Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Specialized Crosstrail vs. Trek Hybrid (7.1 & 7100)

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Specialized Crosstrail vs. Trek Hybrid (7.1 & 7100)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-09, 05:05 PM
  #1  
d25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Specialized Crosstrail vs. Trek Hybrid (7.1 & 7100)

Looking to purchase a new bike. the few within my range that I've liked are the Crosstrail, Trek 7.1 & 7100. I liked that the Trek 7.1 was light and had a quick pick up but the frame and seat felt pretty stiff. Most of my riding will be primarily around NYC, and some light off roading. Does anyone have either of these bikes and could provide some advice?

thanks
d25 is offline  
Old 04-07-09, 09:52 PM
  #2  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
I'm assuming you mean this:

https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes/bike_path/fx/71fx/

And this:

https://bicyclehabitat.com/itemdetails.cfm?LibId=47730

How did a Specialized, current-production bicycle wind up with a Suntour crankset? Bizarre. Based on components, and Trek's warranty, I'd go for the Trek. First thing I'd do is pitch the seatpost. On the Specialized - it would be more drastic - I'd get rid of the fork with the suspension.
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 04-07-09, 10:23 PM
  #3  
d25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks, well there is a Trek 7100, separate from the 7.1, that is also a hybrid. But I think that is more cruising based with the seat in an upright position. Do you think that a suspension fork is completely unnecessary? I was thinking that it would give a better bounce on some of the light off road riding...
d25 is offline  
Old 04-07-09, 11:07 PM
  #4  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
Cheap suspension-forks tend to be awful and break. On higher-end bikes they tend to actually work well - needing a bit of work now and then. When I see a complicated component on a lower cost bicycle, a little red light goes off in my head.
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 04-08-09, 05:43 AM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,363
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
What do you consider light off roading? Are you talking single track? Or you local rails to trails type path. Both bikes are fine for rail trails but not for single track.
Cyclist01012 is offline  
Old 04-09-09, 03:54 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I can't speak for trek coz I haven't owned one, seems like a solid bike though. But I own a crosstrail sport and I must tell you it has nothing I can complain about.. Yeah yeah I may have said that cox it's what I already have and ofcourse I'm emotionally attached to my bike, but who isn't? Right?

Anyway, crosstrail hybrid is "super" for light offroad and mostly paved roads. It's light, quick and fast. It also has front suspension with adjustable stiffness, you can also lock the suspension totally. In short, you really have the best of both worlds. The saddle is also perfectly shaped and sized that it doesn't hurt your "buttbone"
Cutaway is offline  
Old 04-09-09, 04:25 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
ecrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 270

Bikes: 2008 Trek FX 7.1, 1984 Fuji Esprit, 2009 Jamis Aurora Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by d25
Looking to purchase a new bike. the few within my range that I've liked are the Crosstrail, Trek 7.1 & 7100. I liked that the Trek 7.1 was light and had a quick pick up but the frame and seat felt pretty stiff. Most of my riding will be primarily around NYC, and some light off roading. Does anyone have either of these bikes and could provide some advice?

thanks
I bought the 7.1 at Christmas and think it is a good entry level bike. I hated the saddle and had to get rid of that almost immediately. But the bike itself is good for commuting, short rides, etc. It's definitely more of an upright ride and not as aerodynamic as a road bike. The wider tires make for a smooth ride. It's not a speed merchant or serious off-road bike, but it's a decent all around bike.
ecrider is offline  
Old 04-09-09, 04:49 PM
  #8  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
Telling people which saddle is comfortable should be banned. People's butts are all different -just ask a Peeping-Tom. So what is comfortable to one might make another (I'm sure of this) person howl in pain after a mile. I found the saddle that came stock on my Trek 7.5 FX to be truly unbearable. But when I write this, another person - with a different butt - will claim they love the very same saddle (Race Lux)!

Thank you, cutaway, for the clarification on the suspension-fork on the Crosstrail. So you can disable this outright, eh? That's a good feature. I'd like to examine, in person, one of those critters. But my vote is still for the Trek. Trek built a very good reputation with the FX-series. Both with their owners/riders, as well as with the bicycle-mechanics who tend to them. Their components work together quite nicely. Their major problem is the mechanic at the LBS who put it together in the first place. For instance let's look at my 7.5 FX. Problem 1. A cricking noise as the cranks revolved. Under warranty, so I took it back to the shop I bought it at. There was no grease in the bottom-bracket. None - not even on the threads! Remedied. Crik was still there. Turns out the chain was stretched beyond it's life-span. It was NOT the chain that was in the box with the bike. The mechanic (I call him the 'Pet-Monkey') had slipped an old, worn-out Shimano chain on the bike. Maybe he collects chains? Unknown. Problem 2. The right-hand post that holds the rear brake was cross-threaded. It took off the entire post when removed. I was removing it to install better brakes than came with the bike. Took it back. The pet-monkey managed to get them separated with a 9mm cone-wrench - a very unusual size tool. Maybe the pet-monkey cross-threads often? Unknown. Problem 3. The headset came loose. Seems the pet-monkey didn't clamp the stem properly. Fixed.

