Used Subaru Outback the right car for a cyclist?
#1
Gorntastic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Used Subaru Outback the right car for a cyclist?
I need a cheap, reliable rig that gets great gas mileage and can transport 3-4 bikes (Yakima Rack) for the next year or two. I'm thinking about picking up a new-to-me, mid to late 90s Subaru Outback. Two questions:
1. Both the Impreza and the Legacy seem short on space. What's it like hauling bikes and gear in either of these cars? I'm doubting the Impreza can transport four people + bikes comfortably.
2. I'm a big guy at 6'3." I know I can fit just fine into the Legacy Outback because my friend has one. Is the leg room and head room in the Impreza comparable or am I going to die of leg cramps?
3. Anything else you could add would be great.
Forgive me for asking car questions on a bike forum.
1. Both the Impreza and the Legacy seem short on space. What's it like hauling bikes and gear in either of these cars? I'm doubting the Impreza can transport four people + bikes comfortably.
2. I'm a big guy at 6'3." I know I can fit just fine into the Legacy Outback because my friend has one. Is the leg room and head room in the Impreza comparable or am I going to die of leg cramps?
3. Anything else you could add would be great.
Forgive me for asking car questions on a bike forum.
__________________
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The AWD on Subs robs some gas mileage. My wife's Outback sedan has been very reliable, my Legacy wagon... not so much.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 3,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My two Subes have been good--not Honda-like reliability, but nothing serious in more than 120,000 miles each (one would still be going, but my wife got rear-ended). I'm 6'4 and fit fine, but I like small cars--I wouldn't want to drive anything bigger even if it was a gift. The Impreza is smaller inside than an outback, but I can't say how much--I haven't been in an Outback in a couple of years. I can get my 64cm Atlantis inside with the wheels off and the back seat down, and I've carried four bikes and three people from Reno to Portland on the Yakima (mileage takes a huge dump, of course--from @33 to 24mpg).
If I had to choose between an Impreza and an Outback, I'd take the Impreza just because it's smaller. I don't need the extra size more than a few times a year.
If I had to choose between an Impreza and an Outback, I'd take the Impreza just because it's smaller. I don't need the extra size more than a few times a year.
#7
Gorntastic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My two Subes have been good--not Honda-like reliability, but nothing serious in more than 120,000 miles each (one would still be going, but my wife got rear-ended). I'm 6'4 and fit fine, but I like small cars--I wouldn't want to drive anything bigger even if it was a gift. The Impreza is smaller inside than an outback, but I can't say how much--I haven't been in an Outback in a couple of years. I can get my 64cm Atlantis inside with the wheels off and the back seat down, and I've carried four bikes and three people from Reno to Portland on the Yakima (mileage takes a huge dump, of course--from @33 to 24mpg).
If I had to choose between an Impreza and an Outback, I'd take the Impreza just because it's smaller. I don't need the extra size more than a few times a year.
If I had to choose between an Impreza and an Outback, I'd take the Impreza just because it's smaller. I don't need the extra size more than a few times a year.
__________________
#8
The Rock Cycle
Beware of head gasket issues on mid to late '90s Outbacks.
Lots of good info here:
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/
My '91 Legacy wagon has been pretty reliable up to 160k, but may be having some oil consumption issues now that I have to keep an eye on. I'll buy another 'ru eventually.
Lots of good info here:
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/
My '91 Legacy wagon has been pretty reliable up to 160k, but may be having some oil consumption issues now that I have to keep an eye on. I'll buy another 'ru eventually.
__________________
Gunnar Sport
Specialized Ruby
Salsa Vaya Ti
Novara Randonee x2
Motobecane Fantom CXX
Jamis Dakar XCR
Gunnar Sport
Specialized Ruby
Salsa Vaya Ti
Novara Randonee x2
Motobecane Fantom CXX
Jamis Dakar XCR
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You're not interested in the Subaru Forester? It's a bit squarer in the back, which looks like it opens up the trunk space a bit more than the more curved and attractive Outback.
My friend is a drummer and has had an Outback for 10 years. Apart from a front end collision (ice - his fault), the only problem I remember him mentioning is a bad rear wheel bearing after 9 years. ymmv.
My friend is a drummer and has had an Outback for 10 years. Apart from a front end collision (ice - his fault), the only problem I remember him mentioning is a bad rear wheel bearing after 9 years. ymmv.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You don't mention where you are but this guy off that forum above in Syracuse, NY has a 1996 for $5,000. Being a car nerd (like we're bike nerds), I'd guess it's probably reasonably well-cared for:
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/show...?threadid=9369
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/show...?threadid=9369
#11
Gorntastic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You don't mention where you are but this guy off that forum above in Syracuse, NY has a 1996 for $5,000. Being a car nerd (like we're bike nerds), I'd guess it's probably reasonably well-cared for:
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/show...?threadid=9369
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/show...?threadid=9369
__________________
#12
Gorntastic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You're not interested in the Subaru Forester? It's a bit squarer in the back, which looks like it opens up the trunk space a bit more than the more curved and attractive Outback.
My friend is a drummer and has had an Outback for 10 years. Apart from a front end collision (ice - his fault), the only problem I remember him mentioning is a bad rear wheel bearing after 9 years. ymmv.
My friend is a drummer and has had an Outback for 10 years. Apart from a front end collision (ice - his fault), the only problem I remember him mentioning is a bad rear wheel bearing after 9 years. ymmv.
__________________
#13
Senior Member
If you don't need the AWD don't bother. If you're carrying a bike with a rear rack just about any car will do. Subarus aren't a cheap car to own.
#14
Grumbly Goat
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 895
Bikes: bicycles with round wheels
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Beware of head gasket issues on mid to late '90s Outbacks.
Lots of good info here:
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/
My '91 Legacy wagon has been pretty reliable up to 160k, but may be having some oil consumption issues now that I have to keep an eye on. I'll buy another 'ru eventually.
Lots of good info here:
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/
My '91 Legacy wagon has been pretty reliable up to 160k, but may be having some oil consumption issues now that I have to keep an eye on. I'll buy another 'ru eventually.
+ 1 on the head gasket alert! they aint cheap to fix eihter
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 3,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My '92 Subaru Legacy wagon has 248k miles on it and still runs great. Original motor and clutch. No major repairs except for some body work that I did when I bought it used (bought it for $1,000 when it had 'only' 200k miles and a dented driver's door). Plenty of room for hauling, takes a Yakima roof rack fine, and I still get around 26 -27 mpg with one bike on top. I run 'mud and snow' tires all year round ... super in the snow and on gravel roads. Great winter car ... the XC skis and poles go right in, and the heater works well.
My '98 Subaru Outback wagon has 146k miles on it, and I've had it for one year. Several issues with it: it has the 2.5 liter engine which is notorious for head gasket leaks, which mine is developing. I'm still driving it, but will have to fix that soon (no overheating issues yet and I plan on doing it myself so that will save $$$). Am also having clutch problems which I think are more related to the hydraulics rather than the clutch plate. (again, I'll fix that myself). I get about 27 mpg on this car too. It's bigger than the Legacy wagon, but handles well, has lots of room for hauling, and also takes a Yakima rack on top well (I've had 3 bikes up there no problem).
I find both cars quite comfortable (BTW, I'm 6'5" tall.).
Stay away from the 2.5 liter motor if you can, otherwise plan on head gasket work, not that it's the end of the world though. No problems like that with the 2.2L or 6 cylinder motors. Like any car, if something starts to rattle, or wear out ... FIX IT! A Subaru will run a LONG time if cared for. I really like the all wheel drive, even in the summer. A cool thing about the AWD is that it will pull you around a corner ... getting a little wide in a turn? Hit the gas! It will corner tighter. Do you 'need' it in the winter? No. But AWD + real snow tires is almost unstoppable. That's a plus where I live.
My '98 Subaru Outback wagon has 146k miles on it, and I've had it for one year. Several issues with it: it has the 2.5 liter engine which is notorious for head gasket leaks, which mine is developing. I'm still driving it, but will have to fix that soon (no overheating issues yet and I plan on doing it myself so that will save $$$). Am also having clutch problems which I think are more related to the hydraulics rather than the clutch plate. (again, I'll fix that myself). I get about 27 mpg on this car too. It's bigger than the Legacy wagon, but handles well, has lots of room for hauling, and also takes a Yakima rack on top well (I've had 3 bikes up there no problem).
I find both cars quite comfortable (BTW, I'm 6'5" tall.).
Stay away from the 2.5 liter motor if you can, otherwise plan on head gasket work, not that it's the end of the world though. No problems like that with the 2.2L or 6 cylinder motors. Like any car, if something starts to rattle, or wear out ... FIX IT! A Subaru will run a LONG time if cared for. I really like the all wheel drive, even in the summer. A cool thing about the AWD is that it will pull you around a corner ... getting a little wide in a turn? Hit the gas! It will corner tighter. Do you 'need' it in the winter? No. But AWD + real snow tires is almost unstoppable. That's a plus where I live.
Last edited by John Wilke; 09-01-07 at 01:59 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
OutBack is more a package, a theme of any one of a number of Subarus. "True" Outbacks are the Legacy platform. The Legacy model is not as good.Many of you have included their weak points in your posts. Nothing's
extraordinary regarding these problems, many suffer these problems at some point, ussually well within the 160K range. What IS extraordinary is the Forester model,built on the Impreza platform,a much better car. The difference in passenger room is negligable. A rear passenger in a Legacy will have more leg room than he would in an Impreza,really close to a Forester wagon. Foresters handle better,have better engines than all but the newest Legacy and have among the very best repair record in the industry. Imprezas,now the RS and WRX etc. models are quite good too, they have tight "cock-pit" designs though. Men I know, who are over 6'2" have no problems in their wive's Foresters. All Subarus built within the last eight years are AWD.The forester gets 30
or more MPG,average. More on a long Hi-Way trip. No down-side tro a Forester AND compared to a similar year
they cost LESS than a Legacy, MUCH less than a Legacy OutBack. I worked at a car dealer,my perspective.
extraordinary regarding these problems, many suffer these problems at some point, ussually well within the 160K range. What IS extraordinary is the Forester model,built on the Impreza platform,a much better car. The difference in passenger room is negligable. A rear passenger in a Legacy will have more leg room than he would in an Impreza,really close to a Forester wagon. Foresters handle better,have better engines than all but the newest Legacy and have among the very best repair record in the industry. Imprezas,now the RS and WRX etc. models are quite good too, they have tight "cock-pit" designs though. Men I know, who are over 6'2" have no problems in their wive's Foresters. All Subarus built within the last eight years are AWD.The forester gets 30
or more MPG,average. More on a long Hi-Way trip. No down-side tro a Forester AND compared to a similar year
they cost LESS than a Legacy, MUCH less than a Legacy OutBack. I worked at a car dealer,my perspective.
#17
Caustic Soccer Mom
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Millstone WV
Posts: 1,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Subies are great for bike carrying, not bad on gas, and relatively problem free - in my experience.
Had a 1995 Impreza which I drove for 5 years (put 225,000 miles on it) and then gave it to my son who drove it another 5 years, then we sold it with 268,000 miles on it (it badly needed a new gas tank). I took 3 kids to bike races in WV from 1998 through the summer of 2000 in that car, using a trunk mounted rack.
Got a 2000 Outback, which I am still driving (275,400 and counting), which goes to MTB races all over the east coast. I can put 3 bikes on the roof, 3 (with front wheels & seats off) inside with the back seat down - and I don't use the rtrunk rack anymore. Kids are well over 6 foot, and still have plenty of room. Gas - @27 mpg. No major engine problems to date. The front axels have been replaced, as have all the brake rotors.
The "check engine" light has been on since about 45,000 miles, whicj I hear is pretty common with Subarus.
I would suggest that you go with an Impreza unless you can go up to at least a 2001 Outback - the design of the rear door & back lights encourages water to fill the light fixtures in the 2000 - don't know about the earlier ones, but they LOOK the same.
Had a 1995 Impreza which I drove for 5 years (put 225,000 miles on it) and then gave it to my son who drove it another 5 years, then we sold it with 268,000 miles on it (it badly needed a new gas tank). I took 3 kids to bike races in WV from 1998 through the summer of 2000 in that car, using a trunk mounted rack.
Got a 2000 Outback, which I am still driving (275,400 and counting), which goes to MTB races all over the east coast. I can put 3 bikes on the roof, 3 (with front wheels & seats off) inside with the back seat down - and I don't use the rtrunk rack anymore. Kids are well over 6 foot, and still have plenty of room. Gas - @27 mpg. No major engine problems to date. The front axels have been replaced, as have all the brake rotors.
The "check engine" light has been on since about 45,000 miles, whicj I hear is pretty common with Subarus.
I would suggest that you go with an Impreza unless you can go up to at least a 2001 Outback - the design of the rear door & back lights encourages water to fill the light fixtures in the 2000 - don't know about the earlier ones, but they LOOK the same.
__________________
As with mud, life, too, slides by.
As with mud, life, too, slides by.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I need a cheap, reliable rig that gets great gas mileage and can transport 3-4 bikes (Yakima Rack) for the next year or two. I'm thinking about picking up a new-to-me, mid to late 90s Subaru Outback. Two questions:
1. Both the Impreza and the Legacy seem short on space. What's it like hauling bikes and gear in either of these cars? I'm doubting the Impreza can transport four people + bikes comfortably.
2. I'm a big guy at 6'3." I know I can fit just fine into the Legacy Outback because my friend has one. Is the leg room and head room in the Impreza comparable or am I going to die of leg cramps?
