Are Big Box Stores Promoting a Throwaway Bike Culture?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Are Big Box Stores Promoting a Throwaway Bike Culture?
Recently, there was a thread in this sub-forum where the owner of a new Breezer Downtown lamented that the bike was already "starting to deteriorate" after "a couple hundred miles."
The "deterioration" = some worn bar tape, a loose bolt on a fender, and a missing bar end cap. This is also known as "normal wear and tear" (or something close).
I got to wondering, did the OP not realize bikes could be repaired? Is there a whole community of people out there raised on bikes from XMart or wherever, with the presumption that bikes typically "deteriorate" after 100 miles of use, and when they "deteriorate" you should just throw your bike away and get another one?
Obviously, the Breezer Downtown is not an XMart bike; I've ridden one, and I think it's a really cool, durable utility bike. But I wonder if hastily-assembled, poorly-lubed big box bikes are giving consumers the perception that this is just how bikes are - bikes look good when you first buy them, but they inevitably "deteriorate" within three months or 100 miles.
The "deterioration" = some worn bar tape, a loose bolt on a fender, and a missing bar end cap. This is also known as "normal wear and tear" (or something close).
I got to wondering, did the OP not realize bikes could be repaired? Is there a whole community of people out there raised on bikes from XMart or wherever, with the presumption that bikes typically "deteriorate" after 100 miles of use, and when they "deteriorate" you should just throw your bike away and get another one?
Obviously, the Breezer Downtown is not an XMart bike; I've ridden one, and I think it's a really cool, durable utility bike. But I wonder if hastily-assembled, poorly-lubed big box bikes are giving consumers the perception that this is just how bikes are - bikes look good when you first buy them, but they inevitably "deteriorate" within three months or 100 miles.
Likes For RandomlyWest:
#2
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,823
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
Just about anything a big box store sells is cheaper to replace than to repair. So it would seem that all the goods sold in those stores promote a throw away culture.
Likes For FiftySix:
#3
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,105
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2707 Post(s)
Liked 2,462 Times
in
1,391 Posts
It is not unique to bikes.
Likes For Kapusta:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Absolutely. That's one main reason I dislike hi-ten bikes. Has nothing to do with being snobby or anything. They also have no resale value on the private market.
Which means they end up in the landfill, and it's just a TON of waste all around.
They're pretty good for kids though. Like, if you just want to roll around the block with the family, or maybe screw around with it and smash around the block, they're perfectly fine.
For those purposes, a $75-$100 bike is a great value. But they are not marketed in that way, they are marketed as X-treme "sports" bikes, which irks me because they're actually unsafe to do anything serious with.a bnd as soon as anything happens to them, and they find out that the repair is more than the bike itself, they just get tossed.
It would be nice if someone had a bunch of big box bike parts laying around to just fix them up to roll again so that they can be sent off to developing countries.
Nothing that rolls should be wasted and thrown in a landfill.
They're also made with some pretty ****ty labor standards, and QC is obviously lacking.
But you're not going to find replacement parts for them on the aftermarket very easily, and franken-biking one with aftermarket parts is just really bad and not worth it.
I see these all the time. Would be way sicker if they got to have chromoly bikes though, but better to be a bike that some kid just rolls around on and has some fun with than to just throw it away.
They are catching on though. The new Schwinn MTB that's being sold at the big boxes is actually great. Everything is specced to industry standards, so you can actually replace parts as you break them, and eventually replace the frame.
That's not wasteful at all, and it's a great entry level bike. I started off on a bike like that actually, and it ended up being great. It helped me learn how to ride BMX, and my parents replaced parts as they broke, and it eventually turned into a sick bike.
It was made of mostly hi-ten, but it had a chromoly downtube, 3 piece cranks, and halfway decent wheels. Obviously because of the steel used I snapped literally every part on that bike, but it lasted long enough for them to be replaced as they went, and for my skill to build as I rode it.
I still have the stem from that bike as it's the only part that never broke. It's an old style big chunk of aluminium front loader that will probably never break, and I will probably still use it if I build another BMX just because of how funny it is lol.
Anyways, I think that a good solution would involve first sourcing ethical labor, and then not marketing them as anything other than "leave this in the garage for an around the block spin once in a while", along with the existence of people who know where to source REALLY cheap (like the same parts that were on the bike before) kind of parts. That way they can be re-purposed and either sent off to developing countries, or given away to people in deep poverty.
They're already catching on with the whole industry spec thing though, and ideally we would see mostly those kinds of bikes.
