View Poll Results: Frame Material Preference
Carbon Fiber




39
30.71%
Aluminum




10
7.87%
Steel




61
48.03%
Titanium




17
13.39%
Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll
Frame Material Preference Poll
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,554
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 557 Post(s)
Liked 862 Times
in
493 Posts
Before aluminum was the dominant frame material and steel was still king, failures of steel frames was common, especially very light frames.
There were some growing pains when the industry moved to aluminum, but after those problems were sorted out the overall failure rate per bicycle sold was lower than in the steel era.
Titanium frames, again especially very light ones, had a fairly high failure rate. I have seen about half as many broken Litespeeds as I have seen intact ones.
Early carbon frames often` failed where the carbon was bonded to aluminum lugs and fittings. Other failures are usually due to bad maintenance (overtightening clamps for instance) or due to 'misadventure' that may have been the end of a frame made from any material.
I did not vote because there are pros and cons to each and personal preference is as important as any 'data' people are throwing around.... except for racing - it does seem that carbon is the best material for bikes intended for racing.
There were some growing pains when the industry moved to aluminum, but after those problems were sorted out the overall failure rate per bicycle sold was lower than in the steel era.
Titanium frames, again especially very light ones, had a fairly high failure rate. I have seen about half as many broken Litespeeds as I have seen intact ones.
Early carbon frames often` failed where the carbon was bonded to aluminum lugs and fittings. Other failures are usually due to bad maintenance (overtightening clamps for instance) or due to 'misadventure' that may have been the end of a frame made from any material.
I did not vote because there are pros and cons to each and personal preference is as important as any 'data' people are throwing around.... except for racing - it does seem that carbon is the best material for bikes intended for racing.
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,127
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3574 Post(s)
Liked 2,050 Times
in
1,046 Posts
The shape of the bars may be irrelevant but the bar tape and wrapping is relevant because it traps and holds in all that salty sweat against the tubing and ruins it. Never happened to me yet. Not a speck of corrosion on any of my aluminum bars... This is a non-issue on a frame.
Likes For wolfchild:
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,584
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2992 Post(s)
Liked 5,189 Times
in
2,108 Posts
The shape of the bars may be irrelevant but the bar tape and wrapping is relevant because it traps and holds in all that salty sweat against the tubing and ruins it. Never happened to me yet. Not a speck of corrosion on any of my aluminum bars... This is a non-issue on a frame.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 36,140
Mentioned: 205 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16655 Post(s)
Liked 11,755 Times
in
5,622 Posts
I'd say the OP has succeeded.
Likes For indyfabz:
#82
Just Pedaling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: West Coast
Posts: 560
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 201 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times
in
193 Posts
Thanks to everyone that responded. I can see now that a carbon bike is probably in my future and not aluminum. I've already eyed some nice carbon endurance bikes and will proceed in that direction. I'm sticking to the 105 mechanical group set though because of familiarity and my well stocked parts bin. Time to go for a ride, Smokey
#83
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 830
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1997KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon(to be built),1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
203 Posts
Apologizes for my belated reply. Steel because I have always ridden high grade steel road and mtb bikes with an exception of one which is a 1992 merida albon a mix between4130 Crmo seat and stays glued into a 6061front triangle and a 4130crmo fork. Steel is comfy, lively, durable and easy to repair. As they say "Steel is real". I always favored one tube manufacturer over others which is Reynolds. 3 of my 7 bikes are made of Reynolds tubes. I have one Dedacciai DR Zero high grade steel italian made MTB. The next MTB will be in steel again and very probably a Reynolds 853 frame.
#84
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 830
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1997KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon(to be built),1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
203 Posts
Before aluminum was the dominant frame material and steel was still king, failures of steel frames was common, especially very light frames.
There were some growing pains when the industry moved to aluminum, but after those problems were sorted out the overall failure rate per bicycle sold was lower than in the steel era.
Titanium frames, again especially very light ones, had a fairly high failure rate. I have seen about half as many broken Litespeeds as I have seen intact ones.
Early carbon frames often` failed where the carbon was bonded to aluminum lugs and fittings. Other failures are usually due to bad maintenance (overtightening clamps for instance) or due to 'misadventure' that may have been the end of a frame made from any material.
I did not vote because there are pros and cons to each and personal preference is as important as any 'data' people are throwing around.... except for racing - it does seem that carbon is the best material for bikes intended for racing.
