Climbing Bike?
02-08-22, 10:00 PM
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,061
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2838 Post(s)
Liked 1,999 Times
in
1,250 Posts
Maybe the question should be, "Why should you not use a climbing bike if you're not climbing?"
02-13-22, 12:32 PM
#52
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I would instead buy a mountain bike if I were you since it has a lot of weight. Becau
I would instead buy a mountain bike if I were you since it has a lot of weight. Because of this, the depreciation of such bikes is very cool, and it is much more pleasant to ride them in the mountains than on other bikes.
02-13-22, 11:25 PM
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,119
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 837 Post(s)
Liked 809 Times
in
514 Posts
Is it just me, but aren't climbing and descending joined at the hip? I don't understand this "climbing bike" stuff. I guess, maybe an aero frame with deep wheels would be less of a climber than a lighter non-aero frame (increasingly not) and the super light shallow wheels? But is that purpose-built "climbing bike" good if it's unstable at high speed? Anyway, I just ride bikes and don't worry about anything except general overall weight (lighter is better, but not to weenie extent), and fit.
Likes For Camilo:
02-14-22, 01:03 PM
#54
Senior Member
Originally Posted by jamesdak
I always have a "climbing bike". When you live in the Rockies and can do a 20 + mile continous climb you better believe some of us have our "climbing" bikes. Optimized to keep me most comfortable while basking in the pain of constantly going up.
Of course I don't have a good climbing bike cause I'm not a good climbing but I dang sure have a climbing bike, LOL!
I mean I've taken my old 1985 Opus III with a 42T small ring, DT shifters, etc up long climbs. I can do them for sure on it. But I'd much rather be on my Climbing bike that's 20 years newer, running a triple with a 32T small ring, STI shifters, lighter CF body, more upright bar setup, etc, etc ... There are tools for a job and there are better tools for a job.
Of course I don't have a good climbing bike cause I'm not a good climbing but I dang sure have a climbing bike, LOL!
I mean I've taken my old 1985 Opus III with a 42T small ring, DT shifters, etc up long climbs. I can do them for sure on it. But I'd much rather be on my Climbing bike that's 20 years newer, running a triple with a 32T small ring, STI shifters, lighter CF body, more upright bar setup, etc, etc ... There are tools for a job and there are better tools for a job.
02-14-22, 01:17 PM
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 5,018
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2543 Post(s)
Liked 2,719 Times
in
1,717 Posts
Originally Posted by Camilo
Is it just me, but aren't climbing and descending joined at the hip? I don't understand this "climbing bike" stuff. I guess, maybe an aero frame with deep wheels would be less of a climber than a lighter non-aero frame (increasingly not) and the super light shallow wheels? But is that purpose-built "climbing bike" good if it's unstable at high speed? Anyway, I just ride bikes and don't worry about anything except general overall weight (lighter is better, but not to weenie extent), and fit.
Likes For PeteHski:
02-14-22, 07:09 PM
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,096
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super(2)Lemond Maillot Juane (2) & custom,PDG Paramount,Serotta CSI,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Prologue TT,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,Klein Quantum II
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2105 Post(s)
Liked 3,199 Times
in
1,284 Posts
Originally Posted by prj71
I would say a lower geared bike then. But not really a climbing bike as noted by the OP. There are people that are more fit than you and I that could probably out-climb us on a bike that is 5 lbs heavier.
It's a climbing bike to me, I'll always refer to it as my climbing bike and others can call it whatever they want.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
02-16-22, 06:38 AM
#57
Newbie
Originally Posted by TTron
Hi, I have my eye on a climbing bike, Aethos. Does it make sense to buy one, worth the investment, that much of a difference on climbs? I live in a hilly area with plenty of climbs. Current riding a great endurance bike, Sworks Roubaix. No plans to race, just have fun and do personal best times. In short, trying to justify a second bike, a climbing bike. Welcome the feedback.
If you want to spend thousands on multiple bikes, only one of which you can ride at one time - then go for it. If you want to spec up your trusty old steed to make sure it knows it is loved, then go for it.
I was very fortunate to get a 2nd hand Bianchi early in Lockdown, before prices went crazy. I love it and have never seen anything I would want to replace it with. It's very much a decent recreational bike, but given I don't race, it is absolutely great for me and hasn't left a huge hole in my bank account. A bit of bar tape and the odd new tyre and it will be all I need for many years to come.
02-16-22, 06:50 AM
#58
Newbie
In terms of the climbing bike discussion... it's worth noting that some of the GC guys in the Pro Cycling world will absolutely change their bike for certain stages.
Not sure if there is much weight they could remove on a Mountain stage, compared to a flat stage given they will already be riding absolute top spec, ultra light. But I know that Froome would put a big chain ring on in order to lay down a bit more power in the descent. So it's really a descending bike, more than a climbing bike... and he probably wouldn't make the change on a mountain finish, only where there is a descent in the final KMs.