If I didn't know how to find decent stuff on craigslist (and if I didn't get so so lucky with my current bike), I would honestly consider one of those schwinns - no joke.
Which means they end up in the landfill, and it's just a TON of waste all around.
They're pretty good for kids though. Like, if you just want to roll around the block with the family, or maybe screw around with it and smash around the block, they're perfectly fine.
For those purposes, a $75-$100 bike is a great value. But they are not marketed in that way, they are marketed as X-treme "sports" bikes, which irks me because they're actually unsafe to do anything serious with.a bnd as soon as anything happens to them, and they find out that the repair is more than the bike itself, they just get tossed.
It would be nice if someone had a bunch of big box bike parts laying around to just fix them up to roll again so that they can be sent off to developing countries.
Nothing that rolls should be wasted and thrown in a landfill.
They're also made with some pretty ****ty labor standards, and QC is obviously lacking.
But you're not going to find replacement parts for them on the aftermarket very easily, and franken-biking one with aftermarket parts is just really bad and not worth it.
I see these all the time. Would be way sicker if they got to have chromoly bikes though, but better to be a bike that some kid just rolls around on and has some fun with than to just throw it away.
They are catching on though. The new Schwinn MTB that's being sold at the big boxes is actually great. Everything is specced to industry standards, so you can actually replace parts as you break them, and eventually replace the frame.
That's not wasteful at all, and it's a great entry level bike. I started off on a bike like that actually, and it ended up being great. It helped me learn how to ride BMX, and my parents replaced parts as they broke, and it eventually turned into a sick bike.
It was made of mostly hi-ten, but it had a chromoly downtube, 3 piece cranks, and halfway decent wheels. Obviously because of the steel used I snapped literally every part on that bike, but it lasted long enough for them to be replaced as they went, and for my skill to build as I rode it.
I still have the stem from that bike as it's the only part that never broke. It's an old style big chunk of aluminium front loader that will probably never break, and I will probably still use it if I build another BMX just because of how funny it is lol.
Anyways, I think that a good solution would involve first sourcing ethical labor, and then not marketing them as anything other than "leave this in the garage for an around the block spin once in a while", along with the existence of people who know where to source REALLY cheap (like the same parts that were on the bike before) kind of parts. That way they can be re-purposed and either sent off to developing countries, or given away to people in deep poverty.
They're already catching on with the whole industry spec thing though, and ideally we would see mostly those kinds of bikes.
If I didn't know how to find decent stuff on craigslist (and if I didn't get so so lucky with my current bike), I would honestly consider one of those schwinns - no joke.
Last edited by BicycleBicycle; 03-25-20 at 12:58 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,154
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17782 Post(s)
Liked 14,146 Times
in
6,714 Posts
Virus stay at home orders are the new winter.
Likes For indyfabz:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 255 Times
in
185 Posts
In Australia, they have days when people can put large items of trash out on the street. Sometimes bicycles are in the trash, in various conditions. Sometimes complete and usable, but often needing repairs. Sometimes little rust, sometimes a lot of rust. If you collect a few of these, you can normally get enough good parts to make a good bike. A lot of my bikes have been free.
Likes For alo:
#7
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,301
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2633 Post(s)
Liked 3,173 Times
in
1,933 Posts
I don't know where you live, but no bicycle goes in a landfill here. If it's metal it gets recycled. Whether that is by the local waste hauler, pickup alley cruisers, or a guy pushing a shopping cart, it happens.
Likes For dedhed:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,165
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7459 Post(s)
Liked 3,143 Times
in
1,680 Posts
No, fire is not hot and it is not dark at night.
#9
WALSTIB
Well my bikes as a kid were Huffys and Western Flyers and I've been around awhile. Cheap stores sell cheap stuff. We're the ones who buy it so who's to blame?
Likes For dabac:
#11
Industry guy
The basic nature of big box store products. It is pretty easy to change color, slap any of wide array of decals
on one of these and call it a bicycle. Low end components. poorly manufactured and speed assembly put on
branded name plate = BSO's(Bicycle shaped objects).
No precision, really not repairable and as stated above, virtually no value in resale.
A true indicator of the throw away mentality.
As an industry, bicycles are a bit of an inconstancy.
The humble bicycle is a lifeline of mobility for many around the world.
They are very simple, functional and actually, very fun to ride.
They are virtually free to operate, save for cost to maintain and replace wear parts.
There are very few protections from the consumer receiving poorly manufactured, poorly assembled and
non precision units.( Note the posts and photos of big box units with the fork on backwards).
Assembly on the big box level is "pieces per hour".
Assembly at the LBS level is more of "hours per piece".
I would venture a guess there are more regulations for a pair of electronic ear buds than for a bicycle.
Compare a fork failing to the worst that could happen to many consumer product failures.
It is interesting to note that the cost of a LBS bicycle tune up or a professional assembly can rival or exceed
the initial cost or that of replacing a big box model with a new one.
The "return it because it broke" mentality fostered by amazon has people believing that this is their right.
Ebay's orientation is that the vendor/seller is always wrong and needs eat the costs for user error or abuse.
The "customer is always right" mentality of yesteryear has evolved into "Solve my stupidity or do what t I want or I'll sue or more
and its current iteration - "I'll blast you on social media" because you are not willing to roll over".
"I put the product through things it was never engineered to do, now it doesn't work or I bought the wrong thing
and I demand my money back" has become the consumer mantra.
Free service, free parts and immediate satisfaction. Free shipping to be included!
rusty
on one of these and call it a bicycle. Low end components. poorly manufactured and speed assembly put on
branded name plate = BSO's(Bicycle shaped objects).
No precision, really not repairable and as stated above, virtually no value in resale.
A true indicator of the throw away mentality.
As an industry, bicycles are a bit of an inconstancy.
The humble bicycle is a lifeline of mobility for many around the world.
They are very simple, functional and actually, very fun to ride.
They are virtually free to operate, save for cost to maintain and replace wear parts.
There are very few protections from the consumer receiving poorly manufactured, poorly assembled and
non precision units.( Note the posts and photos of big box units with the fork on backwards).
Assembly on the big box level is "pieces per hour".
Assembly at the LBS level is more of "hours per piece".
I would venture a guess there are more regulations for a pair of electronic ear buds than for a bicycle.
Compare a fork failing to the worst that could happen to many consumer product failures.
It is interesting to note that the cost of a LBS bicycle tune up or a professional assembly can rival or exceed
the initial cost or that of replacing a big box model with a new one.
The "return it because it broke" mentality fostered by amazon has people believing that this is their right.
Ebay's orientation is that the vendor/seller is always wrong and needs eat the costs for user error or abuse.
The "customer is always right" mentality of yesteryear has evolved into "Solve my stupidity or do what t I want or I'll sue or more
and its current iteration - "I'll blast you on social media" because you are not willing to roll over".
"I put the product through things it was never engineered to do, now it doesn't work or I bought the wrong thing
and I demand my money back" has become the consumer mantra.
Free service, free parts and immediate satisfaction. Free shipping to be included!
rusty
#12
Industry guy
Bicycle grave yard in China.
Last edited by 100bikes; 03-25-20 at 08:28 AM.
#13
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8185 Post(s)
Liked 9,087 Times
in
5,052 Posts
That's the aftermath of the bike share bubble--really a very different issue. Maybe I'm missing something here, but the premise of this whole thread really seems off the beam to me--high end carbon fiber bikes are by far the least recyclable bikes as the frame material cannot be used as scrap. Steel frames are scrap metal. Continued use of either type of bike requires a fairly high use of disposable consumables.
Just another "BSO" bashing thread. Guess it's its own form of recycling.
Likes For livedarklions:
#14
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,823
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
The "return it because it broke" mentality fostered by amazon has people believing that this is their right.
Ebay's orientation is that the vendor/seller is always wrong and needs eat the costs for user error or abuse.
The "customer is always right" mentality of yesteryear has evolved into "Solve my stupidity or do what t I want or I'll sue or more
and its current iteration - "I'll blast you on social media" because you are not willing to roll over".
"I put the product through things it was never engineered to do, now it doesn't work or I bought the wrong thing
and I demand my money back" has become the consumer mantra.
Free service, free parts and immediate satisfaction. Free shipping to be included!
rusty
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 769
Bikes: Muddyfox Evolve 200, Bicycles4u Paris Explorer, Raleigh Twenty Stowaway, Bickerton California, Saracen Xile, Kona Hoss Deluxe, Vertigo Carnaby, Exodus Havoc, Kona Lanai, Revolution Cuillin Sport, Dawes Kingpin, Bickerton, NSU & Elswick Cosmopolitan
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 292 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
25 Posts
High end bikes are far more wasteful, the resources that go into each bike are far more, carbon fibre is far more labour intensive and expensive e-bikes have complicated motors with many proprietary parts. Many have dedicated frame designs that means when the motor fails the bike is scrap. Most cheap bikes do not have proprietary parts and can be repaired easily. When such bikes hit recycling they are either sold as repairable bikes or recycled fully. Most of the world's bikes are steel and provide decades of service. It's good that people in the west buy cheap steel and aluminium recyclable bikes. If they bought expensive CF bikes and didn't use them that would be far worse adding far more waste to landfill. Better to test the water with a cheap walmart bike than a CF bike.
