The slipstream...
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The slipstream...
Hi there...I have to do a concept presentation for an interview and want to present on the concept of using the "slipstream" in cycling. Does anyone have any creative ideas about how to teach this concept, links to information, or activities that could help me with this presentation?
Thanks!
Thanks!
#3
Humvee of bikes =Worksman
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
If by "slipstream" you mean "drafting" another vehicle to gain
speed know this...........Drafting is not only stupid it's deadly
to those idiots who do it in addtion to being illegal.
speed know this...........Drafting is not only stupid it's deadly
to those idiots who do it in addtion to being illegal.
__________________
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.
Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.
Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
#4
Videre non videri
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208
Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Ok...
Aerodynamic drag (in terms of power required to counter it) on a bicyclist varies as speed cubed. Speed in this case is speed through the air (in your direction of travel), which is lower than your "road speed" if you have a tailwind, and higher if you have a headwind.
When a bicyclist rides through an airmass (with a speed not equal to that of the bicyclist), the air surrounding the bicyclist will be accelerated in the bicyclist's direction of travel - he is setting air in motion, pulling it along. The power required to set this air in motion is the power required to overcome the wind resistance.
Behind the moving bicyclist will be a mass of air moving along with him, but not quite at the same speed. Towards the sides of this rearward-pointing "cone" of dragged-along air, the speed of the air will be gradually lower until at some point, it will be the same as for the unaffected air. The same is true in the rearward direction, so at some point behind the bicyclist, air will return to its normal state, and be effectively unaffected.
If second bicyclist rides closely behind the first, he will be moving along inside that accelerated mass of air, and will see a reduction in relative air speed for himself. This translates to a lower power required to maintain any given speed.
Since power required to overcome aerodynamic drag varies as the air speed cubed, even a small reduction in relative air speed will make a big difference in the power requirement for the second bicyclist. Another factor to consider is also that the faster the first bicyclist rides (and/or the greater the headwind), the greater the reduction in drag for the second rider will be.
The cone of accelerated air behind the first bicyclist will be deflected to the side in a crosswind, so the actual sweet spot could very well be at an angle behind the first, requiring a staggered position for a trailing bicyclist.
The effect of drafting increases as the distance between the two bicyclists decreases. At a sufficiently low relative air speed, the drafting zone is too small for another bicyclist to fit into, and virtually no benefit comes from drafting.
Aerodynamic drag (in terms of power required to counter it) on a bicyclist varies as speed cubed. Speed in this case is speed through the air (in your direction of travel), which is lower than your "road speed" if you have a tailwind, and higher if you have a headwind.
When a bicyclist rides through an airmass (with a speed not equal to that of the bicyclist), the air surrounding the bicyclist will be accelerated in the bicyclist's direction of travel - he is setting air in motion, pulling it along. The power required to set this air in motion is the power required to overcome the wind resistance.
Behind the moving bicyclist will be a mass of air moving along with him, but not quite at the same speed. Towards the sides of this rearward-pointing "cone" of dragged-along air, the speed of the air will be gradually lower until at some point, it will be the same as for the unaffected air. The same is true in the rearward direction, so at some point behind the bicyclist, air will return to its normal state, and be effectively unaffected.
If second bicyclist rides closely behind the first, he will be moving along inside that accelerated mass of air, and will see a reduction in relative air speed for himself. This translates to a lower power required to maintain any given speed.
Since power required to overcome aerodynamic drag varies as the air speed cubed, even a small reduction in relative air speed will make a big difference in the power requirement for the second bicyclist. Another factor to consider is also that the faster the first bicyclist rides (and/or the greater the headwind), the greater the reduction in drag for the second rider will be.
The cone of accelerated air behind the first bicyclist will be deflected to the side in a crosswind, so the actual sweet spot could very well be at an angle behind the first, requiring a staggered position for a trailing bicyclist.
The effect of drafting increases as the distance between the two bicyclists decreases. At a sufficiently low relative air speed, the drafting zone is too small for another bicyclist to fit into, and virtually no benefit comes from drafting.
#5
Membership Not Required
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
14 Posts
Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(
ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.
"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"_Nicodemus
"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"_krazygluon
#6
Humvee of bikes =Worksman
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Yes, it sure is.....BUT.... speed records are set on closed courses with pro's
all around and riding. Idiot's need not apply.
__________________
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.
Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.
Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
#8
Senior Member
There's a Mythbusters episode where they presented this concept fairly well. Even though their "plausible" conclusion was way off the mark!
Anyone have a video of John Howards 152mph record run?
Anyone have a video of John Howards 152mph record run?
#9
~ Going the Distance ~
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: 2006 Bianchi Carbon 928, 2002 Gary Fisher Utopia
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi there...I have to do a concept presentation for an interview and want to present on the concept of using the "slipstream" in cycling. Does anyone have any creative ideas about how to teach this concept, links to information, or activities that could help me with this presentation?
Thanks!
Thanks!
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I always liked the poster (think it's www.despair.com that markets it) that has a picture of geese flying in a "V" formation. Caption: "Geese flying in formation use 30% less energy than flying alone. Which proves even Nature values laziness."
I might have the caption slightly off, but you get the idea. Maybe not what you're looking for in an interview, though.
Minstrie
I might have the caption slightly off, but you get the idea. Maybe not what you're looking for in an interview, though.
Minstrie