Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   General Cycling Discussion (https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/)
-   -   TPU justification for tubulars (https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/1279850-tpu-justification-tubulars.html)

ljsense 08-21-23 08:46 PM

TPU justification for tubulars
 
I read the TPU threads. $30 or $40 for a tube that saves you 40-60 grams over butyl.

They just had a special -- Vittoria Corsa tubular for $85 for a pair. A whole race tire with a lighter rim for the price of an inner tube.

No beef with TPU tubes. I'll probably get some. But for know I'm not going to feel too bad if I flat a tubular. It's cheaper than a day of golf.

Germany_chris 08-21-23 08:53 PM

It's not just the weight with TPU is the better ride and better rolling resistance. If you want to ride tubies go ahead if I were going to ride a bike with 25's I'd probably ride them too, just add a bit of tubeless sealant and you need to worry about flats

icemilkcoffee 08-21-23 11:10 PM

Ridenow TPU tubes are like $7 each.
The other advantage of TPU tubes is that they are easy to carry as spares. You can't say the same for your tubular tire now.

Wildwood 08-22-23 01:10 AM

Tubulars = a good reccomendation for one's fast pavement bikes. I used sealant as a precaution, until a couple of stems got plugged. I probably stopped during first ride with valve stems at bottom on wheel. Anyway, I carry my sealant now. Makes for a longer stop to seal a flat, but never a valve stem concern. I very rarely flat.

daviddavieboy 08-22-23 01:39 AM


Originally Posted by ljsense (Post 22991763)
I read the TPU threads. $30 or $40 for a tube that saves you 40-60 grams over butyl.

They just had a special -- Vittoria Corsa tubular for $85 for a pair. A whole race tire with a lighter rim for the price of an inner tube.

No beef with TPU tubes. I'll probably get some. But for know I'm not going to feel too bad if I flat a tubular. It's cheaper than a day of golf.

Care to share where this sale is? I am sure you are not the only one who would go for it.

chaadster 08-22-23 04:13 AM

Pirelli’s top tubular, P Zero Race SL use TPU tubes inside. It’s the tubular supplied to all their sponsored World Tour teams when not on tubeless. At over $100 per tubular, way more expensive than running TPU innertubes, so I’m glad I run clinchers!

texbiker 08-22-23 06:13 AM

On yesterday's ride I had a flat and replaced the rubber tube with a RideNow TPU tube. I bought some to carry for times like that. I bought them on AliExpress for about the same cost as rubber tubes. When I got home I put another TPU tube in my seat bag. Hopefully I won't use it for a long time.

jadmt 08-22-23 06:27 AM

I just received 2 aerothanes in the mail and when I picked up the package I thought it was empty.....

PeteHski 08-22-23 06:30 AM


Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee (Post 22991816)
Ridenow TPU tubes are like $7 each.
The other advantage of TPU tubes is that they are easy to carry as spares. You can't say the same for your tubular tire now.

This is the main reason I’m interested in TPU tubes ie emergency spare for my tubeless setup. They appear to be much less bulky than regular tubes.

ljsense 08-22-23 08:33 AM


Originally Posted by daviddavieboy (Post 22991843)
Care to share where this sale is? I am sure you are not the only one who would go for it.

Of course -- it's at Excel Sports. Someone pointed me to it in the Totally Tubular thread.

https://www.excelsports.com/vittoria...ad-tire-2-pack

I ordered a pair and they look great, arrived quickly.

chaadster 08-22-23 09:00 AM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22991965)
This is the main reason I’m interested in TPU tubes ie emergency spare for my tubeless setup. They appear to be much less bulky than regular tubes.

That’s what big TPU companies and their media lackeys want you to think. They have ways of manipulating the images to make their old, warmed-over technology look smaller than butyl. Next thing you know, they’ll fade you into believing they’re more durable, have less rolling resistance, weigh less, and hold pressure better, too. They won’t stop until we’re all back in tubes! This battle between Big TPU and Big Tubeless is ruining cycling! Jan Heine for UCI President 2024!!!

CrimsonEclipse 08-22-23 09:59 AM

Wonder what the weight savings for a 26x4.8 would be....

icemilkcoffee 08-22-23 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by chaadster (Post 22991883)
Pirelli’s top tubular, P Zero Race SL use TPU tubes inside.

Seems to be the worst of both worlds. You don't get the puncture resistance of latex and you can't use sealant (I don't think) in case of a puncture.

Wildwood 08-22-23 10:13 AM

I run my tubulars at a pretty high pressure (but nowhere near 175psi - the rated max). Vittoria (in clinchers) has always been my 'go to' tire. I was a little disappointed in the Vittoria Corsa tubulars, not as supple a feel as I was expecting. Mine are 25mm.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...7f11844ee5.jpg

PeteHski 08-22-23 11:15 AM


Originally Posted by chaadster (Post 22992120)
That’s what big TPU companies and their media lackeys want you to think. They have ways of manipulating the images to make their old, warmed-over technology look smaller than butyl. Next thing you know, they’ll fade you into believing they’re more durable, have less rolling resistance, weigh less, and hold pressure better, too. They won’t stop until we’re all back in tubes! This battle between Big TPU and Big Tubeless is ruining cycling! Jan Heine for UCI President 2024!!!

What stops me buying one as an emergency spare is the very mixed reviews in terms of reliability out of the box, especially reports of fragile, leaky plastic valve stems. This season I have been riding without a spare tube. Relying on sealant and Dynaplugs. The idea of a very compact, lightweight tube still appeals as a last resort back-up, but not if there's a high chance it might fail out of the box. In that regard I have more confidence in a regular tube, but don't like the extra bulk.

chaadster 08-22-23 01:04 PM


Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee (Post 22992179)
Seems to be the worst of both worlds. You don't get the puncture resistance of latex and you can't use sealant (I don't think) in case of a puncture.

Puncture resistance could certainly be better than latex, but pro racers don’t fix flats on the road anyway, so they’re almost certainly after the weight savings compared to a latex tubed tubular.

chaadster 08-22-23 01:11 PM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22992249)
What stops me buying one as an emergency spare is the very mixed reviews in terms of reliability out of the box, especially reports of fragile, leaky plastic valve stems. This season I have been riding without a spare tube. Relying on sealant and Dynaplugs. The idea of a very compact, lightweight tube still appeals as a last resort back-up, but not if there's a high chance it might fail out of the box. In that regard I have more confidence in a regular tube, but don't like the extra bulk.

Never heard of those problems, and haven’t experienced it in any of the 6 TPU tubes I have in service or the 8 I’ve used.

I don’t use $8 China-direct TPU tubes, though.

PeteHski 08-22-23 01:36 PM


Originally Posted by chaadster (Post 22992359)
Never heard of those problems, and haven’t experienced it in any of the 6 TPU tubes I have in service or the 8 I’ve used.

I don’t use $8 China-direct TPU tubes, though.

I was reading reviews of Tubolito and Ridenow. They both appear to have potential issues with the valve stems. Also read somewhere about the valve stems not sealing well with my Silca mini-pump head. Enough bad user reviews to put me off for now.

chaadster 08-22-23 03:23 PM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22992391)
I was reading reviews of Tubolito and Ridenow. They both appear to have potential issues with the valve stems. Also read somewhere about the valve stems not sealing well with my Silca mini-pump head. Enough bad user reviews to put me off for now.

Hmm, yeah, not heard of those as widespread problems, but I selected Aerothan, and have only used Aerothan, based on the fullness of their technical marketing presentation, which, because it was clear and specific in its explanations and claims, gave me confidence that it was a soundly conceived and well-engineered product. I was not impressed with Tubolito’s presentation, which as I recall was centered on lightweight, whereas Schwalbe claimed specific achievements in weight reduction as well, but also puncture resistance, cut resistance, rolling resistance and presented test results to back it up, with comps to butyl, latex, and a “plastic tube” indicated in orange, a thinly veiled reference to Tubolito, I assumed.

Eric F 08-22-23 05:45 PM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22991965)
This is the main reason I’m interested in TPU tubes ie emergency spare for my tubeless setup. They appear to be much less bulky than regular tubes.

This is exactly what I have done, and why I’ve done it. 2 TPU tubes takes up the same or less space than 1 butyl tube, and weigh less.

PeteHski 08-22-23 05:59 PM


Originally Posted by chaadster (Post 22992497)
Hmm, yeah, not heard of those as widespread problems, but I selected Aerothan, and have only used Aerothan, based on the fullness of their technical marketing presentation, which, because it was clear and specific in its explanations and claims, gave me confidence that it was a soundly conceived and well-engineered product. I was not impressed with Tubolito’s presentation, which as I recall was centered on lightweight, whereas Schwalbe claimed specific achievements in weight reduction as well, but also puncture resistance, cut resistance, rolling resistance and presented test results to back it up, with comps to butyl, latex, and a “plastic tube” indicated in orange, a thinly veiled reference to Tubolito, I assumed.

Aerothans do seem to have a better reputation. When I was looking at options about a year ago they were impossible to find in stock here, so I eventually gave up. I should check them out again.

daviddavieboy 08-23-23 01:14 AM


Originally Posted by ljsense (Post 22992087)
Of course -- it's at Excel Sports. Someone pointed me to it in the Totally Tubular thread.
https://www.excelsports.com/vittoria...ad-tire-2-pack
I ordered a pair and they look great, arrived quickly.

Thanks for that. I didn't get the Vittoria but they do have my go-to Cont Sprinter tire in a 2 pack. They usually sell for 80-90 here so basically 2 for 1 deal. Thanks !

KerryIrons 08-23-23 08:56 AM


Originally Posted by Wildwood (Post 22992189)
I run my tubulars at a pretty high pressure (but nowhere near 175psi - the rated max).

How much do you weigh? Is this a track bike? The experience of decades says that if you need over 100 psi on the road then you should be on wider tires. Pumping to that pressure does not make you faster as suspension losses climb dramatically due to the super hard tire having essentially no compliance. Higher pressures mean less traction, faster tire wear, and reduced comfort for no benefit in rolling resistance. What's not to like?

Wildwood 08-23-23 11:00 AM

I ride smooth roads, I guess.
Too much 'compliance' feels mushy - fine if you ride straight lines. Not fine if you descend at 30+mph on a twisty road, as I do on every ride from my home = ~95% of all my rides. YMMV

chaadster 08-23-23 04:09 PM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22992646)
Aerothans do seem to have a better reputation. When I was looking at options about a year ago they were impossible to find in stock here, so I eventually gave up. I should check them out again.

Also, just the other day I realized that Eclipse are in business; dunno if you've looked at those, but they use metal valve stems which may be of interest to you.

I'd thought Eclipse disappeared many years ago, but apparently not! I went back to look at BRR's TPU Crr test, and saw Eclipse had been added to the original test results sometime last year. They're pretty hard to find, but this E. Dubied place, somewhere in Germany, seem to be the main source, although I didn't look all that much:
https://edubied.com/products/eclipse-endurance-tube


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.