What Shoes do you Use for Cycling?
#76
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
Bike Forums: Where pudgy old men who spend thousands of dollars on bicycles, but only dozens of dollars on flat pedals and walking shoes are vastly overrepresented. Good times, good times.
Likes For AdkMtnMonster:
#77
Fredly Fredster
I have flats on my mountain bike. I either wear Salomon hiking shoes or Vans skating shoes, depending on the terrain.
#78
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I use flat pedal bicycle shoes
Particularly those of you who don't clip in. Do you just wear running shoes or whatever you have available?
I've been using running shoes for a while until someone brought up that its not ideal because the sole is thick and soft. I realized this is why i feel like i need to have my seat higher than baseline.
I found some worn lacoste shoes laying around with a thin, flat sole which seem to work great. I don't notice much of a difference in power transfer, but that extra cm or so of leg extension without needing to raise your seat higher is nice.
I've been using running shoes for a while until someone brought up that its not ideal because the sole is thick and soft. I realized this is why i feel like i need to have my seat higher than baseline.
I found some worn lacoste shoes laying around with a thin, flat sole which seem to work great. I don't notice much of a difference in power transfer, but that extra cm or so of leg extension without needing to raise your seat higher is nice.
I finally got tired of either slipping of the pedals or very sore feet using running shoes. I have about a dozen pairs of clip on shoes but none of them worked on my Term folder or my GoCycle GS as they have flat folding pedals. They also have those holes in the sole which let water in. Wet socks are no fun. So I broke down and bought Bontrager Flatline Mountain bike shoes. Good support and they have enough grip to stay on pedals. Also no holes in the soles and stiff tread. Best purchase as they work and I can walk in them.
Likes For Lvnbicycle:
#79
Member
Likes For MDS61:
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,317
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1437 Post(s)
Liked 1,085 Times
in
720 Posts
I wear Piloti driving shoes and my bikes have platform pedals, some with, some without, Power Grips straps. The soles are fairly narrow and stiff with good traction.
#81
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 141
Bikes: 2008 Specialized Roubaix Elite, 2002 Specialized Sirius Pro, 1985 Vitus 979 (DuraAce 7400), 1985 Bianchi Trofeo
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
12 Posts
These threads are always great. I love all the references to riding with “running” shoes, “hiking” shoes, “skateboarding” shoes, “walking” shoes… Shoes made for everything except pedaling a bike. This thread is exactly like the “Which shorts?” threads, the “Which gloves?” threads and the “Which lube?” threads. The best part about them, and I mean the VERY BEST part, is that the most common responses are always the ones downplaying cycling-specific things. On a cycling forum. And that’s why we can’t have nice things.
"I ride a bike sometimes. I have shoes that will spend 95% of their time being used not on a bike, and 5% of their time being used on a bike. I don't want a pair of shoes that only get used for riding on a bike.
Which shoes would I be happy wearing around the house and neighborhood walking around doing life things work best when being used on a bicycle."
What would Grant Petersen say?
#82
Junior Member
My mountain bike, circa 1993 Specialized Stumpjumper with no shocks front or rear, has clips and straps... I still use an old pair of Nike Nguba cycling shoes. Amazing that they haven't fallen apart, coming up on almost 30 years old and gotta be well over 1000 rides. The soles are hard rubber, not completely 100% intact at this point of course, lots of wear all over and a few nubs have broken off. But they still feel good and give good grip on the clips and I don't need to crank down the straps to an uncomfortable level. Of course I'm not racing the bike any more but I do an occasional semi-technical ride that needs good reliability on the foot/pedal connection and no issues for the most part.
Next 5 or so years I'm going to need a new pair I figure, so I'm always on the lookout but it's hard to find what I want. This is my "all arounder" bike, I use it for single-track trail riding, for casual riding on the local paths and neighborhood streets with my girlfriend, for occasional commutes or to pop over to the market for a backpack of groceries, and I also use it to measure courses for running races. Have a set of wheels with knobby tires and another set with slicks, same wheelbuild so it's an easy/quick swap when I need to. Because of the course measuring I really need a shoe I can get off the bike and walk around easily on.
Next 5 or so years I'm going to need a new pair I figure, so I'm always on the lookout but it's hard to find what I want. This is my "all arounder" bike, I use it for single-track trail riding, for casual riding on the local paths and neighborhood streets with my girlfriend, for occasional commutes or to pop over to the market for a backpack of groceries, and I also use it to measure courses for running races. Have a set of wheels with knobby tires and another set with slicks, same wheelbuild so it's an easy/quick swap when I need to. Because of the course measuring I really need a shoe I can get off the bike and walk around easily on.
#83
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,427
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8083 Post(s)
Liked 8,910 Times
in
4,961 Posts
So your problem is other people don't spend enough on shoes and pedals? Why do you care?
#84
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 14,464
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8256 Post(s)
Liked 9,127 Times
in
4,638 Posts
Cycling shoes. I tried some Adidas Gazelles, but the sole's too thin.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#85
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Northeastern Oregon
Posts: 273
Bikes: 2021 Trek Verve 2 Disk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times
in
77 Posts
I ride mainly with a pair of Keen water sandals. They have a leather protected toe, very sticky grip to the pedals, and they are very comfortable for me. My Keens I wear daily from April until September/October.
For winter riding I just picked up a pair of Oboz hiking boots… they probably aren’t the best on a bike, it I’ll return to this thread later with my thoughts after a few weeks of riding in them…
If the Oboz don’t work out I have my eyes in a cycle specific clip in shoe that should fit my needs pretty well.
For winter riding I just picked up a pair of Oboz hiking boots… they probably aren’t the best on a bike, it I’ll return to this thread later with my thoughts after a few weeks of riding in them…
If the Oboz don’t work out I have my eyes in a cycle specific clip in shoe that should fit my needs pretty well.
#86
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 7,376
Bikes: Old school lightweights
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3172 Post(s)
Liked 4,746 Times
in
2,469 Posts
#87
Junior Member
Particularly those of you who don't clip in. Do you just wear running shoes or whatever you have available?
I've been using running shoes for a while until someone brought up that its not ideal because the sole is thick and soft. I realized this is why i feel like i need to have my seat higher than baseline.
I've been using running shoes for a while until someone brought up that its not ideal because the sole is thick and soft. I realized this is why i feel like i need to have my seat higher than baseline.

