Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Raleigh vs. Trek?

Old 07-28-09, 09:05 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Raleigh vs. Trek?

My wife and I are now in our mid / late 40’s and we have been biking for enjoyment and fitness. 70% of our riding is on a scenic bike trail which runs around 57 miles. The trail is mostly level and the roadbed consists of dirt / cinder. It is a beautiful scenic Virginia State Park knows as The New River Trail. www.dcr.virginia.gov/state_parks/new.shtml. I also sometimes ride my bike at work which is a campus type of setting. At work the bike is used on pavement, grass, and sidewalks.
I have been riding a 2000 model Schwinn Frontier FS which I bought new. My wife rides a Raleigh SC 30 which we also bought new in 2001. Although these bikes are still in great shape we are considering purchasing new bikes in the near future. The bikes we have considered are between a Trek 7100 / 7200 and a Raleigh Route 4.0. Could anyone give me some insight / feedback on which would be the better bike to suit our needs (and approx. $500.00 budget.)? Or is there another bike we should consider? A more experienced opinion than ours would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for your help.

KellyRay

Last edited by kellyray; 07-30-09 at 10:57 AM.
kellyray is offline  
Old 07-28-09, 02:32 PM
  #2  
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Not quite the model you are looking at but The Trek 7.3 FX is being offered at some dealers at a cheap price. May be a better buy for the price.

https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/563846-trek-wow-sale-7-3fx.html
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Old 07-28-09, 09:31 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
alhedges's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Naptown
Posts: 1,133

Bikes: NWT 24sp DD; Brompton M6R

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
I would get a Trek 7000 over the 71 or 7200; I think that the front suspensions on the more expensive bikes are counterproductive because they waste energy (some of your pedalling effort is diverted into compressing the shock on each stroke), are heavy, and aren't that useful. Inflating your tires to 10 or 20 psi less than the maximum (or more) will provide more useful shock absorbtion. I might also be tempted to use the money I saved to upgrade the tires.
alhedges is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 03:47 PM
  #4  
Life is good
 
RonH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not far from the Withlacoochee Trail. 🚴🏻
Posts: 18,209

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey Helix Pro

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by kellyray
The bikes we have considered are between a Trek 7100 / 7200 and a Raleigh 4.0.
I'm guessing you mean Raleigh Route 4.0.
Gotta say that, IMHO, the Raleigh is superior to the Trek.
__________________
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8

I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
RonH is offline  
Old 07-29-09, 09:33 PM
  #5  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1

Bikes: none, yet

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just purchased a used bike but did a ton of test riding new bikes over the past few months. I preferred the Raleighs and Fujis over the Treks. I agree with losing the front suspension - it was something I went back and forth with until I started test riding more and more and realized how much it slowed me down on street and paved trails. Also preferred Specialized in that price range.
JetJetHead is offline  
Old 07-30-09, 11:22 AM
  #6  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks so much for all the input. Since I'm not very educated on components, its hard for me to evaluate which bikes have the best components which I understand is VERY important.
Thanks again and feel free to keep responding. This is a great way for me to become knowledgeable about the products.
kellyray is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.