3. Anything else you could add would be great.
Forgive me for asking car questions on a bike forum.
1. Both the Impreza and the Legacy seem short on space. What's it like hauling bikes and gear in either of these cars? I'm doubting the Impreza can transport four people + bikes comfortably.
2. I'm a big guy at 6'3." I know I can fit just fine into the Legacy Outback because my friend has one. Is the leg room and head room in the Impreza comparable or am I going to die of leg cramps?
3. Anything else you could add would be great.
Forgive me for asking car questions on a bike forum.
I do think the Impreza might be a bit on the tiny side for 4 people + bikes.
I'm also assuming you're planning on a roof rack. You can only put 1 1/2" hitches on subies, and you can only find 2 bike hitch racks for them (you might be able to use an adapter to get to a 2" hitch rack...)
__________________
Eric
2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)
Read my cycling blog at https://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto https://www.bicycleclimbs.com
Eric
2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)
Read my cycling blog at https://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto https://www.bicycleclimbs.com
#19
Gorntastic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm sure if you can fit in a Legacy, I'll be just fine in an Impreza. After looking at the figures on leg room and headroom, there is only about an inch or difference between the Legacy and the Impreza.
__________________
#20
Gorntastic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What IS extraordinary is the Forester model,built on the Impreza platform,a much better car. The difference in passenger room is negligable. A rear passenger in a Legacy will have more leg room than he would in an Impreza,really close to a Forester wagon. Foresters handle better,have better engines than all but the newest Legacy and have among the very best repair record in the industry. Imprezas,now the RS and WRX etc. models are quite good too, they have tight "cock-pit" designs though. Men I know, who are over 6'2" have no problems in their wive's Foresters. All Subarus built within the last eight years are AWD.The forester gets 30
or more MPG,average. More on a long Hi-Way trip. No down-side tro a Forester AND compared to a similar year
they cost LESS than a Legacy, MUCH less than a Legacy OutBack. I worked at a car dealer,my perspective.
or more MPG,average. More on a long Hi-Way trip. No down-side tro a Forester AND compared to a similar year
they cost LESS than a Legacy, MUCH less than a Legacy OutBack. I worked at a car dealer,my perspective.
And yeah, I've been in a newer WRX and I barely fit! That's why I asked about the older Imprezas.
__________________
#21
Gorntastic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Had a 1995 Impreza which I drove for 5 years (put 225,000 miles on it) and then gave it to my son who drove it another 5 years, then we sold it with 268,000 miles on it...Got a 2000 Outback, which I am still driving (275,400 and counting)...No major engine problems to date.
__________________
#22
Gorntastic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have an outback that's a killer ski car, but I agree that if you don't need AWD, you don't need the weight and complexity. My outback has been a pretty good car but I agree that it's not Honda quality.
I do think the Impreza might be a bit on the tiny side for 4 people + bikes.
I'm also assuming you're planning on a roof rack. You can only put 1 1/2" hitches on subies, and you can only find 2 bike hitch racks for them (you might be able to use an adapter to get to a 2" hitch rack...)
I do think the Impreza might be a bit on the tiny side for 4 people + bikes.
I'm also assuming you're planning on a roof rack. You can only put 1 1/2" hitches on subies, and you can only find 2 bike hitch racks for them (you might be able to use an adapter to get to a 2" hitch rack...)
I don't know if I need the AWD because I'm not sure where I'm going to end up working in the next couple of years. I'm basically looking for a versatile, reliable station-wagonish type car that I can drive for another five years or so.
I've looked around for civic wagons but they are extremely hard to find.
__________________
#23
One Hep Cat
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: N 44.91577 W093.25327
Posts: 748
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check (commuter), Lemond Sarthe (sports car), Schwinn fixed gear conversion (for fun)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We bought a lightly used Forester in Anchorage for my wife. It had about 20K miles on it when we bought it and it now has about 60K miles. It's been a great car and she loves it. It is roomy (although neither of us are tall) and comfortable for long rides. We average about 29 mpg now in Minneapolis. It does not have tons of power but we don't drive like that anyway. I like the Outback a lot and if I totaled my Tundra tomorrow I would probably buy one, but I agree they seem over-priced.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Beware of head gasket issues on mid to late '90s Outbacks.
Lots of good info here:
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/
My '91 Legacy wagon has been pretty reliable up to 160k, but may be having some oil consumption issues now that I have to keep an eye on. I'll buy another 'ru eventually.
Lots of good info here:
https://subaruoutback.org/forums/
My '91 Legacy wagon has been pretty reliable up to 160k, but may be having some oil consumption issues now that I have to keep an eye on. I'll buy another 'ru eventually.