For my road/gravel bikes with SPD pedals I use Shimano XC100:

And for my MTB I use Muddyfox Tour 100 (which are also SPD compatible). My MTB is set up with a slightly lower saddle to pedal height.

Last edited by Humanbeing757; 09-08-21 at 03:46 AM.
Likes For Humanbeing757:
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,317
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1437 Post(s)
Liked 1,085 Times
in
720 Posts
Older ones, like leather low-top sneakers with a rounded heel. Similar to the current Endurance model: https://piloti.com/products/endurance-slate
Likes For dsbrantjr:
#89
Member
Particularly those of you who don't clip in. Do you just wear running shoes or whatever you have available?
I've been using running shoes for a while until someone brought up that its not ideal because the sole is thick and soft. I realized this is why i feel like i need to have my seat higher than baseline.
I found some worn lacoste shoes laying around with a thin, flat sole which seem to work great. I don't notice much of a difference in power transfer, but that extra cm or so of leg extension without needing to raise your seat higher is nice.
I've been using running shoes for a while until someone brought up that its not ideal because the sole is thick and soft. I realized this is why i feel like i need to have my seat higher than baseline.
I found some worn lacoste shoes laying around with a thin, flat sole which seem to work great. I don't notice much of a difference in power transfer, but that extra cm or so of leg extension without needing to raise your seat higher is nice.
#90
Senior Member
These threads are always great. I love all the references to riding with “running” shoes, “hiking” shoes, “skateboarding” shoes, “walking” shoes… Shoes made for everything except pedaling a bike. This thread is exactly like the “Which shorts?” threads, the “Which gloves?” threads and the “Which lube?” threads. The best part about them, and I mean the VERY BEST part, is that the most common responses are always the ones downplaying cycling-specific things. On a cycling forum. And that’s why we can’t have nice things.
Likes For RH Clark:
#91
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
I don't begrudge a single person owning or using anything that they enjoy. My position is more about using what you have or can afford to your best advantage. Guess I should just stay home and not ride today because I don't have the right shoes, or jersey, or bibs, or whatever. LOL.

Likes For AdkMtnMonster:
#92
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,427
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8083 Post(s)
Liked 8,910 Times
in
4,961 Posts
#93
Senior Member
Yes, give people your best advice, but do it in such a way as to encourage rather than exclude.
#94
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
I do brother, and I want you to do the same. The one thing however that has surprised me the most and simultaneously disappointed me the most concerning cycling is just how elitist and exclusive it is concerning anyone with anything less than the "correct" whatever. I am happy to see anyone cycling, whether they are doing it "right" or not.
Yes, give people your best advice, but do it in such a way as to encourage rather than exclude.
Yes, give people your best advice, but do it in such a way as to encourage rather than exclude.

