Sensors, multiple bikes
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sensors, multiple bikes
I'm about to buy my first bike computer together with a cadence and speed sensor. The problem that I find with them is that they are attached to your bike with zip ties.
So I was wondering what people do with their sensors if they own more than just one bike:
So I was wondering what people do with their sensors if they own more than just one bike:
- Buy an additional set for each bike you would like to use the cadence and speed sensor on, or;
- Is there an option out there that I'm overlooking that allows you to switch these sensors between bikes as easily as the bike computer itself?
#2
Junior Member
The bike computer I have utilizes a GPS signal to calculate speed, so I can install a mount on a few bikes and easily swap the computer around with no wheel size adjustments. I have thought about buying more cadence sensors... but so far I have just put it on my favored bike, and occasionally cut off the zip ties and swapped it around as my "favored bike" changes
#3
Senior Member
Like stoogehand, I went the GPS bike computer route (Wahoo Roam) which solves that problem - but is expensive. I do put cadence sensors (Wahoo ones that don't require both a sensor and a magnet, just a pod on your crank arm) on each of 2 bikes I ride today.
There are some other solutions:
Back when I used a Cateye bike computer, and before I switched to GPS-based, I bought a wireless Cateye model and 2 extra mounts. I then used Velcro to attach the speed (wheel) and cadence (pedal sensors) across 3 bikes. Worked fine for a few years, then I switched to the GPS way for a number of reasons.
There are some other solutions:
Back when I used a Cateye bike computer, and before I switched to GPS-based, I bought a wireless Cateye model and 2 extra mounts. I then used Velcro to attach the speed (wheel) and cadence (pedal sensors) across 3 bikes. Worked fine for a few years, then I switched to the GPS way for a number of reasons.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 602
Bikes: Planet X Carbon Pro Evo SRAM Force, custom built 653 and 531 bikes with frames by Barry Witcomb, Giant XTC 4 mountain bike and a Brompton folding bike.
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked 52 Times
in
40 Posts
In my case it was option 1. I've been using a Garmin GPS unit for getting on for ten years now so I've managed to build up a collection of sensors.
The original unit, and Edge 705, was very fussy about what sensors it would talk to. I think it had to be a combined speed/cadence sensor which pretty much meant a GSC-10 and that was it. I bought one new with the unit and managed to pick up a used one a few years later. I now have an Edge 520 Plus which will talk to pretty much anything. A year or so back I picked up a used Giant NEOS computer for my mountain bike which came with speed and cadence sensors and the Edge 520 picks up the signal from that fine.
So, the point of that ramble was that the Garmin sensors are quite expensive but you can get cheaper options which work just fine. You don't say what computer you are planning to buy; are you after one with full GPS or simple computer? I keep the latter on a couple of my bikes simply as an easy way to record the overall mileage as well as using the Garmin for recording my rides. I'm coming to the conclusion, though, that web sites like Strada and RideWithGPS make recording mileage so easy that the basic computer is becoming redundant.
I like Garmin and get a special deal on them through my health insurance provider but a lot of people on this site will extol the praises of Wahoo, which seem to come out a bit cheaper and have a good reputation for reliability.
The original unit, and Edge 705, was very fussy about what sensors it would talk to. I think it had to be a combined speed/cadence sensor which pretty much meant a GSC-10 and that was it. I bought one new with the unit and managed to pick up a used one a few years later. I now have an Edge 520 Plus which will talk to pretty much anything. A year or so back I picked up a used Giant NEOS computer for my mountain bike which came with speed and cadence sensors and the Edge 520 picks up the signal from that fine.
So, the point of that ramble was that the Garmin sensors are quite expensive but you can get cheaper options which work just fine. You don't say what computer you are planning to buy; are you after one with full GPS or simple computer? I keep the latter on a couple of my bikes simply as an easy way to record the overall mileage as well as using the Garmin for recording my rides. I'm coming to the conclusion, though, that web sites like Strada and RideWithGPS make recording mileage so easy that the basic computer is becoming redundant.
I like Garmin and get a special deal on them through my health insurance provider but a lot of people on this site will extol the praises of Wahoo, which seem to come out a bit cheaper and have a good reputation for reliability.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was planning on buying a Wahoo Roam, which has gps since I will be using it mainly for navigation.
So far I have used my phone for navigation and a very simple and cheap bike computer (€10) that is wired to my front fork together with a magnet attached to the spoke of my wheel.
I have found that using the gps signal for speed is only about 80% to 90% accurate on my phone if I compare it to that simple bike computer, where I believe the latter is more reliable.
I’m aware of the fact that a dedicated gps unit also has acces to galileo and glonass, which could make it more reliable but I believe that only goes for when you are in the forest or in cities with high buildings.
Therefore I wanted to track my speed with a dedicated sensor designed for it... Ive found some that allow for easy swapping with rubber bands, but I cant find out how the settings work for such a sensor. Do you have to adjust the wheel diameter in the settings everytime you change it to a different bike or how does it determine your speed if it does not use gps?
So far I have used my phone for navigation and a very simple and cheap bike computer (€10) that is wired to my front fork together with a magnet attached to the spoke of my wheel.
I have found that using the gps signal for speed is only about 80% to 90% accurate on my phone if I compare it to that simple bike computer, where I believe the latter is more reliable.
I’m aware of the fact that a dedicated gps unit also has acces to galileo and glonass, which could make it more reliable but I believe that only goes for when you are in the forest or in cities with high buildings.
Therefore I wanted to track my speed with a dedicated sensor designed for it... Ive found some that allow for easy swapping with rubber bands, but I cant find out how the settings work for such a sensor. Do you have to adjust the wheel diameter in the settings everytime you change it to a different bike or how does it determine your speed if it does not use gps?
#6
Junior Member
Something like the Wahoo Speed Sensor does not use GPS, but instead it has a sensor that counts revolutions. You can easily swap it between bikes with an elastic band, but you would need to change your tire diameter in the companion app
Likes For stoogehand:
#7
I think I know nothing.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NE PA
Posts: 655
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Liked 267 Times
in
188 Posts
I'm using a Garmin Edge 530 and have speed and cadence sensors on each bike (and Garmin mounts) that I normally ride just makes it a lot easier.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,067
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2206 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,275 Posts
Some of the more basic GPS computers are so inexpensive that it makes no sense to buy a non-GPS unit.
Speed sensor is not essential - I get perfectly accurate data without one. And a cadence sensor can go on your shoe.
Speed sensor is not essential - I get perfectly accurate data without one. And a cadence sensor can go on your shoe.
Last edited by Koyote; 01-07-21 at 08:14 AM.
Likes For Koyote:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,127
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 906 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
333 Posts
Speed you will have to swap, no way around it unless you just use GPS. Cadence sensor can be attached to your shoe not the bike (as long as it is wireless).
#10
Senior Member
I have considered doing exactly that, for those occasions when the bike I want to ride has a dead battery in the sensor.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Maryland
Posts: 901
Bikes: 1982 Bianchi Sport SX, Rayleigh Tamland 1, Rans V-Rex recumbent, Fuji MTB, 80's Cannondale MTB with BBSHD ebike motor
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 412 Post(s)
Liked 320 Times
in
216 Posts
Cateye sells wheel sensor units separately. I put a wheel sensor on each bike than swap the single head unit across bikes. The head units always have an A and B wheel size.
Now I have an old GPS unit, I only care about speed, distance and time.
Now I have an old GPS unit, I only care about speed, distance and time.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 6,507
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times
in
374 Posts
Old school. I have wired computers (with cadence and speed sensors). Funny thing is one of those per bike costs less than the combined speed and cadence sensor package for each bike to hook up to a GPS.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,041
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 240 Times
in
171 Posts
Have you thought of just buying sensors that don't require zip-ties? Most speed and cadence sensors I'm familiar with use rubber straps/bands that are simple to remove/reinstall. It only takes a few seconds to move from one bike to another. If you have a GPS head-unit, it'll (likely) automatically calibrate the speed sensor.



