Expensive Components with Rust-Prone Bolts
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 85
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Pacer, Spa Steel Tourer, Kona Kula
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times
in
14 Posts
Seemsto be a bit of a debate about stainless steel bolts.
"Stainless steel work hardens and becomes brittle, potentially leading to breakage when subjected to cyclic stress. However the only place you really need to be wary of this on a bike is the saddle clamp, although discretion should be used if you suspect there may be such stress imposed elsewhere."
https://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/v...ic.php?t=97139
But I have no engineering knowledge. So I have no idea if the above is correct.
"Stainless steel work hardens and becomes brittle, potentially leading to breakage when subjected to cyclic stress. However the only place you really need to be wary of this on a bike is the saddle clamp, although discretion should be used if you suspect there may be such stress imposed elsewhere."
https://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/v...ic.php?t=97139
But I have no engineering knowledge. So I have no idea if the above is correct.
#27
Senior Member
My local Ace Hardware has a nice selection of metric stainless. I use that and titanium for everything on my bikes that I can. Never had a problem.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,857
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4157 Post(s)
Liked 3,146 Times
in
2,043 Posts
Question - do you sweat? Does the seatpost see that sweat? If it does, you may have a complete circuit through dissimilar metals. The steel may not be touching the carbon but if the circuit is there, the galvanic reaction will happen. The good thing here is that what is degrading is the sacrificial zinc on the steel bolt. It lasted plenty long enough for you to spot it. Did its job.
Like others here, I am a fan of the right material for the job. But I am less of a fan of stainless steel on many land applications because for things like bolts, quality non-stainless does the job better. (Less galling, less damage to matching threads. Harder.) Now, in marine applications in salt environs 24/7 stainless steel is a gift to mariners. But the stainless steel devices there are bigger, heavier and less precise for the most part than their land based equivalents. Granted, some of this is due to both the probable lack of service abilities out at sea and the importance in terms of life and death.
If it were me, I'd grease the heck out of that bolt with marine grease and put it back in for in another 5-10 years and see if more needs to be done. (I don't know that marine grease will stop galvanic action. But from what I see here, I'm pretty certain that bolt can handle more of that it has seen and the marine grease certainly won't hurt.
Like others here, I am a fan of the right material for the job. But I am less of a fan of stainless steel on many land applications because for things like bolts, quality non-stainless does the job better. (Less galling, less damage to matching threads. Harder.) Now, in marine applications in salt environs 24/7 stainless steel is a gift to mariners. But the stainless steel devices there are bigger, heavier and less precise for the most part than their land based equivalents. Granted, some of this is due to both the probable lack of service abilities out at sea and the importance in terms of life and death.
If it were me, I'd grease the heck out of that bolt with marine grease and put it back in for in another 5-10 years and see if more needs to be done. (I don't know that marine grease will stop galvanic action. But from what I see here, I'm pretty certain that bolt can handle more of that it has seen and the marine grease certainly won't hurt.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,857
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4157 Post(s)
Liked 3,146 Times
in
2,043 Posts
Seemsto be a bit of a debate about stainless steel bolts.
"Stainless steel work hardens and becomes brittle, potentially leading to breakage when subjected to cyclic stress. However the only place you really need to be wary of this on a bike is the saddle clamp, although discretion should be used if you suspect there may be such stress imposed elsewhere."
https://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/v...ic.php?t=97139
But I have no engineering knowledge. So I have no idea if the above is correct.
"Stainless steel work hardens and becomes brittle, potentially leading to breakage when subjected to cyclic stress. However the only place you really need to be wary of this on a bike is the saddle clamp, although discretion should be used if you suspect there may be such stress imposed elsewhere."
https://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/v...ic.php?t=97139
But I have no engineering knowledge. So I have no idea if the above is correct.
I had another Avocet post years later for my Ticycles bike that broke at the clamp. My takeaway? The problem is mainly Avocet and less the bolt material.
I'm pretty certain the bolts in most of my Japanese seatposts are chromed steel of unknown but appropriate grade. My customs use Thompson hardware.
#30
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,860
Bikes: Scott Addict R1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,327 Times
in
1,177 Posts
I did a little searching on high strength steel vs stainless bolts, and I found this:
Tensile strength (ksi):
12.9 steel - 170
stainless - 70
Torque (M6, lubricated, N-m):
12.9 steel - 18
stainless - 6
Now I知 re-thinking my choice of stainless. But first, I知 going to re-torque the SS bolt to 6 and see if that holds the saddle snugly.
Tensile strength (ksi):
12.9 steel - 170
stainless - 70
Torque (M6, lubricated, N-m):
12.9 steel - 18
stainless - 6
Now I知 re-thinking my choice of stainless. But first, I知 going to re-torque the SS bolt to 6 and see if that holds the saddle snugly.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat

#31
climber has-been
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,860
Bikes: Scott Addict R1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,327 Times
in
1,177 Posts
I did a little searching on high strength steel vs stainless bolts, and I found this:
Tensile strength (ksi):
12.9 steel - 170
stainless - 70
Torque (M6, lubricated, N-m):
12.9 steel - 18
stainless - 6
Now I知 re-thinking my choice of stainless. But first, I知 going to re-torque the SS bolt to 6 and see if that holds the saddle snugly.
Tensile strength (ksi):
12.9 steel - 170
stainless - 70
Torque (M6, lubricated, N-m):
12.9 steel - 18
stainless - 6
Now I知 re-thinking my choice of stainless. But first, I知 going to re-torque the SS bolt to 6 and see if that holds the saddle snugly.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat
