Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-11-06, 10:49 AM   #1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Fork suspension or not !!!

Can anyone give me advice on whethter it is a good idea to buy a new bike with Fork suspension ot NOT.

That is to say is fork suspension a good idea if I am only to ride the bike mainly on the road .I am talking Hybrid or Comfort BIke riding here ie a Claude Butler Legend (with Sus)or Specialised Crossroads Sport.(No sus
all advice and views welcomed ASAP please.
Beanyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-06, 12:06 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,953
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
If you are just riding on the road then a faster style of bike like the Specialized Sirrus is more fun. It can take wide enough tyres to tackle any country lane or bike trail.
MichaelW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-06, 12:41 PM   #3
Faster but still slow
slowandsteady's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006
Posts: 5,979
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Don't get a suspension. You don't need it, and it will just slow you down. The only time you really need a suspension is if you intend to do some downhills on a mountain trail with some serious boulders and giant tree roots. Way back in the stone ages, MTB did not even have suspensions and we did just fine. You certainly don't need it for any road riding. Front suspensions on MTBs essentially enable you to have less technical skill and still not do an endo when you hit that big rock.
slowandsteady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-06, 12:50 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree, suspension is superfluous on a road bike. (unless you live in an area with cobblestones...)

Heavier, requires maintenance, and is another source of instability as the sliders wear.

On MTBs they make a big difference. I started mountain biking on a ratty old Specialized Rockhopper with solid frame. Pretty decent little bike....Long descents on rocky trails left my forearms about to fall off.

When I got a decent MTB (Schwinn Moab III with JudyXC front end) it was like, "wow, lets do that again!"
Bikewer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-06, 05:41 PM   #5
New Orleans
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,785
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
As you get older-you appreciate suspension on a road bike more

When you are young you don't need any suspension on a road bike.However as you get older you really start to appreciate the bump absorbing qualities of a decent suspension.My neck, back and knees would feel every pothole, expansion joint etc on my old road bikes.Even 40mm 700c tires couldn't take enough edge off; my NRS really smooths out our crummy potholed roads and sidewalks.Granted it weighs about 27lbs, but it is worth it.The Carbon Ybike works about as well, but you can feel more bob(25lbs.).The trade off is maybe 7-8 lbs over an equivalent no suspension bike.The price for used bikes is about the same-sus vs no sus.The Dean Titanium hardtail I am selling weighed just 21 lbs 12 ounces-fully built.It has a 3.5lb frame.Wish it was mine, or I had the room and $$ for it!!
Even huge low pressure tires-like 2.35 Schwalbe super motos- don't work anywhere near as well as a decent rear suspension.I'm talking about comfort-not speed.Luck,Charlie
phoebeisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-06, 07:22 PM   #6
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
bikingshearer's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Bikes: 1967 Paramount, 1982-ish Ron Cooper,1978 Eisentraut "A," mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 1961 Bianchi Competizione (an Eroica bike), 1994 Trek 520, 199? Burley Bossa Nova, early-1970s Cinelli Speciale Corsa (also an Eroica bike)
Posts: 3,454
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 64 Post(s)
Unless your roads look the cobbles of Paris-Roubaix or the Tour of Flanders, forego the shocks. In addition to all the listed disadvantges, some of your energy output will go into compressing the suspension rather than moving the bike forward. So let's recap: heavier, energy wasting, added expense, added complexity, added thing to break/need maintenance for something that was designed to use on bumpy single-track, not paved roads. Put the money into more bike (or just pocket the difference) and forget about the suspension.

BTW, this goes double for rear suspension.
bikingshearer is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.