#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,263
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 524 Post(s)
Liked 313 Times
in
184 Posts
The Wahoo RPM cadence sensor is just a pod that you can attach to your shoe or even stuff inside it. Speed sensors, it's easier to just have multiple, or not use at all.
#17
Senior Member
I would still use at least 1 zip tie.I don't trust the self-adhesive . I have a couple bikes and run the sigma bc1900 on all of them. I am sure there was a cheaper way to do it. But for me it was easier than always changing out the sensors.
#18
Senior Member
Maybe a twist-tie from a loaf of bread.
Easy on and off without any tools.
I think the only ones I worry about are those stretchy O-rings which secure the bracket to the stem. Especially since it gets stretched SO tightly (especially on my beefy Bianchi stem). But if that snaps while I am riding, at least there's a reasonable chance I will notice pretty quickly and can go back and look for it.

I think the only ones I worry about are those stretchy O-rings which secure the bracket to the stem. Especially since it gets stretched SO tightly (especially on my beefy Bianchi stem). But if that snaps while I am riding, at least there's a reasonable chance I will notice pretty quickly and can go back and look for it.
#19
Senior Member
Maybe a twist-tie from a loaf of bread.
Easy on and off without any tools.
I think the only ones I worry about are those stretchy O-rings which secure the bracket to the stem. Especially since it gets stretched SO tightly (especially on my beefy Bianchi stem). But if that snaps while I am riding, at least there's a reasonable chance I will notice pretty quickly and can go back and look for it.

