Let's Discuss Frame Geometry
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
I've a few MTBs from that era..ish. Here is a 94 Kona Hot where I swapped out the Judy fork for a CrabonCycles Exotic fork.
#77
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
BTW: whatever the original intent of GT’s “triple triangle” was, in reality it was just a visual cue to distinguish their frames. It makes zero difference in - or influence on - the bikes geometry. It also makes essentially zero difference in the ride.
If you enjoy the bike, then there is nothing to explain. Just enjoy it.
However if you are going to compare it to newer bikes, you really ought to read up on what has changed in MTB design (even hartails) in the 22 years since your bike was produced. Modern mtb geo (and I would include wheel size as part of that) is far better and far more versatile for off-road riding.
1990’s XC HTs like yours are versatile in the sense that they work better than modern ones as street bikes. Not surprising as both the bike geo and rider technique were still heavily influenced by road riding in the 90s.
What has changed over the past 20 years is that MTB designers have gotten a better grasp of what is needed for mtb, and along with that, riders have found new riding techniques better suited to MTB.
Last edited by Kapusta; 10-08-20 at 09:46 AM.
Likes For Kapusta:
#78
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
This thread is like a sourdough starter
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#79
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
I've a few MTBs from that era..ish. Here is a 94 Kona Hot where I swapped out the Judy fork for a CrabonCycles Exotic fork.
It seems like my bike came with either a 63 or 80mm suspension fork. Will 425mm be a good size? Or do I need even smaller?
#80
jj
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 331
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 110 Times
in
78 Posts
FWIW, I have plenty of fun riding road bikes, both vintage and new, in local State Park trails that’re mostly dirt with some roots & rocks and some good climbs and descents. Drop bars effectively function as your on-the-fly height adjusting stem idea, but are durability proven for nearly a century. I have yet to be passed by anyone on a bike with knobby tires in these trails.
Likes For hsuBM:
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,487
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7651 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
I've a few MTBs from that era..ish. Here is a 94 Kona Hot where I swapped out the Judy fork for a CrabonCycles Exotic fork.
Likes For Maelochs:
#82
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
I fitted a new fork from an old rocky mountain commuter bike. Wasn't able to fit my stem riser because the steerer tube was cut to length. With a spacer underneath, I found it pretty comfortable.
The bike is very fast and smooth now. On pavement, the cornering grip is absurdly high. Im sure it will perform fantastic on less technical singletrack like this. I have to get used to the siginifucsntly faster and more sensrice steering.
The all purpose speed intentions of this bike fit in perfectly with what I need considering that there isn't much singletrack in my immediate area. Replacing this bike is something I will never do because I know that all I will find is something only marginally more comfortable. Ill add a second bike for singletrack only to the lineup eventually.
The bike is very fast and smooth now. On pavement, the cornering grip is absurdly high. Im sure it will perform fantastic on less technical singletrack like this. I have to get used to the siginifucsntly faster and more sensrice steering.
The all purpose speed intentions of this bike fit in perfectly with what I need considering that there isn't much singletrack in my immediate area. Replacing this bike is something I will never do because I know that all I will find is something only marginally more comfortable. Ill add a second bike for singletrack only to the lineup eventually.
Last edited by Moisture; 10-11-20 at 03:00 AM.
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,487
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7651 Post(s)
Liked 3,473 Times
in
1,834 Posts
^That looks a lot more stable.
Nothing wrong with a high-bar cruiser. It is just that the style of bike is very limited in its uses. But for relaxed cruising on paved surfaces, if you want your bars at shoulder-level, go for it.
The bike with the rigid fork looks like a much better commuter (to me) because it looks a lot more stable and responsive---lower center of gravity, weight better divided between the wheels.
For me commuting is riding in areas where there are more cars than I would ever want around me on most rides. I commuted for decades, and cars are no problem---but i'd rather ride on roads where cars are rarer. But when I had to go to work, to the stores, to classes, the the laundromat---I had to be on major roads a lot. And for that I want a bike which responds quickly but doesn't get upset easily. The bike in the early photos looks a little top-heavy and rear-haevy
Nothing wrong with a high-bar cruiser. It is just that the style of bike is very limited in its uses. But for relaxed cruising on paved surfaces, if you want your bars at shoulder-level, go for it.
The bike with the rigid fork looks like a much better commuter (to me) because it looks a lot more stable and responsive---lower center of gravity, weight better divided between the wheels.
For me commuting is riding in areas where there are more cars than I would ever want around me on most rides. I commuted for decades, and cars are no problem---but i'd rather ride on roads where cars are rarer. But when I had to go to work, to the stores, to classes, the the laundromat---I had to be on major roads a lot. And for that I want a bike which responds quickly but doesn't get upset easily. The bike in the early photos looks a little top-heavy and rear-haevy
Likes For Maelochs:
#84
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
^That looks a lot more stable.
Nothing wrong with a high-bar cruiser. It is just that the style of bike is very limited in its uses. But for relaxed cruising on paved surfaces, if you want your bars at shoulder-level, go for it.
The bike with the rigid fork looks like a much better commuter (to me) because it looks a lot more stable and responsive---lower center of gravity, weight better divided between the wheels.
For me commuting is riding in areas where there are more cars than I would ever want around me on most rides. I commuted for decades, and cars are no problem---but i'd rather ride on roads where cars are rarer. But when I had to go to work, to the stores, to classes, the the laundromat---I had to be on major roads a lot. And for that I want a bike which responds quickly but doesn't get upset easily. The bike in the early photos looks a little top-heavy and rear-haevy
Nothing wrong with a high-bar cruiser. It is just that the style of bike is very limited in its uses. But for relaxed cruising on paved surfaces, if you want your bars at shoulder-level, go for it.
The bike with the rigid fork looks like a much better commuter (to me) because it looks a lot more stable and responsive---lower center of gravity, weight better divided between the wheels.
For me commuting is riding in areas where there are more cars than I would ever want around me on most rides. I commuted for decades, and cars are no problem---but i'd rather ride on roads where cars are rarer. But when I had to go to work, to the stores, to classes, the the laundromat---I had to be on major roads a lot. And for that I want a bike which responds quickly but doesn't get upset easily. The bike in the early photos looks a little top-heavy and rear-haevy
Now, I had to take out one of the spacers below the stem because the steerer tube is barely long enough, and its not that comfortable. While the new fork certainly.makes up for this on pavement, im leaning forward too much over the front axle to the point where even trying to lift the front wheel (instead of letting the suspension do the front fork do the work for you) just doesnt feel balanced at all.
I actually replaced my chain before this, because I was using an 8 speed chain. Bad idea. The new chain in itself made a huge difference with speed and smoothness.
plus, I need longer cranks. Don't know how i will find 185mm cranks, but power trasnfer is definetely limited particularly when im pedalling out of the saddle.
With a new rigid fork with a longer steerer tube to fit spacers, the longer cranks, and perhaps lowering the seat slightly this bike will fit me about perfectly.
As for the handling, razor sharp.
#85
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Here is my new bike, if anyone is interested. A 1980 Norco Monterey. 63.5CM frame.