bike science: more than 1 way to turn a bike?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,512 Times
in
2,855 Posts
Hmm I took both the Basic and Advanced MSF courses years ago, in the early 90's, and the instructors talked about countersteering at length. It was a skill we had to demonstrate repeatedly to pass the course.. much more so in the Advanced course--- but even in the Basic course as evasive maneuvering. Have they eliminated this from the POI?
ETA Correction, I just found it:
Press: To initiate motorcycle lean, press forward on the handgrip in the direction of the turn. This is referred to as counter-steering (the front wheel briefly points in the opposite direction of the turn). Press left handgrip, lean left, go left. Press right handgrip, lean right, go right.
Last edited by Shimagnolo; 05-19-21 at 09:42 AM.
#52
Senior Member
finally, a video explaining the physics behind countersteering
a few takaway points:
-countersteering is the quickest method to initiate a turn
-countersteering cannot (and must not) be maintained after the initiation phase (very quick) has been completed, i.e., the handlebar must be returned to the normal steering position
-the above video demonstate a "no slip" condition. In a slip condttion, eg, in flat-tracking, where the rider intentionally slip the back wheel to go around a turn, then countersteering is maintained throughout the turn. But ugh, do not try to flat-track your bicycle on the pavement, it will not end well.
a few takaway points:
-countersteering is the quickest method to initiate a turn
-countersteering cannot (and must not) be maintained after the initiation phase (very quick) has been completed, i.e., the handlebar must be returned to the normal steering position
-the above video demonstate a "no slip" condition. In a slip condttion, eg, in flat-tracking, where the rider intentionally slip the back wheel to go around a turn, then countersteering is maintained throughout the turn. But ugh, do not try to flat-track your bicycle on the pavement, it will not end well.
Likes For aclinjury:
#53
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Wouldn't you get a better counter steer with a heavier bike?
Likes For AlmostTrick:
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
In this case, the video above, counter steering is just being used to initiate a sharper turn by first increasing the radius by banking the opposite way. A fighter pilot might do the same thing if banking down to attack from above and a skier does it running moguls.
The bike needs to make sharp radius turns through pylons. They first counter steer to increase the radius and drop their balance lower, allowing a steeper angle of attack.
If they were going slower, or not turning so sharply, they would not need to counter steer.
The bike needs to make sharp radius turns through pylons. They first counter steer to increase the radius and drop their balance lower, allowing a steeper angle of attack.
If they were going slower, or not turning so sharply, they would not need to counter steer.
#55
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times
in
1,790 Posts
In a left turn, turning the bar left moves the contact patch left (to the inside of the turn). This unbalances the bike/rider system, causing the rider+bike to start tilting to the right. If the rider does nothing else, the bike/rider will continue to tilt to the right, and he will soon "high side" and fall to the outside of the turn. What happens in reality is the rider compensates with a quick turn of the bars to the right, the bike+rider establish a stable more upright lean angle, and the turn radius increases.
The ability to quickly increase the radius of a turn is another useful skill, accomplished once again by counter steering.
No. Pushing on the right bar in a left turn is the identical situation described above (pulling on the left bar in a left turn).
Last edited by terrymorse; 05-19-21 at 09:51 AM.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I would imagine way less than 1% of bike riders have ever heard of countersteering or even know that they do it instinctively. I had not heard the term until recently, relatively speaking, in comparison to my years of riding.
Many years ago I would occasionally ride with no hands and could negotiate sweeping turns. I have no doubt that I shifted my weight slightly to countersteer and then shifted it back to make the turn; although I really was not analyzing it.
I would guess at speed with hands on the bars, a good portion of is done with weight. Going into a left turn would be a slight lean right and lean to dive left. I’m sure the bars are turning slightly.
I also understand the upright tricycle effect where you can’t really lean into a turn. At speed, unless you can drift the rear wheels or move a substantial amount of weight to the inside, you won’t make the turn.
I’m not sure, but I would guess steering may be more pronounced on a motorcycle, since the bike weight is substantially greater. While rider weight has an influence. getting the bike to lean through steering, right go left, might be more pronounced.
John
Many years ago I would occasionally ride with no hands and could negotiate sweeping turns. I have no doubt that I shifted my weight slightly to countersteer and then shifted it back to make the turn; although I really was not analyzing it.
I would guess at speed with hands on the bars, a good portion of is done with weight. Going into a left turn would be a slight lean right and lean to dive left. I’m sure the bars are turning slightly.
I also understand the upright tricycle effect where you can’t really lean into a turn. At speed, unless you can drift the rear wheels or move a substantial amount of weight to the inside, you won’t make the turn.
I’m not sure, but I would guess steering may be more pronounced on a motorcycle, since the bike weight is substantially greater. While rider weight has an influence. getting the bike to lean through steering, right go left, might be more pronounced.
John
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 549
Bikes: Focus Arriba, Specialized Roubaix Expert, Bianchi Impulso Allroad
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 82 Times
in
53 Posts
I just looked thought the manual we used, and found no mention of it.
ETA Correction, I just found it:
Press: To initiate motorcycle lean, press forward on the handgrip in the direction of the turn. This is referred to as counter-steering (the front wheel briefly points in the opposite direction of the turn). Press left handgrip, lean left, go left. Press right handgrip, lean right, go right.
ETA Correction, I just found it:
Press: To initiate motorcycle lean, press forward on the handgrip in the direction of the turn. This is referred to as counter-steering (the front wheel briefly points in the opposite direction of the turn). Press left handgrip, lean left, go left. Press right handgrip, lean right, go right.
Pressing to Initiate and Adjust Lean
Understand the maneuvering elements needed for negotiating curves
- Experience the effects of handgrip pressure and handlebar movement to initiate and adjust lean
The Advance Course I took included some tough crash-avoidance exercises using countersteering that some riders on heavy baggers never mastered. We used our own motorcycles and I had no issues on my VFR750.
#58
Senior Member
probably not.
Reason is with a heavier bike, while the torque that initiates the countersteer is greater, but this greater torque is negated by the greater weight of the bike.
It's the reason why lighter bikes are quicker (all else being equal).
Reason is with a heavier bike, while the torque that initiates the countersteer is greater, but this greater torque is negated by the greater weight of the bike.
It's the reason why lighter bikes are quicker (all else being equal).
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,232
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,525 Times
in
7,325 Posts
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
Not quite right.
In a left turn, turning the bar left moves the contact patch left (to the inside of the turn). This unbalances the bike/rider system, causing the rider+bike to start tilting to the right. If the rider does nothing else, the bike/rider will continue to tilt to the right, and he will soon "high side" and fall to the outside of the turn. What happens in reality is the rider compensates with a quick turn of the bars to the right, the bike+rider establish a stable more upright lean angle, and the turn radius increases.
The ability to quickly increase the radius of a turn is another useful skill, accomplished once again by counter steering.
No. Pushing on the right bar in a left turn is the identical situation described above (pulling on the left bar in a left turn).
In a left turn, turning the bar left moves the contact patch left (to the inside of the turn). This unbalances the bike/rider system, causing the rider+bike to start tilting to the right. If the rider does nothing else, the bike/rider will continue to tilt to the right, and he will soon "high side" and fall to the outside of the turn. What happens in reality is the rider compensates with a quick turn of the bars to the right, the bike+rider establish a stable more upright lean angle, and the turn radius increases.
The ability to quickly increase the radius of a turn is another useful skill, accomplished once again by counter steering.
No. Pushing on the right bar in a left turn is the identical situation described above (pulling on the left bar in a left turn).
Still being full from just having enjoyed an epic details debate I'll push away from the table and say ok. I understand what you are describing.
#61
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times
in
1,790 Posts
No, you would fall out of the turn (towards the outside).
#62
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
Still incorrect, no matter how many times you write it.
Counter steering is the only way you can steer your handlebars to:
Counter steering is the only way you can steer your handlebars to:
- initiate a turn
- tighten the radius of a turn
It’s the “only way tighten the radius of a turn” but somehow, “Most people never use counter steering to tighten the radius of a turn.”
Very, very interesting.
Soooo... most people never turn?
(Just got back from a nice easy 25 mile ride and I turned a lot. Didn’t turn the wrong way one single time. When I was in a tuck on a fast descent @ 45mph I leaned and the bike turned. Thank God my bike isn’t dumb enough to counter steer or I would have crashed hard.)
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
On my mountain bike I’ll sometimes have to lean the bike left and out of the saddle be more upright, which is technically on the right side of the leaned bike. This has nothing to do with counter steering, basically it is weight shifting.