There were some growing pains when the industry moved to aluminum, but after those problems were sorted out the overall failure rate per bicycle sold was lower than in the steel era.
Titanium frames, again especially very light ones, had a fairly high failure rate. I have seen about half as many broken Litespeeds as I have seen intact ones.
Early carbon frames often` failed where the carbon was bonded to aluminum lugs and fittings. Other failures are usually due to bad maintenance (overtightening clamps for instance) or due to 'misadventure' that may have been the end of a frame made from any material.
I did not vote because there are pros and cons to each and personal preference is as important as any 'data' people are throwing around.... except for racing - it does seem that carbon is the best material for bikes intended for racing.
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 3,859
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1553 Post(s)
Liked 1,587 Times
in
925 Posts
Many people posting here have already seen this report of the results of fatigue tests of a number of high-end road bike frames as performed for the German Tour magazine back in 1997, but for those who haven't, here it is. (Short version: two aluminum frames and one carbon frame survived the testing. All of the steel and titanium frames failed. The testers concluded that the failures had less to do with the frame material and more to do with the design of each frame and with how careful the builder was during the building process.)
For those who might object that the steel and titanium alloys used for building frames have improved since 1997---that's true, but aluminum and carbon technology has improved too, of course.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/...tigue_test.htm
For those who might object that the steel and titanium alloys used for building frames have improved since 1997---that's true, but aluminum and carbon technology has improved too, of course.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/...tigue_test.htm
#86
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,269
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 775 Post(s)
Liked 676 Times
in
449 Posts
There is no best material. Too many other variables. This is a good read:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-materials.html
In a nutshell:
The reality is that you can make a good bike frame out of any of these metals, with any desired riding qualities, by selecting appropriate tubing diameters, wall thicknesses and frame geometry.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-materials.html
In a nutshell:
Did you know that:
- Aluminum frames have a harsh ride?
- Titanium frames are soft and whippy?
- Steel frames go soft with age, but they have a nicer ride quality?
- England's
Queen ElizabethKing Charles III is a kingpin of the international drug trade?
The reality is that you can make a good bike frame out of any of these metals, with any desired riding qualities, by selecting appropriate tubing diameters, wall thicknesses and frame geometry.
Likes For Lombard:
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 5,018
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2543 Post(s)
Liked 2,719 Times
in
1,717 Posts
Thanks to everyone that responded. I can see now that a carbon bike is probably in my future and not aluminum. I've already eyed some nice carbon endurance bikes and will proceed in that direction. I'm sticking to the 105 mechanical group set though because of familiarity and my well stocked parts bin. Time to go for a ride, Smokey
Likes For PeteHski:
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 5,018
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2543 Post(s)
Liked 2,719 Times
in
1,717 Posts
So you just have to pick some priorities when choosing a suitable frame for your needs and budget.
#89
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 830
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1997KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon(to be built),1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
203 Posts
Many people posting here have already seen this report of the results of fatigue tests of a number of high-end road bike frames as performed for the German Tour magazine back in 1997, but for those who haven't, here it is. (Short version: two aluminum frames and one carbon frame survived the testing. All of the steel and titanium frames failed. The testers concluded that the failures had less to do with the frame material and more to do with the design of each frame and with how careful the builder was during the building process.)
For those who might object that the steel and titanium alloys used for building frames have improved since 1997---that's true, but aluminum and carbon technology has improved too, of course.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/...tigue_test.htm
For those who might object that the steel and titanium alloys used for building frames have improved since 1997---that's true, but aluminum and carbon technology has improved too, of course.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/...tigue_test.htm
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 5,018
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2543 Post(s)
Liked 2,719 Times
in
1,717 Posts
