Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Bike math: Is 25+10+35?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Bike math: Is 25+10+35?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-07, 08:09 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bike math: Is 25+10+35?

Suppose I am going to cycle at a speed of 10 mph. It will take me x units of force to go 10 mph. Now...I am on the same bike, which, by the way, has an electric motor. I am using the motor to move the bike at 25 mph. If I add X amount of force to it, i.e. the amount of force needed to make the bike travel at 10 mph, will the result be 35 mph -assuming my gear ratio has changed?
pengyou is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 08:29 AM
  #2  
Poser
 
hjeand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No, wind resistance isn't linear with respect to speed - it's a cubed relationship. If you add the same amount of power to the bike as you did at 10 mph when traveling at 25 mph, you won't go 35 mph.
See the power formula at the bottom of this link --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_performance
hjeand is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 10:29 AM
  #3  
You need a new bike
 
supcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by hjeand
No, wind resistance isn't linear with respect to speed - it's a cubed relationship. If you add the same amount of power to the bike as you did at 10 mph when traveling at 25 mph, you won't go 35 mph.
See the power formula at the bottom of this link --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_performance
Correct.
supcom is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 12:33 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Garfield Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085

Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times in 67 Posts
That's our experience with cars too. Cars today are more aero. The faster the car goes, the more power it needs, more gasoline. I can't imagine the amount of power it takes the race cars to hit 200 mph.
Garfield Cat is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 01:15 PM
  #5  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,870

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1793 Post(s)
Liked 1,267 Times in 874 Posts
Cubed? my ballistics programs use squared!
Anyway, the effort increases dramatically as the speed increases.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 02:09 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,751

Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 75 Posts
Air resistance increases exponentially. So it will take twice as much power to go 32MPH as going 25MPH.

Only way to overcome air resistance is to install a fairing.
hotbike is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 02:29 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by hotbike
Air resistance increases exponentially.
Quadratically, not exponentially.
asgelle is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 03:31 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A significant difference...thanks!
pengyou is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 03:40 PM
  #9  
Two H's!!! TWO!!!!!
 
chephy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 4,267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by hotbike
Only way to overcome air resistance is to install a fairing.
You mean, to lower air resistance. There only two ways to truly overcome air resistance: stop moving or get rid of air. Neither is desirable for a cyclist.
chephy is offline  
Old 10-18-07, 07:07 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
deraltekluge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,195

Bikes: Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Don't confuse force with power. Air resistance (a force) goes up with the square of the speed, but power is force times speed, so the power requirement goes up with the cube of the speed. To double the speed takes 8 times the power.
deraltekluge is offline  
Old 10-19-07, 12:11 AM
  #11  
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by deraltekluge
Don't confuse force with power. Air resistance (a force) goes up with the square of the speed, but power is force times speed, so the power requirement goes up with the cube of the speed. To double the speed takes 8 times the power.
Correct, but for air resistance only.

A car, and a bike, has rolling resistance as well, and rolling resistance power is roughly linear with speed.

For a typical bike+rider, the combined effect of air resistance power and rolling resistance power increases with the speed raised to the power of ~2.6, as an approximation, at least for typical speeds (say 15-35 km/h). It's close enough to be within a few percent of the actual value, as calculated by combining the true components.

To answer the OP, the difference in power used between 10 and 25 mph should be around (25/10)^2.6, which is roughly 11 times the power. That means that the power required to travel at 10 mph is 1/11 of that required for 25 mph, so adding the same amount of power to 25 mph, will only add just over 1 mph.
CdCf is offline  
Old 10-19-07, 06:53 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
deraltekluge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,195

Bikes: Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Right...I was considering only air resistance. I didn't have a good feel for the relative magnitudes of rolling resistance and air resistance, but doesn't rolling resistance vary wildly depending on the type of bike? Compare a mountain bike with fat, 26", low pressure, knobby tires with a road bike with skinny, slick, high pressure 700's for example.
deraltekluge is offline  
Old 10-19-07, 08:15 AM
  #13  
Poser
 
hjeand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by deraltekluge
Right...I was considering only air resistance. I didn't have a good feel for the relative magnitudes of rolling resistance and air resistance, but doesn't rolling resistance vary wildly depending on the type of bike? Compare a mountain bike with fat, 26", low pressure, knobby tires with a road bike with skinny, slick, high pressure 700's for example.
Right, that would be encapsulated in the first term of the equation below. Specifically the constant K1. If rolling resistance is less, K1 would be smaller. Rolling resistance power has a linear relationship to speed. Air resistance has a cubed relationship.

P = g * m * Vg(K1+S) + K2 * Va^3

Where P is in watts, g is Earth's gravity, Vg is ground speed (m/s), m is bike/rider mass in kg, s is the grade (m/m), and Va is the rider's speed through the air (m/s). K1 is a lumped constant for all frictional losses (tires, bearings, chain), and is generally reported with a value of 0.0053. K2 is a lumped constant for aerodynamic drag and is generally reported with a value of 0.185 kg/m [5].
Note that the power required to overcome friction and gravity is proportional only to rider weight and ground speed. The power required to overcome wind drag is proportional to the cube of the air speed.
hjeand is offline  
Old 10-19-07, 09:52 AM
  #14  
n00b
 
Mofopotomus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 234

Bikes: nice Raleigh roadbike and an S&M BMX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have been reading through this thhread with great interest and I am thoroughly thankful that my pretty good schooling in mathematics has helped me to actually understand it a little (might even be tempted to slap together a neat little power output calculator in Excel so people can know what speed they can roughly expect with any given number of gear inches). I just wanted to say one thing.

I love bike nerds
Mofopotomus is offline  
Old 10-19-07, 10:15 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
"I love bike nerds"

Me too Thanks for all of your help!
pengyou is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.