Likes For AdkMtnMonster:
#95
Senior Member
It’s not “elitist and exclusive,” it’s categorical and demarcated by levels of fitness, interest, effort, time, mileage, speed, type of riding, surface, location, season, et cetera… When anyone on BF tries to toss out a little hand grenade question they’re going to get an explosive response of answers that come from all directions and experience levels. Just like in every other forum on the interwebz. 

What I found elitist was the comments that left the impression that anything other than expensive dedicated cycling shoes was unacceptable to the point of being laughable to the "real" cyclist.
Last edited by RH Clark; 09-14-21 at 01:24 PM.
#96
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
You just proved my point, so thanks. What is elitist is to think that you are at some greater cycling level than someone else based mostly on gear choice or Strava data, but if that's your game then I hope you enjoy it as much as the game I am playing.
What I found elitist was the comments that left the impression that anything other than expensive dedicated cycling shoes was unacceptable to the point of being laughable to the "real" cyclist.
What I found elitist was the comments that left the impression that anything other than expensive dedicated cycling shoes was unacceptable to the point of being laughable to the "real" cyclist.

#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,744
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 571 Post(s)
Liked 919 Times
in
474 Posts
Adidas Gazelles
Tim
Tim
#98
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,427
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8083 Post(s)
Liked 8,910 Times
in
4,961 Posts
Exactly right. That’s the joke. We’re talking about BICYCLES here, not billion dollar net worths, yachts and private islands. Bicycles. Relax. Live it up. Ride, or don’t. It won’t phase me, or really anyone on BF, if you do or don’t, and if you love it or hate it. I’d like to think that people on BF love riding bikes, but there’s a lot of aggression and very little humor. Don’t read too deeply into things. Try reading my posts like they’re all written in a very dry tone, with little emotion. 

This puzzles me. You're a perfectly reasonable poster about 2/3 of the time, but when you go off on one of your complaint rants about non-cycling gear posts, you aren't within miles of a "dry tone." I just don't think you get how hostile these rants sound.
Dismissive sarcasm really isn't a choice between humor and aggression, it's using humor as aggression. You're at your least funny when you're trying to use it.
Post 16 was the one that's pissing people off. It's not dry at all, and it's pretty much completely incompatible with all your "do whatever, it's all good" posts.
Last edited by livedarklions; 09-14-21 at 02:43 PM.
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,062
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6355 Post(s)
Liked 9,833 Times
in
4,225 Posts
This puzzles me. You're a perfectly reasonable poster about 2/3 of the time, but when you go off on one of your complaint rants about non-cycling gear posts, you aren't within miles of a "dry tone." I just don't think you get how hostile these rants sound.
Dismissive sarcasm really isn't a choice between humor and aggression, it's using humor as aggression. You're at your least funny when you're trying to use it.
Post 16 was the one that's pissing people off. It's not dry at all, and it's pretty much completely incompatible with all your "do whatever, it's all good" posts.
Dismissive sarcasm really isn't a choice between humor and aggression, it's using humor as aggression. You're at your least funny when you're trying to use it.
Post 16 was the one that's pissing people off. It's not dry at all, and it's pretty much completely incompatible with all your "do whatever, it's all good" posts.
#100
Airplanes, bikes, beer.
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Off the front
Posts: 763
Bikes: Road bikes, mountain bikes, a cx bike, a gravel bike…
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 788 Times
in
339 Posts
This puzzles me. You're a perfectly reasonable poster about 2/3 of the time, but when you go off on one of your complaint rants about non-cycling gear posts, you aren't within miles of a "dry tone." I just don't think you get how hostile these rants sound.
Dismissive sarcasm really isn't a choice between humor and aggression, it's using humor as aggression. You're at your least funny when you're trying to use it.
Post 16 was the one that's pissing people off. It's not dry at all, and it's pretty much completely incompatible with all your "do whatever, it's all good" posts.
Dismissive sarcasm really isn't a choice between humor and aggression, it's using humor as aggression. You're at your least funny when you're trying to use it.
Post 16 was the one that's pissing people off. It's not dry at all, and it's pretty much completely incompatible with all your "do whatever, it's all good" posts.
