![]() |
Originally Posted by LUCAS
(Post 10352841)
In most cases (not all), the real expensive recreational toys are expensive because they are better engineered and perform better.
Also- Having six wheelsets for one bike seems like a sign of some sort of hoarding disorder. http://www.easttnriders.com/forum/im...milies/064.gif :) |
Originally Posted by HandsomeRyan
(Post 10348127)
As I was looking at my bikes piled in the corner of my living room I noticed that when I line them up from most fun to [relatively] least fun they are also in order from least expensive to most expensive.
I wondered if anyone else has found this to be true, that the cost of a bike does not necessarily mean it will be more enjoyable to ride than a less expensive bike? What do you think... If you took your most expensive bike and installed the wheelset from your least expensive bike I think most people would agree that you have decreased it's monitary value. Having done that, do you think you would find riding the bike more enjoyable? |
I own a '1988, 753 Reynolds Steel framed Raleigh. I also have a 2001 Trek 5900 USPS SuperLite. The trek doesn't even come close to the Raleigh's greatness...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_I4Snyzw2IM...0/Jan_Raas.jpg |
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
(Post 10354122)
I'm thinking that you're asking the wrong question.
If you took your most expensive bike and installed the wheelset from your least expensive bike I think most people would agree that you have decreased it's monitary value. Having done that, do you think you would find riding the bike more enjoyable? |
Originally Posted by HandsomeRyan
(Post 10354071)
Also- Having six wheelsets for one bike seems like a sign of some sort of hoarding disorder. http://www.easttnriders.com/forum/im...milies/064.gif :)
Remember, if you can afford it, it is no skin off anybody's nose. And it is definitely not hoarding. |
It depends on what you mean by enjoyment and what you want out of a bike. Todays bikes clearly out perform older bikes. But technology and prgress comes with a price tag. A modern CF bike with aero wheels and 10 or 11 speed group rides quicker and handles better than a 30 year old steel frame with a 5 speed freewheel. But if you like the feel of something that old, then you get enjoyment out of it. So if speed and handling are important, yes cost is the price of enjoyment.
|
Originally Posted by *****3nin.vend3t
(Post 10354248)
I own a '1988, 753 Reynolds Steel framed Raleigh. I also have a 2001 Trek 5900 USPS SuperLite. The trek doesn't even come close to the Raleigh's greatness...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_I4Snyzw2IM...0/Jan_Raas.jpg |
Originally Posted by wunderkind
(Post 10354547)
Is it me or what that the bike is too small for the rider? Look at his right leg. At that pedal location, the legs should be nearly fully stretched. But it is fairly bent.
And lets not confuse a classic bike with a enjoyable bike to ride. |
Originally Posted by MilitantPotato
(Post 10351920)
I only enjoy my more expensive bike because it fits (custom job with 210mm cranks.)
I ride 175's and find most of the world dreadfully underscaled (well, at least my head does). |
I enjoy riding my more expensive bikes since they are more tailor made for my riding needs, but I enjoy riding my inexpensive bikes as well since I don't have to fuss over them as much, and they are much easier to replace in case of theft; mainly, they are less for me to worry about. For me, it just depends on when, where, and what type of riding I'll be doing that will determine my level of enjoyment from any of my bikes.
|
...
|
Originally Posted by HandsomeRyan
(Post 10354268)
To me it isn't any one component or even a mix of components that make a bike more or less fun, it is the type of riding. Maybe it's because I'm not a racer and generally enjoy a moderate length rides at what most would consider a slow pace that having 'performace' bikes means less to me than it does to most. I think if I won a $5,000 race bike tomorrow it would be wasted on me because I'd still rather be lollygagging along the local MUP on it rather than training to race with Lance in the next TdF.
Originally Posted by StanSeven
(Post 10354353)
It depends on what you mean by enjoyment and what you want out of a bike. Todays bikes clearly out perform older bikes. But technology and prgress comes with a price tag. A modern CF bike with aero wheels and 10 or 11 speed group rides quicker and handles better than a 30 year old steel frame with a 5 speed freewheel. But if you like the feel of something that old, then you get enjoyment out of it. So if speed and handling are important, yes cost is the price of enjoyment.
Aaron:) |
Originally Posted by LUCAS
(Post 10354277)
Remember, if you can afford it, it is no skin off anybody's nose. And it is definitely not hoarding.
|
I have 13 bikes and enjoy them all on their own merits as each is unique and offers a different riding experience.
I figure my mtb is the most expensive bike I own... replacing that would cost about $3000.00 and it is the finest steel hard tail ever made (a hand built Rocky Mountain Blizzard). http://www.ravingbikefiend.com/bikep...izzardnew1.jpg At the other end of the spectrum it is probably my 1940 CCM that cost the least as the frame was free and it is cobbled together from salvaged parts save for the rear wheel that I had to build. This bike has given me a lot of joy as there is just something about riding it that really pleases me... she isn't the fastest or the most comfortable (the ride is pretty smooth) but she has some unique style. http://www.ravingbikefiend.com/bikep...thnewfork1.jpg My polo bike cost next to nothing to build and the fun factor when I ride that is off the scale... :) http://www.ravingbikefiend.com/bikepics/polobike2.JPG |
I don't rate my bike by how I paid for them. I rate them for job I bought them to do which makes how much each one cost a non-issue if I did my job of selecting each one for the job right.
|
Originally Posted by Nightshade
(Post 10361407)
I don't rate my bike by how I paid for them. I rate them for job I bought them to do which makes how much each one cost a non-issue if I did my job of selecting each one for the job right.
|
It all depends upon what importance you place on the value of money.
If you were gifted a $3000 Cinelli Supercorsa, you might well find it your most enjoyable bike. But... would you view it as your most expensive, or least expensive, bike... and what value would you place on your enjoyment of it? I think you would be forced to value it in terms other than monetary... (ie. "It was a treasured gift from someone special", or "I worked hard for it", "I found it in a skip and re-built it" and so on).... ... which to me is a better way of looking at life in general. (Sorry if that's a bit deep ;) ) |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 10348770)
Horses for courses.
|
My most fun bike is my most expensive one for a couple reasons
1. it was pro built and tuned so everything works like a fine watch 2. Its really freekin fast and easy to accelerate, and to me fun is hammering it as fast as possible like a guided missile. That said I often get the most enjoyment out of my middle bike (the BD Mercier I built with Campy Parts), mainly because I can ride it more often... taking a triathlon bike out on the streets here is asking to become road pizza. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.