My main complaint about walmart bikes is the ridiculously crap suspension that fails quickly and achieves nothing and make the bikes more difficult to recycle for use again.
My main complaint about walmart bikes is the ridiculously crap suspension that fails quickly and achieves nothing and make the bikes more difficult to recycle for use again.
Likes For Bonzo Banana:
#16
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,823
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
Yep, two bikes I had in the 1970s were a Sears branded banana seat bike and a Huffy 10 speed. That banana seat bike got a home made conversion to a BMX bike, since we didn't have the money for a new BMX style bike. The 10 speed got donated away to a local church charity after I moved away from home at 18. The banana/BMX bike had the same fate a few years prior.
Last edited by FiftySix; 03-25-20 at 07:49 AM.
#17
Member
Likes For rydabent:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,831
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 1,032 Times
in
521 Posts
our fearless leader in Wisconsin said to go outside, take walks, walk your dog, or ride your bike, as it’s good for you and your well-being. Looks like today will be warm enough to to so. Of course, your post, and my reply have absolutely nothing to do with this thread, but didn’t want to leave you out there by yourself.
Tim
Tim
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,165
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7459 Post(s)
Liked 3,143 Times
in
1,680 Posts
High end bikes are far more wasteful, the resources that go into each bike are far more, carbon fibre is far more labour intensive and expensive e-bikes have complicated motors with many proprietary parts. Many have dedicated frame designs that means when the motor fails the bike is scrap. Most cheap bikes do not have proprietary parts and can be repaired easily. .
Most of the parts are proprietary and ultra-flimsy---hard plastic or stamped pot-metal levers, stamped chain rings, cheap and flimsy stamped brakes .... you cannot buy replacement parts so you have to go to a real bike retailer and pay----almost always half or more of the total worth of the bike---to get real parts.
Now you have a $120 bike with $60 brakes and the rest is still crap. When the next bit fails .... spend another $60?
As far as recycling goes, when is the last time you actually took a bike to a recycler? How much of it gets reused?
The plastic might ... but probably none of it is recyclable. The metal might ... but how much does the recycler pay to have workers disassemble the bike for $1.22 worth of aluminum?
And where I live, a lot of "recyclable" material is Not accepted for recycling any more because there is no profit---the market is flooded with cheap crap. A lot of it cannot be reused due to contamination, and a lot of the plastic is already partially recycled and all it is good for is blown-in insulation for houses ... and there are only so many houses.
I know it is probably regional, but I question how much of any "recycling: is actually done---as opposed to companies shipping everything to landfills in India so they can meet their federal requirements for waste-stream recycling by percentage.
Also ... High-end bikes Don't get thrown away. Most of them are used by their owners and then relegated to back-up or rain bike when they get replaced by a new model. A lot are sold. And even the expensive bikes which don't get ridden get sold---garage queens? ever heard the term?---and then ridden by someone else who really appreciates a good bike.
High-end bikes Can be repaired, and generally get good maintenance, because not a lot of people spend a lot of money on expensive stuff and trash it. And even if they don't get maintained, they still get sold ... and people replace the worn bits and ride them for years longer. It is worth doing if the basic bike is of good quality.
Walmart bikes ... break them, toss them, because almost any repair will cost more than a new bike.
Last edited by Maelochs; 03-25-20 at 09:03 AM.
Likes For Maelochs:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,154
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17782 Post(s)
Liked 14,146 Times
in
6,714 Posts
our fearless leader in Wisconsin said to go outside, take walks, walk your dog, or ride your bike, as it’s good for you and your well-being. Looks like today will be warm enough to to so. Of course, your post, and my reply have absolutely nothing to do with this thread, but didn’t want to leave you out there by yourself.
Tim
Tim
My point was that some must be bored to death if they are starting threads about subjects that have beat to death ad nauseam to the power of infinity. They definitely need to get outside.
#23
Senior Member
#24
WALSTIB
Yep, two bikes I had in the 1970s were a Sears branded banana seat bike and a Huffy 10 speed. That banana seat bike got a home made conversion to a BMX bike, since we didn't have the money for a new BMX style bike. The 10 speed got donated away to a local church charity after I moved away from home at 18. The banana/BMX bike had the same fate a few years prior.
