Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

56 vs 54cm Specialized Diverge

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

56 vs 54cm Specialized Diverge

Old 06-24-20, 05:01 PM
  #1  
aquiver
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
56 vs 54cm Specialized Diverge

Hello,
wondering if I should get a 56 or 54 cm specialized diverge. Can't test ride in my lbs right now, as due to covid they don't allow test-rides.
My height is 5'9.5
Inseam is 30.5
Armspan is 64.5 inches
I have short legs, short arms, and a long torso.

Any advice on sizing would be excellent.
aquiver is offline  
Old 06-24-20, 05:14 PM
  #2  
CyFan4036
Wanderer
 
CyFan4036's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 18

Bikes: Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
With a long torso I'd recommend a 56cm but there are so many variables that are unknown. I have a 31" inseam and a longer torso and arms and a 56 fits me perfectly. But mine is a Cannondale. I have 1" of clearance from my top tube and it feels comfortable to ride.
CyFan4036 is offline  
Old 06-24-20, 05:35 PM
  #3  
Troul 
:D
 
Troul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 5,720

Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 1,956 Times in 1,301 Posts
I'd go with the smaller size.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
Troul is offline  
Likes For Troul:
Old 06-24-20, 05:40 PM
  #4  
nomadmax 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,119
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 965 Post(s)
Liked 1,431 Times in 691 Posts
You can make a small bike bigger but you can't make a big bike smaller. If it were me, I'd get the 54 and run a longer stem and get a tighter triangle/better standover in the deal.
nomadmax is offline  
Likes For nomadmax:
Old 06-24-20, 05:54 PM
  #5  
GeneO 
Senior Member
 
GeneO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,517

Bikes: 2018 Roubaix Expert Di2, 2016 Diverge Expert X1

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 97 Posts
Smaller 54. Your proportions are pretty normal iME.
GeneO is offline  
Old 06-24-20, 07:47 PM
  #6  
Outrider1
Full Member
 
Outrider1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 273

Bikes: Trek Emonda ALR 5, Motobecane Cafe Disc Comp

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 85 Posts
Originally Posted by nomadmax View Post
You can make a small bike bigger but you can't make a big bike smaller. If it were me, I'd get the 54 and run a longer stem and get a tighter triangle/better standover in the deal.
This. I'm 6 feet and ride a 56.
Outrider1 is offline  
Likes For Outrider1:
Old 06-24-20, 08:03 PM
  #7  
MattTheHat 
Senior Member
 
MattTheHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,296

Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 698 Post(s)
Liked 3,247 Times in 1,131 Posts
Yep, Im 6 and ride a 56 Diverge. 31 inseam. I run a 90mm stem. Id vote 54.
MattTheHat is online now  
Old 06-24-20, 08:11 PM
  #8  
sledgefisher
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Te Kuiti, New Zealand
Posts: 35

Bikes: 1968 - Peugeot PR10 1987 Bianchi Brava, 1987 / 1987 Gitane Super Corsa Reynolds 531, 1969 Moulton Super, 2020 Kona Dew Deluxe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 10 Posts
I am 5'8.5 and have a 56cm bike that is just a little too big for me and although I can ride it, it never gets used. Go 54cm and use the bike more.

Last edited by sledgefisher; 06-24-20 at 09:11 PM.
sledgefisher is offline  
Old 06-24-20, 09:09 PM
  #9  
blakcloud
Senior Member
 
blakcloud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,581
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 602 Post(s)
Liked 339 Times in 218 Posts
Sorry to be the naysayer here but go to the Specialized site and fit generator and it will come up with 56 which is what I would put you on. When I hear 6' foot people on 56 I have to ask who do they make the 62 cm bikes for, 8' tall people?
blakcloud is offline  
Old 06-24-20, 10:24 PM
  #10  
Ironfish653
Dirty Heathen
 
Ironfish653's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 1,857

Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 709 Post(s)
Liked 586 Times in 364 Posts
Depends. You could probably ride either, depending on what youre looking for. I am almost exactly the same height and inseam as the OP, and while I fit fine on a 54, I found it very short front-to-back, and surprisingly upright, more so than my XC bike. The 56 was better, although still higher than I was expecting.
The Diverge just wasnt the bike I was looking for, I ended up on a 56cm Cannondale Synapse.
Ironfish653 is offline  
Old 06-24-20, 10:24 PM
  #11  
Wilmingtech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Rt 12 Washington USA
Posts: 458

Bikes: 2013 Ridley Helium, 2017 Blue Pro-Secco EX, 1987 Schwinn Super Sport

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 72 Posts
Originally Posted by aquiver View Post
Hello,
wondering if I should get a 56 or 54 cm specialized diverge. Can't test ride in my lbs right now, as due to covid they don't allow test-rides.
My height is 5'9.5
Inseam is 30.5
Armspan is 64.5 inches
I have short legs, short arms, and a long torso.

Any advice on sizing would be excellent.
I'm 5'10" with a 31" inseam. 54" is the way to go here. You will have much more room to adjust in stem length, crank size and seat post height on a 54 than on a 56. You can get a 56 to work but the 54 will be lighter and have more adjustment.
Wilmingtech is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 04:31 AM
  #12  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1621 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times in 639 Posts
In my youth I was 5' 10 1/2" with a 32.5" inseam. Down to 5' 9" but same inseam. I find a 54-55 is perfect. If my inseam was like yours I'd go no larger than a 54 and probably a 53. Be careful when buying a bike with a sloping TT. My CAAD 12 is a 53 but using virtual TT measurement it is actually a 55.
bruce19 is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 05:06 AM
  #13  
MattTheHat 
Senior Member
 
MattTheHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,296

Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 698 Post(s)
Liked 3,247 Times in 1,131 Posts
Originally Posted by blakcloud View Post
Sorry to be the naysayer here but go to the Specialized site and fit generator and it will come up with 56 which is what I would put you on. When I hear 6' foot people on 56 I have to ask who do they make the 62 cm bikes for, 8' tall people?
I just did that. At 59 it comes back with 54. If you enter 510 it comes back 56. The OP should probably use their size calculator and enter the other measurements they ask for, not just height. Id be curious to see which they recommend.
MattTheHat is online now  
Old 06-25-20, 06:15 AM
  #14  
Paul Barnard
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,406

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 1,212 Times in 622 Posts
It is likely that both bikes can be adjusted to fit you just fine.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Likes For Paul Barnard:
Old 06-25-20, 08:22 AM
  #15  
aquiver
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by MattTheHat View Post
I just did that. At 59 it comes back with 54. If you enter 510 it comes back 56. The OP should probably use their size calculator and enter the other measurements they ask for, not just height. Id be curious to see which they recommend.
They actually recommended 52cm.
Measurements for knee to floor was 18 inches and ankle to floor was 3 inches.
I also measured some more and inputted information into competitvecyclist calculator although i'm not sure I measured everything correctly, and it gave me these frame specs:
https://imgur.com/tG1OcY0
aquiver is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 09:38 AM
  #16  
Atlas Shrugged
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 808
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked 631 Times in 295 Posts
There is a tendency to ride smaller bikes as that's what the current pros ride. In days past seat posts only came in 180 cm lengths and road stems were horizontal to the ground. The typical MAMIL setup is a bike with a tall stack of spacers and a sharply angled stem rather than just buying a bike that is one size larger allowing a more stable ride and comfortable fit.
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
Old 06-25-20, 09:52 AM
  #17  
MattTheHat 
Senior Member
 
MattTheHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,296

Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 698 Post(s)
Liked 3,247 Times in 1,131 Posts
Originally Posted by aquiver View Post
They actually recommended 52cm.
Measurements for knee to floor was 18 inches and ankle to floor was 3 inches.
I also measured some more and inputted information into competitvecyclist calculator although i'm not sure I measured everything correctly, and it gave me these frame specs:
https://imgur.com/tG1OcY0
Okay, interesting.
MattTheHat is online now  
Old 06-25-20, 09:58 AM
  #18  
trailangel
Senior Member
 
trailangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,782

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1884 Post(s)
Liked 657 Times in 385 Posts
Short legs, long torso, size up to the 56 for the longer reach.
52....? don't be ridiculous
trailangel is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 11:06 AM
  #19  
Hornplayer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 91

