![]() |
Ab development is ridiculous. I ride to develop my pecks... and they are awesome. :ride:
|
You could just ride with your core engaged. As you ride make sure you engage your abs, and then release, maybe make a game out of it.
|
No. I do sit-ups, bicycle crunches, and flutter kicks daily. At least 100.
I also do various types of pushups, working up to doing hand stand pushups, plus lunges. I love riding, but I don't want a cyclist's body either. |
cycling to build 6-pack is like eating potato chips for ur daily protein intake (with the 1g of protein in them).
ok, may be not... u might get a 6-pack with enuf cycling... but chips? yummmm, LISA, where is that blue colored pack of salty stuff? |
Originally Posted by shrimp123
(Post 21777462)
cycling to build 6-pack is like eating potato chips for ur daily protein intake (with the 1g of protein in them).
ok, may be not... u might get a 6-pack with enuf cycling... but chips? yummmm, LISA, where is that blue colored pack of salty stuff? Homer |
Originally Posted by cubewheels
(Post 21774509)
You'll never get 6 pack ab muscles by purely by cycling.
Everyone has a 4 to 12 pack depending on how many tendinous intersections they were born with. An eight pack is most common. Fat just hides it. Building muscles purely by cycling is usually done by powering the bike with the big gears (high gear ratios) and pedaling out-of-the-saddle (pedaling while standing and off the saddle) very often for the longest time you can possibly maintain. At even just 30 reps per minute out of the saddle the workload must be too low for hypertrophy and strength. Track cyclists have huge muscles because they squat a multiple of their bodyweight in the gym. Robert Förstemann maintains his 28 inch quads hefting 650 pounds: |
Thank you everyone for your cool reply.
|
Originally Posted by cubewheels
(Post 21776130)
Mine is really big. It's one reason I avoid wearing tight jersey and shorts!
https://www.newyorker.com/wp-content...1466344628.jpg |
you'd likely seek an abnormal diet to support a hardcore workout. my gut feeling is that, unless your are willing to make a lifestyle change, the effort may not be sustainable for the end result.
|
Originally Posted by cubewheels
(Post 21774509)
You'll never get 6 pack ab muscles by purely by cycling. HOWEVER, if you have belly fat, cycling can help eliminate belly fat if you do it at enough intensity.
My waistline for example, went from 30 inches to 24 inches. Building muscles purely by cycling is usually done by powering the bike with the big gears (high gear ratios) and pedaling out-of-the-saddle (pedaling while standing and off the saddle) very often for the longest time you can possibly maintain. |
Originally Posted by cubewheels
(Post 21774509)
My waistline for example, went from 30 inches to 24 inches. A skinny man with a BMI of 20 will usually still have a 28" waist. And is probably built such that a lifestyle of Twinkies, BBQ, and beer wouldn't raise the waist much over 30". Is it possible you're converting from CM to inches incorrectly? As a 28er myself, pants are an eternal struggle to find. If you're truly that skinny, what are you wearing? So many questions... |
The only excercise i partake in anymore after my knee surgeries is cycling. When i am in my best shape, and putting in high mileage weeks of high effort riding, i develop a pretty defined abdominal section. I ride lots of hills in the saddle and can feel those muscles working while riding - it can be done.
|
Originally Posted by cycler56
(Post 21774502)
Hello,
Is it possible to build abs and muscles only by riding? I can't find any trustable source about it. So is there anyone who gain those only by cycling? :foo: |
Originally Posted by Lemond1985
(Post 21776024)
:lol: |
Look at old school bike racers. Greg Lemond, Bernard Hinault, Francesco Moser, Sean Kelly. They were built like tree trunks. Waist as big as the chest or hips. Massive core strength. This was back in the day when a racer raced minimum 150 days a year and 200 was common. That strength was used to keep them on the bike. Get out of alignment and then you are subject to injuries. Live on the bike and core strength will come. The old guys did not do gym work. It was all from the bike.