Interesting but that test in question didn't include high end steel framed bikes with tubes such as the Columbus Nemo , the Columbus Genius, the Dedacciai Dr Zero 18 mcd v6ht and even the Reynolds 853 and 631. I doubt that aluminium frames will outlast them. Back in the days all Cannondale frame were made in the USA,that is not the case anymore. Where as for carbon, good luck for repairing a broken frame. For instance the Columbus Genius won a number of victories in the road bike racing and mtb racing races and championships from early 90's to mid late 90's beating aluminium and carbon made bikes. In 1991, the Genius tubing, made of Nivacrom steel, was an unprecedented success. For the first time in the history of cycling, the concept of"Differential Shape Butting" appeared, which only Columbus technology, now the master of the know-how connected with the strain of a frame could design. In 1994, to celebrate 110 years of Bianchi, Columbus strengthened the friendship that born between the fathers of the two companies, making MEGATUBE solely for the Treviglio company, the first oversize tube for high-performance, strong and lightframes. Megatube has become a must and is now one of the strong pointsof the Milanese company, with more than 14 different shapes. In 1995, the Columbus adventure also began in the mountain bike sector with the OR tubing for Cinelli and the custom series for Tom Ritchey (the first fork blades with a variable thickness). With the CYBER tube set (1994), specifically for mtb use, with subsequent forms, and then with Genius mtb, Columbus began accumulating World Championship mtb victories: from Brentjens with American Eagle to Acquaroli with Bianchi, to the Sunn Team and their multi-medallists Vouilloz, Martinez and Chausson. The competitive sector is obviously not the least: from Coppi and Bartoli who were the first to use the Columbus tubes, passing through Merckx, Gimondi, Hinault, Lemond, Argentin, Fondriest, Chiappucci, Roche, Rominger, Pantani, Chioccioli, Armstrong, Rijs, Bartoli and Olano to Tonkov, Brochard, Zuelle and Virenque.
Likes For PeteHski:
#91
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,269
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 775 Post(s)
Liked 676 Times
in
449 Posts
The pros ride what they do because their sponsors, the bike companies, supply their bikes. It's a promotion of sorts. Because the sheeple will follow what the pros do with the hopes they will ride like the pros.
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,584
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2992 Post(s)
Liked 5,189 Times
in
2,108 Posts
Pro teams are not forced into sponsorship deals. They are free to align themselves with any manufacturer they choose, and can ride steel bikes if they think it will give them an advantage.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#93
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 3,859
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1553 Post(s)
Liked 1,587 Times
in
925 Posts
Paraphrasing Rooster Cogburn in True Grit:
If I ever meet an American male who doesn't claim to be a one-of-a-kind nonconformist, I'll shake his hand and give him a five-cent Daniel Webster cigar.
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 36,140
Mentioned: 205 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16655 Post(s)
Liked 11,755 Times
in
5,622 Posts
#95
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,269
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 775 Post(s)
Liked 676 Times
in
449 Posts
Whenever I see someone use the word "sheeple" non-ironically, it drives home how good a job advertising agencies have done at convincing every American male that he's an individualistic freethinker who can express his superiority to the masses through his purchase choices. Those guys are probably the same 92% of driving-age American males who believe that they're above average in driving skills.
Paraphrasing Rooster Cogburn in True Grit:
If I ever meet an American male who doesn't claim to be a one-of-a-kind nonconformist, I'll shake his hand and give him a five-cent Daniel Webster cigar.
Paraphrasing Rooster Cogburn in True Grit:
If I ever meet an American male who doesn't claim to be a one-of-a-kind nonconformist, I'll shake his hand and give him a five-cent Daniel Webster cigar.
It just irks me that so many people think something is great for them because the pros ride it. The pros have achieved a fitness and skill level that few of us mere mortals will ever achieve.
And no, sorry, I don't smoke.
#96
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,678
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 535 Post(s)
Liked 867 Times
in
549 Posts
Otto
Likes For ofajen:
#97
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 830
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1997KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon(to be built),1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
203 Posts
So you took us till the mid 90’s, almost 30 years ago. You have not explained how steel overcomes it’s massive strength to weight disadvantage to carbon nor the ability to modify the layup throughout the bike. A 1,500 gram carbon bike will be more durable than any equivalent weight steel bike. A Specialized Aethos S-Works comes in at 585grams try that with any other material. But I did enjoy all the fancy branding for what is essentially heat treated steel. But my favorite was the “Differential Shape Butting”.

#98
Life Is Good
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 1,665
Bikes: Zipp2001 Carbon Belt Drive SS, Kestrel RT900SL, Kestrel KM40 Airfoil 1x10, Orbea Occam H30, Trek Stache 5 29 Plus, Giant Yukon 2 Fat Bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 789 Times
in
414 Posts
Can you repair a carbon bike frame if crashed ? Not as far as I know.
Of course, you can repair carbon if you crash it.
I've ridden and raced on all your listed material chooses and enjoyed them all.
At present the bikes left in my stable are made from the following materials.
4 road bikes = all carbon
4 trail bikes = all aluminum
1 bike in progress of being built = steel
Of course, you can repair carbon if you crash it.
I've ridden and raced on all your listed material chooses and enjoyed them all.
At present the bikes left in my stable are made from the following materials.
4 road bikes = all carbon
4 trail bikes = all aluminum
1 bike in progress of being built = steel
#100
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 6,677
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6059 Post(s)
Liked 9,178 Times
in
3,965 Posts
Likes For Koyote: