Question about Leg Shaving
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,091 Times
in
1,310 Posts
In absolute terms, yes. Proportionally, no. If you're doing time trials and racing, you'll probably notice it. Other kinds of riding, probably not.
I really think some of this is coming down to how much leg hair you actually have, that .02 figure is an average of some sample. My leg hair is naturally very short and a bit sparse, I honestly don't think I'd see much difference if they were completely smooth.
I really think some of this is coming down to how much leg hair you actually have, that .02 figure is an average of some sample. My leg hair is naturally very short and a bit sparse, I honestly don't think I'd see much difference if they were completely smooth.
If I am doing a TT, why would I care about the proportional advantages to a 50 minute racer. I only care about my modest TT result and improving my result, the simple fact is most riders mistakenly think aerodynamic benefits only make a difference when riding fast when in fact, the benefit is greater to them because they are out there longer.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,463
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 2,318 Times
in
1,392 Posts
I don't shave mine because the wife would think I was living life on the down low. She's ok with a little manscaping here and there, but that's about it. I also make sure I don't carry any hanky's or bandanas sticking out of my back pockets for others to see.
Last edited by seypat; 07-15-21 at 07:54 AM.
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,091 Times
in
1,310 Posts
This is really simple math. Like 8th grade. Honestly
Here is a calculator to play around with....
https://www.gribble.org/cycling/power_v_speed.html
#54
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8185 Post(s)
Liked 9,087 Times
in
5,052 Posts
Who notices what isn't measured. OP seems to be more of a racer-type. Most recreational riders don't notice how slow they are on Gators. Aerodynamics are everything for a racer.
If I am doing a TT, why would I care about the proportional advantages to a 50 minute racer. I only care about my modest TT result and improving my result, the simple fast most riders mistakenly think aerodynamic benefits only make a difference when riding fast when in fact, the benefit is greater to them because they are out there longer.
If I am doing a TT, why would I care about the proportional advantages to a 50 minute racer. I only care about my modest TT result and improving my result, the simple fast most riders mistakenly think aerodynamic benefits only make a difference when riding fast when in fact, the benefit is greater to them because they are out there longer.
I get the reasoning, I think it's dubious. If I'm capping out at 15 mph, it's less likely that it's wind resistance that's holding me back. I have no idea what speed OP is traveling at,
BTW, I think this is usually a bang for the buck argument because the aero versions of things tend to be much more expensive. In this instance, shaving is pretty much free, so even if the benefit is actually small proportionately, it might be worth the time to do it..
#56
Shawn of the Dead
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 578
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 448 Times
in
216 Posts
Take it with a grain of salt. Aerodynamic drag grows as the square of speed. In other words, if you are doing the 40k tt at a high speed, yeah, you might realize some real gains from shaving. At mere mortal speeds, you'll get smaller gains.
For context, this guy set a world record in the 4k Pursuit, and did it without shaving off that 'stache:

For context, this guy set a world record in the 4k Pursuit, and did it without shaving off that 'stache:

#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,091 Times
in
1,310 Posts
I get the reasoning, I think it's dubious. If I'm capping out at 15 mph, it's less likely that it's wind resistance that's holding me back. I have no idea what speed OP is traveling at,
BTW, I think this is usually a bang for the buck argument because the aero versions of things tend to be much more expensive. In this instance, shaving is pretty much free, so even if the benefit is actually small proportionately, it might be worth the time to do it..
BTW, I think this is usually a bang for the buck argument because the aero versions of things tend to be much more expensive. In this instance, shaving is pretty much free, so even if the benefit is actually small proportionately, it might be worth the time to do it..
"According to Ballard: “Aerodynamic drag becomes the largest resistance a rider must overcome from 15kph onwards.”"
"“Aero matters even more to amateur riders at modest speeds, because although their speed and drag is less in absolute terms they will save more time because they are slower and on the course longer.”"
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/l...-weight-316952
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128
Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
70 Posts
You bet! It's one of the most hotly contested arguments in road cycling.
It's always amusing when the shavers start quoting pseudo-scientific data to justify their habit (cyclists in general are experts in scientific data). I still feel the shavers simply enjoy shaving their legs and use all kinds of data and anecdotal reasoning to back it up. Seems like a colossal effort to try to gain 1 second of speed (if you believe it improves aerodynamics), or to make it slightly easier to apply sunscreen or to remove dirt. I can understand if you are an exceptionally hairy person that all that hair might be uncomfortable under bibs, so I'll grant that one...but again, if you are that hairy I can't imagine how difficult and time-consuming it would be to shave all the way up to your taint. I shave my chest, so who am I to criticize? I'm not particularly hairy, so it's very easy to do a couple times a week and the wife likes it that way.
It's always amusing when the shavers start quoting pseudo-scientific data to justify their habit (cyclists in general are experts in scientific data). I still feel the shavers simply enjoy shaving their legs and use all kinds of data and anecdotal reasoning to back it up. Seems like a colossal effort to try to gain 1 second of speed (if you believe it improves aerodynamics), or to make it slightly easier to apply sunscreen or to remove dirt. I can understand if you are an exceptionally hairy person that all that hair might be uncomfortable under bibs, so I'll grant that one...but again, if you are that hairy I can't imagine how difficult and time-consuming it would be to shave all the way up to your taint. I shave my chest, so who am I to criticize? I'm not particularly hairy, so it's very easy to do a couple times a week and the wife likes it that way.
#59
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
20 Posts
I didn't read all the replies cuz it seems like some folks were getting butthurt, so I'll just add my .02
I epilate my legs because I like it. Everything is smooth, it's easy to wipe off grime and since I also mountain bike, easier to clean scrapes and cuts. I like the looks too as my leg hair grows in all weird so removing it all is favorable. Speed? Well I'm not that fast to be worried about that little bit of time.
I epilate my legs because I like it. Everything is smooth, it's easy to wipe off grime and since I also mountain bike, easier to clean scrapes and cuts. I like the looks too as my leg hair grows in all weird so removing it all is favorable. Speed? Well I'm not that fast to be worried about that little bit of time.
Likes For cabledawg:
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,373
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6570 Post(s)
Liked 10,305 Times
in
4,413 Posts
I am not making that point, sitting still isn't very fast.
Think of it this way, you get your biggest bang (time savings for energy output) when the forces are linear against you.
When you are going very fast, it takes a massive effort to go just a little bit faster. The gains are harder and harder to achieve as the speed increases. When you are going slower, it is easier to make improvements resulting in shorter times or alternatively, you can ride just the same speed with lower power levels. If you are going 5 mph, a 10% increase in power will get you 10% increase in speed. At 30 mph, that same 10% increase in power will only yield about 3% increase in speed. Where aero losses really mount depends on the rider/bike combination but it is lower than many assume....maybe 15 mph
Think of it this way, you get your biggest bang (time savings for energy output) when the forces are linear against you.
When you are going very fast, it takes a massive effort to go just a little bit faster. The gains are harder and harder to achieve as the speed increases. When you are going slower, it is easier to make improvements resulting in shorter times or alternatively, you can ride just the same speed with lower power levels. If you are going 5 mph, a 10% increase in power will get you 10% increase in speed. At 30 mph, that same 10% increase in power will only yield about 3% increase in speed. Where aero losses really mount depends on the rider/bike combination but it is lower than many assume....maybe 15 mph
I'm gonna go for a ride and try to wrap my head around this.
Likes For woodcraft:
#62
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2733 Post(s)
Liked 2,755 Times
in
1,392 Posts
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion, man.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat

#64
Senior Member
Likes For Lakerat:
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,549
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 642 Times
in
328 Posts
Take it with a grain of salt. Aerodynamic drag grows as the square of speed. In other words, if you are doing the 40k tt at a high speed, yeah, you might realize some real gains from shaving. At mere mortal speeds, you'll get smaller gains.
For context, this guy set a world record in the 4k Pursuit, and did it without shaving off that 'stache:

For context, this guy set a world record in the 4k Pursuit, and did it without shaving off that 'stache:

Also Ashton and literally every track cyclist shave their legs.
To the OP -- do it or don't do it because you want to. Aero benefits are probably trivial at the amateur level but if you want to do it because it looks and feels good that's perfectly valid, despite what some easily triggered insecure people on this thread seem to believe.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,091 Times
in
1,310 Posts
Who needs a clean chain, it isn't noticeable. Who needs fast tires, it isn't noticeable. Who need tight clothing, it isn't noticeable. Who needs aero wheels, it isn't noticeable. Frame. Helmet. And, shaved legs. Are they all marginal gains? Collectively, no. Individually, some would be difficult to measure but not impossible.
I have to admit the extent of time saving for shaven legs is a bit surprising.
Enjoy your ride, I am waiting for the heat to go out
#67
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2733 Post(s)
Liked 2,755 Times
in
1,392 Posts
#69
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2733 Post(s)
Liked 2,755 Times
in
1,392 Posts
References to a classic and hilarious movie, the Big Lebowski:
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat

Likes For terrymorse:
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,430 Times
in
4,662 Posts
Plus my legs look damn sexy when smooth.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,160
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7454 Post(s)
Liked 3,141 Times
in
1,678 Posts
Aero gains are Proportionately greater for slower riders because much smaller gains are applied for longer amounts of time.
They also means less for most slower riders because the gains are so microscopically small. I have heard between 15-18 mph where aero completely dominates weight and tire drag and all that ..... So with my current average being below 15 mph, and the idea that I could save 0.00000000017 seconds over four hours ...... (Note I said "most" slower riders. If you are the exception, I have accepted you. Calm down.)
It's like the "Every microgram matters" debate. Yes, mathematically, every microgram reduction results in less energy needed for every speed but when the gains are too small to measure anywhere outside a laboratory ....... I am not going to shave the inside of my water bottles to lighten them.
Of course, shaving started way before cyclists started testing in wind tunnels ....
You know what's funny (as I watch Stage 18 .... ) it seems most riders don't bother to wear the most aerodynamic sunglasses. And when they climb HC mountains on hot days they open their jerseys. Horrors!!!! The massive aero drag!!!!!!!
I hope they all shave their chests.
They also means less for most slower riders because the gains are so microscopically small. I have heard between 15-18 mph where aero completely dominates weight and tire drag and all that ..... So with my current average being below 15 mph, and the idea that I could save 0.00000000017 seconds over four hours ...... (Note I said "most" slower riders. If you are the exception, I have accepted you. Calm down.)
It's like the "Every microgram matters" debate. Yes, mathematically, every microgram reduction results in less energy needed for every speed but when the gains are too small to measure anywhere outside a laboratory ....... I am not going to shave the inside of my water bottles to lighten them.
Of course, shaving started way before cyclists started testing in wind tunnels ....
You know what's funny (as I watch Stage 18 .... ) it seems most riders don't bother to wear the most aerodynamic sunglasses. And when they climb HC mountains on hot days they open their jerseys. Horrors!!!! The massive aero drag!!!!!!!
I hope they all shave their chests.
Likes For Milton Keynes:
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,430 Times
in
4,662 Posts
#74
Junior Member
Odd to me when amateur's shave. I totally get it with the pros but if you aren't a pro cyclist?? weird
#75
Junior Member