Cut to today and I see homeless, carless not by choice and folks who just like a bargain riding department store bikes and seems to work for them. Necessity brings out the best in anything.
Likes For hillyman:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 207 Times
in
145 Posts
You have obviously never tried to repair a Walmart bike.
Most of the parts are proprietary and ultra-flimsy---hard plastic or stamped pot-metal levers, stamped chain rings, cheap and flimsy stamped brakes .... you cannot buy replacement parts so you have to go to a real bike retailer and pay----almost always half or more of the total worth of the bike---to get real parts.
Now you have a $120 bike with $60 brakes and the rest is still crap. When the next bit fails .... spend another $60?
As far as recycling goes, when is the last time you actually took a bike to a recycler? How much of it gets reused?
The plastic might ... but probably none of it is recyclable. The metal might ... but how much does the recycler pay to have workers disassemble the bike for $1.22 worth of aluminum?
And where I live, a lot of "recyclable" material is Not accepted for recycling any more because there is no profit---the market is flooded with cheap crap. A lot of it cannot be reused due to contamination, and a lot of the plastic is already partially recycled and all it is good for is blown-in insulation for houses ... and there are only so many houses.
I know it is probably regional, but I question how much of any "recycling: is actually done---as opposed to companies shipping everything to landfills in India so they can meet their federal requirements for waste-stream recycling by percentage.
I thought they were easy to repair? Hmmmmm .....
Also ... High-end bikes Don't get thrown away. Most of them are used by their owners and then relegated to back-up or rain bike when they get replaced by a new model. A lot are sold. And even the expensive bikes which don't get ridden get sold---garage queens? ever heard the term?---and then ridden by someone else who really appreciates a good bike.
High-end bikes Can be repaired, and generally get good maintenance, because not a lot of people spend a lot of money on expensive stuff and trash it. And even if they don't get maintained, they still get sold ... and people replace the worn bits and ride them for years longer. It is worth doing if the basic bike is of good quality.
Walmart bikes ... break them, toss them, because almost any repair will cost more than a new bike.
Most of the parts are proprietary and ultra-flimsy---hard plastic or stamped pot-metal levers, stamped chain rings, cheap and flimsy stamped brakes .... you cannot buy replacement parts so you have to go to a real bike retailer and pay----almost always half or more of the total worth of the bike---to get real parts.
Now you have a $120 bike with $60 brakes and the rest is still crap. When the next bit fails .... spend another $60?
As far as recycling goes, when is the last time you actually took a bike to a recycler? How much of it gets reused?
The plastic might ... but probably none of it is recyclable. The metal might ... but how much does the recycler pay to have workers disassemble the bike for $1.22 worth of aluminum?
And where I live, a lot of "recyclable" material is Not accepted for recycling any more because there is no profit---the market is flooded with cheap crap. A lot of it cannot be reused due to contamination, and a lot of the plastic is already partially recycled and all it is good for is blown-in insulation for houses ... and there are only so many houses.
I know it is probably regional, but I question how much of any "recycling: is actually done---as opposed to companies shipping everything to landfills in India so they can meet their federal requirements for waste-stream recycling by percentage.
I thought they were easy to repair? Hmmmmm .....
Also ... High-end bikes Don't get thrown away. Most of them are used by their owners and then relegated to back-up or rain bike when they get replaced by a new model. A lot are sold. And even the expensive bikes which don't get ridden get sold---garage queens? ever heard the term?---and then ridden by someone else who really appreciates a good bike.
High-end bikes Can be repaired, and generally get good maintenance, because not a lot of people spend a lot of money on expensive stuff and trash it. And even if they don't get maintained, they still get sold ... and people replace the worn bits and ride them for years longer. It is worth doing if the basic bike is of good quality.
Walmart bikes ... break them, toss them, because almost any repair will cost more than a new bike.
"So since you are into bikes, could you help me? I (have an old bike sitting in my garage/just got a bike from my father/mother/uncle, just bought a used bike on Craigslist) and was wondering what you think?"
I always ask them to show me the bike, or take a couple of pictures and I know right away if it is worth saving.
If it was a decent bike when it was new, whether that was 5, 10, or even 25 years ago, and the bike is reasonably clean, the answer usually is, yes. For $50 to $100 of parts and/or labor, you have yourself a rideable bike that will probably get you by until funds allow you to upgrade to something better.
If it is a Huffy, Roadmaster, or some such department store brand, even if it is practically brand new, my answer is, just donate it and get something else. Because even $50 put into such a bike is throwing good money after bad.