![]() |
Put on the Thomson?
Question: Assuming a saddle can be placed in the exact same fore-aft position – using the rails – is there any particular pro or con for using a set-back post vs a zero setback post? Everything on my bike is carbon, but my son gave me a Thomson Elite which looks soooooooooo good. My current post is a middle of the road carbon post with a 5mm setback, so I’m certain the Thomson could be put in the same position. As a biker who is not going to be placing a great deal of strain on any bike part, I know I wouldn’t see any difference in performance. Just hate to let the Thomson sit in my gear chest. Also, would inserting a metal post into a carbon tube be of any concern?
|
Same answers as the other place. Do it.
|
Pro- would be if it makes it a better fit. Con- would be if it makes the fit worse.
|
Sounds like the Thompson would be a great upgrade. I personally prefer an aluminum seatpost over a carbon.
|
remember that once you grease up your AL post and install it, it would be hard to clean out the grease to go back to carbon.
|
check out my thread from this morning concerning set-back and 0 setback and the problem I am having on the Road cycling forum
|
If your current seatpost has a clamp that is not centered on the shaft of the seatpost (think Kalloy for a good example), get the setback.
If your current seatpost has a clamp centered over the shaft of the seatpost, then get the non-setback. There you go! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.