Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   General Cycling Discussion (https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/)
-   -   Untrained FTP (https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/1220779-untrained-ftp.html)

dsmyth12 01-03-21 06:33 PM

Untrained FTP
 
What would generally be considered a high FTP (w/kg) for someone who is untrained with no previous riding experience? I'm currently at 80kg.

rsbob 01-03-21 07:56 PM

Uh, maybe 6?

Dunno, don’t track that but have no problem with those than do.

sorry, it was a wasted post but was feeling snarky. Thanks for helping me work through it. :D

billridesbikes 01-03-21 08:05 PM

If you find you're >5.5 start contacting the World Tour teams.

The plot below has the 50 percentile at somewhere between 3.6-3.7 (if I'm reading the chart correctly) and the same for men and woemen. And this seems a little on the high side to me for both genders. So I take the percentiles here with a grain of salt.
From cyclinganalytics.com



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...bc2c2bc0aa.png

Here is a plot of selected TrainerRoad users from 2014. Assume (1) if you're on TrainerRoad you're fairly serious about cycling (2) people accurately report their weight on TrainerRoad. Here the average FTP is ~3 with ~1000 data points although results for men and women might be mixed together here. I think this corresponds with some aggregated data w/kg FTP on the Garmin web site as well.


https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...5be5195775.jpg

base2 01-03-21 08:15 PM

A totally untrained ftp for someone of 80 kilos may be around 80 watts.

Yep.
1 watt per kilo. Probably less though.
That's my guess.

I think the above chart is pretty charitable.
Someone here will tell me I'm wrong.

Welcome to Bike Forums!
:D

CAT7RDR 01-03-21 08:15 PM

Darn! I missed it by "that" much.

Barry2 01-04-21 06:56 PM

Ftp
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dsmyth12 (Post 21860873)
What would generally be considered a high FTP .

First off - Welcome to Bike Forums.

Your question is a little too generic and so you suffered the humor/wrath of some of the Gent's here.

Joe Friel has written some good books and I've one on Power Meter training in front of me right now.
He offers a method by which to estimate FTP using the following factors.

Your lean weight (as in not your actual weight, but what you should weigh)
Sex
Age
Altitude
Number of days per week you train

But this is still just very rough numbers.

If you use a Heart Rate Monitor & suitable software/hardware then Strava will actually give you estimated power for you rides.
It's a cheap way to get an indication without the investment in a Power Meter.

All the best

Barry

rsbob 01-04-21 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by base2 (Post 21861038)

Yep.

Someone here will tell me I'm wrong.
:D

Hate for you to be disappointed because I care and also want to be the first to say.... Your wrong!

What was the subject again?

base2 01-04-21 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rsbob (Post 21862772)
Hate for you to be disappointed because I care and also want to be the first to say.... Your wrong!

What was the subject again?

Ha! Thanks. You made my day.
:D

badger1 01-04-21 10:09 PM

I don't allow untrained FTPs anywhere near my domicile. Messy things, they are.

rubiksoval 01-05-21 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsmyth12 (Post 21860873)
What would generally be considered a high FTP (w/kg) for someone who is untrained with no previous riding experience? I'm currently at 80kg.

High FTPs? As in a power you could legitimately hold for 45+ minutes?

3 w/kg would be a pretty high FTP for someone untrained, so around 240w?

After a few months of deliberate structured training, I'd expect around 4 w/kg or 320ish watts for a "high FTP". After a year or two, if you were really quite good, I'd expect around 5, or near 400 w/kg. Clearly those people are really quite rare and/or have an extensive endurance background, though, so I most assuredly would not expect anything close to that.

If you're talking about your average person who could lose 20 lbs and hasn't done much more than walk to the fridge in the last few years, than anything between 1-2 w/kg would be expected, so somewhere between 80-160ish watts.

And if you don't have an actual power meter, absolutely none of that matters a bit. Strava estimates or whatever are genuinely useless for this type of question.

rubiksoval 01-05-21 02:27 PM

This may be of interest:

https://forum.slowtwitch.com/forum/S...e%3F_P2830186/

Drew Eckhardt 01-05-21 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsmyth12 (Post 21860873)
What would generally be considered a high FTP (w/kg) for someone who is untrained with no previous riding experience? I'm currently at 80kg.

3W/kg.

1.6 - 2.6 W/kg is more typical based on personal experience with a power meter while I was out of shape.

20 miles in one hour solo is the benchmark for a fit recreational cyclist which takes me about 210 W.

An 80 kg rider dragging 18 kg more around would use 23 kj extra, or an additional 6W.

Doing it comfortably on 95% of FTP they'd have about 230 W which is 2.9 W/kg.

Riding a lot but not training my anaerobic threshold, I could just manage 10 minute intervals at 200W suggesting a 180W FTP. When thin by normal people's standards I weigh 150 pounds which is 68 kg. That's 2.6W/kg.

After not riding for six weeks while a broken collarbone healed, I could only produce 164W for 10 minutes suggesting a 147W FTP. The average American male weighs 198 pounds which is 90kg. That power and weight would be 1.6W/kg.

Conversely, in great shape I can manage a 220W FTP at 62 kg which is 3.5 W/kg.

dsmyth12 01-05-21 04:36 PM

I actually do have a power meter, which is why I asked the question. Just trying to see where I'm at. Thanks for your responses on this thread and the other one I started, they've been pretty helpful.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.