None of these problems, aside from the swapped-out chain, were the fault of the 7.5 FX. All were caused by the Pet-Monkey. Why the owner let's that chimp keep working there is beyond me. I wouldn't let him wrench together a tricycle.

Other than Pet-Monkey's found in the bowels of bike-shops world-wide, who give us real bike-mechanics a black-eye, the Trek FX-series is judged very favorably by their owners and mechanics alike. Now what I'd do in your situation is talk to a few bike-mechanics who have occasion to work on these bicycles. See what kind of repairs/adjustments have been necessary on both. In any event, get the bicycle that YOU like best. This will be the bike you ride the most. Sleep on it. When it's time to decide and reach for your wallet, if you feel anxiety, buy the other one.
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 04-09-09, 05:13 PM
  #9  
aka Phil Jungels
 
Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Aurora, IL
Posts: 8,234

Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
I have an '08 Crosstrail Sport, and love it. It is a great "do it all" bike.
Wanderer is offline  
Old 04-09-09, 08:44 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
ecrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 270

Bikes: 2008 Trek FX 7.1, 1984 Fuji Esprit, 2009 Jamis Aurora Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Panthers007
Telling people which saddle is comfortable should be banned. People's butts are all different -just ask a Peeping-Tom. So what is comfortable to one might make another (I'm sure of this) person howl in pain after a mile. I found the saddle that came stock on my Trek 7.5 FX to be truly unbearable. But when I write this, another person - with a different butt - will claim they love the very same saddle (Race Lux)!....
Banning saddle comments would deny my First Amendment Freedoms:>) Actually, I was giving my honest, overall evaluation of the bike to someone who asked for comments. But it seems to me that both you and I hated our saddles. I have had read other postings where other FX owners had saddle issues as well. Hmmmm... Shouldn't people be aware of that? (Besides it wasn't my butt that was hurting, anyway.)
ecrider is offline  
Old 04-09-09, 11:01 PM
  #11  
Great State of Varmint
 
Panthers007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
Not to worry - it was tongue-in-cheek. I still have the almost-new Bontrager Race Lux saddle that came with it. That and the wheels were the first to go. I replaced the saddle with a real ($140) Terry Fly from Terry herself. It's right across and down from me over Lake Champlain. I love it - but it would undoubtedly kill someone here - and they'd take the Race Lux!

The wheels were dreadful. 20 spoke radial front, etc. Spokes on at over 200Kgf. Lordy! But I digress. I think you get my point though regards saddles. But I'm not seriously contemplating launching any campaigns to ban such being expressed. I have the saddle here in my parts cabinet. Just in case I meet someone who says they loved them as his friend has one, or something.

No accounting for taste when it comes to butts...
Panthers007 is offline  
Old 04-10-09, 09:18 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
ecrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 270

Bikes: 2008 Trek FX 7.1, 1984 Fuji Esprit, 2009 Jamis Aurora Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Panthers007
Not to worry - it was tongue-in-cheek. I still have the almost-new Bontrager Race Lux saddle that came with it. That and the wheels were the first to go. I replaced the saddle with a real ($140) Terry Fly from Terry herself. It's right across and down from me over Lake Champlain. I love it - but it would undoubtedly kill someone here - and they'd take the Race Lux!

The wheels were dreadful. 20 spoke radial front, etc. Spokes on at over 200Kgf. Lordy! But I digress. I think you get my point though regards saddles. But I'm not seriously contemplating launching any campaigns to ban such being expressed. I have the saddle here in my parts cabinet. Just in case I meet someone who says they loved them as his friend has one, or something.

No accounting for taste when it comes to butts...

10-4. I think we're of the same mind...
ecrider is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 03:10 PM
  #13  
d25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
does one brand tend to be more durable than the other?
d25 is offline  
Old 04-12-09, 05:26 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
KungPaoSchwinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ms/Ca, USA,Earth.
Posts: 705

Bikes: 2009 Trek FX 7.3 ( pimp moment )

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
My 09' FX 7.3 has a Bontrager Nebula saddle and i don't have any complain cus my seat bones set just right on it, it was feeling good from day one,my luck i guess.
KungPaoSchwinn is offline  
Old 04-15-09, 06:47 PM
  #15  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
7.2 fx

I just shopped same bikes as you are looking at in the Trek line and bought the 7.2 fx. Have about 400 miles on it and have had positive comments (including working into the saddle). I would recommend that your choice would depend on where or the type of riding that you plan to do. I'm strictly on the road and have changed to clipless pedals and plan to move from a 32mm to a 28mm tire. I rode the bikes with the shocks but didn't like the weight or the feel. The fx line is light and nimble.....worked well for me.
Vince868 is offline  
Old 04-15-09, 07:48 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Originally Posted by d25
Looking to purchase a new bike. the few within my range that I've liked are the Crosstrail, Trek 7.1 & 7100.
Shop for a bike shop first. When you find the right one you'll know it because it will just "feel" right. Once you find the right shop, buy a brand that they carry and you'll never go wrong.
Retro Grouch is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.