|
SOMEBODY KILL THIS THREAD.......PLEASE!!!!!!!
|
Originally posted by jonnyweale .... a grammatical error? ;) Technically speaking, either way is acceptable. Check your grammar sources if you need additional clarification. |
All right... to prevent this from degenerating any further, I'll lock the thread. I think we all get the point by now, right?
Thread closed. Koffee Brown |
spelling rant, part 2
I'm not trying to stir up more bile, but that thread reminded me of a blurb that came with an ancient public domain spell checker, I thought others might enjoy.
USER BEE WEAR!!! A soft wear package witch checks spelling is no mower than a weigh to verify. That the weird, as it appears inn the taxed is also in the stored file. It can knot correct arrows in punctuation ore usage: and it will not fined words witch are mis-used butt spelled rite. Four example, this paragraph wood bee past by most such programs, even though it has mini flaws. Their fore, the message is that proof-reading is knot eliminated by using such a package, and is berry much reek wired. P.S. If you don't speak English as your primary language, your homework is to decipher and translate into proper English, using the correct words and spelling. ;) |
originally posted by BigWheel The paomnnehil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. **** is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. ...and it makes the "search" function quite useless... :) Dan |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.