Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

is bike maintainance really necessary?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

is bike maintainance really necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-07, 08:56 PM
  #1  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
exas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
is bike maintainance really necessary?

before i came to this forum i still rode bikes and never did anything to them after i have purchased them. but i came here and now i see people here saying stuff like clean your chain and pump air in your tires every week etc and other stuff you guys do.

is that really necessary? i see bikes being ridden with rusty chains and they look fine. air doesn't leak out of my tires anyways. is it because before, i bought department store bikes and those bikes are so rugged and bullet proof and the people here ride rode bikes with are thin and light and i guess that can make them fragile and therefore need more maintenance? or is it because bikes sold in department stores have to be durable and be expected to last years without a tuneup because the customers there know nothing about bikes and are not expected to anyways. or is it because the more expensive the bike (and more lighter), the more you need to do to keep the parts running properly, sort of like how professional bikers have really light bikes but they ahve lots of mechanics looking over it everyday
exas is offline  
Old 05-30-07, 08:59 PM
  #2  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Posts: 6,017

Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by exas
before i came to this forum i still rode bikes and never did anything to them after i have purchased them. but i came here and now i see people here saying stuff like clean your chain and pump air in your tires every week etc and other stuff you guys do.

is that really necessary? i see bikes being ridden with rusty chains and they look fine. air doesn't leak out of my tires anyways. is it because before, i bought department store bikes and those bikes are so rugged and bullet proof and the people here ride rode bikes with are thin and light and i guess that can make them fragile and therefore need more maintenance? or is it because bikes sold in department stores have to be durable and be expected to last years without a tuneup because the customers there know nothing about bikes and are not expected to anyways. or is it because the more expensive the bike (and more lighter), the more you need to do to keep the parts running properly, sort of like how professional bikers have really light bikes but they ahve lots of mechanics looking over it everyday
If you don't ride very much or very often, it isn't necessary.
Portis is offline  
Old 05-30-07, 09:06 PM
  #3  
CRIKEY!!!!!!!
 
Cyclaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: all the way down under
Posts: 4,276

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1589 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times in 365 Posts
Originally Posted by exas
before i came to this forum i still rode bikes and never did anything to them after i have purchased them. but i came here and now i see people here saying stuff like clean your chain and pump air in your tires every week etc and other stuff you guys do. is that really necessary? i see bikes being ridden with rusty chains and they look fine. air doesn't leak out of my tires anyways. is it because before, i bought department store bikes and those bikes are so rugged and bullet proof and the people here ride rode bikes with are thin and light and i guess that can make them fragile and therefore need more maintenance? or is it because bikes sold in department stores have to be durable and be expected to last years without a tuneup because the customers there know nothing about bikes and are not expected to anyways. or is it because the more expensive the bike (and more lighter), the more you need to do to keep the parts running properly, sort of like how professional bikers have really light bikes but they ahve lots of mechanics looking over it everyday
How many miles do you do on average in a week/month/year?
__________________
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
Cyclaholic is offline  
Old 05-30-07, 09:47 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Cadfael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 475
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I hope this does not sound snobbish...

But if you buy a new bike for £70 from somewhere like Halfords in the UK, or Walmart in the US and you get a good 18 months out of it before it falls apart due to lack of servicing.... who can fault it? But if your baby cost £500 or more... you want to get more use than 18 months from it.

Cycle maintainence is not only about keeping a bike in good repair however. A well maintained bike is easier to ride and will give you more power for the energy you put into it than a poorly maintained bike. When a BB turns smoothly and easily, when your chain is running free, your pedals spinning with no effort, your hubs giving you a good freewheel distance, then you are not woking 'to' hard to keep a forward momentum.

I will tell you what I think is a crime, and pi**es me of big time. It is me on my £175 Raleigh Lithium passing a bloke on a Marin that is quite literally a wreck due to poor maintenance. Usually the tyres are under-inflated and the seat to low as well. And it has happened... I have seen Marins, Treks, Orange.. and my personale fave, a bike no longer produced... 'The Rivington Pike'. Okay, either they have 'aquired' the bike and have no idea just what they have.. but some must have bought them new, and not cheaply. I can't understand NOT looking after an expensive bike. Yes, for a cheap one... run it into the ground and then get another. But even cheap bikes will last a few years if looked after.
Cadfael is offline  
Old 05-30-07, 09:59 PM
  #5  
mud
Lurker
 
mud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So IL
Posts: 269

Bikes: 07 Fuji Professional 2.0, Specialized Roubaix SL4 Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A simple answer; for you no, for me yes!
Mud
mud is offline  
Old 05-30-07, 11:13 PM
  #6  
Mad Furyan
 