John
John
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Does steering/turning a bike have anything to do with "the force?"
Edit: The way the thread's going, it seems like it.
Edit: The way the thread's going, it seems like it.
Last edited by seypat; 05-19-21 at 01:37 PM.
#65
Senior Member
Thread Starter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countersteering
then look down a bit: "The scientific literature does not provide a clear and comprehensive definition of countersteering."
Last edited by JeffOYB; 05-19-21 at 01:42 PM.
#66
Senior Member
Thread Starter
...does the science that we know about agree that leaning and steering are both involved in turning and that they can be adjusted separately? ...we can use more or less lean and more or less steer to change the angle of the bike in the turn.
if countersteering is how we steer then countersteering LESS would amount to more "felt" steer in the direction of the turn.
keeping a bike more upright in a turn can improve traction and control
if countersteering is how we steer then countersteering LESS would amount to more "felt" steer in the direction of the turn.
keeping a bike more upright in a turn can improve traction and control
#67
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
For best counter steer should I mash or spin?
#68
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times
in
1,790 Posts
I can’t see how that would be beneficial.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
...does the science that we know about agree that leaning and steering are both involved in turning and that they can be adjusted separately? ...we can use more or less lean and more or less steer to change the angle of the bike in the turn.
if countersteering is how we steer then countersteering LESS would amount to more "felt" steer in the direction of the turn.
keeping a bike more upright in a turn can improve traction and control
if countersteering is how we steer then countersteering LESS would amount to more "felt" steer in the direction of the turn.
keeping a bike more upright in a turn can improve traction and control
#70
Senior Member
another great counter steer demostration, push left go left, push right go right. Sheesh people are making this more complicated then it s.
#71
Senior Member
That's kind of nonsensical question, isn't it?. Are you asking about a heavy frame with light wheels, a light-weight frame with very heavy wheels, or something else? Bottom-line; rotating wheels with more mass create greater gyroscopic precession than lighter wheels for a given rpm. The gyroscopic force of the wheels has little to do with the mass of the thing they're attached to.
I'm surprised that no one has yet mentioned the term "gyroscopic precession". Spin a bicycle wheel with it's axle in your hands and try to turn it left or right suddenly. Gyroscopic precession will cause the wheel to strongly want to flop on it's side. Gyroscopic precession acts at a 90-degree angle to the deflection of the spinning mass. This technical term is the root of counter-steering (and the reason why counter-steering doesn't work at very low speeds where there is little gyroscopic force in the wheel). Try to turn a moving two-wheel vehicle to the LEFT, and gyroscopic precession causes the bicycle/motorcycle to flop over to the right thus initiating a RIGHT-hand turn by turning slightly LEFT. The popular claim is that "scientists can't explain how a bicycle steers" but that's absurd - the physics are very well understood but, with so many overlapping factors to account for, there just isn't a simple formula to mathematically describe a turning bicycle (the rounded cross-section of a deformed tire under load plays a huge role in the resulting geometry).
I read Keith Code's book "A Twist of the Wrist" 30-years ago but I was aware of counter-steering since childhood from riding motorcycles (and also from owning a crazy and dangerous bicycle with a round steering wheel instead of a handlebar - very difficult to ride).
Have a look at this YouTube video below explaining how the U.S. Navy created a guided air-to-air missile in the 1950's without the use of any sophisticated electronics nor even a traditional battery - the AIM-9 Sidewinder missile. Note that the control vane shown in the video, the "rolleron", one of four on the missile, is hinged at a 45-degree angle. With the air wheel within each rolleron spinning at over 100,000 rpm in supersonic air, when the missile veers off course, gyroscopic precession causes the rolleron to flop out in the opposite direction harnessing air-pressure to turn the missile back straight again. In the original 1950's version of the missile, there was only a very basic, yet ingenious, electrical mechanism (powered by a burning "thermal battery") for "proportional pursuit" guidance offering high-performance target lead calculation without the use of any computer. Amazing ingenuity based on German WWII research captured by the Western Allies. Anyway, yeah, gyroscopic precession.
I'm surprised that no one has yet mentioned the term "gyroscopic precession". Spin a bicycle wheel with it's axle in your hands and try to turn it left or right suddenly. Gyroscopic precession will cause the wheel to strongly want to flop on it's side. Gyroscopic precession acts at a 90-degree angle to the deflection of the spinning mass. This technical term is the root of counter-steering (and the reason why counter-steering doesn't work at very low speeds where there is little gyroscopic force in the wheel). Try to turn a moving two-wheel vehicle to the LEFT, and gyroscopic precession causes the bicycle/motorcycle to flop over to the right thus initiating a RIGHT-hand turn by turning slightly LEFT. The popular claim is that "scientists can't explain how a bicycle steers" but that's absurd - the physics are very well understood but, with so many overlapping factors to account for, there just isn't a simple formula to mathematically describe a turning bicycle (the rounded cross-section of a deformed tire under load plays a huge role in the resulting geometry).
I read Keith Code's book "A Twist of the Wrist" 30-years ago but I was aware of counter-steering since childhood from riding motorcycles (and also from owning a crazy and dangerous bicycle with a round steering wheel instead of a handlebar - very difficult to ride).
Have a look at this YouTube video below explaining how the U.S. Navy created a guided air-to-air missile in the 1950's without the use of any sophisticated electronics nor even a traditional battery - the AIM-9 Sidewinder missile. Note that the control vane shown in the video, the "rolleron", one of four on the missile, is hinged at a 45-degree angle. With the air wheel within each rolleron spinning at over 100,000 rpm in supersonic air, when the missile veers off course, gyroscopic precession causes the rolleron to flop out in the opposite direction harnessing air-pressure to turn the missile back straight again. In the original 1950's version of the missile, there was only a very basic, yet ingenious, electrical mechanism (powered by a burning "thermal battery") for "proportional pursuit" guidance offering high-performance target lead calculation without the use of any computer. Amazing ingenuity based on German WWII research captured by the Western Allies. Anyway, yeah, gyroscopic precession.
Likes For Motorazr:
#72
Senior Member
A fault I find with the MSF course is that they don't teach about counter-steering.
After passing the MSF course and getting my CO motorcycle endorsement, I bought a bike.
The first time I descended Boulder Canyon, I missed a curve. i.e. I ran off the left side of a righthand curve into the gravel, but thankfully there was enough space to brake to a stop w/o hitting anything or dropping the bike. Shaken, I went hope and began an online search for everything about turning motorcycles. I learned a lot!
After passing the MSF course and getting my CO motorcycle endorsement, I bought a bike.
The first time I descended Boulder Canyon, I missed a curve. i.e. I ran off the left side of a righthand curve into the gravel, but thankfully there was enough space to brake to a stop w/o hitting anything or dropping the bike. Shaken, I went hope and began an online search for everything about turning motorcycles. I learned a lot!
Great video above. It shows that counter steering must be maintained to keep turning. Its not just an initiator. Some people will swear that once a turn is initiated, it will continue without further counter steering. Not true at all.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 05-19-21 at 04:13 PM.
#73
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times
in
1,790 Posts
What we have here is failure to comprehend. Let me clarify:
Not what I wrote. Counter steering is the only way to tighten the radius of a turn by using your handlebars.
Correct, my observation of many descending cyclists over many years suggests that most of them never change the radius of their turn. They lock in a radius at the start of a turn and hang onto it.
I've also seen people crash when they didn't change their radius to avoid an obstacle or keep from veering off the tarmac.
Don't be daft.
I've also seen people crash when they didn't change their radius to avoid an obstacle or keep from veering off the tarmac.
Don't be daft.
Likes For terrymorse:
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
I know I shouldn't but...
You are describing what would happen after what I explained. .
And I agree.
You would decrease the radius, and in reaction to that, would over correct and increase it again or flop over to the outside. You could also lay the bike down to the inside if you lose traction.
Both could happen.
...Only momentarily. Turning the bars left moves the contact patch of the front tire inside of the current turn circle, followed quickly by an opposite handlebar turn to keep from falling, which will increase the radius of the turn.
No, you would fall out of the turn (towards the outside).
No, you would fall out of the turn (towards the outside).
And I agree.
You would decrease the radius, and in reaction to that, would over correct and increase it again or flop over to the outside. You could also lay the bike down to the inside if you lose traction.
Both could happen.
#75
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I tried steering my counter, but the damn thing won't move.
Likes For livedarklions: