Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

More Brooks talk

Old 01-17-06, 10:21 AM
  #1  
JT52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Highlands Ranch, Colordao
Posts: 137

Bikes: '84 Peugeot PSV-10, '00 Schwinn Moab 2, '01 Airborne Valkyrie, '04 Surly Cross-Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
More Brooks talk

Seems Brooks saddles are discussed the most on BikeForums and are well loved by the majority. I've been thinking about getting one but I've hesitated for two reasons. The first is the weight of the B17. 500+ grams is quite a bit, but if the comfort is as great as most say, it would be worth it.

The second question is a bit more serious and concerns numbness. The saddles on my current bikes all have cutouts, but I still have problems getting numb (I've tried numerous position changes to no avail).

Has anyone riding Brooks saddles experienced numbness?

Thanks!
JT52 is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 10:29 AM
  #2  
Olebiker
Resident Old Fart
 
Olebiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,299

Bikes: Douglas Precision Ti

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It has been years since I rode a Brooks but I certainly recall the numbness. As a Brooks saddle breaks in a ridge is created where your saddle has a cutout. I would think that would exacerbate the numbness problem.

Most folks I know who use Brooks saddles ride in a more upright position, though, putting less pressure on the squishy bits that cause numbness.
__________________
Wag more, bark less
Olebiker is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 11:12 AM
  #3  
Portis
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,020

Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've got three brooks b-17's. I've often said i would give up riding if i had to give them up. In fact i regard them as my best cycling purchases every and my wife will vouch for the fact that i have made a lot.

I have never had any numbness, and am always puzzled by all of the numbness threads. I ride quite a bit and have ridden around 15,000 miles in the last couple years. Most of those were on unpaved roads, so i get the most out of my saddles.

I think that some people are just put together differently is some way. That is the only explanation i can come up with. Some can't stand brooks saddles, to me that illustrates this point. I can't imagine anything more comfortable. I can't even stand to test ride a bike in a shop becuase the stock saddle hurt so much.

Go ahead and get a brooks. Wallingford bicycle (google them) has a 6 month money back guarantee. If you don't like it, send it back. Or heck, you can often ebay them and get basically all of your money back. They hold their value.
Portis is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 11:19 AM
  #4  
JT52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Highlands Ranch, Colordao
Posts: 137

Bikes: '84 Peugeot PSV-10, '00 Schwinn Moab 2, '01 Airborne Valkyrie, '04 Surly Cross-Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks, Ranger, I believe I'll take your advice. A nice Honey Brooks will look great on my Surly Cross-Check...
JT52 is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 12:51 PM
  #5  
Ironwoman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 87

Bikes: Trek 5200, Calfee Tetra Tri

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
JT52, The B-17 also has a titanium rail option, which would make it lighter weight (more expensive, though).

I've been riding a B-15 Brooks saddle for 35 years (the same one). It is definitely by far the most comfortable saddle I've ever ridden. A Brooks will last you a long time, so a little extra money may be worth it.
Ironwoman is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 04:53 PM
  #6  
jur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,391
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 315 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Get a Brooks. I strongly suspect that the number of people satisfied with them outweigh the dissatisfied ones by a very large number (they're still in business after what, 85 years, aren't they?). I went through a number of saddles before getting a B17. My 1st saddle was a torture device that put me off biking for several years after riding a paltry 8km, I wish it had been a Brooks instead.

Once you break it in, the comfort factor outweighs the extra weight by a huge amount. If you were doing a century, that extra weight becomes irrelevant, with a uncomfortable saddle you would wish for an extra kg just to get more comfy.
jur is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 05:40 PM
  #7  
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,025

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Brooks got bought by Selle Italia or San Marco in the last year or two, I thought.....
Bekologist is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 06:23 PM
  #8  
Dang
Senior Member
 
Dang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Highlands, Ca.
Posts: 326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Love my Brooks! And thanks for reminding me it time to treat her again to another proofhide session.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
When hobbies merg 078.jpg (81.1 KB, 38 views)
Dang is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 06:51 PM
  #9  
jur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,391
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 315 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
Brooks got bought by Selle Italia or San Marco in the last year or two, I thought.....
And your point is...?
jur is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 06:57 PM
  #10  
chipcom 
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,365

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JT52
Seems Brooks saddles are discussed the most on BikeForums and are well loved by the majority. I've been thinking about getting one but I've hesitated for two reasons. The first is the weight of the B17. 500+ grams is quite a bit, but if the comfort is as great as most say, it would be worth it.
What, are you racing? Consider the weight of the bike...say 20-35lbs? Now add your own weight and tell me how a couple of hundred grams stacks up in the grand scheme of things. If the weight is a big deal, I'm sure skipping a meal or two would compensate...or, to be serious for a moment, being more comfortable means you might ride longer, thus dropping a pound or two off of you.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 07:09 PM
  #11  
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,025

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've got four of them, don't get me wrong....

I was just saying, maybe 85 years, but quality control and sales were lagging, but then an italian saddle manufacturer stepped in and rejuvenated the brand...
Bekologist is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 07:21 PM
  #12  
jur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,391
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 315 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
You probably know more about this than me. What quality problems were they having? Was this posted in BF? AFAIK, the saddles have not changed at all in all that time except for more models being introduced.

Buying a company that turns a profit is a good move. Buying a company that seems headed for a sandbar perhaps less so.

But I don't want to argue, just learn.
jur is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 07:39 PM
  #13  
supcom
You need a new bike
 
supcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have many thousands of miles, about 20 centuries, and countless metric centuries on my Brooks B-17s and have never experienced any numbness, saddle sores, or significant pain in the rear from the saddle. I wear padded shorts but have never used any sort of "butt cream".
supcom is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 07:50 PM
  #14  
TomM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 961

Bikes: Trek5000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I got my first Brooks about 2 weeks ago and have put about 140 miles on it. I have not experienced any numbness. This morning I noticed how it's starting to fit to my butt. Most comfortable.
TomM is offline  
Old 01-17-06, 09:50 PM
  #15  
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,025

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
All this is hearsay, heretical, and possibly false (kind of like Helmet Head's traffic theories!)

but Brooks Saddlery was on the fade in the last two decades of the 20th century, with worker morale etc flagging and quality in the crapper.

Selle Royal aquired Brooks in summer 2002 with plans to 'round out' selle royal's product mix, with a 'return to the roots' of bicycle saddles and talk of rejuvenating the Brooks brand.

I think Selle Royal Italia has done just that admirably well.
As far as I know however, all saddles are still made at the Brooks factory in 'brighamshire-on-avon-devoldswood-hampdensdown' or thereabouts, England.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 05:10 AM
  #16  
MichaelW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,949
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The issue of weight is easily resolved when you consider the weight of the saddle + luggage system for commuting, long day rides and light weekend tours.
With a B17 you can strap on a Carradice saddlebag for 7-25l of easy to carry, aerodynamic and durable luggage.
With a lightweight racing saddle, most people would opt for a seatpost clamp rack with a rack-top bag. This is heavier, weaker and less aerodynamic.
MichaelW is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 11:46 AM
  #17  
onbike 1939
Senior Member
 
onbike 1939's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 2,051

Bikes: Airnimal Chameleon; Ellis Briggs; Moulton TSR27 Moulton Esprit

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1706 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by jur
You probably know more about this than me. What quality problems were they having? Was this posted in BF? AFAIK, the saddles have not changed at all in all that time except for more models being introduced.

Buying a company that turns a profit is a good move. Buying a company that seems headed for a sandbar perhaps less so.

But I don't want to argue, just learn.
It's true that Brooks, once the preferred choice for cycle-tourists (and in the old days racers too) had been having difficulties, being content to rest on their laurels and do little to encourage buyers. I have to say also having bought a good number of them for over 35 years that the quality control was erratic in that the same type of saddle would vary in the thickness of the butts of leather used. This meant that having bought two identical Team Pro's I found that while one broke-in easily the other refused to do so. After 3 years and much cursing I found that the uncomfortable one was three times thicker than the other. That's changed with the new company who have tightened QC and mounted a brilliant publicity campaign mounted at the USA market. The new B17 Special seems to me to be a cracking saddle combining comfort and appearance and is well worth the money.
onbike 1939 is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 12:53 PM
  #18  
JT52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Highlands Ranch, Colordao
Posts: 137

Bikes: '84 Peugeot PSV-10, '00 Schwinn Moab 2, '01 Airborne Valkyrie, '04 Surly Cross-Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks to everyone for their input. I've decided to go ahead and give it a try. If it doesn't work out for me, then, like Ranger said, I can always sell it on ebay!

I guess the weight thing only bugged me from my, admittedly short, racing days in the 80s, and ever since I've always considered the three things when making a purchase: price, durability, and weight. While a couple hundred grams may not be much (just shy of 8 oz.), you can certainly add a lot of unnecessary weight by not paying attention to the componentry and accessories you're buying and their weights, so it's always been something I've considered. If I like the B17, I can always bite the bullet and get one with the ti rails like IronWoman suggested.

As far as the bike rider goes...I'm well aware of my contribution to the overall package!
JT52 is offline  
Old 01-18-06, 03:28 PM
  #19  
jur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,391
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 315 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by JT52
Thanks to everyone for their input.
Heh, you can enter a new thread any day with the word Brooks in the title, everybody loves discussing these, so you'll get lots of replies.
jur is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.