I think the only ones I worry about are those stretchy O-rings which secure the bracket to the stem. Especially since it gets stretched SO tightly (especially on my beefy Bianchi stem). But if that snaps while I am riding, at least there's a reasonable chance I will notice pretty quickly and can go back and look for it.

#20
Junior Member
I’m aware of the fact that a dedicated gps unit also has acces to galileo and glonass, which could make it more reliable but I believe that only goes for when you are in the forest or in cities with high buildings.
Therefore I wanted to track my speed with a dedicated sensor designed for it... Ive found some that allow for easy swapping with rubber bands, but I cant find out how the settings work for such a sensor. Do you have to adjust the wheel diameter in the settings everytime you change it to a different bike or how does it determine your speed if it does not use gps?
Therefore I wanted to track my speed with a dedicated sensor designed for it... Ive found some that allow for easy swapping with rubber bands, but I cant find out how the settings work for such a sensor. Do you have to adjust the wheel diameter in the settings everytime you change it to a different bike or how does it determine your speed if it does not use gps?
My Bolt head unit does a pretty good job of passing the gut test, but as I was thinking about how to answer your question, I realized that the GPS does have its limitations. The terrain around here is pretty flat and open. However, you will occasionally happen upon some corridors of tall and thick trees. When going in to such a corridor, my Bolt may go from reading 18 mph to 12 mph, which is a significant difference, and as I am riding, it does not pass the gut test. So if you frequently ride in areas with structures that block GPS signal, you may well want a wireless speed sensor.
Your question got me curious, so I busted out my Wahoo Speed Sensor (the one piece of the ELEMT Bolt bundle that I never used) and I played around with the settings. Turns out, you can set it to automatically calculate your wheel circumference. Don't ask me how it does it, or if it is as accurate as manually setting it, but there it is. Or, as others have mentioned, you can buy a sensor for each bike$$

#21
Senior Member
A little off topic
If a speed sensor is paired with a GPS computer, which speed reading shows on the display?
#22
Senior Member
As comment about using and needing speed sensors. I have a Garmin 1030, have had a 1000 and 810. I have 4 speed sensors on assorted wheels. I use them on my mt. bike, my gravel bike on 2 sets of wheels and on my road bike. The mt. bike so as to reduce errors when riding in wooded cover. Ditto the gravel bike. On my road bike it's to give me a more accurate speed at that moment, as there's always a few seconds delay of the speed generated with GPS only and that can be less then useful when trying to maintain a steady speed in a road paceline.
On my touring bike that I use to commute, I don't use a speed sensor as I really don't need accurate speed and I've found that the GPS only track is accurate as to location and overall distance, as compared to a track whose speed and distance were from a wheel with a speed sensor. In typical conditions, GPS units (IME) are as accurate as to distance as when using a speed sensor. When you get into heavy leaf coverage, canyons in Utah or NYC, or such, is when a speed sensor is useful.
Last edited by Steve B.; 01-08-21 at 12:09 PM.
Likes For Steve B.:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 32,928
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 342 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15406 Post(s)
Liked 4,270 Times
in
2,248 Posts
Speed sensors are really only beneficial if you want an accurate reading at any given moment while you're actually riding. Without a speed sensor, your indicated speed may fluctuate a little as you go in and out of cover but, over the course of the ride, your average speed reading will be more than accurate enough.
As far as the directly answering the question, I'd recommend getting dedicated sensors for each bike. As a bonus, the Wahoo should be able to log each bike ride to the proper bike by way of the ID of the sensors being used.
As far as the directly answering the question, I'd recommend getting dedicated sensors for each bike. As a bonus, the Wahoo should be able to log each bike ride to the proper bike by way of the ID of the sensors being used.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 32,928
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 342 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15406 Post(s)
Liked 4,270 Times
in
2,248 Posts
The difference here is likely down to how the speed is being calculated. Some default to average speed, from start to finish, while others display average *moving* speed. IOW, stop lights aren't being held against you.
#25
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,895
Bikes: Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1700 Post(s)
Liked 1,575 Times
in
844 Posts
Have you thought of just buying sensors that don't require zip-ties? Most speed and cadence sensors I'm familiar with use rubber straps/bands that are simple to remove/reinstall. It only takes a few seconds to move from one bike to another. If you have a GPS head-unit, it'll (likely) automatically calibrate the speed sensor.



