gearing question
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
gearing question
Hello, how would I work out the crossover between the gears on the larger chainring and the gears on the smaller one?
ie is 5th gear on the large chainring the same as 10th gear on the smaller one?
is there some mathematical formula?
Any help gratefully received.
ie is 5th gear on the large chainring the same as 10th gear on the smaller one?
is there some mathematical formula?
Any help gratefully received.
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 343
Bikes: GR300, Grail, Live Wire, 5010
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Liked 239 Times
in
120 Posts
Click here Good luck.
#3
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,430 Times
in
1,184 Posts
It's better to think of it as the small chainring is for climbing and headwinds while the large is for flat, tailwinds and desents.
You're never going to move through the gears in an exact progression. If you did then you would be constantly switching chainrings and moving up and down the cassette.
You're never going to move through the gears in an exact progression. If you did then you would be constantly switching chainrings and moving up and down the cassette.
Likes For GlennR:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 793 Times
in
445 Posts
It's better to think of it as the small chainring is for climbing and headwinds while the large is for flat, tailwinds and desents.
You're never going to move through the gears in an exact progression. If you did then you would be constantly switching chainrings and moving up and down the cassette.
You're never going to move through the gears in an exact progression. If you did then you would be constantly switching chainrings and moving up and down the cassette.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Liked 639 Times
in
360 Posts
It's better to think of it as the small chainring is for climbing and headwinds while the large is for flat, tailwinds and desents.
You're never going to move through the gears in an exact progression. If you did then you would be constantly switching chainrings and moving up and down the cassette.
You're never going to move through the gears in an exact progression. If you did then you would be constantly switching chainrings and moving up and down the cassette.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#6
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 2,734
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 732 Post(s)
Liked 1,091 Times
in
645 Posts
There are going to be times when you feel like you are in between gears on the one chainring, you are either spinning too fast, too easy or too slow, too hard.. Time to shift to the other chainring. Generally, if shifting from the small ring to the big ring up shift 2 gears before going to the big. If going from the big ring to the small ring, downshift 2 gears before going to the small. That is what works for me. Sometimes I will have to shift another gear once I have changed from one ring to the other. On long rides, it makes a difference in expended effort when in the proper gear.
#7
Senior Member
That said, the tool linked to in post #2 is very illustrative and easy to use.
#8
Banned
Ratio math quiz: count teeth .. it's a number . use those numbers, calculate, to learn the ratio ...
like 44:11 is 4:1 50:11 ,,,, is 1: 4.545454545454...
like 44:11 is 4:1 50:11 ,,,, is 1: 4.545454545454...
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,805
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3234 Post(s)
Liked 998 Times
in
599 Posts
Or if you have a triple -------------small chain ring for up hills-----------middle ring for most riding---------------large chain ring for down hills or with the wind.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
Nope, wrong again. My triple is used thusly: big ring for most riding, middle ring for most climbing, small ring for extreme and/or loaded climbing.
Likes For BoraxKid:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,085
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times
in
163 Posts
There should be about 2 gears in the rear difference between chainrings. You shouldn't be trying to use them that way though. As mentioned above choose your chainring based on the range you need. Then fine tune your shin with the rear gears.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 325 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
72 Posts
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-theory.html
I believe that piece was written around the turn of the century, but most of the information still applies to bikes made in the 2 decades since. Good luck!
Likes For BoraxKid:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,533
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4009 Post(s)
Liked 2,889 Times
in
1,879 Posts
Click here Good luck.
OP, calculating your gears is the way to "get" what you need to do to find shift patterns that match your riding style. (It might even encourage you to change the gears top better fit. See my gear choices above. I've never seen my choices on a stock bike but I love 'em. Before I aged, I rode 53-42-28 X a variety of freewheels and cassettes, all having 13,14,15,17,19 and adding more cogs as the numbers grew.
I live around real hills, some quite steep and I love to climb. Having a bike that doesn't allow me to go up them doesn't work for me. (I've been known to pull out middle cogs and add 25 and 28 tooth cogs.)
Ben
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,849
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2945 Post(s)
Liked 3,067 Times
in
1,403 Posts
I couldn't get that calculator to run custom chainrings and cogs. (50-38-24 X 12,14-19, 21,23 9-speed) I hit :custom" but the chart just went blank. I saw no way to enter my sprockets.
OP, calculating your gears is the way to "get" what you need to do to find shift patterns that match your riding style. (It might even encourage you to change the gears top better fit. See my gear choices above. I've never seen my choices on a stock bike but I love 'em. Before I aged, I rode 53-42-28 X a variety of freewheels and cassettes, all having 13,14,15,17,19 and adding more cogs as the numbers grew.
I live around real hills, some quite steep and I love to climb. Having a bike that doesn't allow me to go up them doesn't work for me. (I've been known to pull out middle cogs and add 25 and 28 tooth cogs.)
Ben
OP, calculating your gears is the way to "get" what you need to do to find shift patterns that match your riding style. (It might even encourage you to change the gears top better fit. See my gear choices above. I've never seen my choices on a stock bike but I love 'em. Before I aged, I rode 53-42-28 X a variety of freewheels and cassettes, all having 13,14,15,17,19 and adding more cogs as the numbers grew.
I live around real hills, some quite steep and I love to climb. Having a bike that doesn't allow me to go up them doesn't work for me. (I've been known to pull out middle cogs and add 25 and 28 tooth cogs.)
Ben
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,533
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4009 Post(s)
Liked 2,889 Times
in
1,879 Posts
OP, "gear inches" is simply the wheel an early bike rider on the high-wheeler of the 1880s was riding. (Also your kid's tricycle.) Both travel one wheel circumference with one complete pedal revolution. The bigger the wheel the farther you went. So riders talked about the "wheel" they were riding. (And racing started right away because that is whet we male humans do.) Everybody "got " that bigger wheels were faster. (And with the need to straddle that big wheel in those high-wheelers, small people needn't apply for jobs as pro bike racers.)
Then chains came along. Suddenly anybody could ride any "wheel" they wanted. Since talking wheel diameter was accepted, people just kept doing exactly that, except now that "diameter" was the diameter of the equivalent high-wheel. Calculating it is simple measuring the outside diameter of the wheel you are riding and multiplying by the gear ratio used. (700c and 27" wheels with normal road tires come out close enough to 27".)
Chainring Teeth / Cassette Teeth X Wheel diameter (27" for most of us) = Gear Inches.
Say 39 teeth in front, 18 teeth in back: 39 /18 X 27 = 58.5" (or a higher-wheeler of just under 5 feet).
Gears over 100" are considered "high". Gears in the 60s, 70s and 80s "normal" for flat ground. Gears down to the 20s for climbing. Below that for fully loaded touring climbing.
(If you ever deviate from the common road wheels to say 29ers or folding bikes you will see where gear inches is much more useful than "ratios". You and your much smaller wife or kid can ride different wheeled bikes; both in 72" gears and pedal the same speed.)
Ben
#16
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 10,381
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3130 Post(s)
Liked 4,226 Times
in
2,135 Posts
Recently, right here on BF I learned you can print a gear chart and tape it to your stem or bars!

#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,533
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4009 Post(s)
Liked 2,889 Times
in
1,879 Posts
Thanks! I'm a guy who wrote programs when mice still had fuzz and all numbers had to be typed. That you could just move chainrings on the screen - revolutionary! I took real pride in having instructions on screen that told the user what to type in (so I could use a program I wrote a year before and now needed again having not looked at it since).
Likes For 79pmooney:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,533
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4009 Post(s)
Liked 2,889 Times
in
1,879 Posts
Likes For 79pmooney:
#19
Banned
chain wheel : cog .. ratio x wheel diameter in inches, is 'gear inches'..
gear ratio x wheel circumference in meters is 'development' how far you go down the road, with 1 petal rotation..
gear ratio x wheel circumference in meters is 'development' how far you go down the road, with 1 petal rotation..
#20
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 26,089
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5412 Post(s)
Liked 3,019 Times
in
1,770 Posts
Yup. From fast road bike to dual suspension mountain bike to touring bike, I spend most of my time in the large ring in the middle of the cassette.
__________________
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
Stuart Black
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
#21
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown's gear calculator:
https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
https://sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
#22
Jedi Master
I like the Mike Sherman calculator the best
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,252
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1638 Post(s)
Liked 1,123 Times
in
657 Posts
It's better to think of it as the small chainring is for climbing and headwinds while the large is for flat, tailwinds and desents.
You're never going to move through the gears in an exact progression. If you did then you would be constantly switching chainrings and moving up and down the cassette.
You're never going to move through the gears in an exact progression. If you did then you would be constantly switching chainrings and moving up and down the cassette.
#24
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 13,784
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7800 Post(s)
Liked 8,448 Times
in
4,311 Posts
I spent the time to make an Excel spreadsheet that calculates the ratios of all the gears on all my bikes, which was fun, but on the road it boils down to this:
- Change gears to maintain preferred load and cadence.
- Big ring till I'm going slow enough that it gets noisy, then switch to small ring and drop 2 or 3 cogs smaller depending on the chainring combo - 53/39 drops 2, 50/34 and 52/36 drop 3.
- Stay in small ring till I'm going fast enough that it gets noisy, then shift to big ring and go 2 or 3 cogs larger, again depending on the chainring combo.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#25
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Agree, same for us. But available cassettes of the popular brands have to be adjusted to larger sprockets in the last(smallest) 4 or 5 positions in our case. We use for the top gear in the cassette a 16 or 17 Sprocket (Miche)