Bikes: 2014 Giant Defy 1, 1996 Trek 730

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I am almost exactly your dimensions and am very comfortable on the 54. These bikes have very relaxed geometries and while there has been a lot of discussion of reach I would be concerned that on the 56 the stack would be too high and put you overly upright. The Future Shock is not a pile of spacers that allow you to lower the stem. My recommendation is go with the 54 and change to a longer stem if you think you need it.
Hornplayer is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 11:36 AM
  #20  
phughes
Senior Member
 
phughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,524
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 832 Times in 486 Posts
Originally Posted by aquiver View Post
They actually recommended 52cm.
Measurements for knee to floor was 18 inches and ankle to floor was 3 inches.
I also measured some more and inputted information into competitvecyclist calculator although i'm not sure I measured everything correctly, and it gave me these frame specs:
https://imgur.com/tG1OcY0
I'm not sure where they are getting that, but you could actually use either. If you want your bars up higher, you may want to go with the 56. Both will work, both may need some adjustment. No big deal either way. When I got my Surly, I could have either used the 54 or 56. I went with the 56. I have less seat post showing than most, but I don't have to run a ridiculously high stack of spacers under the stem. I like the slightly longer wheelbase as well, the bike is extremely stable. Whichever way you go, see if you can get it with an uncut steerer. That way you can ride it a while and see where you want the bars, before cutting. I know you can get the Surly with an uncut steerer, but I had to tell the shop that is what I wanted.

Here is Specialized chart for the bike you are considering. You are on the cusp between 54 and 56.

phughes is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 11:57 AM
  #21  
Cyclist0108
Occam's Rotor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,328 Times in 1,161 Posts
Originally Posted by aquiver View Post
Hello,
wondering if I should get a 56 or 54 cm specialized diverge. Can't test ride in my lbs right now, as due to covid they don't allow test-rides.
My height is 5'9.5
Inseam is 30.5
Armspan is 64.5 inches
I have short legs, short arms, and a long torso.

Any advice on sizing would be excellent.
Based on this, I would go for the 54.

I have very similar measurements (including armspan -- I just checked). I got a custom frame built, and it turned out to be almost identical to a 54cm Trek Domane. I know that isn't one you are looking at, but it might be a useful starting point.

This link, if it works correctly, should compare a 54cm Domane to the two sizes of Diverge you are considering:

https://geometrygeeks.bike/compare/t...arbon-2020-56/

I think you will find the reach too long with the 56, and the standover height too high.

Last edited by Cyclist0108; 06-25-20 at 04:07 PM.
Cyclist0108 is offline  
Likes For Cyclist0108:
Old 06-25-20, 03:53 PM
  #22  
Random11
Full Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: North Florida
Posts: 373

Bikes: 2019 Specialized Diverge, 2021 Cervelo Caledonia

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 193 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 263 Times in 134 Posts
I am 6 feet tall and ride a 58cm Diverge. It's a great fit and very comfortable. Based on that, I'd think the 56 would be a better fit for you. But I'd also be reluctant to buy without trying it out first.
Random11 is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 05:07 PM
  #23  
Whitrig
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Im the same height and inside leg and Im very happy with the 56 frame on my 2018 Diverge.
Whitrig is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 05:42 PM
  #24  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1621 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times in 639 Posts
Originally Posted by blakcloud View Post
Sorry to be the naysayer here but go to the Specialized site and fit generator and it will come up with 56 which is what I would put you on. When I hear 6' foot people on 56 I have to ask who do they make the 62 cm bikes for, 8' tall people?
Inseam not height is a better metric for proper fit.
bruce19 is offline  
Old 06-25-20, 05:45 PM
  #25  
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1621 Post(s)
Liked 1,096 Times in 639 Posts
Originally Posted by velopig View Post
There is a tendency to ride smaller bikes as that's what the current pros ride. In days past seat posts only came in 180 cm lengths and road stems were horizontal to the ground. The typical MAMIL setup is a bike with a tall stack of spacers and a sharply angled stem rather than just buying a bike that is one size larger allowing a more stable ride and comfortable fit.
Back in the day...the pros rode the smallest frame that work because they were lighter.
bruce19 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.