Quick_Torch C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 10-a-Sea
Posts: 697

Bikes: 02 Cannondale Jekyll,06 Santa Cruz Heckler, 06 Specialized Roubaix Pro, 09 Santa Cruz Blur LT2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
two words....preventative maintenence
Quick_Torch C5 is offline  
Old 05-30-07, 11:24 PM
  #7  
Two H's!!! TWO!!!!!
 
chephy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 4,267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by exas
is that really necessary? i see bikes being ridden with rusty chains and they look fine. air doesn't leak out of my tires anyways.
Yeah, it's possible to ride a bike with a rusty chain and underinflated tires. It's just much more work than riding a bike that is well-maintainted. Of course if you don't ride much, it won't really matter.

Originally Posted by exas
i bought department store bikes and those bikes are so rugged and bullet proof
Department-store bikes bulletproof? You evidently don't ride very much. That crap breaks after a few hundred miles - if (and that's a big if) it works in the first place (I had a department-store bike on which gears didn't shift since Day 1... and no amount of adjustment would get them to work properly). But most of those bikes don't even see a few hundred miles in their lifetimes anyway.

Originally Posted by exas
or is it because bikes sold in department stores have to be durable and be expected to last years without a tuneup because the customers there know nothing about bikes and are not expected to anyways.
Yes, they're made to be durable enough to make them last for years... sitting inside your garage gathering dust.
chephy is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 04:37 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
As my grandfather a retired mechanical engineer taught me, everything man made needs maintenance. Maintenance optimizes the performance and life span of every piece of equipment. If you enjoy being able to ride a bike without it breaking down then maintenance is a necessity.
Heck, now that I think of it people and animals need health maintenance.
DataJunkie is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 04:56 AM
  #9  
Non Tribuo Anus Rodentum and off to the next adventure (RIP)
 
Stacey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 9,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Sniff, sniff... I smell a troll.
__________________
Stacey is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 05:41 AM
  #10  
Feral Member
 
Nicodemus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Roma, Italia
Posts: 2,667

Bikes: yes, I have one.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by exas
before i came to this forum i still rode bikes and never did anything to them after i have purchased them. but i came here and now i see people here saying stuff like clean your chain and pump air in your tires every week etc and other stuff you guys do.

is that really necessary? i see bikes being ridden with rusty chains and they look fine. air doesn't leak out of my tires anyways. is it because before, i bought department store bikes and those bikes are so rugged and bullet proof and the people here ride rode bikes with are thin and light and i guess that can make them fragile and therefore need more maintenance? or is it because bikes sold in department stores have to be durable and be expected to last years without a tuneup because the customers there know nothing about bikes and are not expected to anyways. or is it because the more expensive the bike (and more lighter), the more you need to do to keep the parts running properly, sort of like how professional bikers have really light bikes but they ahve lots of mechanics looking over it everyday
It depends.

I'd bet pounds to pence that a good 75% of the bicycles ridden here haven't had a thing done to them in years, possibly decades.

But most Dutch don't ride their bikes like high performance machines. They ride them just to get around.

Most people here on BF are into cycling as a sport or a passion. Thus prefer higher performance or at least treat their bikes as something a little more than the get-around tank.

But even over here amidst the mass of old abused beater tanks, I almost *never* hear a squeaky anything.

Maintenance is like learning. The more you do it the more you need to do it.
__________________
Originally Posted by KrisPistofferson
Did you just say "minarchist?" I'm going to start a 10-page vaginathon because only Libertarians can define Libertarianism. Also, you're mean.
Nicodemus is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 06:52 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 714

Bikes: Jamis Nova

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
im telling you, keeping your tires topped off makes such a HUGE difference.
lima_bean is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 07:08 AM
  #12  
Unlisted member
 
no motor?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 6,192

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1376 Post(s)
Liked 432 Times in 297 Posts
Originally Posted by DataJunkie
As my grandfather a retired mechanical engineer taught me, everything man made needs maintenance. Maintenance optimizes the performance and life span of every piece of equipment. If you enjoy being able to ride a bike without it breaking down then maintenance is a necessity.
Heck, now that I think of it people and animals need health maintenance.
+1
no motor? is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 08:52 AM
  #13  
Faster but still slow
 
slowandsteady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 5,978

Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Most people don't even know what it feels like to ride a finely tuned bike so if they leave it in disrepair they don't notice the crappy shifting and stiff chain. They expect it. That is just how bikes are...they think.

A rusty, poorly shifting Walmart bike to a finely tuned $1500 bike is like comparing a 30 year old clunker destined for the junkyard with a brand new Porsche. And if you own a Porsche...you WILL get the oil changed and keep the tires inflated and give it regular tune ups. The 30 year old clunker isn't worth the cost of an oil change so you just run it into the ground.
slowandsteady is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 09:07 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
edp773's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinios
Posts: 1,143

Bikes: 2004 Giant Cypress, 2006 Trek 7.3 FX, 2007 Gary Fisher Wahoo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stacey
Sniff, sniff... I smell a troll.
Welcome to our newest Merton wannabe!!!

It's alive I tell ya! It's ALIVE!!
edp773 is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 09:37 AM
  #15  
The Red Lantern
 
Rev.Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 5,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Brushing your teeth is not necessary either. But it is better for all involved when done regularly.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.

I am in the woods and I have gone crazy.
Rev.Chuck is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 09:38 AM
  #16  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times in 1,044 Posts
Originally Posted by Stacey
Sniff, sniff... I smell a troll.
And the usual suspects replied with the same old, same old CW.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 11:06 AM
  #17  
Faster but still slow
 
slowandsteady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 5,978

Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
And the usual suspects replied with the same old, same old CW.
Like you?
slowandsteady is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 11:44 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
.... and I thought it was a serious question worthy of a serious answer. Before starting the commuting thing I never ever maintained a bike. Went on the same path and was wondering why everything kept falling apart.

Now.... what does CW mean? Is ILTB a Veronica Mars fan?
DataJunkie is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 11:47 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
cyclezealot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Fallbrook,Calif./Palau del Vidre, France
Posts: 13,230

Bikes: Klein QP, Fuji touring, Surly Cross Check, BCH City bike

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1485 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times in 64 Posts
You just want a beater bike for about town, guess any old bike will do. Not very adventurious, what is the risk. You get far away on the road, I appreciate a bike that shifts well, brakes that are reliable on a steep downhill, and like knowing my chain won't break 40 miles away from home.
cyclezealot is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 12:19 PM
  #20  
Plays in Traffic
 
1ply's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cyclezealot
You just want a beater bike for about town, guess any old bike will do. Not very adventurious, what is the risk. You get far away on the road, I appreciate a bike that shifts well, brakes that are reliable on a steep downhill, and like knowing my chain won't break 40 miles away from home.
You never truly KNOW that it won't break. You just lessen the chances by cleaning and lubricating it.
1ply is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 12:27 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
cyclezealot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Fallbrook,Calif./Palau del Vidre, France
Posts: 13,230

Bikes: Klein QP, Fuji touring, Surly Cross Check, BCH City bike

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1485 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times in 64 Posts
I change my chain every 3000 miles , regardless of their condition. Ever see anyone's chain break on an uphill. Not good.
cyclezealot is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 12:53 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 998
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Its up to people how they maintain their bikes.

IMHO, at least keep the tire pressure topped off and the chain lubed.

If the bike is used daily, buy a chain wear indicator and check the chain periodically, replacing the chain when the gauge shows that its worn.

Maintaining a bike is up to its owner, but time spent periodically checking and replacing worn components as a preventative measure is a lot easier than time dealing with a mechanical failure.
mlts22 is offline  
Old 05-31-07, 01:04 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
barba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Regular maintenance saves money in the long run. If I keep my chain lubed and clean, I get more miles out of it. If I change it before the chain gets worn, the cassette lasts almost indefinitely (and they can be pricey). If I keep the wheels true, they run smoother and last longer. Plus, I enjoy working on bikes.
barba is offline  
Old 06-10-07, 07:55 PM
  #24  
.
 
blickblocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,860
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm guessing you won't be riding much in your life...
__________________
https://blicksbags.com/
blickblocks is offline  
Old 06-10-07, 08:04 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 50 Times in 25 Posts
From some of the equipment I've seen out there, you would wonder if it is needed. On the other hand, I spend 15 minutes cleaning my drivetrain and lubing the chain after every ride. It always works flawlessly. It is easy to clean 'cause it never gets groady. Oh, it only takes a tiny bit of lube when you do it every time. Overkill? Yeah, but I like it that way. bk
bkaapcke is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.