Help.. which Hybrid: Trek 7.2FX, 7.3FX, or 7.3FX Disc
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Help.. which Hybrid: Trek 7.2FX, 7.3FX, or 7.3FX Disc
Hello,
I am just getting back into riding with my wife, who has a Specialized bike. I mainly do the bike paths with little road.
I am looking at the Trek 7.2, 7.3FX, 7.3 FX with disc brakes. I know the difference between the 7.2 and 7.3 FX is $100 and the difference between the 7.2 and 7.3FX (w/ disc) is $130.
I am looking for opinions.. are the disc brakes worth it? Is the 7.3 FX a better value with the upgrades vs. the 7.2 FX?
Should I be looking at another bike?
Thanks in advance
I am just getting back into riding with my wife, who has a Specialized bike. I mainly do the bike paths with little road.
I am looking at the Trek 7.2, 7.3FX, 7.3 FX with disc brakes. I know the difference between the 7.2 and 7.3 FX is $100 and the difference between the 7.2 and 7.3FX (w/ disc) is $130.
I am looking for opinions.. are the disc brakes worth it? Is the 7.3 FX a better value with the upgrades vs. the 7.2 FX?
Should I be looking at another bike?
Thanks in advance
#2
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
There really isn't much added value to having disk brakes unless you are constantly riding in wet/winter conditions or bombing down humongous downhills. The 7.3 FX has slightly better components that the 7.2FX, so that's your huckleberry.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St George, UT
Posts: 71
Bikes: Trek 7.5 FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unless you are riding in an area with consistently bad weather you won't need the disc brakes, IMHO. I agree with chipcom the 7.3 has slightly better components and for the price difference I would go for the 7.3. I have a 7.5 and absolutely love it.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 103
Bikes: Trek 7.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a 7.2fx and have no problems with it. Although if you can afford the extra $100, it is probably worth it. Let me just say the 7.2fx is a good bike.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 222
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The components on the 7.3 are worth ~$250 more than those on the 7.2. That basically means it will last a little longer without needing to replace anything. If you're planning on using the bike for more than 5 years, and the $100 won't hurt you financially, it's probably worth the upgrade. But it's not a clincher.
Disc brakes are not a good choice unless you need them (i.e., if you're riding through deep mud, not just rain or snow). They are more difficult to maintain than rim brakes, and rim brakes offer more than enough stopping power.
Disc brakes are not a good choice unless you need them (i.e., if you're riding through deep mud, not just rain or snow). They are more difficult to maintain than rim brakes, and rim brakes offer more than enough stopping power.
#6
Baka dakara
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I commute daily on a 7.2FX. It's a fine bike, but I can't say I love it. Feels kind of soulless (if that makes sense). It has no personality. As far as I've noticed, most 7.2FX owners around here give it a mild thumbs up, but aren't exactly jumping up and down with enthusiam. The 7.5 gets more praise, but that's a whole different level of bike.
Check out the Jamis Coda. Unlike the 7.2, its owners actually seem to love it.
Check out the Jamis Coda. Unlike the 7.2, its owners actually seem to love it.
#7
Feral Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Roma, Italia
Posts: 2,667
Bikes: yes, I have one.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#8
DancesWithSUVs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Griffin Cycle Bethesda,MD
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by DevLaVaca
Disc brakes are not a good choice unless you need them (i.e., if you're riding through deep mud, not just rain or snow). They are more difficult to maintain than rim brakes, and rim brakes offer more than enough stopping power.
To the OP,if you're only going to be riding in nice weather,then the standard 7.3 is a better deal for the component level. If you're thinking about commuting in all weather,get the discs.
__________________
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
#9
The Guadfather
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fart Worth
Posts: 1,090
Bikes: Trek, Centurion, Kuwahara coming soon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
There really isn't much added value to having disk brakes unless you are constantly riding in wet/winter conditions or bombing down humongous downhills. The 7.3 FX has slightly better components that the 7.2FX, so that's your huckleberry.
+1, Chipcom makes a good point on the disc brakes part.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
"Minor bun engine, made Benny Lava!!!"
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
"Minor bun engine, made Benny Lava!!!"
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 50 Times
in
25 Posts
Get the best equipment you are able to afford/willing to spend. I have never heard any complaints about someones ride being too nice. I have friends who have done lots of upgrades to their bikes to solve quality problems. bk
#11
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just bought 2 7.3's this last weekend. These are the first bikes the wife and I have had in years but so far we love them. I kinda wish we had sprung for the disks as we live in Seattle right by Queen Anne hill but I figure by going with out we can upgrade as we please sooner or later.
#13
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the advice everyone.. based upon what you guys were saying, I went ahead last night and ordered a 7.3 FX, paying more for it than the 7.2 because of the additional components.
#16
Erectible Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enroute
Posts: 515
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark5356
The 7.3 & 7.5 FX are listed as fitness bikes in the Trek catalog. Are these bikes also suitable for light trail riding?
#18
``````````````
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: san jose
Posts: 763
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by doctortalk121
what's the widest tire I could put on one?
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinios
Posts: 1,143
Bikes: 2004 Giant Cypress, 2006 Trek 7.3 FX, 2007 Gary Fisher Wahoo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by doctortalk121
regarding the 7.2-7.5 series. I'm thinking about getting one, but have a question. On one of my favorite rides, there is about 1.5 miles of gravel and .5 mile with plain dirt trail. how do the 700x32c tires hold up on it? what's the widest tire I could put on one?