Not sure if there is much weight they could remove on a Mountain stage, compared to a flat stage given they will already be riding absolute top spec, ultra light. But I know that Froome would put a big chain ring on in order to lay down a bit more power in the descent. So it's really a descending bike, more than a climbing bike... and he probably wouldn't make the change on a mountain finish, only where there is a descent in the final KMs.
02-16-22, 01:05 PM
#59
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Koyote
We are off-topic, but a bike is quite literally not an investment.
Likes For mihlbach:
02-16-22, 01:10 PM
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 6,677
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6059 Post(s)
Liked 9,178 Times
in
3,965 Posts
Originally Posted by mihlbach
Don't be pedantic. An investment does not have to directly increase in monetary value to be understood as an investment. Investment is time, energy, or matter spent in the hope of future benefits actualized within a specified time frame. A bike is quite literally an investment if the benefits (health, entertainment, whatever) are hoped to outweigh the financial cost of owning the bicycle.
Likes For Koyote:
02-16-22, 03:00 PM
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,584
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2992 Post(s)
Liked 5,189 Times
in
2,108 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
I get you. But it’s pretty much my job to be pedantic about such things. 😉
02-16-22, 04:33 PM
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 6,677
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6059 Post(s)
Liked 9,178 Times
in
3,965 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Being pedantic about such things is quite literally not your job.
02-16-22, 04:36 PM
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,584
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2992 Post(s)
Liked 5,189 Times
in
2,108 Posts
Originally Posted by Koyote
You are quite literally incorrect.
02-16-22, 05:04 PM
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 6,677
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6059 Post(s)
Liked 9,178 Times
in
3,965 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
But that ruins the joke.
02-16-22, 06:42 PM
#65
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,376
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1566 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
956 Posts
Originally Posted by maglia_grigia
In terms of the climbing bike discussion... it's worth noting that some of the GC guys in the Pro Cycling world will absolutely change their bike for certain stages.
Not sure if there is much weight they could remove on a Mountain stage, compared to a flat stage given they will already be riding absolute top spec, ultra light. But I know that Froome would put a big chain ring on in order to lay down a bit more power in the descent. So it's really a descending bike, more than a climbing bike... and he probably wouldn't make the change on a mountain finish, only where there is a descent in the final KMs.
Not sure if there is much weight they could remove on a Mountain stage, compared to a flat stage given they will already be riding absolute top spec, ultra light. But I know that Froome would put a big chain ring on in order to lay down a bit more power in the descent. So it's really a descending bike, more than a climbing bike... and he probably wouldn't make the change on a mountain finish, only where there is a descent in the final KMs.
Also, sprinters might run a 54/42 for a sprint stage but climbers aren't in climbing stages. They're still using 53/39 or maybe swap a smaller inner ring and use the modern 11-30 (gasp!) on the climb stages. Not sure where you get this Froome chainring mess. He ran oval rings a lot with a lot of asymmetry to them, so that can make the large ring look really big......when it isn't. The effective ratio is still the same.
Swapping bikes seems to have stopped being as much a thing some years ago as the Tarmacs and Emondas of the world got aero enough that it made it not necessary to carry around both and a TT bike on the grand tours.
02-17-22, 03:06 PM
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 5,018
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2543 Post(s)
Liked 2,719 Times
in
1,717 Posts
Originally Posted by burnthesheep
"Absolute top spec", to what? They ride the same groupsets the whole time. It's not like they have a "Dura Ace private limited edition spec just for Movistar".
Also, sprinters might run a 54/42 for a sprint stage but climbers aren't in climbing stages. They're still using 53/39 or maybe swap a smaller inner ring and use the modern 11-30 (gasp!) on the climb stages. Not sure where you get this Froome chainring mess. He ran oval rings a lot with a lot of asymmetry to them, so that can make the large ring look really big......when it isn't. The effective ratio is still the same.
Swapping bikes seems to have stopped being as much a thing some years ago as the Tarmacs and Emondas of the world got aero enough that it made it not necessary to carry around both and a TT bike on the grand tours.
Also, sprinters might run a 54/42 for a sprint stage but climbers aren't in climbing stages. They're still using 53/39 or maybe swap a smaller inner ring and use the modern 11-30 (gasp!) on the climb stages. Not sure where you get this Froome chainring mess. He ran oval rings a lot with a lot of asymmetry to them, so that can make the large ring look really big......when it isn't. The effective ratio is still the same.
Swapping bikes seems to have stopped being as much a thing some years ago as the Tarmacs and Emondas of the world got aero enough that it made it not necessary to carry around both and a TT bike on the grand tours.