Most of us just don’t live and perform that way. Even modern pros do not develop that kind of core. If I am doing intensive ab work then I can feel the abs engaging when climbing and it definitely helps. If I lived where climbing is important I would work the abs harder. If attempting to learn sprinting core work is required. Back injuries happen from sprinting. Be prepared. The second exercise posted by LeMond 85 is very good. Prescribed for me by a therapist long ago and it works. Keep your core straight and motionless while doing that one. Make it harder by doing it in slow motion. Make it even harder with wrist/ankle weights. Not personally familiar with that first exercise from same poster. Some level of ab work will promptly and noticeably help most any cyclist. |
There's a grain of truth to this because a person over a certain body mass, no matter the ab exercises, the abs won't "show up".
Like, "strongmen" have crazy strong abs. But you just can't see them. You "see them" by being skinny. There's only a reasonable level of "ripped" in a gym you can work on if it isn't your biggest hobby to make them "show up". |
Visible abs doesn't mean strong abs., visible abs only means that your bodyfat percentage is low...Cycling won't build a strong core no matter how hard you ride or how much you ride. If you want to have a strong core you need to lift some heavy objects regularly and perform rotational core exercises such as swinging a heavy sledge hammer or swinging some other heavy object.
|
P90X - Ab Ripper X.
|
It's possible if you do a lot of riding standing on the pedals.
I remember one time I did 10 minutes straight climbing out of the saddle, my abs are very sore some time after the ride and I did get flat abs riding without sitting on the saddle for a cumulative time of 30 minutes in every ride. But I don't ride like that anymore. It felt dangerous enough if anything goes wrong in the drivetrain when you're out of the saddle. If I feel like working on my waist, I just mash the pedals at high gear while sitted. It doesn't seem to work the abs but works the waist muscles quite nicely. |
Originally Posted by 63rickert
(Post 22434664)
Look at old school bike racers. Greg Lemond, Bernard Hinault, Francesco Moser, Sean Kelly. They were built like tree trunks. Waist as big as the chest or hips. Massive core strength. This was back in the day when a racer raced minimum 150 days a year and 200 was common. That strength was used to keep them on the bike. Get out of alignment and then you are subject to injuries. Live on the bike and core strength will come. The old guys did not do gym work. It was all from the bike.
Most of us just don’t live and perform that way. Even modern pros do not develop that kind of core. But ever since I incorporated big gear / low cadence intervals in all my rides, I no longer needed any off bike core exercises and my core is stronger than ever. The right posture also helps. The arched lower back posture is easier on the core than trying to keep it straight and also opens the hip angle. It's a quite powerful position, not to mention, it's very comfortable once you get used to it. Lots of pros assume such posture including Eddy Merckx and it's the natural / relaxed form the body would assume if you're pushing big gears. Ironically, recreational riders are often taught to keep their backs straight when riding when that posture is harder on the core muscles and spine and more prone to injury. Such posture is OKAY for spinning and normally taught in spin classes. But not when you have to push hard in a big climb. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...bdc45f2f65.png |
Originally Posted by qwaalodge
(Post 22436110)
The main difference is the old pros are mashing big gears back in the day and they don't sit in front of a computer for long periods. I used to do off bike core training exercises with and without weights.
But ever since I incorporated big gear / low cadence intervals in all my rides, I no longer needed any off bike core exercises and my core is stronger than ever. The right posture also helps. The arched lower back posture is easier on the core than trying to keep it straight and also opens the hip angle. It's a quite powerful position, not to mention, it's very comfortable once you get used to it. Lots of pros assume such posture including Eddy Merckx and it's the natural / relaxed form the body would assume if you're pushing big gears. Ironically, recreational riders are often taught to keep their backs straight when riding when that posture is harder on the core muscles and spine and more prone to injury. Such posture is OKAY for spinning and normally taught in spin classes. But not when you have to push hard in a big climb. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...bdc45f2f65.png I don’t know where the idea old school were big gear mashers comes from. Yes, they climbed in relatively large gears. Otherwise they turned the pedals much faster. Peter Post still has the record for fastest Paris-Roubaix, top gear of 52x14. Sean Kelly won hundreds of races sprinting on 52x15. Flattest back I ever saw was Greg Lemond. When he climbed his position did move towards what your photo shows. Pretty much everyone gets lower in front and bends the elbows more when the pace picks up. All get low, some bend at hip not waist and get flat. Track riders who never climb but do ride a lot develop the same thick midsection as roadies. These days track is beyond specialized and the competitors get their bodies in the weight room. Six day riders of old looked just like roadies. The tiny indoor tracks usually had gear limits. On the bigger tracks with no limits few used more than 46x14 and the speeds were high. When you push down on the pedals the pedal moves down. On a big gear, on a limiting climb, it would make just as much sense to push down and watch the riders torso move up. Even riding fast on the flat it would make sense to push down and watch the riders torso move up. The downward force on the pedal is much greater than rider weight. And much greater than the portion of rider weight that might be resisting the downward force. What keeps you in the saddle is core strength. Core is used all the time when riding. 5 year old children learning how to ride use core strength. Old school raced 200 days a year. Extremists as Merckx raced 250 days a year. No gym work was done. Merckx in particular was known for using the rollers daily even when racing. Rollers are zero resistance training and the whole object is to keep pedal speed high. The reason to do core exercise is most of us are not Merckx or Kelly or Thevenet. Training the quads for big power is relatively easy. Core strength to match comes slower. Best way to build core is to just plain ride a lot. Strong riders who have no chance of being on the bike 20,000 miles a year need to do specifics for core. High gear work for core? Maybe. It is an interesting notion. Did old school get some of their core from the high gear climbing? Maybe, and again I think you are proposing something interesting. But riders who rode flats only and geared relatively low ended up with same core. |
Originally Posted by 63rickert
(Post 22437140)
Nice pic of Thevenet. It illustrates your point well.
I don’t know where the idea old school were big gear mashers comes from. Yes, they climbed in relatively large gears. Otherwise they turned the pedals much faster. Peter Post still has the record for fastest Paris-Roubaix, top gear of 52x14. Sean Kelly won hundreds of races sprinting on 52x15. Flattest back I ever saw was Greg Lemond. When he climbed his position did move towards what your photo shows. Pretty much everyone gets lower in front and bends the elbows more when the pace picks up. All get low, some bend at hip not waist and get flat. Track riders who never climb but do ride a lot develop the same thick midsection as roadies. These days track is beyond specialized and the competitors get their bodies in the weight room. Six day riders of old looked just like roadies. The tiny indoor tracks usually had gear limits. On the bigger tracks with no limits few used more than 46x14 and the speeds were high. When you push down on the pedals the pedal moves down. On a big gear, on a limiting climb, it would make just as much sense to push down and watch the riders torso move up. Even riding fast on the flat it would make sense to push down and watch the riders torso move up. The downward force on the pedal is much greater than rider weight. And much greater than the portion of rider weight that might be resisting the downward force. What keeps you in the saddle is core strength. Core is used all the time when riding. 5 year old children learning how to ride use core strength. Old school raced 200 days a year. Extremists as Merckx raced 250 days a year. No gym work was done. Merckx in particular was known for using the rollers daily even when racing. Rollers are zero resistance training and the whole object is to keep pedal speed high. The reason to do core exercise is most of us are not Merckx or Kelly or Thevenet. Training the quads for big power is relatively easy. Core strength to match comes slower. Best way to build core is to just plain ride a lot. Strong riders who have no chance of being on the bike 20,000 miles a year need to do specifics for core. High gear work for core? Maybe. It is an interesting notion. Did old school get some of their core from the high gear climbing? Maybe, and again I think you are proposing something interesting. But riders who rode flats only and geared relatively low ended up with same core. That and the curved back posture I suppose was the best core development I ever had. It did require a change in bike fit however, one with less reach. I incorporate it in intervals in multiple training sessions per day. I previously tried planks, deadlifts with weights ofc, squats with weights, etc but weren't as good. When you push down on the pedals the pedal moves down. On a big gear, on a limiting climb, it would make just as much sense to push down and watch the riders torso move up. Even riding fast on the flat it would make sense to push down and watch the riders torso move up. The downward force on the pedal is much greater than rider weight. And much greater than the portion of rider weight that might be resisting the downward force. What keeps you in the saddle is core strength. Core is used all the time when riding. I still see many current TdF racers do it especially when facing the most difficult climbs. |
No idea if cycling builds ABs or what that even means but try loaded bike touring for a couple months in the mountains riding 8-12 hours per day. At the end of the tour, you will be able to do thousands of sit ups and that plank thing will be a joke. And, the fat will be gone and all your viens will be popping everywheres.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.