![]() |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 23756677)
Perhaps not officially but I dare you to show how the plains of Colorado and Wyoming are different than the plains of Nebraska and South Dakota. Or how you can see a stark dividing line between Oklahoma and Texas at the Kansas border. Or how Arkansas changes dramatically at the Missouri border. There might be a sign saying that there is a boundary there but climate, terrain, and biome don’t recognize artificial boundaries.
|
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
(Post 23756704)
Redefining what is meant by “Midwest” does not make your original statement any more credible.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 23756710)
Okay. Cut out the parts you want. It doesn’t change the fact that there is a lot of territory between towns and many of the smaller towns a mere shells of towns. You admit that you touring days are long gone. Mine aren’t. I’ve toured in the heart of the Midwest several times in the last 2 decades, including the Great Lakes area twice in the last 2 years. Kinda got a bit more “on the ground” experience than you do.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 23756690)
As to the way to tour, no, my way isn’t the only way. But neither is yours.
And my way can be easily done without a heavy load, therefore does NOT require a touring bike. You’ve made your one and only useful contribution in your first post… I also have more than 10,000 miles of touring experience under my belt I, on the other hand, prefer a bike I can ride 10,000 miles a year within 100 mile of my own house, sleeping in my own proper bed! I will however, take that same bike for a couple overnights in a state park or a well stocked commercial campground (mind you, I didn’t elaborate in my OP, I’m going overseas on those trips). If I have to eat at a restaurant or eat peanut butter crackers for those couple dinners, that’s just fine. Like I said, read my first post. (Not to say this thread isn’t already done to death saved from some old timer insist on perpetuating outdated way of touring) p.s. All your posts have odd looking square blocks embedded inline where quotes should be. I don't know what you’re posting with. But it’s really annoying to read with those things getting in the way |
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
(Post 23756717)
Actually, you don’t. You previously stated you’ve done 10,000 miles - I’ve done much more than that.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 23756860)
Context.
You specifically mentioned Wisconsin -- here is a map showing 6,272 grocery stores in Wisconsin (2024). It is hardly a food desert. You would have to go out of your way to bike 3 days (150-300 miles) and not encounter one of these stores, so the idea that you'd routinely be 3 days away from food is outright silly. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...435248f986.jpg |
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
(Post 23756873)
Your claim is farfetched, regardless of how you try to define the midwest or change the "context."
You specifically mentioned Wisconsin -- here is a map showing 6,272 grocery stores in Wisconsin (2024). It is hardly a food desert. You would have to go out of your way to bike 3 days (150-300 miles) and not encounter one of these stores, so the idea that you'd routinely be 3 days away from food is outright silly. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...675ddd3f6.jpeg Your point is ever weaker when you look at the legend. These don’t appear to be “grocery stores”. The map is a map of all stores that have some kind of food, i.e. mostly convenience stores. Not the same as a “grocery store”. Only one of the 10 store listed in the legend could be called a “grocery store”. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...f6b403ec2.jpeg The same site lists the type of “grocery store” in the map. The vast majority of the business listed are convenience stores which aren’t really known for their selection of true “groceries”. The chart is a bit weird and I’m not sure why they have broken it up the way they have but if we just consider the types of stores to around 2/3 of the circle, there are about 3200 stores listed. Of those 2400 are convenience stores and about 800 are actual grocery/supermarkets. That’s about 75% convenience stores and 25% grocery stores. And, as the initial map shows, those stores aren’t evenly distributed across the state. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...0a9a3fe4b.jpeg This site doesn’t include convenience stores and they say there are 2060 grocery stores mostly concentrated in Milwaukee, Madison, and Green Bay which account for about 900 of the total. |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 23757077)
Also look at the green line along the Mississippi from Minneapolis to La Crosse which is part of the MRT. There aren’t a lot of anything in that 188 miles.
|
Does that map include bars?
|
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
(Post 23757083)
What are you smoking? There are many food stores shown along that 188 mile stretch, or within a stone's throw of it. I doubt you'd ever be more than 10 miles from a store.
I will say that on that leg of my trip, I didn’t camp because that leg was during the Labor Day holiday and campgrounds were full. I stayed in hotels and ate in restaurants over the 3 days it took me to transit that section. However, even that was not as easy a task as one might think. There were slim pickins’ all along that section for ever restaurants. |
So have we abandoned the rack mount discussion? If so, let me know.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 23757314)
Do you not know how to read a map? On the Wisconsin side of the river and hewing close to the river, there are 7 dots between the Helmart in St Paul and Trempelau which is most of that 188 mile trip. There are more stores near La Crosse but generally, that would mean about 26 miles between them.
But, the mods are correct -- this is far off the subject, so no more. |
Originally Posted by atnyc
(Post 23753253)
thanks for that link That answers my question perfectly.
Looks like carbon frames CAN have eyelets, and some do. So my local shop guys was totally wet when he said carbon frames CAN’T have racks! It’s just many manufacturers don’t put eyelets on their road/enduro frames, under the misguided assumption that anyone want a light fast machine for normal day-to-day riding will never want to use that same bike for occasional short duration touring. For me personally, I will not ride a heavy boring dog of a frame all season long just so I can tour on it one week a year. So I’ll look into the thru-axle racks. (Finally figured out why all my previous post disappeared. Better type fast, nor get distracted. Otherwise, the forum logs one out and the post will fail) there was a blog, Cycling in the South Bay, long gone now, where the writer added a rear rack to his carbon road bike. Then set off on essentially a tour. my thought a bad idea. a few months later crack, a seat stay fractured. he had a carbon repair shop fix it and added carbon tape to reinforce. I stopped out reading the blog diligently and near the end he was on a different bike. metallic has its place. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:01 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.