie
 
JDandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: The Western Reserve
Posts: 44

Bikes: 1996 Gary Fisher Avant Garde, 1989 Fuji Sundance, 1994 Bridgestone X0-4, 1971 WF Holdsworth Mitral

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Moishe View Post
#2 22222]So here is my question: should I just install my new 175mm crank-meter and relax with a couple of Dogfish Head triple IPAs, or should I exchange it for a 172.5mm (or even 170mm) crank-meter, buy a matching right-side Ultegra crank for around $125, and THEN have the beers?
I don't feel that I yet have the experience to add much to the discussion here but I just wanted to say that I dig the the phrasing of your question. However, I will make this suggestion:

1) Crack open a Dogfish Head triple IPA and enjoy while reading the responses to your question,
2) Don't discount the small niggles that you feel you are experiencing,
3a) If the $125 is an absolute budget buster for you --> crack open Dogfish Head triple IPA
#2 , relax and call it a day,
3b) If the $125 is not of consequence to you; then by all means spend it, install crank, have peace of mind, enjoy IPA#2 . . . and finally,
3c) If budget is really is of no concern to you as your accountant handles the affairs of your trust fund anyway, then pay for a professional bike fitment and take the advice given regarding crank length for you . . . and then of course, kick back and enjoy a smooth Dogfish Head triple IPA while being confident in the knowledge that you you have done everything to ensure that your future rides will be pain and worry free.
JDandy is offline  
Likes For JDandy:
Old 01-15-20, 11:12 AM
  #11  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,507

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3996 Post(s)
Liked 2,883 Times in 1,874 Posts
A slightly different take here. If you have knee tracking issues such as chrondomalacia patellae (CP), you may find your knees are much more sensitive to crank length. I triggered my life of CPdoing several things wrong but I had been doing all but the crank length change with no issue. (Riding in the cold with not enough on my legs, not stretching my hamstrings and upping my mileage and intensity after a huge conditioning setback - major TBI. But my knees didn't complain until I took my race bike out and rode 100 miles to get ready for that weekend's first race of the season. And that race bike had 175s. My fix gear, 168s.)

A few years ago, I picked up a sweet Campy crankset and built a bike around it. 172.5s. My knees never liked the switch between all the rest of my bikes and that one. After one year, I put 175s back on. Lesson learned.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 01-15-20, 11:17 AM
  #12  
Moishe
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Moishe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 44 Posts
Okay, I drank the beer. The big mistake I made was to Google "crank length knee pain," which was just asking for trouble. What returned was a lot of alarmist advice about the crippling effects of riding with cranks that might be a tiny bit too long. This just fed into my Cyclist Hypochondria. Thanks to you all for setting me straight. And by the way, if you've never had Dogfish Head IPA, give it a try. It's widely available, and if you can't get to Stowe, Vermont for some Heady Topper, it's about the best there is.
Moishe is offline  
Likes For Moishe:
Old 01-15-20, 11:22 AM
  #13  
caloso
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,849

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2945 Post(s)
Liked 3,066 Times in 1,403 Posts
I have bikes with 172.5 and 170mm cranks. I can't tell the difference.
caloso is offline  
Old 01-15-20, 07:49 PM
  #14  
Metieval
Senior Member
 
Metieval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,772

Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times in 192 Posts
I will notice the longer cranks when I try to ride at higher cadence.

I also notice a better , more comfortable, bicycle fit with shorter cranks. I am 5'8" though.

I will agree that people can adapt, however if you have 4 bicycles at 170mm cranks and one at 172.5 you'll feel it.
Metieval is offline  
Old 01-15-20, 08:15 PM
  #15  
calstar 
Senior Member
 
calstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: santa barbara CA
Posts: 1,105
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 91 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 19 Posts
Two bikes, 175 and 180, can't tell the difference.
calstar is offline  
Old 01-15-20, 09:39 PM
  #16  
Darth Lefty 
Disco Infiltrator
 
Darth Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,504

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Timberjack, Expert TG, Samba tandem

Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 1,937 Times in 1,260 Posts
This is a very active forum, I bet you could find somebody to trade with in the for sale section
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Darth Lefty is offline  
Old 01-15-20, 10:56 PM
  #17  
AlmostTrick
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1548 Post(s)
Liked 939 Times in 503 Posts
I notice the difference in crank length as soon as I start pedaling. Then, once I'm rolling the shorter ones (170's) are easier to spin fast. 175'a give more torque, but I won't be able to spin them as fast so it's a wash. But they do seem to give me a little more knee pain.

I once got a fixed gear bike with 165's and the pedal circle just felt too small. I had to switch it out for 170's which seems to be the sweet spot for 5' 7" me with a 31.5" inseam.

If you think you'll be happier and/or more efficient with the swap, do it. You're gonna drink beer either way.
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 01-16-20, 07:46 AM
  #18  
biketampa
I don’t live in Tampa
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 447

Bikes: 2014 Jamis Ventura Race, 2014 Cervelo P2, 2017 Raleigh Tamland 1, 2015 Jamis Trail X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times in 31 Posts
With “hardly noticeable knee twinges over 4000 miles” I wouldn’t be concerned unless they are frequent. But after 4000 miles I would believe you would have noticed major problems
biketampa is offline  
Old 01-16-20, 08:02 AM
  #19  
Viich
Hack
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,141

Bikes: TrueNorth CX bike, 88 Bianchi Strada (currently Sturmey'd), 90's Giant Innova (now with drop bars), Haro Blackout BMX, Intense Sabot Cruiser, FMF Race BMX (sold), Redline Proline Pro24 Cruiser (RIP frame)

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 89 Posts
I ride from 160 (fixie cranks on my drop bars 3 sp) to 185 on my BMX race bike. I think the 185 is a little long and am switching to 180s, but neither hurts my knee.
​​​​​
Viich is offline  
Old 01-16-20, 08:19 AM
  #20  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,458

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1684 Post(s)
Liked 554 Times in 417 Posts
I grew up with 170 cranks, and I'm 5'6" with PBH of 81-ish cm. About 15 years ago I came into a first-generation 53/39 Chorus double chainset with 172.5s, for $25.00! Another $30 and I had the correct BB. At first I noticed it was a little more effort to pedal at cadence, but I don't notice any such problem now. And that chainset has VERY low Q! I still prioritize 170 if I have the choice because most charts/equations say 170 is most likely best for me, but no longer notice which length I'm riding.

At 66 yo my knees feel pretty good. Been lowering the saddle incrementally to reduce pelvic rocking, which is good but it reduces hip closure angle, so the knees can hit the belly. But not a problem so far!
Road Fan is offline  
Old 01-16-20, 11:32 AM
  #21  
zjrog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753

Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 384 Times in 207 Posts
I had a bike fit done yesterday, and crank arm length came up. Since the fitter is a physical therapist, and racer in his own right, he has an opinion, that he backed with a study done, where riders swapped between abnormally longer and shorter cranks, and ultimately, power remained the same, as the riders adapted to the extremes. That being said, due to my ankle in an immobilizing brace, he suggested staying with shorter arms, though we fit the bike yesterday with my existing 172.5 arm crankset. He did suggest swapping to a compact, to match my steel bike...

He also raised my seat without me looking, to prove I wasn't rocking my hips like I thought when I originally lowered it. He proved I wasn't, with the seat covered in sensors...
zjrog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.